Brinley Franklin Vice Provost University of Connecticut Libraries.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Reading Rodski: User Surveys Revisited The 25 th IATUL Annual Conference Krakow 2004 Dr. Grace Saw University of Queensland Cybrary Brisbane, Australia.

Advertisements

Measuring the Impact of Networked Electronic Resources: Developing an Assessment Infrastructure for Libraries, State, and Other Types of Consortia Presented.

Global Developments in Assessment: LibQUAL+ ® and Beyond… 6th International JISC/CNI Conference York, U.K. July 6-7, 2006 Duane Webster Executive Director.

Bound for Disappointment Faculty and Journals at Research Institutions Jim Self University of Virginia Library USA 7 th Northumbria Conference Spier, South.

Brinley Franklin Vice Provost, University of Connecticut Libraries MINES for Libraries Measuring the Impact of Networked Electronic Services (MINES): The.

Nancy Turner Syracuse University Library ARL Survey Coordinators and SPEC Liaisons January 19, 2007 E-Metrics Services and ARL Statistics.

Ontario University Library Consortia Activity Ontario University Library Consortia Activity Gwendolyn Ebbett Dean of the Library University of Windsor.

Toulouse School of Graduate Studies Theses and Dissertations ETDs - Why We Do them –We at UNT believe that electronic theses and dissertations enhance.

Two Decades of User Surveys The Experience of Two Research Libraries from 1992 to 2011 Jim Self, University of Virginia Steve Hiller, University of Washington.

LibQUAL+ Process Overview Introduction to LibQUAL+ Workshop University of Westminster, London 21st January 2008 Selena Killick Association of Research.

Health Center Library Overview Evelyn Morgen, Director March 2007.

Academic Research Library Support of Sponsored Research in the United States Brinley Franklin Vice Provost University of Connecticut Libraries Qualitative.

Measuring the Impact of Networked Electronic Services: Developing Assessment Infrastructure for Libraries, State, and Other Types of Consortia Presented.

The ARL E-Metrics Project Measures for Electronic Resources ACRL/NEC Information Technology Interest Group May 17, 2002 Brinley Franklin Director, University.

Technical Implementation of the MINES Survey Methodology ACRL 2005 Minneapolis, MN April 7, 2005 Terry Plum Assistant Dean, Simmons GSLIS Association of.

LibQUAL + ™ Data Summary An overview of the results of the LibQUAL+™ 2003 survey with comparisons to the 2001 survey.

LibQUAL Tales from Past Participants Vanderbilt University Library Flo Wilson, Deputy University Librarian

of Research Libraries Assessing Library Performance: New Measures, Methods, and Models 24 th IATUL Conference 2-5 June 2003 Ankara,

Circulation Myth Busters! A very special and informative presentation about Circulation by: Julie Leuzinger Willis Library Monday, December 3, 2007.

Library Assessment in North America Stephanie Wright, University of Washington Lynda S. White, University of Virginia American Library Association Mid-Winter.

TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY LibQUAL+ ® Training Practical Lessons Drawn From Ten Years of Library Service Quality in a Research Library ALA Boston Midwinter 2010.

Getting Staff Involved in Assessment at the University of Connecticut Libraries Brinley Franklin 17 August 2009.

Martha Kyrillidou Brinley Franklin Terry Plum MINES for Libraries TM ASSOCIATION OF RESEARCH LIBRARIES Assessing the Value of Networked Electronic Services:

Data Summary July 27, Dealing with Perceptions! Used to quantifiable quality (collection size, # of journals, etc.) Survey of opinions or perceptions.

ACRL: Outcome Assessment Tools for the Library of the Future: MINES at OCUL Association of College and Research Libraries ACRL Conference 2005 Minneapolis.

Demonstrating Value and Creating Value: Evidence-Based Library Management through MINES for Libraries™

Old.libqual.org What will ARL do for you? What will you do? January 2005 Shrivenham, UK.

Testing the LibQUAL+ Survey Instrument James Shedlock, AMLS, Dir. Linda Walton, MLS, Assoc. Dir. Galter Health Sciences Library Northwestern University.

TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY Practical Lessons Drawn From Ten Years of Library Service Quality in a Research Library 17 th Hellenic Conference of Greek Academic.

January 17, 2005 Brinley Franklin Vice Provost, University Libraries University of Connecticut Libraries LibQual+™ Management Information.

LIBQUAL+ and Library Summit: The Clemson Experience.

Using LibQUAL+™ Results Observations from ARL Program “Making Library Assessment Work” Steve Hiller University of Washington Libraries ARL Visiting Program.

Web-Based Usage Surveys MINES for Libraries TM Brinley Franklin University of Connecticut Terry Plum Simmons GSLIS

Single Copy Task Group TRLN Zari Kamarei University of North Carolina At Chapel Hill June 4, :30 PAM-Wide RT.

Dana Thomas, Ontario Council of University Libraries Alan Darnell, Ontario Council of University Libraries Understanding Use of Networked Information Content:

ARL Statistics and Measurement Program Effective, Sustainable and Practical Assessment Martha Kyrillidou Director, ARL Statistics and Service Quality Programs.

Assessing the Scholars Portal Melody Burton, Queen’s University Toni Olshen, York University Ontario Library Association Superconference February 3, 2005.

LibQUAL 2005 at London South Bank. Peter Godwin London South Bank University 2 February 2006.

TM Project web site: Presented by: Colleen Cook Bruce Thompson ALA Mid-Winter January, 2006 “ 22 Items and a Box ” Qualitative.

LibQUAL+ ® Survey Administration American Library Association Midwinter Meeting Denver, CO January 26, 2009 Presented by: MaShana Davis Technical Communications.

LibQUAL+™ Process Management: Using the Web as a Management Tool Amy Hoseth Massachusetts LSTA Orientation Meeting Boston, MA October 21, 2005 old.libqual.org.

Brinley Franklin Vice Provost University of Connecticut Libraries.

Toward Meaningful Academic Library Ratio Analysis Brinley Franklin Stellenbosch, South Africa 15 August 2007.

TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY LibQUAL+ ® Training Practical Lessons Drawn From Ten Years of Library Service Quality in a Research Library ALA Denver Midwinter 2009.

MINES for Libraries™ Presented by Martha Kyrillidou Director of the ARL Statistics and Service.

Use Measures for Electronic Resources: Theory and Practice A Librarian’s Perspective ALA / ALCTS June 27, 2005 Chicago, Illinois Brinley Franklin Vice.

Project web site: old.libqual.org LibQUAL+™ Process Management: Using the Web as a Management Tool ALA Midwinter Conference San Diego, California January.

® LibQUAL+ ® Implementation Procedures The Third Lodz [Poland] Library Conference Technical University of Lodz June, 2008 Presented by: Bruce Thompson.

MINES for Libraries™ Presented by Martha Kyrillidou Director of the ARL Statistics and Service.

Selected Findings from The UC/CMI Journal Use and User Preference Studies The University of California Collections Management Initiative (UC/CMI) Brian.

Strategic Elements of LibQUAL+ ® at LibQUAL+ and Beyond: Using Results Effectively Glasgow, Scotland 24 May, 2010 Colleen Cook, Texas A&M University.

LibQUAL 2005 at London South Bank and a Lincolnshire man in Chicago.

LibQual+ Spring 2008 results and recommendations Library Assessment Working Group 11/19/2008 Library Faculty Meeting.

Monmouth University LibQUAL Survey Results Lead to Improvements in Library Services October 31, 2007 Eleonora Dubicki

Brinley Franklin Vice Provost University of Connecticut Libraries MINES for Libraries.

Independent Schools Survey— Fall 2005 Summary Report Conducted by the Data Committee of the Independent School Section of the AASL.

Do Students Want Mobile Library Access And Are Librarians Ready to Deliver? Electronic Resources & Libraries, February 28, 2011 Angela Dresselhaus, Electronic.

Our 2005 Survey Results. “….only customers judge quality; all other judgments are essentially irrelevant” Delivering Quality Service : Balancing Customer.

Greater Western Library Alliance 2006 Spring Membership Meeting Arizona State University, Tempe AZ February 27, 2006 Brinley Franklin Vice Provost, University.

Webmetrics Workshop American Library Association Chicago, IL June 24, 2004 Martha Kyrillidou Director, ARL Statistics and Measurement Program Association.

Assessing the Value and Impact of Digital Content Brinley Franklin Vice Provost for University Libraries University of Connecticut March 1, 2007.

Brinley Franklin and Terry Plum August 18, 2005

ARL New Measures MINES for Libraries Measuring the Impact of Networked Electronic Services Brinley Franklin Vice Provost University of Connecticut Libraries.

Evaluating the Portal: The Story Behind the Numbers

Brinley Franklin Vice Provost University of Connecticut Libraries.

Standards for Use Measures for Electronic Resources

MINES for Libraries Measuring the Impact of Networked Electronic Services (MINES): The North American Experience Brinley Franklin Vice Provost, University.

The Story Behind the Numbers: Measuring the Impact of Networked Electronic Services (MINES) and the Assessment of the Ontario Council of University Libraries’

LibQual+ Survey Results 2002

Collecting Library Statistics for Management Decision-making

Presentation transcript:

Brinley Franklin Vice Provost University of Connecticut Libraries

ARL New Measures E-Metrics LibQual +™ DD/ILL Study SAILS Learning Outcomes MINES

MINES is a research methodology consisting of a web- based survey form and a sampling plan. MINES measures who is using electronic resources, where users are located at the time of use, and their purpose of use. MINES was adopted by the Association of Research Libraries (ARL) as part of the “New Measures” toolkit in May, MINES is different from other electronic resource usage measures that quantify total usage (e.g., COUNTER, EQUINOX, E-Metrics, ICOLC Guidelines, ISO and NISO standards) or measure how well a library makes electronic resources accessible (LibQual+ TM ). What is MINES?

Data was collected at seven main campus libraries and seven academic health science libraries in the U.S., between January, 2003 and January, Recent Data Collection Activities Main University LibrariesAcademic Medical Libraries University of ColoradoUniversity of Connecticut Health Center University of ConnecticutUniversity of North Carolina University of Texas Medical Branch Oregon State UniversityUniversity of Texas Southwestern University of Utah University of Virginia Washington University

More than 45,000 networked electronic services uses were surveyed. At each library, the MINES survey was one component of a comprehensive cost analysis study that assigned all library costs to sponsored research, instruction/education/non- sponsored research, patient care, other sponsored activities and other activities. Recent Data Collection Activities MINES is also being conducted by the Ontario Council of University Libraries (OCUL) in in conjunction with ARL.

How extensively do sponsored researchers use the new digital information environment? Are researchers more likely to use networked electronic resources from inside or outside the library? Are there differences in usage of electronic information based on the user’s location (e.g., in the library; on-campus, but not in the library; or off-campus)? What is a statistically valid methodology for capturing electronic services usage both in the library and remotely through web surveys? Are particular network configurations more conducive to studies of digital libraries patron use? Questions Addressed

A representative sampling plan, including sample size, is determined at the outset. Typically, there are 48 hours of surveying over 12 months at a medical library and 24 hours a year at a main library. Random moment/web-based surveys are employed at each site. Participation is usually mandatory, negating non-respondent bias, and is based on actual use in real-time. Libraries with database-to-web gateways or proxy re-writers offer the most comprehensive networking solution for surveying all networked services users during survey periods. MINES Methodological Considerations

Library User Survey

Patron Status

Library User Survey Affiliation

Library User Survey Location

Library User Survey Purpose

Library User Survey Purpose

Sample Survey Data File Generated Other UConnInstruction/Education/Departmental (Non-Funded) Researchhttp://newfirstsearch.oclc.org/done=referer;dbname=WorldCat;autho= ;FSIP12:36:5012/3/2004Off CampusUConn Faculty Family StudiesInstruction/Education/Departmental (Non-Funded) Researchhttp:// bin/jstor/gensearch12:37:4312/3/2004Off CampusUConn Undergraduate Student Non-UConnOther Activitieshttp://homerweb.lib.uconn.edu/cgi-bin/Pwebrecon.cgi?DB=local&PAGE=First13:08:4112/3/2004Off CampusNon- UConn Non-UConnInstruction/Education/Departmental (Non-Funded) Researchhttp://magic.lib.uconn.edu/index_real.html13:31:2912/3/2004Off CampusNon-UConn Non-UConnOther Activitieshttp://magic.lib.uconn.edu/index_real.html12:11:0612/3/2004Off CampusNon-UConn Agriculture & Natural ResourcesInstruction/Education/Departmental (Non-Funded) Researchhttp://magic.lib.uconn.edu/index_real.html12:33:5712/3/2004 Off CampusNon-UConn EducationInstruction/Education/Departmental (Non-Funded) Researchhttp:// Off CampusNon-UConn Non-UConnInstruction/Education/Departmental (Non-Funded) Researchhttp://homerweb.lib.uconn.edu/cgi-bin/Pwebrecon.cgi?DB=local&PAGE=First13:28:5212/3/2004 Off CampusNon-UConn Business AdministrationOther Activitieshttp://homerweb.lib.uconn.edu/cgi- bin/Pwebrecon.cgi?DB=local&PAGE=First12:56:4612/3/2004In the LibraryUConn Faculty Liberal Arts & SciencesOther Activitieshttp:// Campus - StorrsUConn Graduate Student EngineeringInstruction/Education/Departmental (Non-Funded) Researchhttp://homerweb.lib.uconn.edu/cgi- bin/Pwebrecon.cgi?DB=local&PAGE=First12:04:3112/3/2004On Campus - StorrsUConn Graduate Student Business AdministrationInstruction/Education/Departmental (Non-Funded) Researchhttp://proquest.umi.com/pqdweb?RQT=31812:16:3312/3/2004On Campus - StorrsUConn Graduate Student Business AdministrationInstruction/Education/Departmental (Non-Funded) Researchhttp:// Campus - StorrsUConn Graduate Student Business AdministrationInstruction/Education/Departmental (Non-Funded) Researchhttp://homerweb.lib.uconn.edu/cgi- bin/Pwebrecon.cgi?DB=local&PAGE=First12:29:5312/3/2004On Campus - StorrsUConn Graduate Student Business AdministrationInstruction/Education/Departmental (Non-Funded) Researchhttp://homerweb.lib.uconn.edu/cgi- bin/Pwebrecon.cgi?DB=local&PAGE=First12:48:4112/3/2004On Campus - StorrsUConn Graduate Student Business AdministrationInstruction/Education/Departmental (Non-Funded) Researchhttp://proquest.umi.com/login?COPT=SU5UPTAmVkVSPTImREJTPTE3MjErMysxNkJD&clientId= :04:2312/3/2004On Campus - StorrsUConn Graduate Student

On-Campus, Not in the Library n = 15,423 In the Library n = 6,312 Purpose of Use By Location Medical Libraries 2003 – 2005 Off-Campus n = 4,375 *83% of sponsored research usage occurred outside the library. 92% of this use took place on-campus. Overall Use n = 26,110

Purpose of Use By Location Main Campus Libraries 2003 – 2005 In the Library n = 7,618 On-Campus, not in the Library n = 6,641 All Usage n = 19,271 72% of sponsored research usage of electronic resources occurred outside the library; 83% of this took place on campus. Off-Campus n = 5,012

Location of Users Medical Library Main Library All Libraries 30% 40% 60% 70% 76% 24%

Off-Campus n = 5,133 Demographics by Location of User Medical Libraries Inside the Library n = 6,635 On Campus, Not in the Library n = 19,244 Total Users n = 31,012

Demographics by Location of User Main Libraries On Campus, Not in the Library n = 6,391 Inside the Library n = 7,064 Off-Campus n = 4,953 Total Users n = 18,408

Location of Users All Libraries 20% 52% 28% 72% 28%

Electronic Services Sponsored Research Use Compared to Print Journal and Total Library Use Medical Libraries

Electronic Services Sponsored Research Use Compared to Print Journal and Total Library Use Main Libraries