The evidence is in: Patron Driven Acquisition Promotes Collection Use Jason Price & John McDonald Claremont University Consortium SCELC Colloquium - March.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Everything You Always Wanted to Know About Electronic Journals but Were Afraid to Ask! NASIG Pre-Conference June 2002 Stefanie Wittenbach Head of Acquisitions,
Advertisements

Servicekoncept LM Information Delivery and EBL co-operation LM and EBL co-operation since April 2011 Local awareness Local support LibNet- integration.
Giving the Users What They Want: Is Patron-Driven Acquisitions The Answer? Buddy Pennington, Director of Collections and Access Management Steve Alleman,
Science and Technology Library, University of Alberta Libraries: Patron Driven Acquisitions ALA Mid-winter, January 2011 Diane Clark, University of Alberta.
Cambridge University Press Our digital platforms for titles published by Cambridge University Press and our Partner Presses.
VIVA’s View of the Big Deal, Cost Sharing, and Cooperative Collection Management; Why sometimes having just one key is not enough. Museum of Innocence:
Buy Only What You Need: Demand- Driven Acquisition as a Strategy for Academic Libraries IDS Project Conference Oswego, NY August 3, 2010 Michael Levine-Clark.
EBL User Group Patron-driven Purchasing in Ebooks 12:30 – 2:00 ALIA Information Online Sydney, NSW January 19th, 2009.
LIBRARY SERVICES Patron Driven Acquisition of Online Video ALIA Information Online 2013 Colleen Cleary (Library.
“Give The Patrons What They Want: Even If You Don’t Have It Yet!” A patron-driven acquisition collaboration between interlibrary loan and collection development.
Charting Strange Lands: The acquisitions of e-books By Kate Seago University of Kentucky Libraries.
1 User/Patron Driven Ebook Collection Development  Tony Ferguson, Gayle Chan, and Janny Lai  University of Hong Kong Libraries
DDA EXPERIENCES WITH JSTOR E-BOOKS Amy Castillo Tarleton State University Tiffany LeMaistre The University of Texas at Tyler.
Are Ebooks Used Equally Across the Disciplines? Teddy Gray, Duke University Alex Carroll, University of Maryland TRLN Annual Meeting July 22, 2013.
Maria Savova, The Claremont Colleges Terese Heidenwolf, Lafayette College Kevin Butterfield, University of Richmond CNI Spring meeting – April 1, 2014.
Liene Nikele, Library of the University of Latvia 19/05/2015.
Cambridge University Press Law titles on Cambridge Books Online.
Anita Foster Head, Acquisitions and Electronic Resources Milner Library, Illinois State University May 1, 2014 Using SFX to Facilitate Electronic Book.
MANAGING E-BOOK ACQUISITION: THE COORDINATION OF "P" AND "E" PUBLICATION DATES Sarah Forzetting Collections Consultant Coutts Information Services Gabrielle.
NELLCO and e-books An odyssey. In the beginning – 2003 The concept –Dipping our toes –Shared collection –Shared selection –Shared cost –Law focus The.
Maria Savova Collection Management & Digital Integration Librarian SCELC Colloquium – March 5, 2014.
@ Toronto March 15, Acquisition Models Budget Collection Policy Publishers & Vendors Library’s OPAC Patrons Librarians.
User Experience – Highlights  Fully integrated into EBSCOhost Fully integrated into EBSCOhost  Strength of the EBSCOhost platform Strength of the EBSCOhost.
ATLA Conference 2013 EBOOKS: Nuts and Bolts Acquisitions, Cataloging, and Access Patsy Yang, Digital Services Librarian Matthew Thiesen, Reference & Instruction.
Patron-Driven Access for EContent: Have We Finally Found the Solution Implications for Publishers and Vendors.
User-Centered Collection Development: Purchase On-Demand ebook patron-driven selection at UNCG Christine Fischer Head of Acquisitions/ University Libraries.
When Patrons Call the Shots: Patron-driven Collection Development at Brigham Young University 2011 ULA Conference May 11-13, 2011 Rebecca Schroeder Monograph.
SHRINKING BUDGET, EXPANDING SELECTION: PATRON-DRIVEN ACQUISITION AT TRINITY INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY Stephanie Fletcher, Trinity International University.
Link resolver service connecting readers to full-text automatically.
Copyright 2012 Richard Sweeney Patron Driven Acquisitions: Managing the Runaway Costs Richard Sweeney VALE User Conference.
E-book survey: CJK cases 2012 Committee on Korean Materials CEAL/AAS Hyokyoung U of Washington.
Developing Collections for the 21st Century OVGTSL Conference 2012 Kelly Smith Interim Coordinator for Collection Services Eastern Kentucky University.
20 October 2008Hildegard Schäffler - ICOLC Fall Meeting Munich Requirements for E-Book Standards.
As implemented in Memorial University Libraries Louise White SAIL Conference May 2015, St. John’s NL DEMAND DRIVEN ACQUISITION (DDA)
The E-Book Dilemma: A Study of Aggregator and Publisher Options to Deliver Electronic Book Content.
1 Patron Data Management and Library Systems: A Vendor Perspective ALA Conference Summer, 2004.
Making Smart Choices: Data-Driven Decision Making in Academic Libraries IDS Project Conference August 3, 2010 Oswego, NY Michael Levine-Clark Collections.
Tina Chrzastowski Lynn Wiley Jean-Louise Zancanella University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Incorporating Ebooks into Humanities Scholarship: Results.
Call Me Old Fashioned Common Expectations for E-Book Publishers or E-book Aggregators in a Consortium Context Or… Why OhioLINK Has Focused on Direct Deals.
Idan Hadari | Alma Product Management Choice and Diversity in Acquisition Models.
2008 eBook Study Overview Are Librarians and Publishers on the Same Page? Janet Fisher Senior Publishing Consultant Publishers Communications Group Emilie.
Ebooks? John Akeroyd Milano March 7 th Ebook Readers.
Choice and Diversity in Acquisition Models Idan Hadari | Alma Product Management.
Once you acquire thousands e-books, then what? Shi Deng, UC San Diego OCLC CJK User Group Meeting March 24, 2007.
Technical Services Member Group FLA 2014 Annual Conference.
EBooks Corporation. EBL – Objectives  Meet the specific needs of academic and research libraries  Deliver a catalog of relevant and recent ebook titles.
Do Approval Plan Purchases Circulate More Than Firm Orders? Friday November 8, :15pm - 3:00pm Drayton Room, Francis Marion Hotel 33rd Annual Charleston.
Managing E-Book Patron- Driven Acquisitions Rusty Tryon, M.L.S., M.Div. Head, Collection Management Jerry Falwell Library Liberty University.
Complications of Forging e-Book Deals Rob Kairis Library Director Kent State University at Stark.
Legal Digital Content through YBP Library Services Barbara Kawecki, Senior Manager, Digital Content (West) Beverley Geer, Collection Development Manager.
Give ‘em What They Want Patron-Driven Collection Development Karen Fischer, Collections Analysis & Planning Librarian Mike Wright, Head, Acquisitions &
Patron-Driven Acquisition Getting In The Game Linette Koren and Roman Koshykar Rochester Institute of Technology Presented at Upstate New York Science.
Give ‘em What They Want: Patron-Driven Collection Development Hope Barton, Associate University Librarian, Services, U of Iowa Mike Wright, Acquisitions.
Presented by: Bruce Fyfe Nicole Nolan Harriet Rykse Nazi Torabi
Patron Driven Acquisition Project Mieko Yamaguchi – Bangor University.
Patron Driven Acquisition: An Overview Kelli Gonzalez, ebrary Specialist March 21, 2013 Library Technology Conference St. Paul, MN.
Let the Patron Drive: Purchase on Demand of E-books Jonathan Nabe Andrea Imre Southern Illinois University Carbondale NASIG, June 4, 2010.
EBA vs. PDA Examining demand-driven models for acquiring video.
8 th Nov 2012 Patron Driven Acquisition Dawn Derraven Area Manager Ingram Coutts.
E-books at the Alliance Changes to DDA: Open Call December 10, 2015.
Monographs acquisitions at UWA after the WAGUL consortium agreement.
16 Schools, $150,000 and 9 days: Experimenting with the Patron Driven Acquisition Model in a Consortial Environment The OCUL PDA Pilot September, 2010.
Welcome to the 6th Annual E-ZBorrow Practitioners Meeting
Firm-ordered vs. DDA ebooks: What are the differences?
Peer Reports: YBP GOBI2 CIRM CBTF Best Practices 2004, 29 October
Managing the eBook Revolution
“Give The Patrons What They Want: Even If You Don’t Have It Yet!”
Practicals of Pixels: Purchasing and Processing Ebooks
Michelle Ehlert, MLIS Assistant Director of Technical Services
Emerging Acquisitions Workflows: Print DDA
Presentation transcript:

The evidence is in: Patron Driven Acquisition Promotes Collection Use Jason Price & John McDonald Claremont University Consortium SCELC Colloquium - March 2, 2011 (with thanks for data & discussion from Kari Paulson & Alison Morin of EBL)

Bananas tipped the boat: a cautionary tale Early patron-driven deal with a major platform Assignment on economics of banana plantations UC Boulder ‘bought every book with banana in the title’ Used by librarians & vendors(!) as evidence that user-driven selection is a bad idea

Patron-driven model objections: cautionary conclusions? Books will be selected based on click-thrus that don’t indicate interest Users will select ebooks that no one (else) is interested in User selected collections will be unbalanced turkeys

Definitions Purchase type Patron selected = Demand Driven = User-selected Librarian selected ≈ Library selected ≈ Pre-selected Ebook usage was measured conservatively Data reflects post-purchase use –Did not count uses that lead to user-selection ‘Casual’ use eliminated –1 use ≈ 1 ‘read online’ ≈ 1 ‘download’ –read online = >10 min w/click thru OR copy OR print Transaction level data –each use recorded separately with user anonymously identified

Questions we’ll address 1.Are user-selected ebooks used less often than pre-selected ebooks? 2.Do user-selected ebooks have a narrower audience? 3.Are user-selected collections less balanced? Do we have anything to fear in patron-driven selection? (Can we use this to build better acquisition models?)

Scope of the overall dataset 1 Ebook Vendor – EBL (Ebook Library) 11 Libraries 28,327 ebooks bought from ,887 uses during that period Purchase Models: User Selection, Pre- Selection, or Mixed

Total Books & Usage LibraryModel User- Selected Pre- Selected Usage by Download Usage Read Online AMIX BMIX CUSER DUSER EMIX FPRE GPRE HUSER IMIX JUSER KMIX TOTAL 19,8318,49685,983126,904

Total Books & Usage LibraryModel User- Selected Pre- Selected Usage by Download Usage Read Online AMIX BMIX CUSER DUSER EMIX FPRE GPRE HUSER IMIX JUSER KMIX TOTAL 19,8318,49685,983126,904

Total Books & Usage LibraryModel User- Selected Pre- Selected Usage by Download Usage Read Online AMIX BMIX CUSER DUSER EMIX FPRE GPRE HUSER IMIX JUSER KMIX TOTAL 19,8318,49685,983126,904

Total Books & Usage LibraryModel User- Selected Pre- Selected Usage by Download Usage Read Online AMIX BMIX CUSER DUSER EMIX FPRE GPRE HUSER IMIX JUSER KMIX TOTAL 19,8318,49685,983126,904

Scope of this analysis 5 Mixed-model libraries Design –Test variables: Purchase type & Library –Response variables: Uses per year Unique users per year Books owned more than 6 months Inferential stats: Negative binomial regression (not shown), ANOVA

Question 1 1.Are user-selected ebooks used less often than pre-selected ebooks? 2.Do user-selected ebooks have a narrower audience? 3.Are user-selected collections less balanced?

Librarian Acquired

Question 2 1.Are user-selected ebooks used less often than pre-selected ebooks? 2.Do user-selected ebooks have a narrower audience? 3.Are user-selected collections less balanced?

User-selected collections have fewer unused titles

Question 3 1.Are user-selected ebooks used less often than pre-selected ebooks? 2.Do user-selected ebooks have a narrower audience? 3.Are user-selected collections less balanced?

User-selected collections have similar subject profiles User Pre User Pre User Pre User Pre User Pre Proportion of individual collection Library

User-selected collections have similar LC profiles Blue = User selected Green = Pre selected

User-selected collection have similar YBP Content Levels

Patron vs. Librarian: Content Level Shen et al ER&L Conference Head first into the PDA Pool…

User-selected collections have similar YBP select ratings

Patron vs. Librarian: YBP Select Shen et al ER&L Conference Head first into the PDA Pool…

Summary 1.Are user-selected ebooks used less often than pre- selected ebooks? No. User-selected ebooks are used 2-5x more often 2.Do user-selected ebooks have a narrower audience? No. User-selected ebooks are used by 2-3x more unique users 3.Are user-selected collections less balanced? No. User selected collections are similarly balanced.

Questions & Discussion Given our results – what do we still have to fear from patron-driven purchasing (at least in the EBL model)?

Thanks! Jason Price John McDonald For more detail see: