GBLWMP-SLUP Integration Meeting February 4-5, 2010 Sahtu Land Use Planning Board.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Reliability Center Data Request Task Force Report WECC Board Meeting April 2009.
Advertisements

First Working Draft Dehcho Land Use Plan Comments from the Department of Indian Affairs and Northern Development – March 2005.
Regulatory Landscape for Leased Federal Airports Archerfield Airport Community Aviation Consultation Group (AACACG) 2 November 2011 Helen Gannon Aviation.
Clean Water Act Integrated Planning Framework Sewer Smart Summit October 23, 2012.
29e CONFÉRENCE INTERNATIONALE DES COMMISSAIRES À LA PROTECTION DES DONNÉES ET DE LA VIE PRIVÉE 29 th INTERNATIONAL DATA PROTECTION AND PRIVACY COMMISSIONERS.
DRAFT SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES CLIMATE ADAPTATION GUIDEBOOK Kate Marshall, SRA International, Inc. (703) ,
PRESERVATION and PROGRESS IN THE DRAGON RUN SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS PRESERVATION and PROGRESS IN THE DRAGON RUN SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS PARADIGM.
November 22, 2011 Historical Commission Mission : To promote, preserve and protect Alachua County’s historic resources.
Purpose of the Standards
Wetlands Mitigation Policy Sudbury Wetlands Administration Bylaw April 27, 2015.
Noel H. Kaplan, Senior Environmental Planner
Forest Plan Revision Using the 2012 Planning Rule Process Overview Steps and Expectations (I don’t know….but I’ve been told…if the horse don’t pull….you.
Internal Auditing and Outsourcing
Disclosure and Public Consultation Transparency and Participation in the Application of Safeguard Policies.
Planning for a Vibrant Community. Introduction Planning is a process that involves: –Assessing current conditions; envisioning a desired future; charting.
1 Brace Centre for Water Resources Management McGill University, Sept. 25 François Boulanger, Regional Director The New Canadian Environmental Assessment.
Overview of Land and Resource Management in the NWT.
Board of County Commissioners Meeting September 22, 2009 PROPOSED FERTILIZER ORDINANCE.
The Proposed Devolution Agreement. What is a “devolution”? de·vo·lu·tionˌde-və-ˈlü-shən alsoˌdē-və- : transference of rights, powers, property, or responsibility.
Parks Canada in the Dehcho Presentation to the Dehcho Land Use Planning Committee Hay River, NWT March 30, 2005.
Guidance for AONB Partnership Members Welsh Member Training January 26/
Deh Cho Land Use Planning Regional Forum Hay River, NWT 2005 Bill Carpenter, Tony Iacobelli, Freya Nales.
Building Strong! 1 US Army Corps of Engineers Regulatory Program Kimberly McLaughlin Program Manager Headquarters Operations and Regulatory Community of.
Water Supply Planning Initiative State Water Commission November 22, 2004.
1 IDEM Overview of March 14, 2008 Draft Antidegradation Rule Presented at the April 29, 2008 Antidegradation Stakeholder Meeting.
Energy, Environmental Impacts, and Sustainable Development Presented by Cat Shrier, Ph.D., P.G. Water Resources Planner (403)
Monterey Peninsula Water Management District 1 Confirm Scope of Work and Description for MPWMD ASR Project Item 13 April 18, 2005 Regular Meeting Staff.
MS4 Remand Rule Intergovernmental Associations Briefing September 15, 2015.
New Brighton Planning Commission Meeting April 18, 2006 Public Hearing: Zoning Ordinance Amendment: Section Regarding Commercial/Industrial Park.
Disclosure of Preliminary Screening Staff package provided to MVEIRB prior to Board meeting MVEIRB informed of Board decision Decision issued three (working)
WEST BERKELEY PROJECT Master Use Permits (MUP) May 15, 2012 Response to Concerns & Issues.
TEXAS NODAL Board of Directors Austin, Texas July 15, 2003.
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ABORIGINAL LANDS AND PEOPLES NOVEMBER 5, 2012.
NEGOTIATING TRADE FACILITATION Kennedy Mbekeani UNDP, RSC.
Federal Department of the Environment, Transport, Energy and Communications DETEC Federal Office for the Environment FOEN Economics and Environmental Monitoring.
Planning schemes Statutory documents under s.20(2) of LUPAA –outline policies and objectives –regulate or prohibit use or development of land –reserve.
EIA-legislation and practice in Norway history history latest amendments of regulations latest amendments of regulations integrated planning/EIA processes.
Environmental Impact Assessment in the Slovak republic.
Revisions to Primacy State Underground Injection Control Programs Primacy State Implementation of the New Class V Rule.
April 2006 Middle Fork Project Relicensing Process April 25, 2006
© 2009 Barnes & Thornburg LLP. All Rights Reserved. This page, and all information on it, is the property of Barnes & Thornburg LLP which may not be reproduced,
1 Update to Dehcho Land Use Planning Forum on Draft Changes to Interim Dehcho Land Use Plan Update to Dehcho Land Use Planning Forum on Draft Changes to.
Page 1 | Confidential and Proprietary Information Structure of the Code Don Thomson, Working Group Chair IESBA Meeting Toronto, Canada April 7-9, 2014.
Cooperating Agency Status Presented by Horst Greczmiel Associate Director, NEPA Oversight Council on Environmental Quality Washington, DC September 14,
Drinking Water Source Protection Ministry of the Environment Source Protection Programs Branch March 2010.
1 Waste Discharge Authorization Application - British Columbia WG6 Application Process WG Document Review presented by Helga Harlander October x, 2008.
Responsibilities of Lead Agency Pages 7-8 of Training Guide 1. Preliminary review a) Determine if activity is a project as described by CEQA b) May require.
Page 1 | Confidential and Proprietary Information Review of Part C Jim Gaa, Chair, Part C Task Force IESBA CAG Meeting New York, USA September 14, 2015.
Page 1 | Proprietary and Copyrighted Information Structure of the Code Don Thomson, Task Force Chair IESBA Meeting New York, USA September 15-16, 2015.
Community Redevelopment for Eastside Report on Advisory Committee Input and Request for Board Direction June 26, 2012.
Disclosure and Public Consultation Transparency and Participation in the Application of Safeguard Policies Presenter: Johnson Appavoo Presentation prepared.
Eagle Heights Development Proposal Consists of two sets of development applications and two property ownerships: Paletta and Taylor lands. Paletta is applicant.
Public Consultation Session: Consultation and Transparency Requirements for Offshore Petroleum Activities Francesca Astolfi A/g General Manager, Offshore.
GBLWMP-SLUP Integration February 5, 2010 Deline. Ecological Integrity Policy GBLWMPSLUP (a): All activities in the GBLW must be consistent with.
Highlights  Describe Our Missoula Growth Policy Project  Relationship to Rattlesnake Neighborhood Plan  Next Steps.
1 Sahtu Land Use Planning Board Public Hearing on the Draft 3 Sahtu Land Use Plan May 2011 INAC Presentation.
Planning & Community Development Department Olivewood Village Project (530, 535 E. Union St., 95, 99, 119 N. Madison Ave. and 585 E. Colorado Blvd.) Predevelopment.
EIAScreening6(Gajaseni, 2007)1 II. Scoping. EIAScreening6(Gajaseni, 2007)2 Scoping Definition: is a process of interaction between the interested public,
SLUP Issues / Draft Agenda DLC & DRRC SLUP Meetings, February 4 & 5, 2010, Deline, NT.
New Environmental Science-based Regulations on Pleasure Craft
Recommended Draft Policy ARIN
Proposed Revisions to 10 CFR Part 61
Roadmap to Enhanced Technical Regulations of WMO
Outcome TFCS-11// February Washington DC
Setting Actuarial Standards
Outcome TFCS-11// February Washington DC
Structure–Feedback on Structure ED-2 and Task Force Proposals
Structure of the Code Don Thomson, Task Force Chair IESBA CAG Meeting
1915(c) WAIVER REDESIGN 2019 Brain Injury Summit
Alignment of Part 4B with ISAE 3000
Presentation transcript:

GBLWMP-SLUP Integration Meeting February 4-5, 2010 Sahtu Land Use Planning Board

Agenda History and Context SLUP Proposed Revisions Structure Zoning Conformity Requirements, Actions and Recommendations Integration Questions

History & Context 1999–2002: SLUPB develops Preliminary Draft : GBLWMP developed GBLWMP developed outside the SLUP process (SLUPB Board not fully operational) Government –funded, community-driven process with representation from government, Boards and others Incorporates zoning elements from Preliminary Draft Presented to SLUPB in 2005/06 for inclusion in SLUP

Draft 1 – February 2007 SLUP produces Draft 1 which incorporates zoning, conditions and prohibitions of GBLWMP Sahtu-wide INAC Comments: “Regarding the Great Bear Lake Watershed Management Plan, this document needs to be appended to the Plan as formally agreed to by the parties that developed it, based on the recommendations of the Elders of Déline.” “ …it was developed specifically for the GBL watershed, to represent the Land Use Plan's provisions for that part of the GBLW that lies within the SSA.”

Deline Draft 1 Comments “We recommend that the Sahtu Land Use Planning Board incorporate the entire Great Bear Lake Management Plan, amended as set out below, into the next draft of the SLUP. If that is not possible, we recommend that the Board incorporate the story of the water heart and all of Parts 4 and 5 of the Great Bear Lake Management Plan, amended as set out below, into the next draft of the SLUP, and that the Management Plan as a whole, amended as set out below, be appended to the Land Use Plan, as part of the SLUP.”

Discussion Draft 2 – Aug 2007 Minor editorial changes to conditions & prohibitions of GBLWMP to address comments (still Sahtu-wide) Incomplete draft (zoning and terms only) INAC Comments: “capture at least the essence of the GBLWMP as well as its recommendations within the Sahtu Land Use Plan, if the GBLWMP is not appended in its entirety.” Deline Comments (March 2009): Incorporate the GBLWMP into the SLUP, complete the rest of the plan and send to SSI, the GNWT and INAC for approval ASAP OR fast-track approval of GBLW portion

Draft 2 – April 2009 New SLUPB Board and Staff members Establishes the GBLWMP as “the plan” within the GBLWMP with amendments as requested (CR#1) Deline Comments: Nothing submitted on SLUP directly Ecological integrity papers submitted in Sept/10

Draft 2 Comments GNWT Comments: “The GNWT has serious concerns about the Great Bear Lake Watershed not being incorporated into the regional Sahtu Land Use Plan. Having a portion of the Sahtu region fall under a separate planning regime as opposed to under the SLUP, with potentially different conformity and implementation mechanisms, would greatly increase the complexity of the overall land management/regulatory regime in the NWT as a whole.” More detailed comments submitted in Dec/09

Draft 2 Comments INAC Comments: “Regarding the Great Bear Lake Watershed Management Plan, the Board should keep in mind that it is not a land use plan and does not have legal force or effect. Land use planning in the Sahtu must therefore be integrated into a single Sahtu Land Use Plan with consistent language throughout that conform to the regulatory regime.” “The Department supports incorporating those parts of the GBLWMP from Chapters 4 and 5 which are relevant and enforceable into the Plan. “

Draft 2 Comments INAC Comments: “The GBLWMP contains a number of mandatory directions to appropriate authorities and others to do certain things independent of any particular application for an authorization. These sorts of directions potentially cross the line into the jurisdiction of government and regulatory authorities” “…the GBLWMP must clearly define what is expected of First Nations, departments and agencies of government, and other regulatory authorities where it states that something should be done or avoided.” Additional comments submitted in Nov & Dec/09

Draft 3 Approach “A Planning Board shall take into consideration a land use plan proposed by the first nation for its settlement lands in the settlement area, and may incorporate that plan into the land use plan for the settlement area.” (MVRMA S. 41(4)) SLUP must be: Acceptable to Parties (SSI, GNWT, INAC) Fit with regulatory regime Clear and implementable Have consistent language, rules and structure throughout (including sections on GBLW) Integrate spirit and intent of GBLWMP into SLUP: Terms and conditions must be harmonized with SLUP approach Vision, goals and descriptive information easier to integrate

Plan Structure Plan: Scope and Application Vision & Goals Zoning /Descriptions Conformity Requirements, Actions & Recommendations Approval and Implementation Background Report Society and Culture Biophysical Environment Economy Regulatory Environment Other Planning Initiatives  Separation of “Plan” and “Background Report”

Zone Definition Changes General Use Zones – General protection requirements Special Management Zones – Enhanced protection measures to mitigate impacts on identified values Conservation Zones / Proposed Conservation Initiatives – No Development Zones (No Change)

General Use Zones General Environmental & Cultural Protection Conformity Requirements (e.g. CR # 5-11, 18-20) Basic Wildlife CRs – Identify & mitigate impacts (CR 14-15) New requirement for watershed-level considerations Actions applicable Sahtu-wide – e.g. (Consultation, TK Collection, Monitoring)

Special Management Zones Enhanced measures to protect specific values Identification of specific ecological or cultural areas and values Requirement to mitigate impacts to those values identified for those areas Developers and regulators to pay special attention May require additional monitoring and enforcement Greater need for community engagement in those areas

Conservation Zones No Development Zones Identifies the most significant areas where development is not compatible with protection of values Existing uses allowed to continue and develop Access and infrastructure permitted for existing uses, community development, and across zones to enable development in adjacent zones

WaterWildlife CZ: No Dev’t SMZ: Mitigate impacts on specific rivers and lakes GUZ: Consider impacts within greater watershed CZ: No Dev’t SMZ: Setbacks & measures to protect critical areas GUZ: Identify general wildlife use and mitigate impacts

Community Engagement Traditional use areas CZ: No Dev’t SMZ: Discuss site-specific values and mitigation GUZ: Consult with communities CZ: No Dev’t SMZ: Mitigate impacts to key community use areas GUZ: Avoid cabins and trap lines

Integration Questions Degree of integration: 1) Application of terms to zone types as per GBLWMP; or 2) Application of terms to zone types as per ongoing changes to the SLUP Equality of information: Ok if sections pertaining to GBLW contain more information than for other districts? Open to use of General Use Zones given proposed changes to SLUP?