A Diamond Micro-strip Electron Detector for Compton Polarimetry Amrendra Narayan Mississippi State University on behalf of Hall – C Compton Team.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Measuring the Neutron and 3 He Spin Structure at Low Q 2 Vincent Sulkosky College of William and Mary, Williamsburg VA Experimental Overview The.
Advertisements

Measuring the Neutron and 3 He Spin Structure at Low Q 2 Vincent Sulkosky for the JLab Hall A Collaboration College of William and Mary, Williamsburg VA.
Jin Huang PhD Candidate, MIT For MENU 2010 May 31, Williamsburg.
USE OF GEANT4 FOR LHCB RICH SIMULATION S. Easo, RAL, LHCB AND ITS RICH DETECTORS. TESTBEAM DATA FOR LHCB-RICH. OVERVIEW OF GEANT4 SIMULATION.
Compton polarimetry for EIC Jefferson Lab Compton Polarimeters.
1 Electron Beam Polarimetry for EIC/eRHIC W. Lorenzon (Michigan) Introduction Polarimetry at HERA Lessons learned from HERA Polarimetry at EIC.
May 14, 2015Pavel Řezníček, IPNP Charles University, Prague1 Tests of ATLAS strip detector modules: beam, source, G4 simulations.
Electron Detector for the Hall C Compton Polarimeter J.W. Martin & D. Dutta U. Winnipeg & Mississippi State U.
Upcoming Review of the Hall D Photon Beam and Tagger Richard Jones, University of Connecticut, for the GlueX collaboration GlueX Collaboration Meeting.
Slide 1 Diamonds in Flash Steve Schnetzer Rd42 Collaboration Meeting May 14.
Hall C Compton Polarimeter Preliminary Design by the Qweak Polarimetry Working Group S. Kowalski, M.I.T. (chair) D. Gaskell, Jefferson Lab R.T. Jones,
Design and test of a high-speed beam monitor for hardon therapy H. Pernegger on behalf of Erich Griesmayer Fachhochschule Wr. Neustadt/Fotec Austria (H.
TOF at 10ps with SiGe BJT Amplifiers
STS Simulations Anna Kotynia 15 th CBM Collaboration Meeting April , 2010, GSI 1.
Proton Form Factor ratio GEp/GMp with polarization method --on behalf of Jefferson lab GEp3 collaboration Wei Luo Lanzhou University, China April
Why silicon detectors? Main characteristics of silicon detectors: Small band gap (E g = 1.12 V)  good resolution in the deposited energy  3.6 eV of deposited.
The PEPPo e - & e + polarization measurements E. Fanchini On behalf of the PEPPo collaboration POSIPOL 2012 Zeuthen 4-6 September E. Fanchini -Posipol.
Polarized Source Development Run Results Riad Suleiman Injector Group November 18, 2008.
Status of the Beamline Simulation A.Somov Jefferson Lab Collaboration Meeting, May 11, 2010.
Collimator June 1-19, 2015HUGS The collimator is placed about 85 cm from the target and intercepts scattered electrons from 0.78° to 3.8° Water cooled.
NEW COMMENTS TO ILC BEAM ENERGY MEASUREMENTS BASED ON SYNCHROTRON RADIATION FROM MAGNETIC SPECTROMETER E.Syresin, B. Zalikhanov-DLNP, JINR R. Makarov-MSU.
Calibration of the ZEUS calorimeter for electrons Alex Tapper Imperial College, London for the ZEUS Collaboration Workshop on Energy Calibration of the.
A study of systematic uncertainties of Compton e-detector at JLab, Hall C and its cross calibration against Moller polarimeter APS April Meeting 2014 Amrendra.
COMPTON POLARIMETRY Collected data Cavity power Status on counting methods Systematic errors and hardware issues.
Status of Møller Polarimeter Peter-Bernd Otte September 23, th Collaboration Meeting, Mainz.
Radius To use a Compton polarimeter, the possible range of the backscattered photons’ energy should be calculated. Applying the laws of conservation of.
Photodetection EDIT Internal photoelectric effect in Si Band gap (T=300K) = 1.12 eV (~1100 nm) More than 1 photoelectron can be created by light in silicon.
Nuruzzaman ( Hampton University Group Meeting 1 st November 2011 Beamline Optics Using Beam Modulation for the Q-weak Experiment.
Compton polarimetry for EIC Jefferson Lab Compton Polarimeters.
PrimEx collaboration meeting Energy calibration of the Hall B bremsstrahlung tagging system using magnetic pair spectrometer S. Stepanyan (JLAB)
Beam Tests of 3D Vertically Interconnected Prototypes Matthew Jones (Purdue University) Grzegorz Deptuch, Scott Holm, Ryan Rivera, Lorenzo Uplegger (FNAL)
Lead Fluoride Calorimeter for Deeply Virtual Compton Scattering in Hall A Alexandre Camsonne Hall A Jefferson Laboratory October 31 st 2008.
Electron Detection for Compton Polarimetry Michael McDonald Outline -Compton Effect -Polarimetry -Detectors -Diamond Results.
M. Dugger, February Triplet polarimeter study Michael Dugger* Arizona State University *Work at ASU is supported by the U.S. National Science Foundation.
Mitglied der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft Calibration of the COSY-TOF STT & pp Elastic Analysis Sedigheh Jowzaee IKP Group Talk 11 July 2013.
May 17, 2006Sebastian Baunack, PAVI06 The Parity Violation A4 Experiment at forward and backward angles Strange Form Factors The Mainz A4 Experiment Result.
1 Overview of Polarimetry Outline of Talk Polarized Physics Machine-Detector Interface Issues Upstream Polarimeter Downstream Polarimeter Ken Moffeit,
Apollo Go, NCU Taiwan BES III Luminosity Monitor Apollo Go National Central University, Taiwan September 16, 2002.
Summary of Workshop on Precision Electron Beam Polarimetry Newport News June 9-10, 2003 workshop summary by Dave Gaskell, Jefferson Lab Richard Jones,
Proton Charge Form Factor Measurement E. Cisbani INFN Rome – Sanità Group and Italian National Institute of Health 113/Oct/2011E. Cisbani / Proton FF.
Jefferson Laboratory Hall A SuperBigBite Spectrometer Data Acquisition System Alexandre Camsonne APS DNP 2013 October 24 th 2013 Hall A Jefferson Laboratory.
A. Zelenski a, G. Atoian a *, A. Bogdanov b, D.Raparia a, M.Runtso b, D. Steski a, V. Zajic a a Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY, 11973, USA b.
Optical Receivers Theory and Operation
GEp-III in Hall C Andrew Puckett, MIT On behalf of the Jefferson Lab Hall C GEp-III Collaboration April 15, 2008.
Compton polarimetry for EIC. Outline Polarized electron beam Compton process Compton polarimeters at Jefferson Laboratory – Parity experiments at Jlab.
Charles University Prague Charles University Prague Institute of Particle and Nuclear Physics Absolute charge measurements using laser setup Pavel Bažant,
A Prototype Diamond Detector for the Compton Polarimeter in Jefferson lab, Hall C Medium Energy Physics Group Amrendra.
1 A Proposal for Compton Electron Detector R&D Stephan Aune 9, Alexandre Camsonne 1*, Wouter Deconinck 8, Dipankgar Dutta 4, Gregg B. Franklin 7, David.
Moller Polarimeter Q-weak: First direct measurement of the weak charge of the proton Nuruzzaman (
1 First Results of the SLD Cerenkov Polarimeter at the DESY test beam Oleg Eyser Daniela K äfer, Christian Helebrant, Jenny List, Ulrich Velte*
Taikan SUEHARA et al., LCWS2007 & DESY, 2007/06/01 R&D Status of ATF2 IP Beam Size Monitor (Shintake Monitor) Taikan SUEHARA, H.Yoda, M.Oroku,
P.F.Ermolov SVD-2 status and experimental program VHMP 16 April 2005 SVD-2 status and experimental program 1.SVD history 2.SVD-2 setup 3.Experiment characteristics.
Parity Experiments and JLab Injector Riad Suleiman February 5, 2016.
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U.S. Depart. Of Energy The Department.
Philip Bambade, Pierre Barillon, Frédéric Bogard, Selma Conforti, Patrick Cornebise, Shan Liu, Illia Khvastunov Journée PHIL
A New, Robust Beam Modulation Strategy for the Q p weak Experiment Nuruzzaman ( Advisors: Dr. Dipangkar Dutta (
Manoj B. Jadhav Supervisor Prof. Raghava Varma I.I.T. Bombay PANDA Collaboration Meeting, PARIS – September 11, 2012.
Pb-Parity and Septum Update Presented by: Luis Mercado UMass - Amherst 12/05/2008 Thanks to Robert Michaels, Kent Pachke, Krishna Kumar, Dustin McNulty.
Youth, Family, and Contextual Characteristics Predicting Violence Exposure: Disruptive Behavior Disorder Symptoms as a Moderator Penny S. Loosier, Michael.
Compton Polarimeter Electron Detector Jeff Martin University of Winnipeg (for Dipangkar Dutta and the Canadian group) Outline ● Overview/Funding/Project.
Polarized Injector Update
Results with the RPC system of OPERA and perspectives
Start Detector for pion experiments
FCPPL, Clermont-Ferrand , 8-10 April, 2014
HARPO, a Micromegas+GEM TPC for gamma polarimetry above 1 MeV
THE NEW FOCAL PLANE POLARIMETER
Status of n-XYTER read-out chain at GSI
BESIII EMC electronics
The LHCb Level 1 trigger LHC Symposium, October 27, 2001
Why silicon detectors? Main characteristics of silicon detectors:
Presentation transcript:

A Diamond Micro-strip Electron Detector for Compton Polarimetry Amrendra Narayan Mississippi State University on behalf of Hall – C Compton Team

Outline  Qweak Polarimetry requirements  Hall – C Compton Overview  Electron detector  Data Acquisition  Analysis approach  Preliminary results PAVI 11 2 Mississippi State University

Qweak and Polarimetry PAVI 11 Mississippi State University 3 The Qweak experiment aims to measure the weak charge of the proton with a precision of 4.1%, by measuring the parity violating asymmetry in polarized e-p elastic scattering with a precision of 2.5% Qweak Error Budget Uncertainty δAPV/APV δQw/Qw Statistical (~2500 hours at 150 μA)2.1%3.2% Systematic:2.6% Hadronic structure uncertainties1.5% Beam polarimetry1.0%1.5% Effective Q 2 determination0.5%1.0% Backgrounds0.5%0.7% Helicity-correlated beam properties0.5%0.7% Total:2.5%4.1% The Hall-C Moller polarimeter is the highest precision polarimeter at JLab, however it is periodic, invasive and operates only at low currents.. one of the largest experimental contribution to the error budget The new Compton polarimeter is continuous, non invasive and can operate at high currents. Qweak talk: Katherine Myers, Sept 8

Overview: Compton Layout PAVI 11 4 Mississippi State University ParameterValue Beam Energy1.16 GeV Laser Wavelength532 nm Chicane bend angle10.1 deg Electron free drift distance1.6 m Max. Electron Displacement17 mm Compton edge energy46 MeV

 Photon target at center of chicane is Coherent Verdi 10W laser locked to low gain Fabry-Perot cavity  Power in the cavity is ~ 1kW  laser polarization > 99%  low reflectivity mirror in Fabry-Perot cavity allows robust measurement of laser polarization Installed laser table Overview: Laser Table Test setup for Fabry-Perot cavity PAVI 11 5 Installed laser table courtesy: Donald Jones, University of Virginia

 Laser cycled on and off with a period of ~ 140 s  γ - detector signal is integrated with no threshold to eliminate sensitivity to gain drift  Tried CsI crystal at first but found that phosphorescence with ms to second timescales diluted our measurement  Currently using PbW crystal detector. Less energy resolution but for signal integration this is not an issue.  Achieving <1% statistical uncertainty in a few hours. Laser On Laser Off Integrated Yield (a.u.) Time (seconds) Fit to Yield from CsI during Beam Trip Time Constants 0.2s (20%) 1.3s (12%) 6.3s (68%) Integrated yield (a.u.) Time (a.u.) Overview: γ -Detector PAVI 11 6 courtesy: Donald Jones, University of Virginia

Overview: e-detector PAVI 11 Mississippi State University 7 Through the γ-detector and e-detector we have two independent measurements having different uncertainties hence being a good cross-check on each other We use diamond micro-strip detector for detecting the Compton scattered electrons We have 4 planes of the detector to allow coincidence measurements

The detector uses Diamond which is artificially grown using Chemical Vapor Deposition How does it work as a detector ? Operation of Diamond Detectors Bias voltage ~ 1000 V, Charge collection distance (d) ~ 250 μm e-detector: working PAVI 11 8 Mississippi State University

Diamond micro-strip detectors PAVI 11 Mississippi State University 9  alumina (ceramic) used for carrier board  metallization (on diamond) done with TiPtAu  detector dimensions : 21 mm x 21 mm  detector thickness: 500 µm  each detector plate has 96 strips  strip pitch is 200 µm.

e-detector: installation PAVI Mississippi State University

e-detector: installed PAVI 11 Mississippi State University 11 upstream view downstream view

e-detector DAQ PAVI 11 Mississippi State University 12 This is the first Diamond micro-strip detector to be used as a tracking device in an experiment Trigger processed using FPGA based v1495 Diamond micro - strip detectors Amplification, shaping and digitization of the signal

e-detector DAQ PAVI 11 Mississippi State University 13 QWAD boards custom made by TRIUMF Gain : 200 mV (10x10 3 ) x (1.6x ) = 120 mV / fC Trigger processed using FPGA based v1495 Diamond micro - strip detectors Amplification, shaping and digitization of the signal test input after charge integration & amplification digital output ~ 1 mV ~ 200 mV LVDS out

e-detector DAQ PAVI 11 Mississippi State University 14 * Field Programmable Gate Array v1495 : CAEN general purpose logic modules. The module was programmed for trigger generation and data readout using VHDL Trigger processed using FPGA * based v1495 Diamond micro - strip detectors Amplification, shaping and digitization of the signal

e-detector DAQ : schematic detector Qweak Amplifier Discriminator Trigger Logic Delay Line Signal Reconditioning Pattern Buffer Read out Based on the decision of Trigger Logic, the corresponding signal is accepted/rejected at the P. buffer The Pattern Buffer acts as a temporary storage to allow the slow Readout process through the VME backplane Delays the input signal for the trigger decision to be made. Conditions the signal to avoid overlap of successive events, hence avoiding false triggers Decides if a pulse corresponds to a real event ~ 60 m shielded twisted pair cable amplifies, shapes and digitizes the detector pulse charge pulse from detector Digitization of signal (QWAD) typically ~9000 electrons 0.56 m flex cable FPGA board CPU PAVI Mississippi State University

e-detector DAQ: Trigger PAVI 11 Mississippi State University 16  to suppress background, we require a coincidence between multiple planes  default trigger is hits on 2 out of 4 planes  we localize the trigger in a single detector plane to 4 consecutive strips Trigger condition: (2 in 4 planes) Plane 1 Plane 2 Plane 3 Plane 4 oooooo oooooo oooooo oooooo oooooo oooooo The fundamental repetitive logic unit signals from two consecutive strips in a detector plane

charge normalized hits Beam Current: 150 μA Charge normalized strip hit PAVI 11 Mississippi State University 17 Red: Laser On Black: Laser Off Green: Background subtracted Compton edge at Strip 50 we had 3 active planes during Qweak Run 1 plane 2 plane 3 plane 4 Strip number

Asymmetry PAVI 11 Mississippi State University 18 Laser on : Laser off :: 2 : 1 where and Asymmetry (A) Distance from beam (mm) Run time : 84 min Run # : Beam : 150 μA IHWP : in Theory Polarization: 90.4 % +/- 0.7% using Plane-2 Strip number Laser OFF

Calculating Polarization PAVI 11 Mississippi State University 19 we know: e-beam energy, magnet field map, detector location & geometry Fitting the calculated asymmetry to the measured asymmetry gives us the beam polarization momentum of Compton recoil e - deviation from nominal e-beam Compton asymmetry is precisely known from QED as a function of momentum

effective pitch parameter fit Plane 2 Plane 3 Plane 4 Calculating Polarization PAVI 11 Mississippi State University 20 The Compton edge for the theoretical Compton asymmetry is fixed at 17.6 mm from the beam (based on known beam parameters and detector geometry) Polarization is obtained by performing a two parameter fit with polarization and effective pitch Asymmetry (A) Distance from beam (mm) Polarization: 90.4 % +/- 0.7% Theory where

Run Number Polarization (%) Error (%) time in min PRELIMINARY Preliminary Polarization PAVI 11 Mississippi State University days of Compton data each point represents a ~ 1 hr run only Partial systematic error (due to strip – pitch) included the dotted vertical lines represent spot changes on the photocathode the dashed vertical line represents Re-activation on an average the beam current was ~ 160 μA 42 days Apr 1, 2011May 12, 2011 Spot change reactivation

Quantum efficiency PAVI 11 Mississippi State University 22 Polarization (%) Quantum Efficiency (%) Time (a.u) Zooming into a region of consecutive spot changes: Polarization was found to drop significantly before the spot move

Systematic errors PAVI 11 Mississippi State University 23 Error Contribution(~)Value Due to detector strip size 0.2 % Detector geometry0.15 % Difference between planes0.2 % Magnetic field? Beam & Laser Position? Dead time? TBD? Laser Polarization99.5 +/- 0.4% (overall) Total0.50 % We don’t expect the unknown in the above table to be very large

Summary PAVI 11 Mississippi State University 24 Next: In our preparation for Qweak run-2, We have 4 active planes (already installed) Adapting from experiences of run-1, we are using more noise- robust electronics, with a better control over signal correlations in adjacent channels. All set to provide an independent absolute polarization measurement for Hall-C beam Accomplished: This is the first Diamond micro-strip detector to be used as a tracking device in an experiment Despite several challenges posed by the electronic noise environment, leading to strict trigger condition, we achieved the design goal of < 1% statistical uncertainty and projected low systematic

Compton Team PAVI This work was supported by U.S. DoE, Grant Number: DE-FG02-07ER41528 Mississippi State University Institutions involved: 1.College of William and Mary (γ - detector) 2.Jefferson Lab (all subsystems) 3.Mississippi State University (e - detector) 4.MIT Bates (magnets, vacuum – can, detector holder, previous CsI crystal for γ - detector) 5.TRIUMF (Qweak Amplifier Discriminator boards) 6.University of Manitoba (e - detector) 7.University of Virginia (laser and γ - detector) 8.University of Winnipeg (e - detector) 9. Yerevan Physics Institute (γ - detector and help with e - detector) Alphabetical order This presentation was made possible due to significant contribution from Dipangkar Dutta, Vladas Tvaskis and Donald Jones

Thanks PAVI 11 Mississippi State University 26 The author can be contacted at Qweak Collaboration, July College of William and Mary

Extras PAVI 11 Mississippi State University 27

Background subtraction PAVI 11 Mississippi State University 28 strip number charge normalized laser off hits Run # Beam ON Laser Off After electronic noise subtraction Run # Beam ON Laser Off before electronic noise subtraction

why diamond ? PAVI 11 Mississippi State University 29 PropertySiliconDiamond Band Gap (eV) Electron/Hole mobility (cm 2 /Vs)1450/ /1600 Saturation velocity (cm/s)0.8x10 7 2x10 7 Breakdown field (V/m)3x x10 7 Dielectric Constant Displacement energy (eV) e-h creation energy (eV)3.613 Av. e-h pairs per MIP per micron8936 Charge collection distance (micron)full~250 Low leakage current, short noise Fast signal collection Low capacitance, noise Radiation hardness Smaller signal

2 parameter fit PAVI 11 Mississippi State University 30 x = (strip # of edge - strip # of histogrammed bin)*strip_pitch x = (strip # of edge - strip # of histogrammed bin)*strip_pitch * P2

Input Reconditioning Stage PAVI 11 Mississippi State University 31 Rising Edge Detection Pulse Width Adjustment of Trigger output (counting circuit) Pulse Width Adjustment of Pipeline Delay (counting circuit) Trigger width Pipeline width Hold Off decision (counting circuit) Hold Off Disable Input from Detector Input to Pipeline Delay Circuit Input to Trigger Logic Circuit

DAQ PAVI 11 Mississippi State University 32  We accumulate the counts in the detector over a given Helicity window and read it out at the end of the Helicity window  Our Helicity reversal rate is ~ 960 Hz  wait time for Helicity stabilization ~ 76 μs