GST 113: LOGIC, PHILOSOPHY AND HUMAN EXISTECE

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Basic Terms in Logic Michael Jhon M. Tamayao.
Advertisements

Formal Criteria for Evaluating Arguments
Four Rules of Aristotelian Logic 1. Rule of Identity: A is A 2. Rule of Non-Contradiction: A is not (-A) 3. Rule of Excluded Middle: Either A or (-A)
What is Social Theory?. Theory Harrington 2005: 1-3 Greek word theōria, opp. of praxis contemplation / reflection Reflection on the value and meaning.
November 4, October 24, G.E. Moore Distinguished English philosopher educated at Dulwich College in London and went on to study & teach at.
Philosophy 103 Linguistics 103 Introductory Logic: Critical Thinking Fall 2007 Dr. Robert Barnard.
Husserl I. The Realm of Ideas Philosophy 157 ©2002, G. J. Mattey.
BUS 290: Critical Thinking for Managers
Philosophy 103 Linguistics 103 Yet, still, Even further More and yet more, etc., ad infinitum, Introductory Logic: Critical Thinking Dr. Robert Barnard.
Intro to Logic: the tools of the trade You need to be able to: Recognize an argument when you see one (in media, articles, people’s claims). Organize arguments.
Philosophy 120 Symbolic Logic I H. Hamner Hill CSTL-CLA.SEMO.EDU/HHILL/PL120.
INTRODUCTION TO CRITICAL THINKING. “There are multiple decisions which you have to make entirely by yourself. You can’t lean on anybody else. And a good.
A Brief History of Artificial Intelligence
HISTORY OF LOGIC BY JOHN NAGUIB. What is Logic? The science or study of how to evaluate arguments and reasoning. “Logic is new and necessary reasoning”
Yusuf Ali Aleks Iricanin Jonathan Odjo Essential question: How does induction impact what you believe in or your own personal beliefs?
Philosophy of Science Psychology is the science of behavior. Science is the study of alternative explanations. We need to understand the concept of an.
Lecture 6 1. Mental gymnastics to prepare to tackle Hume 2. The Problem of Induction as Hume argues for it 1. His question 2. His possible solutions 3.
The Problem of Knowledge. What new information would cause you to be less certain? So when we say “I’m certain that…” what are we saying? 3 things you.
The Arithmetic of Reasoning: Logic and Boolean Algebra -Jeff Johnson -Mike Grassel.
Deductive reasoning.
Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.
LOGIC AND CRITICAL THINKING Jonathan Dolhenty, Ph.D. Logic and Critical Thinking. Available at
The ubiquity of logic One common example of reasoning  If I take an umbrella, I can prevent getting wet by rain  I don’t want to get myself wet by rain.
Causality, Reasoning in Research, and Why Science is Hard
Class 36: Proofs about Unprovability David Evans University of Virginia cs1120.
Learning to Think Critically pages Objectives Define thinking & reflection Identify 3 functions of the brain Describe how thinking impacts decision.
{ PHILOSOPHY Lesson 3 -The divisions of Philosophy A little Logic Part 1.
KNOWLEDGE What is it? How does it differ from belief? What is the relationship between knowledge and truth? These are the concerns of epistemology How.
Logic in Computer Science - Overview Sep 1, 2011 POSTECH 박성우.
0 Validity & Invalidity (Exercises) December 23, 2005.
The Science of Good Reasons
Logic in Everyday Life.
Reasoning and Critical Thinking Validity and Soundness 1.
Logic. What is logic? Logic (from the Ancient Greek: λογική, logike) is the use and study of valid reasoning. The study of logic features most prominently.
Class Two: Sept. 13, 2011 “The First Metaphysicians”
Ways of Knowing: Reason Reason. Cogito ergo sum Reasoning Deductive Inductive.
READING #4 “DEDUCTIVE ARGUMENTS” By Robert FitzGibbons from Making educational decisions: an introduction to Philosophy of Education (New York & London:
0 Validity & Invalidity (Exercises) All dogs have two heads. 2. All tigers are dogs. ___________________________________ 3. All tigers have two.
RECOGNIZING, ANALYZING, AND CONSTRUCTING ARGUMENTS
The construction of a formal argument
Ethics 160 Moral Arguments. Reasons and Arguments Different claims have different uses in our language. Sometimes, a claim or claims are used as a reason.
The Ontological Argument for the Existence of God August 15, 2015 George Cronk, J.D., Ph.D. Professor of Philosophy & Religion Bergen Community College.
NOTE: To change the image on this slide, select the picture and delete it. Then click the Pictures icon in the placeholder to insert your own image. FOUNDATIONS.
Philosophy and Logic The Process of Correct Reasoning.
INTRODUCTION TO CRITICAL THINKING CRITICAL THINKING Definitions History of Critical Thinking (CT) Universal Standards Fallacies.
Higher / Int.2 Philosophy 12. Our Learning  Fallacy Reminder  Summary following Homework NAB  Class NAB.
PHILOSOPHY OF LANGUAGE Some topics and historical issues of the 20 th century.
Branches of Philosophy Areas of Interest & Specialization.
Chapter III Evaluating Arguments. Nondeductive Arguments Most common kinds of arguments Successful arguments are a matter of degree. Deal with likelihood.
Introductory Class. Course code/course title GST 113 LOGIC, PHILOSOPHY AND HUMAN EXISTENCE.
THE NATURE OF ARGUMENT. THE MAIN CONCERN OF LOGIC Basically in logic we deal with ARGUMENTS. Mainly we deal with learning of the principles with which.
What is Philosophy?.
INTRODUCTION TO CRITICAL THINKING
IE 102 Lecture 6 Critical Thinking.
Deductive reasoning.
INTRODUCTION TO CRITICAL THINKING
Win Every Argument Every Time
Chapter 3 Philosophy: Questions and theories
Philosophy Logic Lesson 1.
Introduction to Logic PHIL 240 Sections
Reasoning about Reasoning
Philosophy 1100 Class #8 Title: Critical Reasoning
Logic, Philosophical Tools Quiz Review…20 minutes 10/31
1 A The Cosmological Argument Kalam Argument
Philosophy 1100 Title: Critical Reasoning Instructor: Paul Dickey
Definitions: Evidence-Based Claims- 1.) the ability to take detailed
Intermediate Level Conditionals.
THE LAWS OF LOGIC Let’s be reasonable!.
ID1050– Quantitative & Qualitative Reasoning
Evaluating Deductive Arguments
Presentation transcript:

GST 113: LOGIC, PHILOSOPHY AND HUMAN EXISTECE WHAT IS LOGIC?

LESSON OBJECTIVES For this class our focus shall be on four things 1. To introduce the student to what logic is 2. Trace a brief history of logic as a branch of philosophy 3. Discuss the importance of logic to philosophy, other academic disciplines, and to life generally. 4. Discuss the Three Laws of Thought.

ETYMOLOGY OF THE WORD LOGIC Etymology has to do with tracing the origin of a word. Etymology deals with tracing the historical development of a word. Logic is from the Greek word- logike Logic is from the Latin word- logica From the etymological definition logic refers to the art of reasoning

Logic as a BRANCH of Philosophy Although there are many ways in which one can use the word, logic, we are concerned, in this course, with the employment of logic in the technical sense In the technical sense, logic is a branch of philosophy As a branch of philosophy it is dedicated to the study of correct reasoning It is the study of valid inference

What a training in Logic equips one with A training in logic equips one with skill for evaluating arguments One is able to separate good arguments from bad arguments; separate valid arguments from invalid arguments, deductive arguments from inductive arguments; and sound arguments from unsound arguments. One is able to detect faults in reasoning/arguments

TWO IMPORTANT THINGS ONE IS ABLE TO DO BETTER WITH THE STUDY OF LOGIC There is no doubt that people who have never studied logic are able to do some things that those who have studied logic do. However, a training in logic equips one with the necessary skill and better enhances the ability to do better certain things with greater accuracy. There are mainly two things one is able to do well with the study of logic 1. the evaluation of the arguments of others 2. the construction of good arguments of one’s own ( a good argument will be one without flaws i.e. a argument without fallacies)

OBJECT OF STUDY OF LOGIC The object of study in logic is ARGUMENT What we do in logic is to analyse arguments The analysis of arguments essentially has to do with the SEPARATION OF GOOD ARGUMENTS FROM BAD ARGUMENTS

What the ANALYSIS of arguments entails When we analyse arguments, one may be doing one of the following 1. Separating an argument from other pieces of writing e.g., explanations, questions, narration, etc. 2. identifying the type of argument one is encountering 3. separating an argument into premises and conclusion 4. identify whether a fallacy has been committed in an argument or not

Brief History of Logic The first philosopher that started off logic is ARISTOTLE. It was he that developed systematically and codified the criteria for analysing and evaluating arguments. Aristotle’s principal contributions are in the areas of syllogistic logic modal logic the classification of some informal fallacies.

Other contributors to logic Others who have made significant contribution in one way or the other include: Chrysippus, Peter Abelard, Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz, Bernard Bolzano, Augustus De Morgan, George Boole, William Stanley Jevons, John Venn, Charles Sanders Peirce, Emile Post, Ludwig Wittgenstein, Bertrand Russell

IMPORTANCE OF LOGIC (TO THE PHILOSOPHER) Philosophy is an academic discipline in which the evaluation and advancement of arguments are important tasks for philosophers. 1. The study of logic helps philosophers to put up good arguments 2. The study of logic enables the philosopher to be able to evaluate other peoples’ arguments and pinpoint holes in them

IMPORTANCE OF LOGIC TO OTHER DISCIPLINES Logic is of great importance to disciplines like Law, Intelligence and Security Studies, Computer Science, and Mathematics The first way in which logic is of importance to other academic discipline is that all academic discipline deals with evaluation of arguments of others. As such competence in logic sharpens the acumen of professionals in engaging other people’s ideas. Lawyers need to be able to evaluate the argument of other lawyers in court and pick loopholes In Intelligence and security studies, one needs to be trained in a way that one will have to be able to see through the positions of suspects

THE IMPORTANCE OF LOGIC TO LIFE GENERALLY We encounter arguments everyday in dealing with friends, politicians, business organisations. Logic enables one to be able to separate psychologically persuasive arguments from rational arguments based on facts. A training in logic is able to ensure the development of a MORE CRITICAL MIND in the analysis of events and arguments encountered on daily basis. One then begins to question things read, watched, and listened to as one begins to separate psychologically persuasive points of views from arguments with merits.

There are three laws of thought. They are: 1. The Law of Identity THE LAWS OF THOUGHT There are three laws of thought. They are: 1. The Law of Identity 2. The Law of (Non)contradiction 3. The Excluded Middle

The Law of Identity (P ⊃ P) This law holds that if any statement is true then it is true. EXAMPLE “it is raining.” The Law of Identity stipulates that this statement is identical to itself such that the truth of the statement is not altered if one says “it is raining then it is raining.” Logical form is P ⊃ P

The Law of (Non)Contradiction This law holds that “No statement can be both true and false at the time.” Take for example the statement “it is raining.” If in actual fact this statement is true then one would be contradicting oneself if one holds, at the same time, that “it is not raining” is a true statement as well. Thus, one must not contradict oneself by affirming a proposition and denying the same proposition at the same time. Thus, this law is saying “every statement of the form ‘P.~P’ is self-contradictory.”

The Law of Excluded Middle This law asserts that “any statement is either true or false.” There is no middle ground. The statement: “it is raining” is either true or false. It is true if in actual fact it is raining. It is false if, when the claim is made, it is actually not raining. There is no third option The logical form is ‘PvP’