1 Demystifying Environmental and Historic Preservation (EHP) Compliance EHP Compliance.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MONITORING OF SUBGRANTEES
Advertisements

The Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs HOME Program Environmental Review Procedures OCC – Chapter 6.
The Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs HOME Program Environmental Review Procedures HBA – Chapter 6.
Site Characterization Instructional Goal: Upon completion of this topic the participant will better understand the need to identify and evaluate various.
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES FIRE DEPARTMENT FORESTRY DIVISION (323)
The Lifecycle of Grants: Environmental Review November 7, 2012.
Environmental Scoping Guidance Jerry Vogt Region Environmental Coordinator ODOT – Region 3.
Environmental Project Commitments The Alberta Experience
1 CDBG and Environmental Review For Grant Administrators.
National Environmental Policy Act of Establishes protection of the environment as a national priority Mandates that environmental impacts be considered.
NEPA Environmental Procedure Pam Truitt, Grants Management Consultant  September 4, 2014.
A Brief Overview of Emergency Management Office of Emergency Management April 2006 Prepared By: The Spartanburg County Office of Emergency Management.
HUD Environmental Review Requirements November 30,2010.
CSBG Policy and Procedures A Multi-Faceted and Useful Tool.
1 WELCOME MAP “TUNE-UP” WORKSHOP September 19-20, 2007.
Section 106 Clearance Application Missouri Local Programs How to Complete the Application for Section 106 Clearance.
2009 CDBG/CHIP Recipients’ Workshop Welcome to the COMPLIANCE SESSION ENVIRONMENTAL REQUIREMENTS Afternoon session will cover new CHIP FEDERAL LABOR STANDARDS.
2011 CDBG Recipients’ Workshop COMPLIANCE 9:30EnvironmentalRick 10:30BREAK 10:45Wage Rate ProvisionsMary Alice 11:00Uniform Acquisition Robert 11:15Conflict.
Presented to: Association of California Airports By: Peter F. Ciesla, Environmental Protection Specialist Date: September 21, 2006 Federal Aviation Administration.
FEMA’s EHP Review It is FEMA’s policy to integrate environmental and historic preservation considerations into its emergency preparedness, hazard mitigation,
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Ecological Services Utah Field Office.
Introduction to the State-Level Mitigation 20/20 TM Software for Management of State-Level Hazard Mitigation Planning and Programming A software program.
1 FTA Grant Process & Technical Assistance Federal Transit Administration November 2007.
Federal Emergency Management Agency Public Assistance Grant Program.
Module 15 Environmental Considerations Civil Works Orientation Course - FY 11.
Our mission ead and execute environmental programs and provide expertise that enables Army training, operations, acquisition and sustainable military communities.
1 Environmental Planning and Historic Preservation (EHP) Compliance Workshop EHP Compliance.
Page CDBG Recipients' Workshop Community Finance Division NEPA Environmental Procedures.
Design Phase Coordination and the Regional Environmental Coordinator’s Role.
West Texas Legislative Summit ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES Environmental Regulations Affecting Transportation Carlos Swonke Director, Environmental Affairs Division.
Bridge Building Timelines Presented by The Richland County Engineers Office Thomas E. Beck, PE, PS 77 North Mulberry Street Mansfield, Ohio Jan.
Training Module 3. What You’ll Learn In This Module Conservation Districts’ State and Federal partners Districts’ non-profit partners Other organizations.
COSCDA Workshop Renovation, Reconstruction and Renewal of Historic Properties and Neighborhoods Section 106 and Programmatic Agreements Overview.
Tier II: Module 1C CERCLA 128(a): Tribal Response Program.
Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act ____________________ Review and Compliance for CDBG/CHIP Program Projects.
1 US Fish and Wildlife Service Hurricane Preparedness Your agency’s data products that would be useful for hurricane preparedness and response * Federal.
State Permitting Issues for Wind Developments Southeast and Mid-Atlantic Regional Wind Summit 19 September 2005 Jennifer A. DeCesaro Energy Policy Specialist.
1 Environmental Planning and Historic Preservation (EHP) Compliance (p ) EHP Compliance.
Positive Train Control Infrastructure: Section 106 Review Process under the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation’s May 2014 Program Comment For More.
SAFETEA-LU Section 6002 “ Efficient Environmental Reviews for Project Decisionmaking”
NEPA Environmental Procedure Pam Truitt, Grants Specialist  September 10, 2015.
OFFICE OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT Karl Morgan JUNE 2013 Karl Morgan JUNE 2013.
1 CEQA and CEQA-Plus Presented by Cookie Hirn, Lisa Lee, and Michelle Jones Regional Programs Unit July 2008.
1 Environmental Planning and Historic Preservation (EHP) Compliance (p ) EHP Compliance.
Environmental Review Process for Responsible Entities 24 CFR Part 58 NEIGHBORHOOD STABILIZATION PROGRAM.
Recreational Trails Program Federal Requirements.
1 Implementing the Concepts Environment Pre-Conference Workshop TRB MPOs Present and Future Conference August 27, 2006 Michael Culp FHWA Office of Project.
Slide 1April 8, 2015, Financial Assistance Council Meeting.
Locally Administered Federal-Aid Project Initiation Workshop Prospectus Part 3 and NEPA Requirements Presenter: Howard Postovit; ODOT Region 5 Region Environmental.
1 CDBG and Environmental Review For Local Officials.
Erv Gasser Natural Resource Specialist nps Baer Field Manager National Interagency BAER Team Leader - North team National Park Service, Seattle, Wa BAER.
Department of Natural Resources Historic Preservation Division 1 Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act Review and Compliance for CDBG/CHIP.
NRC Environmental Reviews for Uranium Recovery Applicants and Licensees James Park (301)
Categorical Exclusion Training Class
Island County Planning and Community Development Permitting 101.
Federal Environmental Requirements for Local Agency Transportation Projects Tom Holstein, , Donna Meyer, ,
Federal Aviation Administration ARP SOP No SOP for CATEX Determinations Effective Date: Oct. 01, 2014 February 2016.
Lecturer: Lina Vladimirovna Zhornyak, associated professor.
Environmental Site Assessments Hazardous Materials/ Regulated Substances Categorical Exclusion Training Class.
Railroad Towers ISSUES AND UPDATES FOR TOWERS PROPOSED IN RAILROAD RIGHTS OF WAY.
Subgrantee Compliance February 27, 2013 Preparing TPPS Subgrantees for Monitoring Shelby County Grants Office presents:
FCC’s NEPA Process Overview of NEPA Overview of NEPA Overview of FCC’s NEPA rules and procedures Overview of FCC’s NEPA rules and procedures Nuts and bolts.
PAC Meeting July 2, Agenda  Introductions and thanks  Project to date  Next steps  Questions.
CDBG Disaster Recovery Overview U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Migratory Bird Program Conserving America’s Birds Addressing Migratory Birds in NEPA Migratory Bird Conservation for Federal.
ACA Conference - September 2017
Role of FEMA EHP During Response Activities
Cultural Resources Categorical Exclusion Training Class – Presented by the Office of Environmental Services.
The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
Jess Neuner Esri Corporate Template-Dark v3.3
Presentation transcript:

1 Demystifying Environmental and Historic Preservation (EHP) Compliance EHP Compliance

Agenda Why EHP Reviews Are Required Pete Lara / State Administrative Agency / Grant Coordinator Kevin Jaynes / DHS–Region VI / Regional Environmental Officer How to Submit an EHP Packet Ana-Jo Mounce / State Administrative Agency / Grant Coordinator Questions 2

WHY EHP REVIEWS ARE REQUIRED 3

4  All projects funded with Federal grant dollars must comply with EHP laws, regulations, and Executive Orders  Projects must be EHP approved before initiated  FEMA may be required to consult with State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO), the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS), etc. EHP Compliance Before We Begin…

WHEN Do I Need EHP Approval for a Project? 5

Typical Projects Requiring EHP:  Generators  Repeaters  Antennas  Base Stations  Cameras  Access Readers  Cabling  Satellite Equipment 6  New Construction  Concrete Pads  Communications Towers  Roads  Bridges  Exercises – When not at specialized facilities

7 EHP Laws and Executive Orders NEPA National Historic Preservation Act Endangered Species Act Resource Conservation & Recovery Act Clean Water Act Coastal Zone Management Act Coastal Barrier Resources Act Clean Air Act Executive Orders: Environmental Justice Floodplains Wetlands EHP Compliance

8 What are EHP Considerations?  Endangered Species  Cultural Resources Historic properties Archaeological sites  Air and Water Quality  Noise  Fish, Habitat & Wildlife  Floodplains  Wetlands  Coastal Zones  Agricultural Lands  Environmental Justice  Socioeconomic Resources  Land Use  Hazardous Materials  Traffic  Geology ( Topography, Soils) EHP Compliance

9 Importance of Compliance Compliance Non-Compliance  Protection of natural and cultural resources  Improved project planning  Cost efficient  Programmatic and financial compliance  Efficient project implementation  Improved community relations  Project delays  De-obligation of funding = $0 goes to Sub-grantee  Negative publicity  Civil penalties  Lawsuits EHP Compliance

SAA Notifies the Subrecipient GPD Approves/Denies Project & Sends Notification to the SAA 10 Subrecipient Completes EHP Submission Packet SAA Reviews the EHP Packet SAA Submits the Packet to GPD GPD Returns to SAA for Corrections or Additional Information SAA Returns to Subrecipient for Corrections or Additional Information GPD Submits to SHPO for Review EHP Submission Process How It Flows…

11 Roles and Responsibilities  Sub-grantees - Responsible for EHP compliance - Submittal of EHP review packet to SAA after gathering information, photos and maps. NOTE: Grant funds may be used for preparation of EHP documentation  Grantee (SAA) - Responsible for EHP compliance - Review Sub-grantee Packet - Submit packet to GPD-EHP Team - Serve as the official Liaison More Information, if necessary Submit “status check” inquiries Notify Sub-grantee of FEMA project approval EHP Compliance

12 Roles and Responsibilities – cont.  Grants Program Directorate (GPD) – FEMA/EHP Team - Approval of projects with no potential for environmental and/or historic preservation impacts if certain conditions apply (Type A and Type B)  Regional Environmental Officer (REO) - Review and approval of project with potential for environmental and/or historic preservation impacts (Type C) - Responsible for State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) consultation, with the assistance if necessary from GPD - Liaison with grantees and GPD EHP Compliance

13 Type A Projects Projects with no potential for environmental and/or historic preservation impacts - Planning - Classroom-based training and exercises - Field-based training at existing facilities with established procedures - Personnel - Mobile and portable equipment (PPE, radios, etc.), vehicles, and other equipment that does not require any installation EHP Compliance

14 Type B Projects Projects with no potential for environmental and/or historic preservation impacts if certain conditions apply Examples include: - Physical security enhancements - Equipment installation (structures less than 50 yrs old) Typical questions: - Does the project involve new ground disturbance or clearance of vegetation? - Does project utilize existing infrastructure? - Will work occur in the vicinity of historic properties? - Will work occur in or near water? EHP Compliance

15 Type C Projects Projects that may have the potential for historic and/or environmental preservation impacts - Additional analysis and documentation may be required to adequately address the impacts in compliance with applicable EHP laws and regulations EHP Compliance - Environmental Assessments (EAs), Biological Assessments (BAs), or Memoranda of Agreement (MOAs) may be required - Public involvement may be required

16 Type C Example: Modification of Buildings & Structures 50 + Years Old  Equipment installation on/in/or in the vicinity of historic buildings, piers, bridges, etc.  Building renovations and/or hardening  Examples: - Gates - Bollards - Access Control Systems - Security Cameras EHP Compliance

HOW TO SUBMIT AN EHP REVIEW PACKET 17

18  Subject matter experts review submissions to determine if the project will have an historical or environmental impact  Complex projects will typically require more information and more time to reach a determination  Sub-grantees are responsible for providing all relevant EHP materials to the SAA for submission to GPD EHP Compliance Before We Begin…

19 EHP Review Packet A properly completed EHP review packet will provide the necessary information to expedite the EHP review. Always Required:  Screening Form  Photographs Sometimes Required:  Maps EHP Compliance

Screening Form - Project Information 20

21 The DHS Grant Award Number can be found on your Sub Recipient Award (SRA) or a Grant Adjustment Notice (GAN)

Screening Form - Project Type 22 Enter additional information where indicated

Screening Form - Project Description 23 The project description should contain a brief summary of WHAT specific action is proposed, WHERE it is proposed, and HOW it will be implemented.

Screening Form – Project Description Samples 24

Screening Form – Project Type Sample 25

Screening Form – Project Type Sample 26

Screening Form –Resource Impacts 27

Screening Form – Other Information 28 Double Click on Box or Entry Fields to Open Window

Screening Form – Migratory Birds 29

Photographs & Graphics – Best Practices  Photographs and other Graphics should show the installation location and context  Copy the image, and paste it into Microsoft Paint, Microsoft Power Point, or graphics software  Using the tools such as line drawing and fill colors, label exactly where project features will take place  Cut and paste completed drawing into Word document and include explanatory text 30

31 Photographs & Graphics - Aerial

32

Photographs & Graphics – Aerial 33

Photographs & Graphics – Ground Level 34

Photographs & Graphics – Ground Level 35

Photographs & Graphics – Installation Labels 36

Photographs & Graphics – Installation Labels 37

Photographs & Graphics – Installation Labels 38

Photographs & Graphics – Installation Labels 39

Photographs & Graphics – Installation Labels 40

Photographs & Graphics – Installation Labels 41

Photographs & Graphics – Installation Labels 42

Photographs & Graphics – Topographic Map 43

Photographs & Graphics – Floodplain Map 44

45 Photographs & Graphics – Floodplain Map

Photographs & Graphics – Wetlands Map 46

47 Online Mapping and Information Resources National Register of Historic Places: FEMA’s Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs): National Wetlands Inventory: USDA Soil Survey Map:

48 In Summary - Tips for a Timely EHP Review  Submit materials as soon as you receive your award notice or in your planning phase  A clear and thorough project description: What work is being proposed, where will it take place, and how will it be carried out  Properly labeled color photos and maps  Include any previous Master Plans or other environmental documentation LOOK at Authorized Equipment List (AEL) under the Responder Knowledge Base (RKB) to identify equipment that may require EHP review. EHP Compliance

49 When You Need Help… SAA GRANT COORDINATORS Pete H. Lara txdps.state.tx.us / Ana-Jo txdps.state.tx.us Bryan Hatfield txdps.state.tx.us Arturo txdps.state.tx.us Sherry txdps.state.tx.us Bill txdps.state.tx.us Kenneth txdps.state.tx.us Shane txdps.state.tx.us EHP Compliance /

Resources State Administrative Agency Website FEMA EHP Program Homepage SPARS Forms (Admin Menu) 50

Questions?