CAEP Standard 2 Clinical Partnerships and Practice Dana Leon-Guerrero, CAEP Ann Nutter Coffman, National Education Association CONNECT WI TH CAEP | w w.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WV High Quality Standards for Schools
Advertisements

Qualifications Update: National 5 Drama Qualifications Update: National 5 Drama.
PORTFOLIO.
1 Educator Preparation Advisory Council (EPAC) September, 2013.
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
“Sticking Points” Conceptual framework has five structural elements Conceptual framework has five structural elements Standard 1 requires data, not information.
Transforming Clinical Practice OCTEO – Fall 2014.
Spring CAEP Workshop Clinical Partnerships and Practices Standard 2 Hope College March 26, 2015.
Southeastern Louisiana University College of Education & Human Development Conceptual Framework: Setting the Standard for Excellence through Best Practice.
CONNECT WITH CAEP | Timeline for Accreditation Handbook and Early Adopters Stevie Chepko, Sr., VP.
CONNECT WITH CAEP | Building on Strong Foundations: CAEP Standards 2 & 4 OCTEO Spring Conference,
1 NCATE Standards. 2  Candidate Performance  Candidate Knowledge, Skills, & Dispositions  Assessment System and Unit Evaluation  Unit Capacity Field.
Weber State University’s Teacher Preparation Program Conceptual Framework.
New York State Professional Development Standards S/CDN 2010.
 Description  The unit has a conceptual framework that defines how our programs prepare candidates to be well-rounded educators. Every course in the.
Defiance College – Increased clinical experiences, Expanded P-16 partnerships, Greater P-16 input and workshops OCTEO SPRING 2015 PRESENTED BY: IAN MACGREGOR.
1 Educator Preparation Advisory Council (EPAC) July 31, 2013 A New Framework to Strengthen School Leader Preparation in Connecticut.
Maximizing the Impact of Service-Learning Shelley H. Billig RMC Research Corporation Teri Dary WI Dept of Public Instruction 2008.
CONNECT WITH CAEP | | CAEP Standard 3: Candidate quality, recruitment and selectivity Jennifer Carinci,
CONNECT WITH CAEP | Transitioning from NCATE and TEAC to CAEP: How? Patty Garvin, Senior Director,
Connect with CAEP Transformation Initiatives Respond to the Needs of the Profession James G. Cibulka, President,
2012 Regional Assessment Workshops Session 2 Dr. Maryellen Cosgrove, Dean School of Business, Education, Health and Wellness Gainesville State University.
March 24, :00 pm to 3:00 pm Exhibition Lounge, Corey Union TEC Agenda and Notes.
Graduate School of Education Assessment October 10, 2013.
 This prepares educators to work in P-12 schools (1)  It provides direction (1)  It is knowledge-based, articulated, shared, coherent, consistent with.
NCATE Standard 3: Field Experiences & Clinical Practice Monica Y. Minor, NCATE Jeri A. Carroll, BOE Chair Professor, Wichita State University.
Sultan Qaboos University College of Education Course: Instructor:
NCATE Standards for Professional Development Schools Doug MacIsaac Stetson University Cynthia Hutchinson University of Central Florida.
AdvancED District Accreditation Process © 2010 AdvancED.
Standard Two: Understanding the Assessment System and its Relationship to the Conceptual Framework and the Other Standards Robert Lawrence, Ph.D., Director.
The New CAEP Standards: Implications for Teacher Education Programs Kathryn Chval.
March 15-16, Inquiry and Evidence An introduction to the TEAC system for accrediting educator preparation programs 3/15/12, 9:00-10:00a.m. CAEP.
The Conceptual Framework: What It Is and How It Works Linda Bradley, James Madison University Monica Minor, NCATE April 2008.
Readiness for AdvancED District Accreditation Tuscaloosa County School System.
2015 Certification & Program Officials Conference Sessions E1-6: GaPSC/CAEP Approval Process December 2, 2015 Enjolia Farrington and Nate Thomas GaPSC.
CONNECT WITH CAEP | | CAEP Accreditation and STEM Stevie Chepko, Sr. VP for Accreditation
Continuous Improvement. Focus of the Review: Continuous Improvement The unit will engage in continuous improvement between on-site visits. Submit annual.
WASC Western Association for Schools and Colleges.
Presented at the OSPA Summit 2012 January 9, 2012.
CONNECT WITH CAEP | | Standard 2: Partnership for Practice Stevie Chepko, Sr. VP for Accreditation.
Council for the Accreditationof EducatorPreparation Standard 5: Provider Quality Assurance and Continuous Improvement 2014 CAEP –Conference Nashville,
SEA Strategies for Promoting Equity: SEA/IHE Collaboration on Teacher Preparation Lynn Holdheide, Center on Great Teachers and Leaders & Collaboration.
CONNECT WITH CAEP | | CAEP Update Stevie Chepko, CAEP Sr. VP for Accreditation.
CONNECT WITH CAEP | | Measures of Teacher Impact on P-12 Students Stevie Chepko, Sr. VP for Accreditation.
Council for the Accreditationof EducatorPreparation Standard 1: CONTENT AND PEDAGOGICAL KNOWLEDGE 2014 CAEP –Conference Nashville, TN March 26-28, 2014.
CAEP Standards Workshop Margaret D. Crutchfield, Ph.D.
Authentic service-learning experiences, while almost endlessly diverse, have some common characteristics: Positive, meaningful and real to the participants.
Overview of CAEP Guidelines 2014 CAEP –Conference Nashville, TN March 26-28, 2014 Presenters: Mark LaCelle-Peterson, CAEP Hilda R. Tompkins, CAEP, Emerson.
CAEP Standard 4: Program Impact Emerson Elliott, CAEP Dana Leon-Guerrero, CAEP CONNECT WI TH CAEP | w w w.CAEPnet.org | Tw itter:
Designing Quality Assessment and Rubrics
Clinical Educators Design Team CAEP State Alliance for Clinical Partnership Presented by team members Laurie Henry, University of Kentucky & Nicole Nickens,
The College of Education Beth Kubitskey, Associate Dean EMU prepares caring, professional educators for a diverse and democratic society. Assessment for.
Outcomes By the end of our sessions, participants will have…  an understanding of how VAL-ED is used as a data point in developing professional development.
CAEP Standard 3: Candidate quality, recruitment and selectivity Thursday, March 27 3:00-4:00 PM Emerson Elliott, CAEP CONNECT WITH CAEP |
OCTEO April 1, 2016 Margaret D. Crutchfield, Ph.D.
NCATE Unit Standards 1 and 2
Partnership for Practice
Phyllis Lynch, PhD Director, Instruction, Assessment and Curriculum
Office of Field and Clinical Partnerships and Outreach: Updates
Field Experiences and Clinical Practice
NCATE Standard 3: Field Experiences & Clinical Practice
Elayne Colón and Tom Dana
PPMES-UPRM Methodology & Practice Working Retreat
STANDARD 2/A.2 Clinical Partnerships and Practice
CAEP Standards.
Standard 3 Candidate Quality, Recruitment, and Selectivity
Standard Four Program Impact
Standard one: revisions
Deborah Anne Banker Committee Chair
Preparing for CAEP Accreditation: Standard 2
Presentation transcript:

CAEP Standard 2 Clinical Partnerships and Practice Dana Leon-Guerrero, CAEP Ann Nutter Coffman, National Education Association CONNECT WI TH CAEP | w w w.CAEPnet.org | Tw w w.CAEPnet.org Rebeca Orama, UPRM

Standard 2 Council for the Accreditation of Educator Preparation CONNECT WI TH CAEP | w w w.CAEPnet.org | Tw w w.CAEPnet.org The provider ensures that effective partnerships and high-quality clinical practice are central to preparation so that candidates develop the knowledge, skills, and professional dispositions necessary to demostrate positive impact on all P-12 students´ learning and development.

Standard 2 Council for the Accreditation of Educator Preparation CONNECT WI TH CAEP | w w w.CAEPnet.org | Tw w w.CAEPnet.org Partnership for Clinical Preparation Partners co-construct mutually beneficial P-12 school and community arrangements, including technology-based collaborations, for clinical preparation and share responsibility for continuous improvment of candidate preparation.

Standard 2 Council for the Accreditation of Educator Preparation CONNECT WI TH CAEP | w w w.CAEPnet.org | Tw w w.CAEPnet.org Partnership for Clinical Preparation Partnerships for clinical preparation can follow a range of forms, participants, and functions. They establish mutually agreeable expectations for candidate entry, preparation, and exit; ensure that theory and practice are linked; maintain coherence across clinical and academic components of preparation; and share accountability for candidate outcomes.

Activity Directions Council for the Accreditation of Educator Preparation CONNECT WI TH CAEP | w w w.CAEPnet.org | Tw w w.CAEPnet.org Individually, write in a piece of paper the evidence available or new one that could support this part of Standard 2.

Standard 2 Council for the Accreditation of Educator Preparation CONNECT WI TH CAEP | w w w.CAEPnet.org | Tw w w.CAEPnet.org Clinical Educators Partners co-select, prepare, evaluate, support, and retain high-quality clinical educators, both provider- and school-based, who demostrate a positive impact on candidates´ development and P-12 students learning and development.

Standard 2 Council for the Accreditation of Educator Preparation CONNECT WI TH CAEP | w w w.CAEPnet.org | Tw w w.CAEPnet.org Clinical Educators In collaboration with their partners, providers use multiple indicators and appropriate technology- based applications to establish, maintain, and refine criteria for selection, professional development, performance evaluation, continuous improvement, and retention of clinical educators in all clinical placement settings.

Activity Council for the Accreditation of Educator Preparation CONNECT WI TH CAEP | w w w.CAEPnet.org | Tw w w.CAEPnet.org Individually, write in a piece of paper the evidence available or new one that could support this part of Standard 2. Directions

Standard 2 Council for the Accreditation of Educator Preparation CONNECT WI TH CAEP | w w w.CAEPnet.org | Tw w w.CAEPnet.org Clinical Experiences The provider works with partners to design clinical experiences of sufficient depth, breadth, diversity, coherence, and duration to ensure that candidates demostrate their developing effectiveness and positive impact on all students´learning and development.

Standard 2 Council for the Accreditation of Educator Preparation CONNECT WI TH CAEP | w w w.CAEPnet.org | Tw w w.CAEPnet.org Clinical Experience Clinical experiences, including technology-enhanced learning opportunities, are structured to have multiple performance-based assessments at key points within the program to demostate canditates´ development of the knowledge, skills, and professional dispositions, as delineated in Standard 1, that are associated with a positive impact on the learning and develpment of all P-12 students.

Activity Council for the Accreditation of Educator Preparation CONNECT WI TH CAEP | w w w.CAEPnet.org | Tw w w.CAEPnet.org With a partner(s), write in a piece of paper the evidence available or new one that could support this part of Standard 2. Directions

EvidenceEvidence Session findings Council for the Accreditation of Educator Preparation CONNECT WI TH CAEP | w w w.CAEPnet.org |w w w.CAEPnet.org | Tw itter:

Self-Study ReportSelf-Study Report Your Self-study Report starts with evidence. What is this item of evidence? How was the quality of the evidence determined or assured? What criteria of success have been established on the measure, and how? What does the reported evidence mean? How is the evidence used to support improvement? Council for the Accreditation of Educator Preparation CONNECT WI TH CAEP | w w w.CAEPnet.org | Tw w w.CAEPnet.org

Council for the Accreditation of Educator Preparation EvidenceEvidence Additional evidenceideas! AppendixD CAEP 2013 Standards for Accreditation of Educator Preparation CONNECT WI TH CAEP | w w w.CAEPnet.org | Tw w w.CAEPnet.org

Standard 2 Council for the Accreditation of Educator Preparation CONNECT WI TH CAEP | w w w.CAEPnet.org | Tw w w.CAEPnet.org The CAEP Evidence Guide describes perspectives on the use of data in educator preparation and accreditation as a "culture of evidence" that influences opportunities and expectations for both educator preparation providers and CAEP itself. The Evidence Guide also provides guidance for EPPs on assuring the quality of evidence as well as the design of data collection, analysis, and reporting. Guide to Self-study Reports and Evidence