PHI 103 ASH Courses For more course tutorials visit www.uoptutorial.com Get Ready to grant success at exam by shop at uoptutorial.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Studying Life Science Chapter 1.
Advertisements

Chapter 1 Critical Thinking.
Introduction/Hume’s Problem of Induction Seminar 1: Philosophy of the Sciences 6 September
Philosophy 120 Symbolic Logic I H. Hamner Hill CSTL-CLA.SEMO.EDU/HHILL/PL120.
1 Module 5 How to identify essay Matakuliah: G1222, Writing IV Tahun: 2006 Versi: v 1.0 rev 1.
For Friday, read chapter 2, sections 1-2 (pp ). As nongraded homework, do the problems on p. 19. Graded homework #1 is due at the beginning of class.
Building Logical Arguments. Critical Thinking Skills Understand and use principles of scientific investigation Apply rules of formal and informal logic.
1 Arguments in Philosophy Introduction to Philosophy.
Modified from Resources of the Purdue University Writing Lab Paper Writing: Making an Argument.
Critical Thinking: A User’s Manual
You will be working with your elbow partner…decide right now who will be Partner A and who will be Partner B.
Revision and Exam Skills
Parts with Explanations
Chapter 4: Lecture Notes
Tutorial 3 Understanding Arguments 24 August 2015.
How to write the answer they’re looking for! ANSWERING APUSH ESSAY QUESTIONS.
Constructing a Reasoned Argument argument.ppt
Chapter 31: Fallacies of Weak Induction. Appeal to Authority (pp ) The fallacy of appeal to authority occurs when someone is taken to be an authority.
Reasoning!? What’s that???  Reasoning is the act of drawing a conclusion.  You use premises to help you draw a conclusion. Some conclusions are more.
Chapter 1: Lecture Notes What Is an Argument? (and What is Not?)
Logic and Philosophy Alan Hausman PART ONE Sentential Logic Sentential Logic.
Research Paper Arguments Premises Fallacies Take Notes!
An Introduction to Persuasion and Argument Writing Moving people to a belief, position, or course of action.
Critical Analysis Key ideas to remember. What's the Point? Here are some questions you can ask yourself to help you analyze: So what? How is this significant?
SOCIAL STUDIES Unit 1: Thinking Critically. Unit Overview Critical Thinking Perception Thought Patterns Problem Solving Facts Vs. Opinions Propaganda.
© 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. The Art of Critical Reading Mather ● McCarthy Part 4 Reading Critically Chapter 12 Evaluating.
Chapter 3: MAKING SENSE OF ARGUMENTS
Chapter 3: Introduction to Logic. Logic Main goal: use logic to analyze arguments (claims) to see if they are valid or invalid. This is useful for math.
Philosophical Method  Logic: A Calculus For Good Reason  Clarification, Not Obfuscation  Distinctions and Disambiguation  Examples and Counterexamples.
RECOGNIZING, ANALYZING, AND CONSTRUCTING ARGUMENTS
Inferential Statistics Inferential statistics allow us to infer the characteristic(s) of a population from sample data Slightly different terms and symbols.
Sight Words.
Final Exam Preparation Tutorials Look at the instructions for the exam. How do you plan to spend your time? What questions do you have about the.
Welcome to…. Who am I?...  Mrs. McLeod   We will use a blog as a way of communication in this course.  There.
Scientific Methods in Earth Science. What You Will Learn  Explain how scientists begin to learn about the natural world.  Explain what scientific methods.
Higher / Int.2 Philosophy 12. Our Learning  Fallacy Reminder  Summary following Homework NAB  Class NAB.
© 2009 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.1 Chapters1 & 2.
Foundations of Discrete Mathematics Chapter 1 By Dr. Dalia M. Gil, Ph.D.
Old Fallacies, Emotional Fallacies, Groupthink Sign In HW Due Quiz! Review Quiz! Fallacies Review New Emotional Fallacies Fallacies and evaluating arguments.
Test Taking Skills Make sure you prove what you know!
GEN 499 MART Teaching Effectively\gen499martdotcom FOR MORE CLASSES VISIT
Do Now  With your table partner, briefly tell each other about the last argument you had. (keep it school appropriate)
PHI 103 CART Education Expert/phi103cart.com FOR MORE CLASSES VISIT
The Practice of Statistics, 5th Edition Starnes, Tabor, Yates, Moore Bedford Freeman Worth Publishers CHAPTER 9 Testing a Claim 9.1 Significance Tests:
Tutorial 4: Critical Reading. Inductive Arguments White swan Therefore, all swans are white. Discuss Activity G (only first paragraph).
For more course tutorials visit PHI 103 Entire Course (Ash Course) PHI 103 Week 1 DQ 1 PHI 103 Week 1 DQ 1 (Consider an argument you.
PHI 103 PAPERS E XCELLENCE I N S TUDY PHI 103 Entire Course FOR MORE CLASSES VISIT PHI 103 Week 1 DQ 1 (Consider an argument you.
Chapter 7: Induction.
Part 4 Reading Critically
PHI 208 Course Extraordinary Success tutorialrank.com
KARL POPPER ON THE PROBLEM OF A THEORY OF SCIENTIFIC METHOD
Unit 5: Hypothesis Testing
Inductive / Deductive reasoning
GEN 499 Education for Service-- snaptutorial.com.
GEN 499Competitive Success/tutorialrank.com
PHI 103Competitive Success/snaptutorial.com
GEN 499Education for Service-- tutorialrank.com. GEN 499 Entire Course (New Syllabus) (2 Set) For more course tutorials visit This.
GEN 499 PAPERS Lessons in Excellence -- gen499papers.com.
GEN 499 PAPERS Education for Service- -gen499papers.com.
GEN 499 Teaching Effectively-- snaptutorial.com
PHI 208(ASH) Education for Service/tutorialrank.com.
PHI 103 Education for Service-- snaptutorial.com
PHI 103 Ash knowledge is divine-- snaptutorial.com.
Chapter Nine Part 1 (Sections 9.1 & 9.2) Hypothesis Testing
Significance Tests: The Basics
The Logic of Declarative Statements
PERSUASIVE TEXTS.
“Still I Look to Find a Reason to Believe”
Arguments in Sentential Logic
Avoiding Ungrounded Assumptions
Presentation transcript:

PHI 103 ASH Courses For more course tutorials visit Get Ready to grant success at exam by shop at uoptutorial

PHI 103 ASH Courses PHI 103 ENTIRE COURSE PHI 103 Week 1 DQ 1 PHI 103 Week 1 DQ 1 (Consider an argument you have recently) PHI 103 Week 1 DQ 2 (Logic can do a great deal in helping us understand our arguments) PHI 103 Week 1 Quiz PHI 103 Week 2 DQ 1 (Construct a deductive argument) PHI 103 Week 2 DQ 2 (Construct an inductive argument) PHI 103 Week 2 Assignment Final Paper Outline Pro Choice (Legalized Abortion) Consider an argument you have recently had with a friend, family member, manager, co-worker, or someone else. Identify the topic of the argument and present that argument in premise-conclusion form, identifying both the premises and conclusion.

PHI 103 ASH Courses PHI 103 Week 1 DQ 2 PHI 103 Week 1 Quiz Logic can do a great deal in helping us understand our arguments. Explain what advantages we obtain by studying logic in terms of improving our reasoning. Consider a debate over whether prayer should be allowed in public schools. Explain what logic can and cannot do. In other words, what kinds of questions and topics are not decided by logical analysis? Question :Which of these could be seen as a premise in an argument? Question :A valid deductive argument, the premises of which are accepted as true, shows Question :"You didn't like that book; so you probably don't like to read" is Question :In the statement, "You didn't like that restaurant; so you probably don't like to eat out," "you probably don't like to out" is the

PHI 103 ASH Courses PHI 103 Week 2 Assignment Final Paper Outline Pro Choice PHI 103 Week 2 DQ 1 Final Paper Outline. Review the Final Paper instructions in Week 5 of the onlinecourse or in the “Components of Course Evaluation” section of this guide. Then, visit the Ashford Writing Center (located in the Learning Resources tab in the left navigation bar). Construct a deductive argument that is valid but not sound. Then, construct a valid deductive argument that is sound. Be sure to put the argument in premise-conclusion form.

PHI 103 ASH Courses PHI 103 Week 2 DQ 2 PHI 103 Week 2 Quiz Construct an inductive argument for a specific conclusion. Then, explain what you might do to make this inductive argument stronger, either by revising the premises or by revising the conclusion. Question :"10 is less than 100; 100 is less than 1,000; consequently, 10 is less than 1,000" is an example of a Question :One way to make an inductive argument stronger is to Question :All sound arguments are valid, but not all valid arguments are sound. This means Question :Inductive arguments should never be characterized as

PHI 103 ASH Courses PHI 103 Week 3 Assignment Stereotype Paper PHI 103 Week 3 DQ 1 Read Stereotyping Has Lasting Negative Impact: Prejudice has lingering effects, study shows and watch How Pre-existing Beliefs Distort Logical Reasoning. Discuss three stereotypes you encounter in your own life and the effect those stereotypes can have on others. This can be a stereotype you realize you have been guilty of holding or someone else. Considering the fallacies discussed in Chapter Four of An Introduction to Logic, construct three different arguments that display distinct fallacies. Give an explanation of why each makes a mistake in drawing the conclusion it does. your classmates’ examples and see if they, in fact, commit the fallacy identified.

PHI 103 ASH Courses PHI 103 Week 3 DQ 2 PHI 103 Week 3 Quiz One rich source of fallacies is the media: television, radio, magazines, and the Internet Identify two distinct fallacies you see committed in the media. Do you think it is more likely that you will not be fooled by these fallacies having studied logic? What do you think those presenting these arguments assume about the logical skills of their viewers? Is this a good or bad assumption for them to make? Question :uses too much oil. So they shouldn't develop their industry" may commit which fallacy? Question :"Julie started carrying a rabbit's foot, then she won the lottery. The rabbit's foot must have caused her to win the lottery" commits a(n) Question :A person who is shown his or her argument commits a fallacy should Question :A fallacy is an argument that

PHI 103 ASH Courses PHI 103 Week 4 Critical Thinking Quiz PHI 103 Week 4 DQ 1 Question : Mrs. Orlof teaches two history classes, one in the morning and one in the afternoon. Yesterday she gave the same test to both classes. Anyone who failed the test must take a retest. Since a greater percentage of students who took the morning test failed the test than students who took the afternoon test, more of Orlof’s morning history students than afternoon history students will have to take the rest. DQ 1; As stated in our text book “scientists design experiments and try to obtain results verifying a hypothesis Karl Popper's philosophy of science uses modus as the central method of disconfirming, or falsifying, scientific hypotheses.

PHI 103 ASH Courses PHI 103 Week 4 DQ 2 PHI 103 Week 4 Quiz Mary is poor. She has not been able to find a job and has two children she needs to feed. Assume Mary is forced to let her children go hungry or steal some food from a local grocery store. Which should she do? Construct an argument that supports Mary's decision to steal the food or an argument that shows why Mary should not steal the food. Question :A good way to establish a conclusion as true, or probable, is to Question :Logicians regard the following as the meaning of the word "argument." Question :A strongly supported claim in science should be regarded as Question :Examining reasons and constructing arguments can help in Question :If the word "should" appears in a sentence, that sentence will always involve an ethical claim.

PHI 103 ASH Courses PHI 103 Week 5 DQ 1 PHI 103 Week 5 DQ 2 PHI 103 PHI 103 Week 5 DQ 1;Write two arguments in English, one in the form of modus ponens and one in the form of modus tollens. Then, write the arguments in symbols using sentence letters and truth-functional connectives. Imagine someone asks you what you have learned in your logic class and what you found to be the most useful information you learned there. Is it important for people to study logic? What kinds of mistakes might they make without having been exposed to a careful study of reasoning provided by logic? Offer your response to these questions, and compare your answers to your classmates' responses

PHI 103 ASH Courses PHI 103 Week 5 Final Paper Legalized Abortion PHI 103 Week 5 Quiz For the Final Paper, you will identify a specific claim relative to one of the topics listed before and defend it with as strong an argument as possible. These topics are presented below as questions. The best way to develop a thesis statement is to offer an answer to the question, and then state in a clear and specific sentence the basis for your answer Question :The sentence "P → Q" is read as Question :"P v Q" is best interpreted as Question :What is the truth value of the sentence "P v ~ P"? Question :If P is false, and Q is false, the truth-value of "P ↔Q" is Question :"Julie and Kurt got married and had a baby" is best symbolized as

PHI 103 ASH Courses For more course tutorials visit Get Ready to grant success at exam by shop at uoptutorial