False Premises and Relevant Detail. Warm Up  In your journal, brainstorm what you think false premises in persuasive writing might be.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Argumentation.
Advertisements

Fallacies for Persuasive Writing Part I Ad Hominem Appeal to Emotion Appeal to Authority Bandwagon Straw Man Slippery Slope.
Q3,J4 A) “Hitler was a vegetarian, therefore, I don’t trust vegetarians.” B) “You can’t prove that there aren’t Martians living in caves under the surface.
Text Table of Contents #5 and #8: Evaluating the Argument.
 Logical fallacies are errors in the structure of an argument.  “Fallacy” means falsehood.  These arguments can be used to distract people from the.
Unit 1A Recognizing Fallacies. LOGIC Logic is the study of the methods and principles of reasoning.
Understanding Logical Fallacies
Logical Fallacies.
Logical Fallacies AKA “How NOT to Win an Argument”
©2006 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 16 Thinking and Speaking Critically.
How to make an Argument Toulmin Model.
 Read the following argument. Examine it closely. Do you think it is logically sound? Why?  [T]he acceptance of abortion does not end with the killing.
Fallacies of Logic. Persuasive Techniques Ethos: Ethos is appeal based on the character of the speaker. An ethos-driven document relies on the reputation.
Oral Communications Analysis and Evaluation. California Content Standards Analysis and Evaluation of Oral and Media Communications 1.13 Analyze the four.
Age of the Sage Advertising, Inc. “I cannot teach anybody anything; I can only make him think.” Socrates.
Logical Fallacies.
Making Topic Sentences Interesting M.E. Ellen Graber For Academic Writing, UMSNH.
Logical Fallacies. Syllogism (not a fallacy) A logical argument presented in terms of two statements and a conclusion which must be true if the two statements.
© 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. The Art of Critical Reading Mather ● McCarthy 1 Part 4 Reading Critically Chapter 11 Analyzing.
Grading Criteria for Assigment 1 Structure – –sense of time, present and past –conflict with two distinct sides –description of cause of conflict –shared.
Eng 111 Dana Frierson Fall Types of Reasoning (Logic) n Deductive u Inferring particular “fact” from general assumptions u General to specific n.
Logical Fallacies.
LOGICAL FALLACIES Errors in Reasoning.
Logical Fallacies Invalid Arguments.
PERSUASION. “Everybody Hates Chris”
LOGICAL FALLACIES. A logical fallacy is an error of reasoning. When someone adopts a position based on a bad piece of reasoning, they commit a fallacy.
INFORMAL FALLACIES The aim of this tutorial is to help you learn to recognize and resist fallacious arguments.
Or How I Overcame My Addiction to Illogical Conclusions and Persevered in the Age of Reason Logical Fallacies.
Logic Fallacies Debate Class Production Spain Park High School
Let’s see some more examples!
Logical Fallacies Guided Notes
Logical Fallacies.
Chapter Two: Good Reasoning Review Applying Ethics: A Text with Readings (10 th ed.) Julie C. Van Camp, Jeffrey Olen, Vincent Barry Cengage Learning/Wadsworth.
Fallacies of Argument AKA Logical Fallacies.
LOGIC 2+2=4… right?. Logical Reasoning Statements formed from sound thinking and proof of reasoning.
Standard: Delineate and evaluate the argument and specific claims in a text… identify false statements and fallacious reasoning.
Fallacies The quickest ways to lose arguments. Introduction to Logic O Argument: The assertion of a conclusion based on logical premises O Premise: Proposition.
Errors in Reasoning. Fallacies A Fallacy is “any error in reasoning that makes an argument fail to establish its conclusion.” There are two kinds of fallacies.
PERSUASION AND LOGICAL FALLACIES What are they and HOW do you avoid them?
Chapter Two: Good Reasoning Applying Ethics: A Text with Readings (10 th ed.) Julie C. Van Camp, Jeffrey Olen, Vincent Barry Cengage Learning/Wadsworth.
Logical Fallacies A logical fallacy is an element of an argument that is flawed If spotted one can essentially render an entire line of reasoning invalid.
Fallacies Mistakes in reasoning or thinking.  Occurs when a speaker makes a claim that presents a range of choices.  Writers that use either/or are.
LOGICAL FALLACIES. Post Hoc, Ergo Propter Hoc “After this, therefore because of this.”
Be Reasonable! Recognize and Avoid Logical Fallacies.
Common Logical Fallacies Flawed Arguments. Logical Fallacies… Flaws in an argument Often subtle Learning to recognize these will: – Strengthen your own.
Additional Fallacy – Appeal to Misplaced Authority Use of testimony or an expert in a given field to endorse an idea or product for which the expert does.
Ad Hominem (Personal Attack) An attempt to discredit the argument by discrediting the character of the person advancing it.
Rhetorical Fallacies A failure in reasoning that renders an argument invalid. Faulty reasoning, misleading or unsound argument.
A Journey into the Mind Logic and Debate Unit. Week 2: May 23 through May 26 The Fallacies SWBAT: Identify the common fallacies in logic in order to be.
Introduction to Argument Writing. Introduction Argument: Argument: is persuasive is persuasive has a strong thesis has a strong thesis includes support.
1 WRITING THE ACADEMIC PAPER ——Logic and Argument Tao Yang
By Mrs. Cardoza Cover A Know Book is a creative way to show your knowledge about a topic. On each page of your Know Book, you will take notes about a different.
Reminders for the test and Bell Work
Logical Fallacies.
Logical Fallacies © Copyright 1995 Michael C. Labossiere (author of Fallacy Tutorial Pro 3.0) reprinted with permission as a Nizkor Feature on the Nizkor.
Logical Fallacies.
Topic: Logical Fallacies Objective: I will identify various logical fallacies EQ: What are the most common logical fallacies and where do they appear?
Persuasion Logic and Reasoning What is EVIDENCE?
Propaganda and Logical Fallacies
Errors in reasoning that invalidate the argument
More on Argument.
Logical Fallacies.
C/Maj Nicholas Schroder
Logical Fallacies, Ch 6, RRW
Chapter 4 – Models for Writers Reading: “My Name”
Writing the Argumentative Essay
Fallacies.
Fallacies.
UNDERSTANDING THE ELEMENTS OF PERSUASION
Logical Fallacies English III.
Presentation transcript:

False Premises and Relevant Detail

Warm Up  In your journal, brainstorm what you think false premises in persuasive writing might be

Upcoming Events  X Day:  Benchmark 2 on 10/31  Vocab Quiz 4 on 11/5  Y Day  Crucible Vocab 3 due 10/24  Persuasive Essay 10/24  Act I & II Exam 10/24  Benchmark 2 on 10/30  Vocab Quiz 4 on 11/6

Objective and Agenda  SWBAT demonstrate their understanding of false premises in persuasive writing by using their notes to create examples of each type.  SWBAT demonstrate their ability to detect irrelevant details in a paragraph by reading a paragraph and identifying relevant vs. irrelevant details  Warm Up  Objectives  False Premises  Relevant Details  Irony WS (If applicable)  Continue The Crucible

What is a False Premise?  A false premise is an incorrect proposition that forms the basis of an argument or syllogism. Since the premise (proposition, or assumption) is not correct, the conclusion drawn may be in error.

Ad Hominem  Latin for “to the man”  Does not argue the issue, instead it argues the person  Example:  Person A makes claim X.  Person B makes an attack on person A.  Therefore A's claim is false

Red Herring  A fallacy in which an irrelevant topic is presented in order to divert attention from the original issue. The basic idea is to "win" an argument by leading attention away from the argument and to another topic.  Format:  Topic A is under discussion.  Topic B is introduced under the guise of being relevant to topic A (when topic B is actually not relevant to topic A).  Topic A is abandoned.  Example: "I think there is great merit in making the requirements stricter for the graduate students. I recommend that you support it, too. After all, we are in a budget crisis and we do not want our salaries affected."

Straw Man  The Straw Man fallacy is committed when a person simply ignores a person's actual position and substitutes a distorted, exaggerated or misrepresented version of that position  "Senator Jones says that we should not fund the attack submarine program. I disagree entirely. I can't understand why he wants to leave us defenseless like that."

Begging the Question  A logical fallacy that occurs when the conclusion of an argument is used as a premise of that same argument; i.e., the premises would not work if the conclusion wasn't already assumed to be true.  Example: Happiness is the highest good for a human being, since all other values are inferior to it.

Post Hoc  From the Latin phrase “post hoc ergo propter hoc”  Literal meaning: “after this therefore because of this”  The post hoc fallacy is committed when it is assumed that because one thing occurred after another, it must have occurred as a result of it.  Example: An athlete who adopts a pre-match ritual because one time he did something before a game he got a good result. The reasoning here is presumably that on the first occasion the activity preceded the success, so the activity must have contributed to the success, so repeating the activity is likely to lead to a recurrence of the success.

Slippery Slope  Slippery slope arguments falsely assume that one thing must lead to another. They begin by suggesting that if we do one thing then that will lead to another, and before we know it we’ll be doing something that we don’t want to do. They conclude that we therefore shouldn’t do the first thing.  Example: "You can never give anyone a break. If you do, they'll walk all over you."

Now You Try:  On a loose-leaf piece of paper, create an example of each type of false premise:  Ad Hominem  Red Herring  Straw Man  Begging the Question  Post Hoc  Slippery Slope

A Note About Relevant Detail  Remember, each paragraph should have ONE main idea, and the details you provide within the paragraph should relate to that main idea  Irrelevant details distract from the main purpose of your writing, which means that readers may lose sight of your argument

Example: Identify the Irrelevant Details When I was growing up, one of the places I enjoyed most was the cherry tree in our garden. At the back of our garden was an alley and then more houses. Every summer when the cherries began to ripen, I used to spend hours high in that tree, picking and eating the sweet, sun-warmed cherries. My mother always worried about my falling out of the tree, but I never did. But I had some competition from the birds that enjoyed them as much as I did and would perch all over the tree, devouring the fruit whenever I wasn’t there. I used to wonder why the grown-ups never ate any of the cherries; but actually when the birds and I had finished, there weren’t many left.