TECHNICAL MEETING ENGLISH DEBATE COMPETITION Tema: “Membidik Peluang MEA dengan Sains dan Bahasa “ Pekan Edukasi 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
BP Style With Cameronnnn. What is BP? Not Australian-style (3 on 3) Also known as Worlds-style 4 teams Each team has two speakers.
Advertisements

The European Union Intervarsity Debate Championship 2011.
Introduction to British Parliamentary Debate China Debate Education Network:
The World Schools Format  2 teams, 1 proposing the topic (or motion) and 1 opposing it  Each team has three speaking members, one of whom speaks twice.
Judge’s Briefing Here!. So you want* to become a Debate Judge? *were forced by your kid.
THE BASICS COACHING SESSION. WHAT DO YOU NEED TO KNOW? What happens in a debate? What do you say in your speech? How do you give a good speech? How do.
ADJUDICATORS’ FUNCTIONS Decide which team has won. Decide the best speaker. State the reasons for the decision (oral adjudication). Provide constructive.
We couldn’t do it without you! This Brief Presentation Will Cover Five Talking Points That Will Train You To Be Great Judges Style of Debate Role Of.
Basic Debating Skills.
Introduction to Debating The basics Preparing a case (team) Preparing a speech (individual) Rebuttals.
Basic Training. What is debating? LUDS practice British parliamentary debate that is: A structured argument about a certain topic (motion) Between two.
Technological Debates. Debate Unit Debate Procedure Opening Statement by affirmative (2 minute max) Opening Statement by opposition (2 minute max) Argument.
Introduction to BP Debate
Premier Advanced Premier Junior Advanced Open February 2012.
ALWAYS REMEMBER Speech & Interpersonal Communication Enhancement Unit, IIUM.
DEBATE COACHING MATERIALS IFED UMY 2015 ADJUDICATION CORE TIKA DESTIRATRI SETIAWAN BIMO SATRYO WIBOWO ADOPTED FROM - Monash Association of Debaters Guide.
Adjudication Briefing AdjCore of Japan BP Table of Contents ●Basic Rule ●Role of Adjudicator ●Process of Adjudication ●Criteria of Adjudication.
Debate Pointers A debate Exhibition. Case case: set of arguments supported by evidences anatomy of a case: definition: clarifies the motion/limits debate.
FORMAT (RULES AND PROCEDURES) OMS INSIGHTS Parliamentary Debate.
DEBATING Literacy. WHAT IS A DEBATE  a debate is an argument  There is no screaming or shouting  Two sides: fore and against  Each side argues their.
COMMUNICATION SKILLS I November 26 th Today Speech practice More info on debate.
A Guide for Teachers and Schools
Quebec Student DebatingAssociation Judge’s Briefing.
Chapter Study Guide GROUP COMMUNICATION. Chapter What are the 4 steps in the problem solving process? Describe and understand the problem.
BP DEBATING: STRUCTURE & ROLE FULFILMENT Speaker’s Development, Week 2 Karolien Michiels.
Australasian Parliamentary English Debate System Johanes Leonardi T., S.Pd, M.Sc English Education Study Program Faculty of Teacher Training & Education.
Coaches’ Workshop.  W&W Format  W&W Score system  W&W Marking Standard  Selecting a Team  Training a Team  Fundamentals  Template of a Standard.
Welcome to Warwick Debating Society!. The plan for today  Short introduction to the British Parliamentary debating format  Split off into groups of.
011211js-p1 0 ADJUDICATORS GUIDELINES – OPENING NOTES NZSDC.
Quebec Student DebatingAssociation Judge’s Briefing.
Introduction to Debate Saints Conference 2015/16.
DEBATE 21 APRIL, 2015 World Schools (WSDC) Debate Format: Introduction.
1 DEBATES SPEECH ADJUDICATION Adopted by rs from NoorAlbar/English/04/09.
EJVED 09. Getting to know debating Debating is a clash of argumentations among the Government team and Opposition team Everything starts from the word.
Introduction to British Parliamentary Debate China Debate Education Network:
Debate-Public Speaking 7 th Grade Communication Arts.
debate is all about arguing between affirmative/government team and negative/opposition team upon a motion. Affirmative  support the motion Negative.
Warwick University Debating Society Sponsored by:.
QDU Adjudication Seminar Years Administration Administration Questions- Tony Scarcella If it’s urgent, call.
Presentation by Jessica Prince March 13, 2010 The Pre-competition for the 14 th FLTRP Cup National English Debating Competition 1.
Prepared by Jason Hong, David Miko and the University of Calgary Debate Society.
WHY!? Sponsored by:. Recap 4 teams of 2 people, with 2 teams in favour of each side 4 teams of 2 people, with 2 teams in favour of each side 15 minutes.
Welcome to Debating  Introduction  2008 changes  Speaker roles  Types of debates  Coaching tips  Draw announcement for the Senior Competition.
 The Affirmative team states its position agreeing with the resolution. The United States should continue space exploration as it...
British Parliamentary Debating Course Presented for CPUT by Piet Olivier.
Technical Meeting SADEWA 9. Competition Rule Elimination R1 R2 R3 19 Maret 2 April 16 April 23 April Preliminary Top 4 Rank 1 VS Rank 4 Rank 2 VS Rank.
World Schools Debate: an Introduction
Debating A ‘How To…’ Guide
DEBATE SEMINAR: JOVED SURABAYA 2016
World schools debate championships 3 vs 3 format
DINAS PENDIDIKAN KAB. SUKABUMI 2012
Debate & Adjudication Briefing
Legal Debates ICM Sarajevo
Public Forum Debate.
Debating Skills
Basic Debating Skills.
Quebec Student Debating Association Judge’s Briefing.
Introduction to British Parliamentary Debating Rachmat Nurcahyo,M. A
HI LANGUAGE INSIDE TOURNAMENT 2016
Roles In Debating Week 2.
NUDC KOPERTIS BOBY-ANGGI-OMAR
Quebec Student Debating Association Judge’s Briefing.
Debating Seminar Universitas Mataram
Científico Gabriel Ciscar, nº 1
Technical Meeting English Debate Competition Mechanical Language Club
Presented by : PEPI FIDIA
Científico Gabriel Ciscar, nº 1
National University Debating Championship Kopertis IV 2019
The British Parliamentary Debate Format
National University Debating Championship LLDIKTI XII 2019
Presentation transcript:

TECHNICAL MEETING ENGLISH DEBATE COMPETITION Tema: “Membidik Peluang MEA dengan Sains dan Bahasa “ Pekan Edukasi 1

Scoring : Matter(1-40) Time effectivity 1-10  1-7 Very Bad1-4 > 2 minutes more or less  8-15 Bad minute(s) more or less  Average9-10 on time  Good  Very Good  Method 1-30Manner 1-20  1-5 Very Bad1-3 Very Bad  6-9 Bad4-6 Bad  Average7-11 Average  Good12-17 Good  Very Good18-20 Very Good

 There are 2 teams: 1.Government- proposes and defends the motion. 2.Opposition- refuse and negates the motion.  Each team consist of 3 members  POI is allowed ASIAN PARLIAMENTARY STYLE

DEBATE FORMAT Case Building time: 20 minutes 1 st, 2 nd and 3 rd Speaker : 7 minutes and 20 seconds Reply Speaker: 4 minutes and 20 seconds POIs are allowed between 1 st and 6 th minute. Only 1 st and 2 nd speakers are allowed to reply speaker Motion will be given a week before the debate held

DEBATE FORMAT

1 st speaker role Affirmative  Defining the motion of the debate.  Contextualize the debate  Presenting the affirmative’s stance.  Delivering substantial arguments.  Providing a brief summary/recap of the speech Negative  Presenting the negative’s stance  Rebutting the 1 st affirmative speaker.  Outlining the negative’s team split.  Delivering the substantial argument.  Providing a brief summary/recap of the speech.

2 nd speaker role affirmative  Rebutting the 1 st negative’s major arguments  Restating the affirmative’s team case briefly.  Delivering his substantial argument.  Providing a brief summary. negative  Rebutting the 2 nd affirmative speaker.  Restating the negative's team case briefly.  Delivering his substantial arguments.  Providing a brief summary.

Affirmative  Mapping  Rebutting the points raised by the first two negative speakers.  Rebuilding the team’s case.  Summarizing the issues of the debate  Mapping  Rebutting the points raised by all three affirmative speakers.  Rebuilding team’s case.  Summarizing the issue of the debate Negative

REPLY SPEAKER  Providing the summary or the overview of the debate.  Identifying the issues raised by both sides.  Providing a bias adjudication of the debate.

MOTION DEBATE  1. THBT an integrated curremcy in AEC will contribute in succeeding AEC.  2. THW make English as an official language im AEC  3. THW standardize science curriculum in ASEAN countries.  4. THW make it compulsory for students to learn ASEAN countries’ language in school  5. THBT AEC will not contribute significantly in developing science in ASEAN countries  6. THW educate parents about AEC

MOTION DEBATE  7. Science and Engineering students should study in college for a minimum of 5 years.  8. THW make English as a main language since Junior High School  9. THW allocate a spesific budget for research development in ASEAN  10. ASOSTyN doesn’t contribute in improving research competency in college students and therefore should be disbanded.

BAGAN KOMPETISI B C D E

Keterangan :  A : Wisemen  B : Stratment  C : Jangan Tepuk Tangan  D : Triple A  E : Innamal A’malu binniyat