MSIP 5: SLACCA DISCUSSION JOCELYN STRAND, COORDINATOR TJ SPALTY, DIRECTOR NOVEMBER 6, 2015 Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 2015

MSIP 5 and District Performance  Comprehensive Guide to MSIP  Adjustments in Calculation of 2015 APR  APR Adjustments for 2016 and Beyond  Sample Reports  APR Results  Performance Indicators  Double Testing  Questions

Comprehensive Guide to MSIP  Revised Yearly  Latest edition released September 2015  Can be found at: 15_Comprehensive_Guide.pdf 15_Comprehensive_Guide.pdf  Provides information on all the details of the Annual Performance Report (APR) and the methods used to calculate it

Adjustments in Calculation of 2015 APR  “Hold Harmless” for New 2015 English Language Arts and Mathematics Assessments  Standard Applicable: Standards 1 & 2 – English Language Arts (ELA) and Mathematics  Updated Policy: Administrative Memo QS , dated April 29, 2015 Calculate and report 2015 assessment data for all Local Education Agencies (LEAs) across the state. Examine the “call” (points scored in a given area) for ELA and mathematics within Standards 1 and 2 If the points scored in 2014 in ELA or mathematics points are greater than in 2015, the 2014 “call” will be used  Calculation of Progress  Standard Applicable: Standards 1 & 2 – English Language Arts (ELA) and Mathematics  Updated Policy: Progress calculated for the 2015 APR using normal curve equivalents (NCEs) The use of NCEs allows for statistical comparability across assessments

Adjustments in Calculation of 2015 APR  Removal of Optional End-of-Course Assessments  Standard Applicable: Standards 1 & 2 – All content areas  Updated Policy: Administrative Memo QS , dated January 5, 2015 In calculating the 2015 APR, the Department has excluded optional End-of-Course (EOC) assessments from prior year data to allow for equitable comparison. Local Education Agencies (LEAs) will not be penalized for any Level Not Determined (LND) designation that is created by the removal of optional EOCs. LND designation will not be modified for 2015 data.  Community Eligibility Provision (CEP)  Standard Applicable: Standard 2: Subgroup Achievement  Updated Policy: Administrative Memo QS , dated January 5, 2015 While participating in CEP, the LEA’s super subgroup will be the same as the “all students” group. Missouri will continue to report both aggregated data and disaggregated subgroup data. This policy adheres to Federal guidance.

Adjustments in Calculation of 2015 APR  Census Administration of ACT ® for Grade 11 Students  Standard Applicable: Standard 3*1-3  Updated Policy: Administrative Memo QS , dated January 8, 2015 All grade 11 students who take the assessment will receive a reportable ACT ® score and at least a 0.25 student weight in Standard 3*1-3 upon graduation Will produce two reportable items: participation rate and average composite score Group of total = grade 11 students less any MAP-Alternate students and any English language learner (ELL) students in country for less than a year.

Adjustments in Calculation of 2015 APR  ACT WorkKeys ®  Standard Applicable: Standard 3*1-3  Updated Policy: Established within Administrative Memo LS , dated May 7, ACT WorkKeys ® workplace readiness assessment included in Standard 3*1-3 Two years of prior ACT WorkKeys ® data will be included in the calculation of the 2015 APR. Scores at the Platinum level will receive a 1.25 student weight within Standard 3*1-3.

Adjustments in Calculation of 2015 APR  Dual Credit in Summer School  Standard Applicable: Standard 3*4  Updated Policy: Established within Administrative Memo QS , dated January 12, 2015 Dual credit offered within the summer school term will be utilized in the APR calculation.  Definition of Placement  Standard Applicable: Standard 3*5-6  Updated Policy: Established within Administrative Memo QS , dated January 12, 2015 Expanded definition of placement LEAs will continue to report “Related” and “Not Related” placement for Perkins purposes Both populations will be used for Standard 3*5-6 for placement purposes

APR Adjustments for 2016 and Beyond  Expansion of Career and Technical Education  Standard Applicable: Standard 3*4  Updated Policy: Established within Administrative Memo QS , dated January 12, 2015 In the 2016 APR, a Local Education Agency (LEA) may receive two points toward the ten points possible in Standard 3*4 Must create and entering into a partnership with stakeholders to develop a pathway for students to accomplish each of the following: 1. Enroll in a program of career and technical education while in high school; 2. Participate and complete an internship or apprenticeship during their final year of high school; 3. Obtain the industry certification or credentials applicable to their program or career and technical education and internship or apprenticeship.

2015 Annual Performance Report 10  Published under Guided Inquiry – Accountability MSIP5 Annual Performance Report (APR)

APR – Summary Report – Page 1 11

APR – Summary Report – Page 2 12

APR – Supporting Report – Hold Harmless 13

APR – Supporting Report – Academic Achievement 14

Annual Performance Reports - Status Status Levels APR StatusCountPercentCountPercentCountPercent Unaccredited Range40.8%4 1.02% Provisionally Accredited Range244.6%122.3%71.3% Accredited Range %50597% % Total521

Annual Performance Reports - Charter Status Levels APR StatusCountPercentCountPercentCountPercent <50%827.6%515.2%514.7% =50 <60%310.3%39.1%38.8% =60 to <70%26.9%26.1%720.6% =70 to <80%620.7%927.3%411.8% =80 to <90%517.2%1030.3%617.6% =90 to <100%310.3%39.1%926.5% =100%26.9%13.0%00.0%

Performance Indicators  Performance indicator flags are utilized to identify areas in need of improvement and to guide the school improvement planning.  School-level percent proficient values within each combination are ranked, and the 10th and 90th percentiles are flagged.  Performance indicators are calculated for each subgroup— e.g., White, Black, Hispanic, Multiracial, Asian, American Indian, ELL, FRL and students with disabilities and grade level for each subject area.

Performance Indicators MCDS Portal: Accountability -> Guided Inquiry -> MSIP5 Annual Performance Report (APR)

Performance Indicators

Double Testing  MSIP 5 policy does not grant repeated credit for students who have tested within the Proficient/Advanced range on a repeated assessment.  In the calculation of the 2015 APR, students that scored a repeated achievement level of Proficient/Advanced were not removed.  The Department discovered this error after the corrections window and will not amend the posted scores.  These scores will be corrected within prior year data for the 2016 APR, which may lead to slight changes in MPI for select districts.  The Department will share data detailing any corrections made.

For Assistance Contact:  Office of Quality Schools – School Improvement  Jocelyn Strand, Coordinator  TJ Spalty, Director  Cathi Rust, Supervisor

Area Supervisors RegionNamePhone Number AMaureen Clancy-May ATim Ricker BWalt Brown BTony Stansberry CRon Wilken DJay Reese EKen Jackson FShelly Aubuchon GMike Wutke HNancy Greeley IJill Janes

Questions 23 The Department of Elementary and Secondary Education does not discriminate on the basis of race, color, religion, gender, national origin, age, or disability in its programs and activities. Inquiries related to Department programs and to the location of services, activities, and facilities that are accessible by persons with disabilities may be directed to the Jefferson State Office Building, Office of the General Counsel, Coordinator – Civil Rights Compliance (Title VI/Title IX/504/ADA/Age Act), 6th Floor, 205 Jefferson Street, P.O. Box 480, Jefferson City, MO ; telephone number or TTY ;