Centrality, N part & N collision at BRAHMS H. Ito University of Kansas For the BRAHMS Collaboration.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
NDVCS measurement with BoNuS RTPC M. Osipenko December 2, 2009, CLAS12 Central Detector Collaboration meeting.
Advertisements

Ultra Peripheral Collisions at RHIC Coherent Coupling Coherent Coupling to both nuclei: photon~Z 2, Pomeron~A 4/3 Small transverse momentum p t ~ 2h 
Measurement of charmonia at mid-rapidity at RHIC-PHENIX  c  J/   e + e -  in p+p collisions at √s=200GeV Susumu Oda CNS, University of Tokyo For.
June 6 th, 2011 N. Cartiglia 1 “Measurement of the pp inelastic cross section using pile-up events with the CMS detector” How to use pile-up.
Elementary Process and d+Au Collision at RHIC 大阪大学 RCNP, 28 Oct., 2003 北大理 一瀬 昌嗣 (M.Isse) ☆共同研究 原研東海研 大塚 直彦 (N.Otuka) インド物理学研 P.K.サフ (P.K.Sahu)
Heavy Ion Measurements with the ATLAS Detector at the LHC Brian A. Cole, Columbia University June 28, 2007.
11/21/05Ali Hanks - Journal Club1 Determining Centrality at PHENIX Ali Hanks Journal Club November 21, 2005.
Feasibility Studies of Low-mass Mesons Identification for the CBM Project Radosław Karabowicz Hot Matter Physics Department, Institute of Physics, Jagiellonian.
Event selection at lower incident energies Exists a strong correlation between all impact parameter dependent observables. Possible to exclude peripheral.
Reconstruction of neutrino interactions in PEANUT G.D.L., Andrea Russo, Luca Scotto Lavina Naples University.
Computational Lab in Physics: Final Project Monte Carlo Nuclear Collisions: Glauber Model.
J/  production in In-In collisions at SPS energies Philippe Pillot — IPN Lyon for the NA60 Collaboration work 2005 June 16–20   Outline: Reminder.
H. Ito University of Kansas For the BRAHMS Collaboration The BRAHMS Institutions 1 Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY 11973, U.S.A. 2 Institut de.
High p T  0 Production in p+p, Au+Au, and d+Au Stefan Bathe UC Riverside for the Collaboration Topics in Heavy Ion Collisions McGill University, Montreal,
Roberto GemmeIII Convegno Nazionale sulla Fisica di ALICE Frascati, 12-14/11/2007 Reaction plane determination with the neutron Zero Degree Calorimeters.
1 Ultraperipheral heavy ion collisions Timoshenko S., Emelyanov V. Moscow Engineering Physics Institute (State University) (for the STAR Collaboration)
Preliminary Study of CC-Inclusive Events in the P0D using Global Reconstruction Rajarshi Das (w/ Walter Toki) Nu-Mu Prelim. Meeting Dec 2010 CSU.
STAR Strangeness production and Cronin effect in d+Au collisions at √s NN = 200 GeV in STAR For the STAR Collaboration Xianglei Zhu (Tsinghua U / UCLA)
PPR meeting Marcello Lunardon 1 Semi-electronic beauty detection: status and perspectives THE COLLABORATION Rosario Turrisi and Marcello Lunardon.
Centrality Categorization and its Application to Physics Effects in High-Energy d+A Collisions Javier Orjuela-Koop University of Colorado Boulder For the.
S.A. Voloshin STAR QM’06: Energy and system size dependence of elliptic flow and v 2 /  scaling page1 Sergei A. Voloshin Wayne State University, Detroit,
Photon 2003Falk Meissner, LBNL Falk Meissner Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory For the STAR Collaboration Photon 2003 April 2003 Coherent Electromagnetic.
C. Oppedisano for the ALICE Collaboration. 5 Jun 2012 C. Oppedisano 2/10 Centrality in p-A interactions can be defined through the number of collisions.
Recent Charm Measurements through Hadronic Decay Channels with STAR at RHIC in 200 GeV Cu+Cu Collisions Stephen Baumgart for the STAR Collaboration, Yale.
The centrality dependence of high p T π 0 production in d-Au collisions Abstract Michael Kordell II, Abhijit Majumder Wayne State University, Detroit,
Latifa Elouadrhiri Jefferson Lab Hall B 12 GeV Upgrade Drift Chamber Review Jefferson Lab March 6- 8, 2007 CLAS12 Drift Chambers Simulation and Event Reconstruction.
1 Andrea Dainese - Physics Forum – Measurement of the beauty production cross section in Pb-Pb collisions via single electrons F. Antinori, A.
Frank L. H. WolfsDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of Rochester Status of the TOF February 22, 2001 Straight-line tracking What have we learned?
FTPC status and results Summary of last data taken AuAu and dAu calibration : Data Quality Physic results with AuAu data –Spectra –Flow Physic results.
Charged Particle Multiplicity and Transverse Energy in √s nn = 130 GeV Au+Au Collisions Klaus Reygers University of Münster, Germany for the PHENIX Collaboration.
Francesco Noferini Bologna University Erice, Italy 31 st August 2006 Two-particle correlations: from RHIC to LHC.
M.Monteno / Alushta (Crimea) September, Results from the NA50 experiment on J/ψ suppression and charged particle pseudorapidity distributions.
J. Dunmore, University of Oxford NDM03, 10 June 2003 Event Isotropy in the Salt Phase of SNO Jessica Dunmore University of Oxford NDM03, Nara - 10 June.
First measurements in Pb—Pb collisions at  s NN =2.76 TeV with ALICE at the LHC M. Nicassio (University and INFN Bari) for the ALICE Collaboration Rencontres.
Lecture 07: particle production in AA collisions
Femtoscopy in √s = 200 GeV p+p collisions at RHIC-PHENIX Andrew Glenn for the collaboration Lawrence Livermore National Lab HAW09: Joint APS/DNP JPS Meeting.
 production in p-A and In-In collisions Motivation Apparatus Collected data Results for     Ongoing work for    KK Alessandro De Falco – University.
BNL May 17, 2002Falk Meissner, LBNL Jim Thomas for Falk Meissner Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory The STAR Collaboration Workshop on Diffraction and.
February 27, 2003APPI20031 Study of Chargino Production in e + e ‐ Collisions at Large tanβ Yukihiro Kato Kinki University Collaboration with K.Fujii (KEK),
Fiber target simulation for S-2S experiment Toshiyuki Gogami 2015/10/15.
Open and Hidden Charm production in 920 GeV Proton-Nucleus Collisions Presented by Marko Starič for the Hera-B collaboration The.
1 Guannan Xie Nuclear Modification Factor of D 0 Mesons in Au+Au Collisions at √s NN = 200 GeV Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory University of Science.
1 Charged hadron production at large transverse momentum in d+Au and Au+Au collisions at  s=200 GeV Abstract. The suppression of hadron yields with high.
Measurement of inclusive jet and dijet production in pp collisions at √s = 7 TeV using the ATLAS detector Seminar talk by Eduardo Garcia-Valdecasas Tenreiro.
Observation of a Centrality-Dependent Dijet Asymmetry in Lead-Lead Collisions with the ATLAS Detector Brian A. Cole Columbia University on behalf of the.
Ibrahim H. Albayrak, Hampton University Group Meeting Experiment Rosen07: Measurement of R =  L /  T on Deuterium in the Nucleon Resonance Region. 
The Double Ridge Phenomenon in p-Pb Collisions Measured with ALICE Jan Fiete Grosse-Oetringhaus, CERN for the ALICE Collaboration Moriond QCD 2013.
Marina Golubeva, Alexander Ivashkin Institute for Nuclear Research RAS, Moscow AGeV simulations with Geant4 and Shield Geant4 with Dpmjet-2.5 interface.
1 PP Minimum Bias Triggering Simulations Alan Dion Stony Brook University.
Centrality in the Muon Analysis Jane M. Burward-Hoy Physics Review July 17, 2003.
David Silvermyr Lund University for the PHENIX Collaboration Early global event results using the PHENIX Pad Chambers at RHIC.
1 Giuseppe G. Daquino 26 th January 2005 SoFTware Development for Experiments Group Physics Department, CERN Background radiation studies using Geant4.
PHOBOS at RHIC 2000 XIV Symposium of Nuclear Physics Taxco, Mexico January 2001 Edmundo Garcia, University of Maryland.
S.A. Voloshin STAR ICHEP 2006, Moscow, RUSSIA, July 26 – August 2, 2006page1 Sergei A. Voloshin Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan for the STAR.
P. E. Christakoglou HEP Centrality Dependence of the Balance Function in Pb–Pb Collisions (NA49) P. CHRISTAKOGLOU – M. FARANTATOS A. PETRIDIS –
1 Underlying Event studies & Charged particle multiplicities in inelastic pp events with the ATLAS.
PHENIX J/  Measurements at  s = 200A GeV Wei Xie UC. RiverSide For PHENIX Collaboration.
Two particle correlations: from RHIC to LHC Francesco Noferini Bologna University INFN – sez. Bologna ALICE-TOF Tuesday, May 16th Villasimius (Italy) HOT.
Performance Evaluation for Open Charm and Beauty Measurement at LHC ALICE PID capability from λ and K s 0 measurement at LHC ALICE 筑波大学数理物質科学研究科 Kengo.
Jixie’s Analysis Status Jixie Zhang Sep. 22th, 2010.
Effect of TCTVB collimator on ZDC A fraction of the spectator neutrons will hit the jaws Two physic parameters/measurements are affected –The energy mean.
Charged particle production in Pb-Pb collisions at the LHC with the ALICE detector M Floris (CERN) for the ALICE Collaboration HP2012 – May 28, 2012.
Status of 20 GeV Au+Au Analysis
STAR Geometry and Detectors
STAR Detector Event selection and triggers Corrections to data
“Hard” & “Soft” Interactions in Proton + Proton 200GeV
NKS2 Meeting with Bydzovsky NKS2 Experiment / Analysis Status
p0 ALL analysis in PHENIX
Understanding Neutrino Events at Liquid Argon Detectors
Presentation transcript:

Centrality, N part & N collision at BRAHMS H. Ito University of Kansas For the BRAHMS Collaboration

Why do we want N part ? Comparison of P-P, P-A, and A-A? Comparison of Different Centrality? Can we live without N part ? For comparison of P-P,P-A & A-A, we can compare the most central collisions. What is the concern about using N part ? No Direct Measurement Is there any indirect measurement (ZDC,etc)? If not measured, are there any model dependencies?

What Is Measured? N charge in -4.7<  <4.7 We can measure charged particle multiplicities.

What we have done with N part up to now? Using experimental centrality and comparing with the model calculation, we got N part for our event selections.

How we calculated N part. Measure charged particle multiplicities by Silicon and Tile Correct for missing fraction of the cross section and background events with small multiplicity by Tile only. Correct anomalous background events by Silicon and Tile. Assuming centrality and multiplicity have a linear correlation, select events by slicing the corrected multiplicity distribution vertically. By knowing the centrality, use Monte Carlo simulation to get corresponding N part.

Event Selection for Minimum Bias ZDC is very close to100 % efficient. –Not efficient at the most central events. Beam Beam (BB) is only about 75 % efficient. –Not efficient at the peripheral events. Although the correlated events by BB and ZDC can be used to select only real collision events, it is not used for minimum bias selection. TPC vertexBB vertexZDC vertex

Multiplicity and Centrality Cut Event selection is done by slicing multiplicity distribution vertically. 5%50%

Efficiency for Minimum Bias Events Efficiency of the Tile getting hit in minimum bias event is about 99 % in the Monte Carlo simulation.

How to get the fraction of missing cross section? Measured multiplicity distribution by Tile Throw out Using Hijing with GEANT, estimate how many events we should have for very small multiplicity events.

Centrality Selection in Monte Carlo Multiplicity measured by Silicon and Tile is use to select centrality.

Wounded Nucleon Calculation  NN = 40mb, a =.54 fm CentrallityN part (WN)N collision (WN) N part (Hijing)

Measured Neutron by ZDC 50 % Central Very Few Neutrons ???

Correlation of Tile and Silicon multiplicity

Correlation of BB and Silicon-Tile multiplicity

N part, N collision and Impact Parameter  NN = 40mb, a =.54 fm N collision N part