Sept. 29, 2008Rodger Bossert1 Quench Positions in TQC Models Rodger Bossert Technical Division Technical Memo #TD-08-031 September 29, 2008.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Protection study options for HQ01e-3 Tiina Salmi QXF meeting, 27 Nov 2012.
Advertisements

SC Magnets at Fermilab New Collaring and Coil Pre-stress Limit for a Nb3Sn Magnet Alexander Zlobin Technical Division Fermilab.
QXFSM1 Mirror Shim System R. Bossert Dec. 1, 2014 LARP Teleconference.
Racetrack Coil Technology – G. Ambrosio 1 LARP DOE review – FNAL, June. 5-6, 2007 BNL - FNAL - LBNL - SLAC Racetrack Coil Technology (LR, SQ) & other Supporting.
1 Letter of Rossi to Peggs (agred with Schmickler and Devred) April 2005  We strongly believe that the major steps in the near term are: 1)Construction.
S. Caspi, LBNL HQS Progress Report High Field Nb 3 Sn Quadrupole Magnet Shlomo Caspi LBNL Collaboration Meeting – CM11 FNAL October 27-28, 2008.
ASC 2012, 10/10/2012Test results and analysis of LQS03 – G. Ambrosio 1 BNL - FNAL - LBNL - SLAC Test Results and Analysis of LQS03 Third Long Nb 3 Sn Quadrupole.
BNL - FNAL - LBNL - SLAC Long Quadrupole Results & Status Giorgio Ambrosio Fermilab Task Leaders: Fred Nobrega (FNAL) – Coils Jesse Schmalzle (BNL) – Coils.
2 nd Joint HiLumi LHC – LARP Annual Meeting INFN Frascati – November 14 th to 16 th 2012 Helene Felice Paolo Ferracin LQ Mechanical Behavior Overview and.
Fred Nobrega. 9 Dec 2014 Model Design & Fabrication – FNAL Fred Nobrega 2 Outline Background Mechanical Design Model Magnet Features Coil Technology and.
LQ Goals and Design Study Summary – G. Ambrosio 1 LARP Collab Mtg – SLAC, Oct , 2007 BNL - FNAL - LBNL - SLAC LQ Goals & Design Summary Giorgio Ambrosio.
SC magnet developments at CEA/Saclay Maria Durante Hélène Felice CEA Saclay DSM/DAPNIA/SACM/LEAS.
HiLumi-LHC / LARP Conductor and Cable Internal Review October 16 th and 17 th 2013 H. Felice LARP Short Magnets Fabrication and Test experience relevant.
BNL - FNAL - LBNL - SLAC Design and Test of the 1 st Nb 3 Sn Long Quadrupole by LARP Giorgio Ambrosio Fermilab Acknowledgement: many people contributed.
ASC 2012Nb 3 Sn IR Quadrupoles for HL-LHC – G. Sabbi 1 Nb 3 Sn IR Quadrupoles for HL-LHC BNL - FNAL - LBNL - SLAC GianLuca Sabbi for the US LHC Accelerator.
BNL - FNAL - LBNL - SLAC LQ Test and Future Plans Giorgio Ambrosio, Guram Chlachidize Fermilab LARP Collaboration Meeting 13 Port Jefferson Nov. 4-6, 2009.
BNL - FNAL - LBNL - SLAC Progress Report on LQ Program Giorgio Ambrosio Fermilab Task Leaders: Fred Nobrega (FNAL) – Coils Jesse Schmalzle (BNL) – Coils.
HL-LHC Annual Meeting, November 2013HQ Planning – G. Sabbi 1 HQ Status and Plans G. Sabbi High Luminosity LHC Annual Meeting Daresbury, UK, November 11-14,
S. Caspi, LBNL HQ Progress and Schedule Shlomo Caspi LBNL LARP Collaboration Meeting – CM13 Port Jefferson November 4-6, 2009.
MQXF support structure An extension of LARP experience Helene Felice MQXF Design Review December 10 th to 12 th, 2014 CERN.
LARP Magnet Progress Michael Lamm For the LARP Collaboration bnl - fnal - lbnl - slac US LHC Accelerator Research Program All Experimenters’ Meeting Monday,
Subscale quadrupole (SQ) series Paolo Ferracin LARP DoE Review FNAL June 12-14, 2006.
Hybrid Structure with Cooling John Cozzolino LARP Collaboration Meeting Port Jefferson, NY November 4-6, 2009.
Test Program and Results Guram Chlachidze for FNAL-CERN Collaboration September 26-27, 2012 Outline Test program Quench Performance Quench Protection Magnetic.
F. Savary Question 1 A. Magnet design criteria for the prototype and production magnet to be tested before the installation into the tunnel.
HQM01 Test Summary Outline -Magnet Instrumentation and Shim System -SG Data -Short Sample Limits -Quench Training at 4.6 K and 2.2 K -Ramp rate and Temperature.
Cold powering test results of MBHSP102 Gerard Willering, TE-MSC-TF With thanks to Jerome and Vincent and all others from TF for their contribution.
S. Caspi, LBNL TQS – Progress and plans Shlomo Caspi LBNL Collaboration meeting FNAL April
1 BNL -FNAL - LBNL - SLAC P. Wanderer IR’07 - Frascati 7 November 2007 U.S. LARP Magnet Programme.
DESIGN STUDIES IR Magnet Design P. Wanderer LARP Collaboration Meeting April 27, 2006.
J.C. Perez, S. Izquierdo Bermudez 11T Dipole models instrumentation.
HQ02A2 TEST RESULTS November 7, 2013 FERMILAB. HQ02 test at Fermilab 2  First HQ quadrupole with coils (#15-17, #20) of the optimized design o Only coil.
TQC03e Test Status  Magnetic measurements at 300 K  Z-scan at ±10 A  Magnetic measurements at 4.6 K (I max up to 6.5 kA)  Quench training and ramp.
S. Caspi, LBNL HQ Magnet Program Shlomo Caspi LBNL LARP DOE Review FNAL June 1-2, 2011 BNL Jesse Schmalze Mike Anarella Peter Wanderer Arup Gosh FNAL Rodger.
BNL - FNAL - LBNL - SLAC Long Quadrupole Giorgio Ambrosio Fermilab Long Quadrupole Task Leaders: Fred Nobrega (FNAL) – Coils Jesse Schmalzle (BNL) – Coils.
LARP DOE Review, 7/9/2012Long Quadrupole – G. Ambrosio 1 Long Quadrupole Program Giorgio Ambrosio DOE Review of the LARP Program SLAC July 9-10, 2011 LQ.
BNL - FNAL - LBNL - SLAC Long Quadrupole Giorgio Ambrosio Fermilab Many people contributed to this work, most of all the Long Quadrupole Task Leaders:
MQXFS1 Test Results G. Chlachidze, J. DiMarco, S. Izquierdo-Bermudez, E. Ravaioli, S. Stoynev, T. Strauss et al. Joint LARP CM26/Hi-Lumi Meeting SLAC May.
Answers to the review committee G. Ambrosio, B.Bordini, P. Ferracin MQXF Conductor Review November 5-6, 2014 CERN.
LQM01 Test Summary Guram Chlachidze LARP CM16 Montauk, NY May 16-18, 2011.
MQXFSM1 results Guram Chlachidze Stoyan Stoynev 10 June 2015LARP meeting.
2 nd LARP / HiLumi Collaboration Mtg, May 9, 2012LHQ Goals and Status – G. Ambrosio 11 Quench Protection of Long Nb 3 Sn Quads Giorgio Ambrosio Fermilab.
LHC Performance Workshop 2012Nb 3 Sn IR Magnets – G. Sabbi 1 New Magnets for the IR How far are we from the HL-LHC Target? BNL - FNAL - LBNL - SLAC GianLuca.
2 nd LARP / HiLumi Collaboration Mtg, May 9, 2012LHQ Goals and Status – G. Ambrosio 11 LHQ Goals and Status Giorgio Ambrosio Fermilab 2 nd LARP / HiLumi.
LQS01a Test Results LARP Collaboration Meeting 14 Fermilab - April 26-28, 2010 Guram Chlachidze.
1 Long QXF Mirror Fabrication (MQXFPM1) Rodger Bossert HiLumi-LARP Collaboration Meeting May 18-20, 2016 SLAC R. Bossert - HiLumi Collaboration Meeting.
1 MQXFS Mirror Fabrication R. Bossert, G. Chlachidze, S. Stoynev HiLumi-LARP Collaboration Meeting May 11-13, 2015 FNAL.
Page 1 TQC Mechanical Model Igor Novitski / Rodger Bossert May 24, 2006 Results of MM#4 and MM#5.
LQ Test Results and Next Steps 1 st HiLumi LHC/LARP Collaboration Meeting CERN, November 2011 Guram Chlachidze.
MQXFPM1 and MQXFS1b Test Results
TQS Overview and recent progress
TQ Program and Review Charge
Model magnet test results at FNAL
HQ Mirror Assembly R. Bossert
TQS Structure Design and Modeling
Rodger Bossert/Shlomo Caspi
SQXF Mirror QXFSM1 Strain Gauges
MQXF Goals & Plans G. Ambrosio MQXF Conductor Review
LARP Technology Quadrupole Review
Update on test results MBHDP102 Re-discussion of test program
MBHSP02 test STATUS and first results
New Magnets for the IR How far are we from the HL-LHC Target?
Design of Nb3Sn IR quadrupoles with apertures larger than 120 mm
Guram Chlachidze Stoyan Stoynev
Design of Nb3Sn IR quadrupoles with apertures larger than 120 mm
Long term behavior and high-QI test in the MQXFS program
Long term behavior of MQXFS1
Long term behavior and high MIITs test in the LARP program
MBHSP109 and MBHSP May 2019, Gerard Willering.
MBHSP109 Test results 11T technical meeting – EDMS number:
Presentation transcript:

Sept. 29, 2008Rodger Bossert1 Quench Positions in TQC Models Rodger Bossert Technical Division Technical Memo #TD September 29, 2008

Sept. 29, 2008Rodger Bossert2 Technology Quadrupole - TQC Features: Traditional collared coil with stainless steel shell. Preload shared by collars and shell. Preload applied primarily at room temperature.

Sept. 29, 2008Rodger Bossert3 Preload Application - TQC

Sept. 29, 2008Rodger Bossert4 Magnet Tests - TQC MagnetConductorCoilsIslandTemperatureTest TQC01a MJR (1900 A/mm2) 9, 10, 12, 13 Bronze4.4 K & 1.9K Aug 2006 FNAL TQC01bMJR 7, 8, 7, 8, 10, 12 Bronze4.4 K & 1.9K May 2007 FNAL TQC02E RRP (2800 A/mm2) 20, 21, 22, 23 Titanium4.4 K & 1.9 K Nov 2007 FNAL TQC02aRRP 17, 19, 24, 27 Bronze4.4 K & 1.9 K Jan 2008 FNAL TQC02bMJR/RRP 10, 12, 17, 19 Bronze4.4 K & 1.9 K Aug 2008 FNAL Virgin coils in bold. Coils with non-glued poles and pole slots in red.

Sept. 29, 2008Rodger Bossert5 TQC01 Quench History Low plateau (72% of SSL) at 4.5K with all quenches in inner layer pole turn. Better performance (87% SSL) at 1.9K. Eventual degradation in outer layer lead area in 2 coils. Almost all quenches in area where outer poles are not glued. Very few quenches in end areas.

Sept. 29, 2008Rodger Bossert6 TQC01b Quench History Higher preload gave quench performance similar to that from the coils in TQS01 series. Same coils have same performance in the different structures. 1.9K behavior similar to other MJR coils (as expected). Magnet was disassembled, and coils reused without degradation.

Sept. 29, 2008Rodger Bossert7 TQC01b Quench History by Coil Quench positions of training quenches 4.5K 20 A/s Ramp Rate Studies Temp Dep studies 1.9K 20 A/s Training quenches in all four coils, but more in coils 7 and 8

Sept. 29, 2008Rodger Bossert TQC02E Quench History Similar training behavior as TQS02a with same coils. 1.9K behavior similar to other RRP coils, seemingly limited by instabilities. Training at 4.5K not complete due to quenches in leads. Magnet was disassembled, and coils reused several times without degradation. 4.5 K: Quenches: #2,3,5,6,10,11 - in coil 20 Quench # 6 in outer layer mid-plane Quench # 9 – coil K: All quenches in outer layer mid-plane segment of coil 21 Quenches at high ramp rates: All in coils 22 and 23, mid- plane segments, both inner and outer coil layer

Sept. 29, 2008Rodger Bossert9 TQC02a Quench History TQC02a Quench History Key to zones: (1) 4.5K 20A/s, (2) 4.5K ramp rate studies, (3) 1.9K 20 A/s, (4) 1.9K ramp rate studies, (5) Temp Dependence studies, (6) 4.5K ramp rate studies, (7) 4.5K 20 A/s Slow linear training in coil 24 until quench position changed to coil 27, at a specific position near the return end and current of 9250A, 68% of the SSL. 1.9K training was similar to other RRP models, erratic and not better than at 4.5K. However, most quenches even at 1.9K were in the inner coil pole turn.

Sept. 29, 2008Rodger Bossert10 TQC02a Quench Positions Training quenches all in coils 24 and 27, in the inner coil pole turn but near the junction between outer pole pieces. Many, including the limiting quenches in Coil 27, near the return end. TQC02a: Coil 24, 4.5 K TQC02a: Coil 24, 1.9 K TQc02a: Coil 27

Sept. 29, 2008Rodger Bossert11 TQC02b Quench History TQC02b training at 4.5K proceeded in a slow but linear path, with all training quenches at 4.5K in the same coil (12). At 1.9K, all training quenches also in coil 12, except two in coil 17. Plateau at 4.5K was reached at 10382A, about 84% of the critical current limit, almost identical to that of TQC01b. Behavior at 1.9K is erratic, still unexplained. Return to same plateau when returned to 4.5K. Some retraining during 2 nd thermal cycle. TC1 TC Gradient (T/m)

Sept. 29, 2008Rodger Bossert12 TQC02b Quench Positions at 4.5K 1: A10A9 and A9A8 segments starting almost at the same time, A8A6 follows in 5-6 msec. 2: Quenches in both A10A9 and A8A6 segments. 3: A8A6 is the first quenching segment, A9A8 - very close to it. 4: A10A9 is the first quenching segment, then A9A8, A8A6. 5: Quench in ramp. 4 (64 quenches) 1 (20 quenches) 3 (4 quenches) 5 (2 quenches) 2 (5 quenches) Coil 12

Sept. 29, 2008Rodger Bossert13 TQC02b Quench Positions at 1.9K Coil 12 1: A10A9 and A9A8 segments starting almost at the same time, A8A6 follows in 5-6 msec 2: Quench in ramp Coil training quenches at 1.9K only; The first quenching segment is A8A7 High ramp rate quenches at 1.9K only in mid-plane segments Few quenches during the heater tests The highest quench current in the test: ~ 10.5 kA, quench #92, T=3.6K 1 (34 quenches) 2 (1 quench) A6/B3 Did not return to 1.9K after 2 nd thermal cycle.

Sept. 29, 2008Rodger Bossert14 Model No. After Collaring After Assy After Cooldown At Max field 4.5K At Max Field 1.9 K TQC01a1949N/A TQC01b39/23106/84118/xx39/xx26/xx TQC02E54108N/A* TQC02a TQC02b43120TBD TQC Preload and Quench Behavior Model No. Max % SSL at 4.5K Max % SSL at 1.9K Max Gradient at 4.5K (T/m) Max Gradient at 1.9K (T/m) TQC01a TQC01b TQC02E TQC02a TQC02b Preload at inner pole in TQC models (MPa) TQC01b data is listed separately for coils with glued/non-glued outer poles. % of SSL in TQC models * Actual values unknown but gauges did not unload during excitation

Sept. 29, 2008Rodger Bossert15 All TQC 4.5K Training Quenches Training at 4.5K of all TQC models is compared. Coils with potted parts show a steeper rise and earlier plateau, although all are used in an identical structure.