Assurance of Learning “Eberly AOL” All College Meeting – January 21, 2009 Prashanth Bharadwaj, Dean’s Associate Cyndy Strittmatter, Assistant Dean.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
District Accreditation
Advertisements

The Commissions Expectations for the Assessment of Student Learning and Institutional Effectiveness Beth Paul Interim Provost and Vice President for Academic.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report District Accreditation Forsyth County Schools February 15, 2012.
David J. Sammons, Dean UF International Center. Southern Association of Colleges and Schools: SACS is our regional accrediting authority. The last SACS.
A Practical Guide. The Handbook Part I BCCC Vision of Assessment Guiding Principles of Assessment Part II The Assessment Model Part III A guide on how.
As presented to the Global Colloquium on Engineering Education Deborah Wolfe, P.Eng. October 2008 The Canadian Process for Incorporating Outcomes Assessment.
Dept. of Computing and Technology (CaT) School of Science and Technology B.S. in Computer Information Systems (CIS) CIP Code: Program Code: 411.
Assessment Plans Discussion Career Services Julie Guevara, Accreditation & Assessment Officer February 6, 2006.
Medical Education Grand Rounds Self-Study Overview Middle States Commission on Higher Education January 13, 2010.
College of Business Spring 2013 Advisory Council Meeting AACSB Standards Update.
Service Agency Accreditation Recognizing Quality Educational Service Agencies Mike Bugenski
SACS CASI Background Dedicated to advancing excellence in education worldwide, AdvancED provides accreditation, research, and professional services to.
SEM Planning Model.
Educational Outcomes: The Role of Competencies and The Importance of Assessment.
Update from the UNC General Education Council [presented to the UNC Board of Governors’ Educational Planning, Programs, and Policies Committee on February.
PPA Advisory Board Meeting, May 12, 2006 Assessment Summary.
ACCREDITATION SITE VISITS.  DIVISION 010 – SITE VISIT PROCESS  DIVISION 017 – UNIT STANDARDS  DIVISION 065 – CONTENT STANDARDS.
The SACS Re-accreditation Process: Opportunities to Enhance Quality at Carolina Presentation to the Faculty Council September 3, 2004.
1 MBA Learning Assurance Committee Progress Report to the ZSB Faculty September 20, 2007.
Common Definitions Activities undertaken by teachers –
Develop Systematic processes Mission Performance Criteria Feedback for Quality Assurance Assessment: Collection, Analysis of Evidence Evaluation: Interpretation.
 The Middle States Commission on Higher Education is a voluntary, non-governmental, membership association that is dedicated to quality assurance and.
Reaffirmation of Accreditation: Institutional Effectiveness Southern Association of Colleges and Schools February 2008 Stephen F. Austin State University.
Purpose Program The purpose of this presentation is to clarify the process for conducting Student Learning Outcomes Assessment at the Program Level. At.
COLLEGE-READY LEARNER CRITICAL THINKER ADAPTABLE & PRODUCTIVE LEADERRESPONSIBLE DECISION MAKER SKILLED COMMUNICATOR HISD.
Graduate Program Review Where We Are, Where We Are Headed and Why Duane K. Larick, Associate Graduate Dean Presentation to Directors of Graduate Programs.
Assessment of Ethics Jones College of Business MTSU July 29, 2015.
OCTOBER 2011 Considerations for Assessing Program Objectives Malcolm LeMay Director of Operations College of Business.
 Description  The unit has a conceptual framework that defines how our programs prepare candidates to be well-rounded educators. Every course in the.
Learning & Teaching in FCA: Pathways and Loops!
EMU Strategic Planning Strategic Planning Material Mission/Vision/Values Goals and Objectives January 10, 2014.
Assessment Across Two Cultures: Professional Schools and Arts & Sciences NEASC 126th Annual Meeting and Conference December 7-9, 2011 José-Marie Griffiths,
Essential Elements of a Workable Assessment Plan Pat Tinsley McGill, Ph.D. Professor, Strategic Management College of Business Faculty Lead, Assessment.
Applying the Principles of Prior Learning Assessment Debra A. Dagavarian Diane Holtzman Dennis Fotia.
Assessment Cycle California Lutheran University Deans’ Council February 6, 2006.
Where Innovation Is Tradition Students as Scholars : QEP Update Fall 2010 Kimberly K. Eby Bethany M. Usher QEP Planning Committee.
Overhaul of a Graduate Program in Arts Administration Master of Arts in Arts Administration –Initiated in 2003 –Low-residency—one weekend per month (over.
Department Mission Statement and Program Learning Outcomes.
Computing and Technology Department School of Science and Technology BS in Information Technology CIP Code Program Code 414 Fall 2010 Program Quality.
Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business (AACSB International): Process and Experiences Dr. James Simpson Dr. Yeqing Bao College of Business.
March 26-28, 2013 SINGAPORE CDIO Asian Regional Meeting and Workshop on Engineering Education and Policies for Regional Leaders Programme Evaluation (CDIO.
EE & CSE Program Educational Objectives Review EECS Industrial Advisory Board Meeting May 1 st, 2009 by G. Serpen, PhD Sources ABET website: abet.org Gloria.
AASCB The Assurance of Learning AASCB Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business Marta Colón de Toro, SPHR Assessment Coordinator College of.
Middle States Steering Committee Overview of Standards March 20, 2008.
College of Business Administration Lessons Learned Part I Assurance of Learning: Strategic Planning through Programmatic Assessment Kathleen A. Krentler.
AdvancED District Accreditation Process © 2010 AdvancED.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report District Accreditation Bibb County Schools February 5-8, 2012.
Building and Recognizing Quality School Systems DISTRICT ACCREDITATION © 2010 AdvancED.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
What could we learn from learning outcomes assessment programs in the U.S public research universities? Samuel S. Peng Center for Educational Research.
Practicing Meaningful Learning Outcomes Assessment at UGA Department of Crop and Soil Sciences August 10, 2015 Dr. Leslie Gordon Associate Director for.
Richard Beinecke, Professor and Chair Suffolk University Institute for Public Service.
Standard Two: Understanding the Assessment System and its Relationship to the Conceptual Framework and the Other Standards Robert Lawrence, Ph.D., Director.
What do you do when your assessment data are in? Using Assessment Data to Improve Learning 1.
Preparing for North Central Association / Higher Learning Commission (HLC) Accreditation Reviewing Areas of Specialization and Assessing Learning Outcomes.
College of Business California State University, Monterey Bay February 28, 2014 College of Business Committee Structure: Preparing for AACSB.
Learning Goals at St. John Fisher College Peter J. Gray, Ph.D. Director of Academic Assessment United States Naval Academy May 2004.
What Your Program Needs to Know about Learning Outcomes Assessment at UGA.
Accreditation Update and Institutional Student Learning Outcomes Deborah Moeckel, SUNY Assistant Provost SCoA Drive in Workshops Fall 2015
Office of Service Quality
Working together for curricular excellence Yi Maggie Guo College of Business University of Michigan-Dearborn College of Business.
KSU’s Quality Enhancement Plan.  Current Core Requirement 2.12  The institution has developed an acceptable Quality Enhancement Plan (QEP) that (1)
A Commitment to Continuous Improvement in Teaching and Learning Michaela Rome, Ph.D. NYU Assistant Vice Provost for Assessment.
Jerry E. Trapnell, PhD, CPA Executive Vice President and Chief Accreditation Officer AACSB International A BRIEFING ON AACSB INTERNATIONAL ACCREDITATION.
Effective Outcomes Assessment
Institutional Effectiveness Plan
AACSB’s Standard 9: Curriculum content
Assessment and Accreditation
February 21-22, 2018.
Student Learning Outcomes at CSUDH
Presentation transcript:

Assurance of Learning “Eberly AOL” All College Meeting – January 21, 2009 Prashanth Bharadwaj, Dean’s Associate Cyndy Strittmatter, Assistant Dean

 Introduce AACSB standards related to Assurance of Learning “AOL”  Build upon the work that was done by the Strategic Planning Subcommittee on Outcomes Assessment  Recognize that Accreditation is a COLLEGE- WIDE endeavor 2

 AACSB International accreditation represents the highest standard of achievement for business schools, worldwide. Institutions that earn accreditation confirm their commitment to quality and continuous improvement through a rigorous and comprehensive peer review. AACSB International accreditation is the hallmark of excellence in management education. 3

 AACSB International accreditation assures stakeholders that business schools: ◦ Manage resources to achieve a vibrant and relevant mission. ◦ Advance business and management knowledge through faculty scholarship. ◦ Provide high-caliber teaching of quality and current curricula. ◦ Cultivate meaningful interaction between students and a qualified faculty. ◦ Produce graduates who have achieved specified learning goals. 4

 Started efforts in 1982  Accreditation Council formed in 1988  Accreditation Self-Study  Deferral in ◦ Inadequate scholarship productivity in two departments  Accredited Spring 2001 ◦ Directed to continue efforts to increase scholarly productivity 5

 Compile Self-Study in  Polish Self-Study in early Fall 2010  Submit to Team in mid Fall 2010  Complete Evidence Room Fall 2010  Visit in February

 AOL is assessment  Move to implement has been underway for past 4-5 years within AACSB  Efforts have been mixed thus far  Guideposts are becoming clearer  Pressure is ON !!  Must have our house in order 7

The systematic collection, review, and use of information about educational programs undertaken for the purpose of improving student learning and development (Polomba and Banta, 1999) “The end goal is continuous improvement in student learning and achievement” 8

 We want high quality business programs!  What do our graduates need in order to be prepared for the marketplace? 9

 21 Standards for Business Accreditation  Standards #15-21 focus on Assurance of Learning (AOL) 10

 The school uses well-documented, systematic processes to develop, monitor, evaluate, and revise the substance and delivery of the curricula on learning……..  Requires use of a systematic process for curriculum management 11

 … the school specifies learning goals and demonstrates achievement of learning goals for key general, management-specific and/or appropriate discipline specific knowledge and skills that its students achieve…. 12

KEEP IT SIMPLE !! 13

STEP #1 Define learning goals and objectives: What are the most important things our students should learn in our program? What are our expectations? STEP #2: Align curriculum with goals: Identify how and where they will learn these things. Where is the best place to determine if our students have achieved our learning goals/objectives? STEP #3: Identify instruments and measures and collect, analyze and disseminate data: How will we know they have learned them? What direct and indirect measures can we use? STEP #4: Use assessment data for continuous improvement: How will we use this information for continuous improvement? We must close the loop! 14

 Must implement AOL Process for each Program ◦ Undergraduate majors constitute ONE program ◦ MBA ◦ EMBA ◦ MSIT  Program goals at UG and Grad level may be similar but they need different assessments 15

 Follow the process!  Less is More – Don’t overdo it  Keep plan manageable  Not all students must be assessed – must be a valid sample/representative group  Limit learning goals from 4-8 for each program  Limit learning objectives 2-3 for each learning goal  Assess each goal twice every five years  Distribute assessment among core courses 16

 Critical Thinkers  Competency in their Discipline  Effective Communications  Effective Decision Makers  Ethical Behavior  Global Perspective  Integrate across disciplines  Knowledge of all business disciplines  Problem Solvers  Team Players 17

 Step #1 ◦ Learning Goal*: We expect our graduates to be able to communicate effectively upon graduation.  Learning Objective #1 – They should be able to produce professional quality written communications  Learning Objective #2 – They should be able to deliver professional quality oral presentations  Learning Objective #3 – They should be able to demonstrate effective communication skills in a team setting * Learning Goals have been previously established by the SPC 18

 Step #2 ◦ Curriculum Alignment: We will best be able to measure the achievement of these specific objectives in:  BTST 321– They should be able to produce professional quality written communications  BTST 321 & MGMT 495 – They should be able to deliver professional quality oral presentations  BTST 321 – They should be able to demonstrate effective communication skills in a team setting 19

◦ Program assessment involves evaluation of student learning across the curriculum ◦ Program assessment is a curriculum function and hence the responsibility of ALL faculty ◦ Program assessment is not a course function and hence does not assess a particular course ◦ Program assessment is not about evaluating faculty ◦ It is about evaluating student learning to assist in program improvement 20

Things that we need to document: ◦ We need to specify the curriculum process ◦ How do we manage our curriculum? ◦ Who is involved? 21