Engineering studies for the Conceptual design of the LBNO Facility 1 F. Sanchez Galan (CERN) on behalf of the CERN Secondary Beam Working Group, With contributions.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Matt Rooney RAL The T2K Beam Window Matt Rooney Rutherford Appleton Laboratory BENE November 2006.
Advertisements

Target chase, decay and absorber cooling for LBNE A. Marchionni, Fermilab 8th International Workshop on Neutrino Beams & Instrumentation CERN, November.
The Current T2K Beam Window Design and Upgrade Potential Oxford-Princeton Targetry Workshop Princeton, Nov 2008 Matt Rooney.
Mercury Chamber Update V. Graves NF-IDS Meeting October 4, 2011.
Mike Fitton Engineering Analysis Group Design and Computational Fluid Dynamic analysis of the T2K Target Neutrino Beams and Instrumentation 6th September.
for a neutrinos factory
Status of T2K Target 2 nd Oxford-Princeton High-Power Target Workshop 6-7 th November 2008 Mike Fitton RAL.
May 17-19, 2000 Catalina Island, CA Neutrino Factory and Muon Collider Collaboration Meeting 1 Target Support Facility for a Solid Target Neutrino Production.
The JPARC Neutrino Target
Managed by UT-Battelle for the Department of Energy Review of NFMCC Studies 1 and 2: Target Support Facilities V.B. Graves Meeting on High Power Targets.
NBI March 2002 The MiniBooNE Horn Ioanis Kourbanis For The MiniBooNE Collaboration.
1 Induced radioactivity in the target station and in the decay tunnel from a 4 MW proton beam S.Agosteo (1), M.Magistris (1,2), Th.Otto (2), M.Silari (2)
RF-Accelerating Structure: Cooling Circuit Modeling Riku Raatikainen
Vacuum windows at JPARC Contents Introduction Vacuum windows at hadron beam line Helium gas cooling Vacuum windows at neutrino beam line primitive discussion.
NBI CNGS Horns Status Presented by Sandry Wallon 1 NBI 2003 – KEK, Japan 7-11 nov CNGS Horns : Status 8 nov
1 cm diameter tungsten target Goran Skoro University of Sheffield.
1 EUROnu design System target + horn First thermal calculations on the target made of aluminium G. Gaudiot 02/06/2010 Strasbourg.
Study of a new high power spallation target concept
LAGUNA/LBNO WP4: secondary beam line status report M. Calviani, P. Velten, A. Ferrari, I. Efthymiopoulos, C. Lazaridis (CERN) + M. Zito, V. Galymov (CEA),
Horn design for the CERN to Fréjus neutrino Super Beam Nikolas Vassilopoulos IPHC/CNRS.
EUROnu Target and Horn Studies Nikolaos Vassilopoulos/IPHC-CNRS on behalf of WP2 1ECFA Review PanelDarensbury, 02/05/2011.
1 18 July 2005 “Mini-Review” on CNGS Horns Introduction by K. Elsener 1 “Mini-Review” - Introduction Function of focusing horns “History” of CNGS horns.
Summary Why consider a packed bed as a high power target?
WP2 Superbeam Work Breakdown Structure Version 2 Chris Densham (after Marco Zito version 1 )
LHC Phase II Collimator Compact jaw simulations New FLUKA => ANSYS mapping scheme New 136mm x 950mm jaw –60cm primary collimator –Helical cooling channel.
NML High Energy Beam Absorbers and Dump 29-August-2011 Beams-doc-3928.
First AWAKE dump calculations Helmut Vincke. Beam on dump Muon axis inside and outside CERN Distances: Beam impact point to end of West hall: ~300 m Beam.
NuMI NuMI Target Hall Air System Review Introduction July 30, 2003 Jim Hylen / FNAL Page 1 NuMI Target Hall Air System Review Introduction Air system for.
One-Dimensional Steady-State Conduction
Safety issues for WP2 E. Baussan on behalf of WP2.
PSB dump: proposal of a new design EN – STI technical meeting on Booster dumps Friday 11 May 2012 BE Auditorium Prevessin Alba SARRIÓ MARTÍNEZ.
1 Target Station Design Dan Wilcox High Power Targets Group, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory EuroNu Annual Meeting 2012.
F. Regis, LINAC4 – LBS & LBE LINES DUMP DESIGN.
Convection: Internal Flow ( )
CERN-SLAC meeting June, The LHC Collimator Project LHC Collimators for Phase 1 CERN-SLAC meeting – June, Palo Alto, Ca Alessandro Bertarelli.
Beam line Experiment area SC magnet Pion production target
1 Target Station Design for Neutrino Superbeams Dan Wilcox High Power Targets Group, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory NBI 2012, CERN.
The CNGS Target Station By L.Bruno, S.Péraire, P.Sala SL/BT Targets & Dumps Section.
Investigation of a “Pencil Shaped” Solid Target Peter Loveridge, Mike Fitton, Ottone Caretta High Power Targets Group Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, UK.
PSB dump replacement 17 th November 2011 LIU-PSB meeting Alba Sarrió.
Secondary beam production facility layout discussions SBLNF meeting 5 th Dec M. Calviani, A. Ferrari, R. Losito (EN/STI) H. Vincke (DGS/RP)
7 November 2003 Status of CNGS NBI presented by K. Elsener 1 Status of CNGS Konrad Elsener CERN – Accelerators+Beams Division.
EAR2 Beam Line Report on the Status C. Weiss EAR2 Beam Line - Report on the Status1.
Presentation at BBC, Linac 4 Commissioning Dump at 50 and 100MeV 1 Øyvind Dahle Lauten, EN-STI.
CNGS Operation Summary Edda Gschwendtner, CERN. Outline Introduction CNGS Performance Highlights since last NBI 2010 in Japan Issues Summary 2E. Gschwendtner,
Mitglied der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft Jörg Wolters, Michael Butzek Focused Cross Flow LBE Target for ESS 4th HPTW, Malmö, 3 May 2011.
GRAN SASSO’S HADRON STOP Temperature’s behaviour under specified beam conditions Barbara Calcagno.
WP2 progress on safety E. Baussan EUROnu CB Meeting Monday 10th & Tuesday 11th June 2011 CERN, Geneva, Switzerland.
Simulation of heat load at JHF decay pipe and beam dump KEK Yoshinari Hayato.
Status of UK contribution to LBNF beam and target system Chris Densham, Tristan Davenne, Otto Caretta, Mike Fitton, Peter Loveridge, Joe O’Dell, Andrew.
Engineering studies for CN2PY secondary beam. LAGUNA-LBNO General Helsinki, 26/08/20141 F. Sanchez Galan (CERN) on behalf of the CERN Secondary.
SECONDARY BEAM HANDLING AND INFRASTRUCTURE DESIGN STATUS BRUNO FERAL (CERN/EN) DIAMANTO SMARGIANAKI (CERN/EN) Project Leader: I.Efthymiopoulos (Cern/EN)
High Power Target Experience with T2K Chris Densham T2K Beamline Collaboration including RAL / KEK / Kyoto.
CENF target station and secondary beam design M. Calviani (CERN) on behalf of the CENF Secondary Beam Working Group ICFA Neutrino European Meeting – 8-10.
CENF target station and secondary beam design M. Calviani (CERN) on behalf of the CENF Secondary Beam Working Group CENF/LBNE meeting – 5 th February.
Design for a 2 MW graphite target for a neutrino beam Jim Hylen Accelerator Physics and Technology Workshop for Project X November 12-13, 2007.
High Energy Dump of the Super Proton Synchrotron at CERN – Present and Future designs A. Perillo-Marcone (EN-STI) Contributions from several colleagues.
Target Systems and Monolith Design Update Rikard Linander Group Leader Monolith and Handling April 2, 2014.
T2K Target status PASI Meeting Fermilab 11 th November Chris Densham STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory On behalf of the T2K beam collaboration.
SPS High Energy LSS5 Thermal contact & cooling aspects
The ESS Target Station Eric Pitcher Head of Target Division February 19, 2016.
Target work plan for LBNO study Chris Densham STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory.
Institute of Applied Mechanics
TAXS and TAXN ABSORBERS - OVERVIEW
M. Calviani, A. Ferrari (EN/STI), P. Sala (INFN)
EUROnu Beam Window Studies Stress and Cooling Analysis
Overview of mechanical design & construction
CNGS horn / reflector in 2005: The story of the glass ring insulator
ANALYSIS OF THE HORN UNDER THERMAL SHOCK – FIRST RESULTS
Presentation transcript:

Engineering studies for the Conceptual design of the LBNO Facility 1 F. Sanchez Galan (CERN) on behalf of the CERN Secondary Beam Working Group, With contributions from B. Biskup, D. Brethoux, M. Calviani, N. Charitonidis, DAES, I. Efthymiopoulos, B. Feral, J.A. Osborne, RAL, D. Smargianaki, C. Strabel, P. Velten, V. Venturi, H.Vincke. 9th Fermilab, Sept 2014 F. Sanchez Galan

2 Outline Lay out, overview Horn, reflector, target, striplines Target chamber Decay pipe Hadron stop Timeline Conclusions 9th Fermilab, Sept 2014 F. Sanchez Galan

 = 3 m water cooled steel tube, surrounded by 150 cm concrete; GeV GeV GeV GeV 9th Fermilab, Sept 2014 F. Sanchez Galan3 Helium tanks ~9 m 3 cooled graphite, followed by iron blocks; NeardetectorNeardetector Lay-out, overview

49th Fermilab, Sept 2014 F. Sanchez Galan Lay-out, overview Underground layout designed in close contact with Radioprotection (See talk H. Vincke). Horn, target, reflector, striplines Integration of services.

9th Fermilab, Sept 2014 F. Sanchez Galan5 Lay-out, overview He vessel at target chamber Integration of services Target, Horn and reflector and ancillary systems design and integration. Openings for maintenance operations

9th Fermilab, Sept 2014 F. Sanchez Galan6 Horn and reflector Target integration. Insertion to horn & plug-in at the hot cell Work done in collaboration with RAL

9th Fermilab, Sept 2014 F. Sanchez Galan7 Target Target design was splitted between CERN-STI Phase 1 (400GeV) and RAL (50 GeV)

9th Fermilab, Sept 2014 F. Sanchez Galan8 Target Work done in collaboration with RAL Steady-state results, Trod 1387 C, inner C pipe 202, inner Be pipe 126 C

9th Fermilab, Sept 2014 F. Sanchez Galan9 Target Transient results, T1 608 C, T2 362 C, T3 807 C Maximum equivalent stress around 20 MPa during cycles, below the stress range fatigue limit for Graphite. Maximum displacements around 0.45 mm

Helium cooling velocity streamlines Maximum velocity = 398 m/s Graphite core T2K Beam 30GeV, 750kW Target 23kW, 8 MPa stress Ti-6Al-4V shell Monolithic (peripherally cooled) target à la T2K M.Fitton C.Densham 9th Fermilab, Sept 2014 F. Sanchez Galan10

Target exchange system T2K-like Target & horn (50 GeV) Helium cooled solid graphite rod Design beam power: 750 kW (heat load in target c.25 kW) Beam power so far: 230 kW 1 st target & horn just replaced after 4 years operation, 7e20 p.o.t. π π p RAL 9th Fermilab, Sept 2014 F. Sanchez Galan11

9th Fermilab, Sept 2014 F. Sanchez Galan12 Horn, target integration Work done in collaboration with RAL Target helium feeds Horn plug-in helium & water feeds

9th Fermilab, Sept 2014 F. Sanchez Galan13 Horn, target integration Target integration Work done in collaboration with RAL

9th Fermilab, Sept 2014 F. Sanchez Galan14 Horn and reflector, ancillary systems. Plug-in systems, RH vertical movement. He and water feeds /outlets Striplines connection.

9th Fermilab, Sept 2014 F. Sanchez Galan15 Striplines remote connection Vertical insertion Clamping with a vice system

9th Fermilab, Sept 2014 F. Sanchez Galan16 Striplines thermal analysis With a ‘normal’ He cooling, maximum temperatures are within acceptable values: below 50 C for phase 1 and below 100 C for phase 2

9th Fermilab, Sept 2014 F. Sanchez Galan17 Striplines remote connection There’s a good margin to improve cooling if required.

9th Fermilab, Sept 2014 F. Sanchez Galan18 Horn and reflector Thermo-structural analysis Energy deposition for the entire horn: kW Max energy deposition: at target end ~ 110 W/cm 3

9th Fermilab, Sept 2014 F. Sanchez Galan19 Horn thermal analysis Phase 1 : Beam from 400 GeV 6 s cycle two extractions/cycle separately by 50 ms beam pulse during 10 us in each extraction protons/extraction ( protons/cycle) average beam power 750 kW Phase 2 : Beam from 50 GeV - 1 s cycle - single extraction per cycle - beam pulse during 4 us protons/cycle - average beam power 2.0 MW Phase 1 Phase 2

9th Fermilab, Sept 2014 F. Sanchez Galan20 Horn thermal analysis

9th Fermilab, Sept 2014 F. Sanchez Galan21 Horn thermal analysis The maximum temperature in steady state is 83°C for the 400GeV beam and 73°C for the 50GeV beam For the 50GeV beam, the temperature remains always below 75°C, even during a pulse. For the 400GeV beam, the temperature reaches 162°C during a short time. Convection: Inner conductor 10 kW/m 2 K Outer conductor 100 W/m 2 K

9th Fermilab, Sept 2014 F. Sanchez Galan22 Horn structural analysis Images from P. Sabbagh, DAES Maximum lateral displacement 3.9 mm during pulse Maximum vertical displacement 0.5 mm during pulse

9th Fermilab, Sept 2014 F. Sanchez Galan23 Horn structural analysis Vibration modes start at 93 Hz (main in the range Hz)

9th Fermilab, Sept 2014 F. Sanchez Galan24 Horn structural analysis Stress values are acceptable The equivalent stress reaches for 400GeV 100MPa in the internal part of the horn, 132MPa in the exit cover and 30MPa in the front cover. At 50GeV, those values are much smaller (31MPa, 119MPa and 28MPa respectively).

25 Maintenance of horn + target 9th Fermilab, Sept 2014 F. Sanchez Galan

26 Maintenance of horn + target Concrete shielding wall has to be opened 9th Fermilab, Sept 2014 F. Sanchez Galan

27 Maintenance of horn + target Top concrete blocks have to be removed partially Helium vessel has to be opened Top iron blocks & cooling plates removed All operations have to be done remotely 9th Fermilab, Sept 2014 F. Sanchez Galan

28 Maintenance of horn + target horn & target loaded on gantry crane Water and electrical connectors are automatically released during lifting operation 9th Fermilab, Sept 2014 F. Sanchez Galan

29 Maintenance of horn + target horn & target transportation back to Transport cavern 9th Fermilab, Sept 2014 F. Sanchez Galan

30 Maintenance of horn + target horn & target transportation back to Transport cavern 9th Fermilab, Sept 2014 F. Sanchez Galan

31 Maintenance of horn + target horn & target transportation directly to morgue 9th Fermilab, Sept 2014 F. Sanchez Galan

32 Maintenance of horn + target horn & target lowered in the morgue 9th Fermilab, Sept 2014 F. Sanchez Galan

33 Maintenance of horn + target horn & target transportation to the hot cell 9th Fermilab, Sept 2014 F. Sanchez Galan

34 Maintenance of horn + target horn & target transportation using remotely operated “lifting table” vehicle – omnidirectional. 9th Fermilab, Sept 2014 F. Sanchez Galan

35 Maintenance of horn + target horn & target with transport vehicle 9th Fermilab, Sept 2014 F. Sanchez Galan

36 Maintenance of horn + target horn & target to hot cell 9th Fermilab, Sept 2014 F. Sanchez Galan

37 Maintenance of horn + target horn & target inside hot cell 9th Fermilab, Sept 2014 F. Sanchez Galan

38 Heat loads in shielding elements A detailed model of the whole geometry has been done in Fluka, including: Target chamber shielding elements

399th Fermilab, Sept 2014 F. Sanchez Galan Heat loads in shielding elements Internal elements: horn, reflector, striplines

409th Fermilab, Sept 2014 F. Sanchez Galan Heat loads in shielding elements Decay tunnel

419th Fermilab, Sept 2014 F. Sanchez Galan Heat loads in shielding elements Hadron stopper

429th Fermilab, Sept 2014 F. Sanchez Galan Heat loads in shielding elements 870 kW Iron 0.8 kW Al 80 kW Horn+striplines 5 kW Target 30 kW Reflector+striplines

43 Around 4% of the generated Heat is removed by the Helium, 96% by water cooling 9th Fermilab, Sept 2014 F. Sanchez Galan Temperature profiles: Target Chamber (4/4)

Decay pipe 449th Fermilab, Sept 2014 F. Sanchez Galan 3 m diameter Water cooled Helium bag

459th Fermilab, Sept 2014 F. Sanchez Galan Decay pipe cooling With the chosen configuration (32 cooling channels, contact surface 20 mm) the decay pipe temperature is around 42 C. The highest temperatures (around 75 C) are reached in the surrounding concrete.

Decay pipe 469th Fermilab, Sept 2014 F. Sanchez Galan Upstream shutter allows to keep He inside the decay pipe when opening the target chamber vessel 5 m long tube sectors welded, U water connections (T2K-like).

9th Fermilab, Sept 2014 F. Sanchez Galan47 Hadron stop (CNGS-like dump)

489th Fermilab, Sept 2014 F. Sanchez Galan Hadron stop (CNGS-like dump)

499th Fermilab, Sept 2014 F. Sanchez Galan Hadron stop (CNGS-like dump) Aluminium water cooled sinks Graphite core Steel shielding Energy deposition (FLUKA)

509th Fermilab, Sept 2014 F. Sanchez Galan Temperature estimations: Hadron stop Graphite block, Al water cooled plates (CNGS-like)

51 Temperature estimations: Hadron stop Heat generation (from Fluka) Maximum temperature at graphite 110 C for the 50 GeV case 9th Fermilab, Sept 2014 F. Sanchez Galan

52 Temperature estimations: Hadron stop Heat generation (from Fluka) Maximum temperature at graphite 118 C for the 400 GeV case

9th Fermilab, Sept 2014 F. Sanchez Galan53 Temperature estimations: Hadron stop Temperature in the graphite is far below 400°C (criteria for graphite) and the temperature in the aluminium plates remains around 30°. Even with a reduced water flow the margin is adequate.

549th Fermilab, Sept 2014 F. Sanchez Galan Possible CN2PY timeline

559th Fermilab, Sept 2014 F. Sanchez Galan Conclusions Helium bags at target and decay pipe reduce RP issues. Remote operation foreseen for maintenance operations. Acceptable values of cooling parameters, well known manufacturing methods available. No show stoppers. Integration of elements and general services outlined. A sound technical design for the secondary beam lines. Ready for detailed design..

Spare slides 9th Fermilab, Sept 2014 F. Sanchez Galan56

579th Fermilab, Sept 2014 F. Sanchez Galan Preferred manufacturing method : Cylindrical sections with hydro formed or welded-U channels along each decay pipe section length, connected by U pipes between sectors. To be welded in- situ. Surface Area Coverage Operating Temperature Ratio of Cooling Area to Cost Hydra~CoolExcellent Machined in Trace Excellent Poor Dimple PlateExcellent Good Double WalledExcellent Poor Welded C Channel Good Wrapped TubePoor Effectiveness of Hydro forming Versus Alternative Water Cooling Pictures & table from Picture from CNGS

9th Fermilab, Sept 2014 F. Sanchez Galan58

599th Fermilab, Sept 2014 F. Sanchez Galan Hydra~Cool Features Hydra~Cool is a technically superior and cost effective method of water cooling vacuum chambers. This revolutionary new method of water-cooling is made by welding a trace to a chamber and then using water pressure to hydro-form the water channel. By utilizing radius bends instead of square corners, it improves water flow and eliminates low flow and stagnant areas. When coupled to a full penetration weld, this reduces the chances of crevice crack corrosion and extends the working life of the chamber. Hydra~Cool gives you the ability to approximately double the surface area being cooled over conventional ‘C’ channel style water cooling. This high surface area coverage possible with this method also makes it an affordable alternative to double walled cooling.

Minimal requirements for water cooling ( Heat transfer coefficient ) 609th Fermilab, Sept 2014 F. Sanchez Galan A heat transfer coefficient of 2 kW/m2/K was considered in all calculations. For a 20 mm Din pipe, this is achievable with speeds above 0.35m/s (pressure drop around 1 mbar per meter) For a 20x4mm rectangular channel, this is achievable with speeds above 0.35m/s (pressure drop around 1 mbar per meter)