Purdue Aeroelasticity

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Module 2 Modal Analysis ANSYS Dynamics.
Advertisements

Root Locus Diagrams Professor Walter W. Olson
5.1 Real Vector Spaces.
CS 450: COMPUTER GRAPHICS LINEAR ALGEBRA REVIEW SPRING 2015 DR. MICHAEL J. REALE.
MDOF SYSTEMS WITH DAMPING General case Saeed Ziaei Rad.
Linear Algebra Applications in Matlab ME 303. Special Characters and Matlab Functions.
The Simplex Method The geometric method of solving linear programming problems presented before. The graphical method is useful only for problems involving.
Algebraic, transcendental (i.e., involving trigonometric and exponential functions), ordinary differential equations, or partial differential equations...
Lecture 6  Calculating P n – how do we raise a matrix to the n th power?  Ergodicity in Markov Chains.  When does a chain have equilibrium probabilities?
1D MODELS Logan; chapter 2.
DAST 2005 Week 4 – Some Helpful Material Randomized Quick Sort & Lower bound & General remarks…
Theoretical & Industrial Design of Aerofoils P M V Subbarao Professor Mechanical Engineering Department An Objective Invention ……
Lesson 31 Velocity vs. Load Factor (V-n) Diagrams
Exam 4 Material Radicals, Rational Exponents & Equations
AE 1350 Lecture Notes #7 We have looked at.. Continuity Momentum Equation Bernoulli’s Equation Applications of Bernoulli’s Equation –Pitot’s Tube –Venturi.
The Fundamental Theorem of Algebra And Zeros of Polynomials
Basic structural dynamics II
Formulation of a complete structural uncertainty model for robust flutter prediction Brian Danowsky Staff Engineer, Research Systems Technology, Inc.,
ME 440 Intermediate Vibrations Th, March 26, 2009 Chapter 5: Vibration of 2DOF Systems © Dan Negrut, 2009 ME440, UW-Madison.
© 2011 Autodesk Freely licensed for use by educational institutions. Reuse and changes require a note indicating that content has been modified from the.
1 EEE 431 Computational Methods in Electrodynamics Lecture 17 By Dr. Rasime Uyguroglu
Boyce/DiPrima 9 th ed, Ch 7.6: Complex Eigenvalues Elementary Differential Equations and Boundary Value Problems, 9 th edition, by William E. Boyce and.
1 Copyright © 2010, 2007, 2004 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Example: In a recent poll, 70% of 1501 randomly selected adults said they believed.
, Free vibration Eigenvalue equation EIGENVALUE EQUATION
Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. 7.7 The Determinant of a Square Matrix.
1 Copyright © 2010, 2007, 2004 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Example: In a recent poll, 70% of 1501 randomly selected adults said they believed.
5. The Harmonic Oscillator Consider a general problem in 1D Particles tend to be near their minimum Taylor expand V(x) near its minimum Recall V’(x 0 )
Purdue Aeroelasticity
Purdue Aeroelasticity 4-1 AAE 556 Aeroelasticity Lecture 4 Reading:
AAE 556 Aeroelasticity Lecture 7 – Control effectiveness (2)
“Adde parvum parvo magnus acervus erir” Ovid Purdue Aeroelasticity
AAE 556 Aeroelasticity Lecture 17
AAE 556 Aeroelasticity Lecture 12
Aeroelasticity (made simple)
AAE 556 Aeroelasticity Lecture 28, 29,30-Unsteady aerodynamics 1 Purdue Aeroelasticity.
AAE 556 Aeroelasticity Lecture 23 Representing motion with complex numbers and arithmetic 1 Purdue Aeroelasticity.
AAE556 – Spring Armstrong AAE 556 Aeroelasticity Lecture 5 Reading: text pp
Purdue Aeroelasticity
AAE556 Lectures 34,35 The p-k method, a modern alternative to V-g Purdue Aeroelasticity 1.
AAE 556 Aeroelasticity Lecture 6-Control effectiveness
Purdue Aeroelasticity
AAE 556 Aeroelasticity Lecture 21
AAE 556 Aeroelasticity Lecture 6
AAE 556 Aeroelasticity Lectures 22, 23
Purdue Aeroelasticity
The Simplex Method The geometric method of solving linear programming problems presented before. The graphical method is useful only for problems involving.
Purdue Aeroelasticity
Purdue Aeroelasticity
AAE 556 Aeroelasticity Lecture 6 – Multi-DOF systems
AAE 556 Aeroelasticity Lecture 18
1C9 Design for seismic and climate changes
Copyright 2008-Purdue University
AAE 556 Aeroelasticity Lecture 7-Control effectiveness
Purdue Aeroelasticity
Purdue Aeroelasticity
Purdue Aeroelasticity
The Simplex Method The geometric method of solving linear programming problems presented before. The graphical method is useful only for problems involving.
AAE 556 Aeroelasticity Lecture 22
Purdue Aeroelasticity
AAE 556 Aeroelasticity Lecture 24
Grab their Attention with Active Learning!
AAE 556 Aeroelasticity Lecture 8
AAE 556 Aeroelasticity Lectures 10 and 11
AAE 556 Aeroelasticity Lecture 10
The Determinant of a 2  2 Matrix
AAE 556 Aeroelasticity Lecture 13
November 5, 2002 SE 180 Final Project.
Multi-degree-of-freedom systems
AAE 556 Aeroelasticity Lecture 4
Flutter-a scary instability
Presentation transcript:

Purdue Aeroelasticity AAE 556 Aeroelasticity The P-k flutter solution method (also known as the “British” method) Purdue Aeroelasticity

The eigenvalue problem from the Lecture 33 Purdue Aeroelasticity

Genealogy of the V-g or “k” method Equations of motion for harmonic response (next slide) Forcing frequency and airspeeds are is known parameters Reduced frequency k is determined from w and V Equations are correct at all values of w and V. Take away the harmonic applied forcing function Equations are only true at the flutter point We have an eigenvalue problem Frequency and airspeed are unknowns, but we still need k to define the numbers to compute the elements of the eigenvalue problem We invent ed Theodorsen’s method or V-g artificial damping to create an iterative approach to finding the flutter point Purdue Aeroelasticity

Purdue Aeroelasticity Go back to the original typical section equations of motion, restricted to steady-state harmonic response Purdue Aeroelasticity

The coefficients for the EOM’s Purdue Aeroelasticity

The eigenvalue problem Purdue Aeroelasticity

Another version of the eigenvalue problem with different coefficents Purdue Aeroelasticity

Purdue Aeroelasticity Definitions of terms for alternative set-up of eigenvalue equations for “k-method” Purdue Aeroelasticity

Return to the EOM’s before we assumed harmonic motion Here is what we would like to have Here is the first step in solving the stability problem Purdue Aeroelasticity

Purdue Aeroelasticity The p-k method will use the harmonic aero results to cast the stability problem in the following form …but first, some preliminaries Purdue Aeroelasticity

Purdue Aeroelasticity Revisit the original, harmonic EOM’s where the aero forces were still on the right hand side of the EOM’s and we hadn’t yet nondimensionalized h P Purdue Aeroelasticity

This lift expression looks strange; where is the dynamic pressure? Purdue Aeroelasticity

Writing aero force in different notation - more term definitions The Qij’s are complex numbers Purdue Aeroelasticity

Aero force in terms of the Qij’s Purdue Aeroelasticity

Purdue Aeroelasticity Focus first on the term Purdue Aeroelasticity

Purdue Aeroelasticity The second term Purdue Aeroelasticity

Purdue Aeroelasticity Let’s adopt notation from the controls community to help with our conversion Purdue Aeroelasticity

Continue working on the first term in the aero force expression The expression for A11 reads Purdue Aeroelasticity

Purdue Aeroelasticity The term with the p in it looks like a damping term so let’s work on it Purdue Aeroelasticity

Finally, the exact expressions for each term are as follows Both terms are real numbers, there is no j here. Purdue Aeroelasticity

Aerodynamic moment expression Purdue Aeroelasticity

Purdue Aeroelasticity The Qij’s Purdue Aeroelasticity

Purdue Aeroelasticity The p-k process Step 1 Choose a value of k and compute all four complex aerodynamic coefficients These are the complex Aij’s with the Theodorsen Circulation function in them These will be a set of complex numbers, not algebraic expressions Choose an air density (altitude) and airspeed (V) Purdue Aeroelasticity

Perform this computation Purdue Aeroelasticity

Compute the aerodynamic damping matrix, defined as Purdue Aeroelasticity

Purdue Aeroelasticity Take the results and insert them into an eigenvalue problem that reads as follows Purdue Aeroelasticity

Purdue Aeroelasticity Summary Choose k=wb/V arbitrarily Choose altitude (r), and airspeed (V) Mach number is now known Compute AIC’s from Theodorsen formulas or others Compute aero matrices-B and Q matrices are real Purdue Aeroelasticity

Purdue Aeroelasticity Solving for the eigenvalues Convert the “p-k” equation to first-order state vector form State vector = Purdue Aeroelasticity

State vector elements are related The equation of motion becomes Solve for Purdue Aeroelasticity

State vector eigenvalue equation – the “plant” matrix Assume a solution Result Solve for eigenvalues (p) of the [Aij] matrix (the plant) Plot results as a function of airspeed Purdue Aeroelasticity

Purdue Aeroelasticity 1st order problem Mass matrix is diagonal if we use modal approach – so too is structural stiffness matrix Compute p roots Roots are either real (positive or negative) Complex conjugate pairs Purdue Aeroelasticity

Purdue Aeroelasticity Eigenvalue roots wg=s is the estimated system damping There are “m” computed values of w at the airspeed V You chose a value of k=wb/V, was it correct? “line up” the frequencies to make sure k, w and V are consistent Purdue Aeroelasticity

p-k computation procedure Input k and V Compute eigenvalues No, change k Repeat process for each w yes Purdue Aeroelasticity

Purdue Aeroelasticity What should we expect? w Right half-plane s Root locus plot Purdue Aeroelasticity

Back-up slides for Problem 9.2 Purdue Aeroelasticity

A comparison between V-g and p-k Purdue Aeroelasticity

A comparison between V-g and p-k Purdue Aeroelasticity

A comparison between V-g and p-k Purdue Aeroelasticity

A comparison between V-g and p-k Purdue Aeroelasticity

Purdue Aeroelasticity Flutter in action Accident occurred APR-27-95 at STEVENSON, AL Aircraft: WITTMAN O&O, registration: N41SW Injuries: 2 Fatal. REPORTS FROM GROUND WITNESSES, NONE OF WHOM ACTUALLY SAW THE AIRPLANE, VARIED FROM HEARING A HIGH REVVING ENGINE TO AN EXPLOSION. EXAMINATION OF THE WRECKAGE REVEALED THAT THE AIRPLANE EXPERIENCED AN IN-FLIGHT BREAKUP. DAMAGE AND STRUCTURAL DEFORMATION WAS INDICATIVE OF AILERON-WING FLUTTER. WING FABRIC DOPE WAS DISTRESSED OR MISSING ON THE AFT INBOARD PORTION OF THE LEFT WING UPPER SURFACE AND ALONG THE ENTIRE LENGTH OF THE TOP OF THE MAIN SPAR. LARGE AREAS OF DOPE WERE ALSO MISSING FROM THE LEFT WING UNDERSURFACE. THE ENTIRE FABRIC COVERING ON THE UPPER AND LOWER SURFACES OF THE RIGHT WING HAD DELAMINATED FROM THE WING PLYWOOD SKIN. THE DOPED FINISH WAS SEVERELY DISTRESSED AND MOTTLED. THE FABRIC COVERING HAD NOT BEEN INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLY-FIBER COVERING AND PAINT MANUAL; THE PLYWOOD WAS NOT TREATED WITH THE POLY-BRUSH COMPOUND. Probable Cause AILERON-WING FLUTTER INDUCED BY SEPARATION AT THE TRAILING EDGE OF AN UNBONDED PORTION OF WING FABRIC AT AN AILERON WING STATION. THE DEBONDING OF THE WING FABRIC WAS A RESULT OF IMPROPER INSTALLATION. Purdue Aeroelasticity

Purdue Aeroelasticity Things you should know Royal Aircraft Establishment The RAE started as HM Balloon Factory. From 1911-18 it was called the Royal Aircraft Factory, but was changed its name to Royal Aircraft Establishment to avoid confusion with the newly established Royal Air Force. Farnborough was known as a center of excellence for aircraft research. Major flutter research was conducted there. Famous R&M’s such as the “flutter bible” came from this facility. The RAE played a major role in both World Wars. So confident was Hitler that he could occupy England with relative ease that he spared the RAE from bombing in the hope of benefiting from its research. Recently the RAE (now known as the Royal Aerospace Establishment) was absorbed into the DRA (Defence Research Agency), itself renamed as DERA (Defence Evaluation and Research Agency). The world famous initials are no more. Purdue Aeroelasticity