US Army Corps of Engineers Engineer Research & Development Center Partnering Reduces Costs & Provides Consistency for Federal Auditing Programs Federal.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Role of Senior Management
Advertisements

DOE O Changes and the CRS
EMS Checklist (ISO model)
PRINCIPLES OF A CALIBRATION MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
Department of Military Affairs & Public Safety WV Office of Emergency Services Primary GIS Missions: Support Emergency Operations Partner with GIS Data.
Chapter 7: Key Process Areas for Level 2: Repeatable - Arvind Kabir Yateesh.
National Space-Based Positioning, Navigation, and Timing (PNT) Federal Advisory Board DHS Challenges & Opportunities Captain Curtis Dubay, P.E. Department.
 A large organization composed of appointed officials whose authority is divided among several managers.
ICAO TECHNICAL COOPERATION PROJECTS IN INDONESIA 1973 to 2004.
Department of Defense Legacy Resource Management Program Project Commander’s Guide To Archaeological Curation - Presentation US Army Corps of Engineers,
Environmental Management Systems An Overview With Practical Applications.
Minnesota Manual of Accommodations for Students with Disabilities Training Guide
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS MARINE OPERATIONS CENTER – PACIFIC INTRODUCTION TO OUR SYSTEM JIM SCHELL, ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE OFFICER.
1 $90M of compliance work in past 5 years Conducted environmental compliance projects in GSA Region 3 National and regionally recognized experts.
Self Declaration Protocol EPA Regions 9 & 10 and The Federal Network for Sustainability 2005.
ISO Standard is based on the management model of plan – do - check – act. Today we all be discussing the elements of the standard that deal with.
Environmental Management Systems The ISO Approach Initial Environmental Review & Gap Analysis Presented by: NC Division of Pollution Prevention.
Ann Murphy, Office of the Chief Administrative Officer NOAA Trusted Agent Training Silver Spring, MD October 2014 National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
Environmental Management Services
Keep Fort Rucker “Above The Best.”
1 Monitoring Review: What Every New Coordinator Should Know Victoria Rankin and Greta Colombi, NDTAC.
Naval Organization Chapter 6 BMR
Performance Metrics for EMS Self Assessment & Management Review 30 th Environmental and Energy Symposium & Exhibition April 5 – 8, 2004.
1 Department of the Army Mass Transportation Benefit Program (MTBP) Guidance for Participants.
District Planning Council Program Overview. District Planning Concept Local Elected Officials Emergency Managers Emergency Responders Local Business Community.
Charter, Contract, Laws, Policies, Regulations, and Statutes.
WHAT DO YOU DO IN THE NATIONAL SECURITY PATHWAY? Protecting the nation!
CUI Statistical: Collaborative Efforts of Federal Statistical Agencies Eve Powell-Griner National Center for Health Statistics.
CTTSO Overview John Morgan, Deputy Director for Science and Technology, CTTSO September 2010.
Auditing an EMS for Conformance with EO 13423
The Key Process Areas for Level 2: Repeatable Ralph Covington David Wang.
How To Apply Quality Management
Engaging Contractors in the Environmental Management System (EMS) Department of Energy EMS Workshop: Implementation, Lessons Learned, and Best Practices.
Federal Aviation Administration Advisory Circular 150/5370-2F Operational Safety on Airports During Construction Presented to: Eastern Region 35 th Annual.
1 DOE IMPLEMENTATION WORKSHOP ASSESSING MY EMS Steven R. Woodbury
1 CT DDS Quality Service Review Connecticut Community Providers Association Presented by Fred Balicki, DDS Quality Management Services May 27, 2008.
Emergency Responder Health Monitoring and Surveillance “ERHMS” John Halpin, M.D., MPH and Renee Funk DVM, MPH
IS-804: ESF #4 – Firefighting Firefighting
IS-813: ESF #13 – Public Safety and Security
1 Developed by: U-MIC To start the presentation, click on this button in the lower right corner of your screen. The presentation will begin after the.
Homeland Security Grant Program Reimbursement Workshop May 28, 2009.
Shelf Life Extension Program (SLEP)
Energy Exploration & Development On National Forest System Lands Barry Burkhardt
A Culture of Sustainability NDIA 30 th Environmental & Energy Symposium Hank Habicht Chief Executive Officer Global Environment & Technology Foundation.
Research Compliance: An Overview of the Players and Issues Involved in Emory’s Research Compliance Programs.
SAFETEA-LU Section 6002 “ Efficient Environmental Reviews for Project Decisionmaking”
Introduction to CASA ( C ontacts A nd S elf- A ssessment ) ANR Affirmative Action Unit.
DoD Region 4 Pollution Prevention Project Task 8: Database Development and EMS Integration Phil Barnes University of South Carolina.
Geoffrey L. Beausoleil Assistant Manager, Office of Operational Support DOE Idaho Operations Office September 12, 2006 Presentation to DOE ISM Champions.
Developing an In-House Air Quality Audit Program March 22, 2006 Judy B. Yorke Yorke Engineering, LLC x25
Federal Acquisition Service U.S. General Services Administration GSA Assisted Acquisition Services Peter Han General Services Administration March 16,
6 November 2013 Created for IEA Conference Presented by: M. Cristina Ferrari NAVFAC SW Environmental Program Manager Naval Facilities Engineering Command.
1 EMS Fundamentals An Introduction to the EMS Process Roadmap AASHTO EMS Workshop.
Navy EMS Implementation Status September Title/Group/Section,etc. Navy EMS Requirements  Fully conforming EMS by Sept 2009  U.S. (by EO) and.
OSEP Project Directors’ Conference Managing Your Grants 101 Terry Jackson – OSEP Shedeh Hajghassemali – OSEP July 22, 2008.
Air & Waste Management Association
Safety & Health Considerations in Accommodating Commercial Activties David Loyd, JSC Safety & Test Operations 2013 NASA Safety Directors & Occupational.
A N N I S T O N A R M Y D E P O T Clean Air Act Implementation Through an Environmental Management System April 2004.
Verification, Validation and Internal Audits - Jose Jimenez Federal Facilities Program Manager – EPA Region III.
Department of Defense (DoD) Funded Human Subjects Research J. Bruce Smith, MD.
1 Federal Facilities Environmental Stewardship and Compliance Assistance Center FedCenter User Group Forum 2008 Federal Environmental Symposium June 3,
Office of the City Manager. 2 Presentation Agenda 11 1 Mission Statement Core Services Finance and Budget Admin. Economic Development Grants Administration.
ICAO TECHNICAL COOPERATION PROJECTS IN INDONESIA
The Administration of Subrecipient Agreements
Check On Learning Q: What manual, regulation, or publication governs The Army Management Structure for Fiscal Year? DFAS-IN MANUAL FY DFAS-IN 37-1.
CoC Subrecipient Management
Branches of the Military
County HIPAA Review All Rights Reserved 2002.
EMS Checklist (ISO model)
The Federal Aviation Administration Presented By: Gary Romero
Presentation transcript:

US Army Corps of Engineers Engineer Research & Development Center Partnering Reduces Costs & Provides Consistency for Federal Auditing Programs Federal Environmental Symposium - East Donna J. Schell

US Army Corps of Engineers Engineer Research & Development Center Compliance/Conformance Audit Basics All Federal Agencies are subject to the same environmental, health, safety, and EMS standards. Compliance/conformance with all of these standards is typically determined through an ongoing audit/assessment program where: –Noncompliance/nonconformance is identified –Steps to be taken toward compliance/conformance are identified –Monitoring is done of progress towards compliance/conformance –Program metrics are evaluated. Plan Do Act Check

US Army Corps of Engineers Engineer Research & Development Center IF  Agencies have similar functions AND  All must comply with the same requirements How can agencies share tools and reduce costs?

US Army Corps of Engineers Engineer Research & Development Center The “TEAM” Documents The question of sharing resources/partnering first arose in the early 1990s. DoD agencies were individually paying for environmental compliance audit manuals addressing the same sets of Federal and State regulations. In 1993 a meeting was held with representatives from DoD agencies and CERL personnel to explore the partnering idea.

US Army Corps of Engineers Engineer Research & Development Center First Steps in Partnering In 1994, the following jointly-funded environmental manuals/ checklists were issued: –U.S. TEAM Guide –State Supplements –Agency-Specific Supplements for agency-specific requirements The original partners were: –Active Army (AEC) –Army National Guard –Army Reserve –Air National Guard –Air Force –Corps of Engineers (Civil Works)

US Army Corps of Engineers Engineer Research & Development Center TEAM Partnering Today Army Env. Center Army National Guard Army Reserve Air National Guard Air Force Corps of Engineers (Civil Works) DLA Navy NASA DHS Fish and Wildlife Service Forest Service FAA Dept of Commerce Dept. of Energy USPS National Park Service (West Coast only) State Department Vet. Health Administration

US Army Corps of Engineers Engineer Research & Development Center OSHGuide - Beyond Environmental First OSHGuide was issued in 2002 –Based on 29 CFR 1910, 1926, 1904, and 1960 –Originally developed for the Air National Guard Current partners include: (NOTE: The Radiation Protection protocol is a part of OSHGuide and addresses 10 CFR 20, 31, 50.73, and 71.4) – –Air National Guard – –Air Force – –Dept. of Homeland Security – –FAA – –Forest Service – –State Dept – –Vet. Health Administration

US Army Corps of Engineers Engineer Research & Development Center CPTrack Another Partnering Opportunity A CERL-developed web-based tool used to: –Manage the audit/assessment process –Serve as a data repository Developed with the stipulation that future cost- sharing be considered The result is known today as the Compliance and Processes Tracking (CPTrack) system.

US Army Corps of Engineers Engineer Research & Development Center Id equipment, activities, permits, mission Conduct audit against standards Develop plan to achieve compliance Ensure compliance is maintained CPTrack Business ProcessPLAN DO ACT CHECK

US Army Corps of Engineers Engineer Research & Development Center Facility Survey Facility Survey Self Audit Self Audit Internal Audit Internal Audit Findings of Noncompliance Findings of Noncompliance Findings of Noncompliance Findings of Noncompliance Findings of Noncompliance Findings of Noncompliance External Audit External Audit Corrective Action Plan Corrective Action Plan CPTrack Master Business Process Red Border = Optional at Agency Discretion Green Border = Suggested Required Functions PLAN DO ACT CHECK DO

US Army Corps of Engineers Engineer Research & Development Center CPTrack Partnering CPTrack is a system based on the previously outlined business process –Module-based –Agencies can pick and choose modules Possible new functions presented to partners - the cost divided by those interested Unique functions or applications funded by specific agency Helpdesk costs divided among all partners

US Army Corps of Engineers Engineer Research & Development Center CPTrack Structure

US Army Corps of Engineers Engineer Research & Development Center

US Army Corps of Engineers Engineer Research & Development Center CPTrack Functionalities Within each part of the CPTrack Master Business Process (i.e. functionality), the partners individually choose the following options for their Department/Agency: –Who gets to see what and enter data? –Whether or not there will be a quality assurance process within the individual functionalities? –How the approval process will work to identify a functionality as done/complete? –What additional reports are desired in addition to those already developed? –Which questions from the Facility Survey do you not want to ask and what additional questions do you want to include in the Facility Survey?

US Army Corps of Engineers Engineer Research & Development Center CPTrack Outputs Audit/assessment reports Corrective Action Plan Data Roll ups from Facility Survey Baseline Aspects/Impacts List Tailored Internal Audit Checklist Graphs and charts displaying audit/operation/ corrective action status

US Army Corps of Engineers Engineer Research & Development Center CPTrack Costs New Partners do not pay for the prior development costs, only new development and helpdesk costs. There are no licensing costs. TEAM Guide, the State Supplements, OSHGuide, EMS, and the Radiation protocols are all available in CPTrack, but they will not be turned on, or even seen, unless the CPTrack partner is also a TEAM partner.

US Army Corps of Engineers Engineer Research & Development Center How To Become a Partner If your agency is not currently a partner in TEAM and/or CPTrack, they can become a partner with CERL via the following funding mechanisms – whichever works best for your agency/department: –DoD MIPRs –Civilian Federal Agencies Interagency Agreements (IAG) MOA/MOU Reimbursable Support Agreement (RSA) Funds transfer through a Corps District. Additional information is available in a handout at the CPTrack table.

US Army Corps of Engineers Engineer Research & Development Center Questions?