Prof. David R. Jackson ECE Dept. Spring 2016 Notes 37 ECE 6341 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ECE 6341 Spring 2014 Prof. David R. Jackson ECE Dept. Notes 36.
Advertisements

Prof. Ji Chen Notes 15 Plane Waves ECE Spring 2014 z x E ocean.
Notes 12 ECE Microwave Engineering Fall Surface Waves Prof. David R. Jackson Dept. of ECE Fall 2011.
Prof. David R. Jackson ECE Dept. Spring 2014 Notes 29 ECE
Prof. David R. Jackson Dept. of ECE Fall 2013 Notes 26 ECE 6340 Intermediate EM Waves 1.
Prof. David R. Jackson Dept. of ECE Fall 2013 Notes 22 ECE 6340 Intermediate EM Waves 1.
Prof. David R. Jackson ECE Dept. Spring 2014 Notes 30 ECE
Rectangular Waveguides
Prof. David R. Jackson ECE Dept. Spring 2014 Notes 3 ECE
Prof. David R. Jackson ECE Dept. Spring 2014 Notes 6 ECE
Prof. David R. Jackson Dept. of ECE Fall 2013 Notes 25 ECE 6340 Intermediate EM Waves 1.
Prof. David R. Jackson Dept. of ECE Fall 2013 Notes 19 ECE 6340 Intermediate EM Waves 1.
Prof. David R. Jackson ECE Dept. Fall 2014 Notes 4 ECE 2317 Applied Electricity and Magnetism Notes prepared by the EM Group University of Houston 1.
Prof. David R. Jackson Dept. of ECE Fall 2013 Notes 23 ECE 6340 Intermediate EM Waves 1.
Prof. David R. Jackson ECE Dept. Spring 2014 Notes 13 ECE
Prof. David R. Jackson Dept. of ECE Fall 2013 Notes 17 ECE 6340 Intermediate EM Waves 1.
Prof. David R. Jackson Notes 19 Waveguiding Structures Waveguiding Structures ECE Spring 2013.
Prof. David R. Jackson ECE Dept. Spring 2014 Notes 10 ECE
Prof. David R. Jackson ECE Dept. Spring 2014 Notes 35 ECE
Prof. David R. Jackson ECE Dept. Fall 2014 Notes 6 ECE 2317 Applied Electricity and Magnetism Notes prepared by the EM Group University of Houston 1.
Prof. David R. Jackson ECE Dept. Spring 2014 Notes 34 ECE
Notes 8 ECE Microwave Engineering Waveguides Part 5:
Prof. David R. Jackson Dept. of ECE Fall 2013 Notes 12 ECE 6340 Intermediate EM Waves 1.
Prof. David R. Jackson ECE Dept. Spring 2014 Notes 33 ECE
Prof. David R. Jackson Dept. of ECE Fall 2013 Notes 21 ECE 6340 Intermediate EM Waves 1.
Prof. David R. Jackson Dept. of ECE Fall 2013 Notes 9 ECE 6340 Intermediate EM Waves 1.
1 Spring 2011 Notes 20 ECE 6345 Prof. David R. Jackson ECE Dept.
Rectangular Waveguides
Prof. David R. Jackson ECE Dept. Spring 2014 Notes 21 ECE
Prof. David R. Jackson ECE Dept. Spring 2014 Notes 32 ECE
Prof. David R. Jackson ECE Dept. Spring 2014 Notes 37 ECE
Prof. David R. Jackson ECE Dept. Spring 2014 Notes 19 ECE
1 Spring 2011 Notes 6 ECE 6345 Prof. David R. Jackson ECE Dept.
Prof. David R. Jackson ECE Dept. Fall 2014 Notes 17 ECE 2317 Applied Electricity and Magnetism 1.
Prof. David R. Jackson ECE Dept. Spring 2016 Notes 14 ECE 3318 Applied Electricity and Magnetism 1.
Prof. David R. Jackson ECE Dept. Spring 2016 Notes 17 ECE 3318 Applied Electricity and Magnetism 1.
Spring 2015 Notes 6 ECE 6345 Prof. David R. Jackson ECE Dept. 1.
Prof. David R. Jackson Dept. of ECE Fall 2015 Notes 10 ECE 6340 Intermediate EM Waves 1.
Prof. David R. Jackson Dept. of ECE Fall 2015 Notes 22 ECE 6340 Intermediate EM Waves 1.
The Steepest-Descent Method
Prof. David R. Jackson ECE Dept. Spring 2016 Notes 6 ECE
Prof. David R. Jackson ECE Dept. Spring 2016 Notes 10 ECE
Microwave Engineering
Evaluation of Definite Integrals via the Residue Theorem
Prof. David R. Jackson Dept. of ECE Fall 2015 Notes 11 ECE 6340 Intermediate EM Waves 1.
Spring 2016 Notes 1 ECE 6341 Prof. David R. Jackson ECE Dept. 1.
Branch Points and Branch Cuts
Prof. David R. Jackson ECE Dept. Spring 2016 Notes 42 ECE 6341 Notes 43 1.
Evaluation of Definite Integrals via the Residue Theorem
Notes 22 ECE 6340 Intermediate EM Waves Fall 2016
ECE 6341 Spring 2016 Prof. David R. Jackson ECE Dept. Notes 15.
ECE 6341 Spring 2016 Prof. David R. Jackson ECE Dept. Notes 41.
ECE 6345 Spring 2015 Prof. David R. Jackson ECE Dept. Notes 20.
The Steepest-Descent Method
ECE 6341 Spring 2016 Prof. David R. Jackson ECE Dept. Notes 33.
Notes 12 ECE 6340 Intermediate EM Waves Fall 2016
Notes 4 ECE 3318 Applied Electricity and Magnetism Spring 2017
Notes 17 ECE 6340 Intermediate EM Waves Fall 2016
Microwave Engineering
ECE 6341 Spring 2016 Prof. David R. Jackson ECE Dept. Notes 42.
ECE 6341 Spring 2016 Prof. David R. Jackson ECE Dept. Notes 35.
ECE 6341 Spring 2016 Prof. David R. Jackson ECE Dept. Notes 40.
ECE 6341 Spring 2016 Prof. David R. Jackson ECE Dept. Notes 3.
Bessel Function Examples
ECE 6341 Spring 2016 Prof. David R. Jackson ECE Dept. Notes 32.
ECE 6382 Fall 2017 David R. Jackson Notes 15 Watson’s Lemma.
ECE 6341 Spring 2016 Prof. David R. Jackson ECE Dept. Notes 11.
ECE 6341 Spring 2016 Prof. David R. Jackson ECE Dept. Notes 5.
ECE 6341 Spring 2016 Prof. David R. Jackson ECE Dept. Notes 34.
ECE 6341 Spring 2016 Prof. David R. Jackson ECE Dept. Notes 16.
Presentation transcript:

Prof. David R. Jackson ECE Dept. Spring 2016 Notes 37 ECE

Line Source on a Grounded Slab 2 There are branch points only at (even function of k y1 )

Steepest-Descent Path Physics  There are no branch points in the  plane (cos  is analytic). Both sheets of the k x plane get mapped into a single sheet of the  plane. 3 Steepest-descent transformation:

Steepest-Descent Path Physics Examine k y0 to see where the  plane is proper and improper: 4

SDP Physics (cont.) P: proper I: improper 5 II I I P P PP C

SDP Physics (cont.) Mapping of quadrants in k x plane I LWP SWP I I I P P P P C

SDP Physics (cont.) Non-physical “growing” LW poles (conjugate solution) also exist. 7 I LWP SWP I I I P P P P C The conjugate pole is symmetric about the  /2 line:

SDP Physics (cont.) SDP: A leaky-wave pole is considered to be physical if it is captured when deforming to the SDP (otherwise, there is no direct residue contribution). 8 SDP LWP SWP C

SDP Physics (cont.) LWP: 9 SDP: (exists if pole is captured) The leaky-wave field is important if: 1)The pole is captured (the pole is said to be “physical”). 2)The residue is strong enough. 3)The attenuation constant  is small. Comparison of Fields on interface (  =  / 2 ): (from higher-order steepest-descent method)

SDP Physics (cont.) LWP captured: Note: The angle  b represents the boundary for which the leaky-wave pole is captured (the leaky-wave field exists). 10 SDP LWP

SDP Physics (cont.) Behavior of LW field: In rectangular coordinates: where 11 (It is an inhomogeneous plane-wave field.)

SDP Physics (cont.) Examine the exponential term: Hence since 12

Radially decaying: SDP Physics (cont.) LW exists: Also, recall that 13 LW exists LW decays radially Line source

Power Flow 14 Power flows in the direction of the  vector.

Power Flow (cont.) Hence Note that Also, 15 Note: There is no amplitude change along the rays (  is perpendicular to  in a lossless region).

ESDP (Extreme SDP) ESDP Fast Slow We can show that the ESDP divides the LW region into slow-wave and fast-wave regions. The ESDP is important for evaluating the fields on the interface (which determines the far-field pattern). 16 The ESDP is the SDP for  =  / 2.

ESDP (cont.) (SDP) (ESDP) Recall that To see this: Hence 17

ESDP (cont.) Fast-wave region: Slow-wave region: Hence Compare with ESDP: 18

ESDP (cont.) ESDP Fast Slow The ESDP thus establishes that for fields on the interface, a leaky-wave pole is physical (captured) if it is a fast wave. LWP captured LWP not captured SWP 19

SDP in k x Plane SDP: We now examine the shape of the SDP in the k x plane. The above equations allow us to numerically plot the shape of the SDP in the k x plane. so that 20

SDP in k x Plane (cont.) (Please see the appendix for a proof.) LW SDP SW 21

Fields on Interface The leaky-wave pole is captured if it is in the fast-wave region. LW ESDP SW fast- wave region 22 The SDP is now a lot simpler (two vertical paths)!

Fields on Interface (cont.) The contribution from the ESDP is called the “space-wave” field or the “residual-wave” (RW) field. (It is similar to the lateral wave in the half-space problem.) 23 LW ESDP SW

Asymptotic Evaluation of “Residual-Wave” Field “Residual-Wave” Field Use

Define 25 Asymptotic Evaluation of “Residual-Wave” Field (cont.) “Residual-Wave” Field (cont.)

Then Assume Watson’s lemma (alternative form): 26 We then have Asymptotic Evaluation of “Residual-Wave” Field (cont.) “Residual-Wave” Field (cont.)

It turns out that for the line-source problem at an interface, Hence Note: For a dipole source we have 27 Asymptotic Evaluation of “Residual-Wave” Field (cont.) “Residual-Wave” Field (cont.) Note that the wavenumber is that of free space.

Discussion of Asymptotic Methods We have now seen two ways to asymptotically evaluate the fields on an interface as x   for a line source on a grounded substrate: 1) Steepest-descent (  ) plane 2) Wavenumber ( k x ) plane There are no branch points in the steepest-descent plane. The function f (  ) is analytic at the saddle point  0 =  =  /2, but is zero there. The fields on the interface correspond to a higher- order saddle-point evaluation. The SDP becomes an integration along a vertical path that descends from the branch point at k x = k 0. The integrand is not analytic at the endpoint of integration (branch point) since there is a square-root behavior at the branch point. Watson’s lemma is used to asymptotically evaluate the integral. 28

Summary of Waves LW SW RW Continuous spectrum 29

Interpretation of RW Field The residual-wave (RW) field is actually a sum of lateral-wave fields. 30

Proof of angle property: Hence Appendix: Proof of Angle Property The last identity follows from or 31

As Hence Proof (cont.) On SDP: or (the asymptote) SDP SAP 32

ESDP: Hence To see which choice is correct: In the k x plane, this corresponds to a vertical line for which Proof (cont.) 33