COPE PRESENTATION Process Modeling and Ice Nuclei.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Cloud droplet activation schemes. Motivation Met Office: UM new microphysics (4a scheme), linked to aerosols via parameterisations. Also WRF uses similar.
Advertisements

A Winter Season Physical Evaluation of the Effects of Cloud Seeding in the Colorado Mountains William R. Cotton, Ray McAnelly, and Gustavo Carrió Colorado.
Clouds and cloud microphysics Wojciech W. Grabowski National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado, USA (on collaborative leave at CNRM, Toulouse,
What is precipitation? Phases of water in the air Cloud formation
Steven Siems 1 and Greg McFarquhar 2 1 Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia 2 University of Illinois, Urbana, IL, USA Steven Siems 1 and Greg McFarquhar.
Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory Review June 30 - July 2, 2009 Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory Review June 30 - July 2, 2009.
Hallet-Mossop Process as a Mechanism for Ice Multiplication Steven Brown Atmospheric Sciences 5/16/2011.
Convective Cloud Research Current Projects: 1. CSIP 2. COPS 3. ICEPIC 4. RICO 5. APPRAISE 6. VOCALS (AG) 7. In-cloud temperature probe Possible Future.
ENVI3410 : Lecture 8 Ken Carslaw
NATS 101 Lecture 13 Precipitation Processes. Supplemental References for Today’s Lecture Danielson, E. W., J. Levin and E. Abrams, 1998: Meteorology.
Observational approaches to understanding cloud microphysics.
Numerical Simulations of Snowpack Augmentation for Drought Mitigation Studies in the Colorado Rocky Mountains William R. Cotton, Ray McAnelly, and Gustavo.
Daniel Grosvenor, Thomas Choularton, Martin Gallagher (University of Manchester, UK); Thomas Lachlan Cope and John King (British Antarctic Survey). Daniel.
Cloud Microphysics SOEE3410 : Lecture 4 Ken Carslaw Lecture 2 of a series of 5 on clouds and climate Properties and distribution of clouds Cloud microphysics.
Spectral microphysics in weather forecast models with special emphasis on cloud droplet nucleation Verena Grützun, Oswald Knoth, Martin Simmel, Ralf Wolke.
Chapter 4 (cont.) Precipitation. How does precipitation form? Why do some clouds generate precipitation and others do not? What factors determine the.
A Quick Review Of Snow Microphysics And Its Relation to Heavy Snow Forecasting Greg DeVoir NWS CTP Winter Weather Workshop November 7, 2002.
ON THE RESPONSE OF HAILSTORMS TO ENHANCED CCN CONCENTRATIONS William R. Cotton Department of Atmospheric Science, Colorado State University.
5. Formation and Growth of Ice Crystals
Chapter 7 – Precipitation Processes
Different heterogeneous routes of the formation of atmospheric ice Anatoli Bogdan Institute of Physical Chemistry, University of Innsbruck Austria and.
Acknowledgments This research was supported by the DOE Atmospheric Radiation Measurements Program (ARM) and by the PNNL Directed Research and Development.
Page 1© Crown copyright ICEPIC Sortie Brief P:\OBR\Exeter\2006 Spring Sortie Briefs\ICEPIC sortie brief.doc Steve Abel: 20 th April 2006.
Precipitation.
Chapter 5 Forms of Condensation and Precipitation
Hurricane Cloud Physics
Biosphere/Atmosphere Interactions in the Tropics.
Atul Kapur.  Direct effects i. Aerosols scatter & absorb solar radiation ii. Scatter, absorb & emit thermal radiation  Indirect effects: Aerosols can.
Morrison/Gettelman/GhanAMWG January 2007 Two-moment Stratiform Cloud Microphysics & Cloud-aerosol Interactions in CAM H. Morrison, A. Gettelman (NCAR),
Possible Aerosol Effects on Lightning Activity and Structure of Hurricanes Khain, A., N. Cohen, B. Lynn, and A. Pokrovsky, 2008: Possible aerosol effects.
April Hansen et al. [1997] proposed that absorbing aerosol may reduce cloudiness by modifying the heating rate profiles of the atmosphere. Absorbing.
Betty Croft, and Randall V. Martin – Dalhousie University, Canada
Ice in the Atmosphere W+H 6.5; S+P Ch. 17 Start with some terminology –Warm clouds = T > 0 ºC (= K) –Cold clouds = T < 0 ºC Cold clouds may or may.
Class #24: Wednesday, March 4
Influences of In-cloud Scavenging and Cloud Processing on Aerosol Concentrations in ECHAM5-HAM Betty Croft - Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada Ulrike.
Cloud Microphysics Liz Page NWS/COMET Hydromet February 2000.
Cloud Physics Summary SOURCE:
Distribution of Liquid Water in Orographic Mixed-Phase Clouds Diana Thatcher Mentor: Linnea Avallone LASP REU 2011.
A study of ice formation by primary nucleation and ice multiplication in shallow precipitating embedded convection T. Choularton 1, I. Crawford 1, C. Dearden.
INUPIAQ/CLACE 2014 University of Manchester Data availability.
Daniel Grosvenor, Thomas Choularton, Martin Gallagher (University of Manchester, UK); Thomas Lachlan Cope and John King (British Antarctic Survey). Daniel.
Modelling and observations of droplet growth in clouds A Coals 1, A M Blyth 1, J-L Brenguier 2, A M Gadian 1 and W W Grabowski 3 Understanding the detailed.
Radiative Influences on Glaciation Time-Scales in Mixed-Phase Clouds Zachary Lebo, Nathanial Johnson, and Jerry Harrington Penn State University Acknowledgements:
Guy Cascella, in association with MPO531, presents: Featuring: African dust aerosols as atmospheric nuclei, DeMott et al, 2003 Chemical characteristics.
ATMO 336 Weather, Climate and Society Vertical Stability Precipitation Processes.
Particle Size, Water Path, and Photon Tunneling in Water and Ice Clouds ARM STM Albuquerque Mar Sensitivity of the CAM to Small Ice Crystals.
Ice-Ice Collisions: An Ice Multiplication Process in Atmospheric Clouds by Vaughan Phillips (Uni. of Hawaii) Jun-Ichi Yano(Meteo France)
Modeling. How Do we Address Aerosol-Cloud Interactions? The Scale Problem Process Models ~ 10s km Mesoscale Models Cloud resolving Models Regional Models.
Understanding The Effect Of Anthropogenic Aerosol Weekly Cycles Upon The Climate Using A Global Model Of Aerosol Processes (GLOMAP) Introduction GLOMAP.
Chapter 7 Precipitation Processes Chapter 7 Precipitation Processes.
Production of Ice in Tropospheric Clouds by Will Cantrell and Andrew Heymsfield Presentation by: Emily Riley 27 February 2007.
Update on progress with the implementation of a new two-moment microphysics scheme: Model description and single-column tests Hugh Morrison, Andrew Gettelman,
Chien Wang Massachusetts Institute of Technology A Close Look at the Aerosol-Cloud Interaction in Tropical Deep Convection.
Background – Building their Case “continental” – polluted, aerosol laden “maritime” – clean, pristine Polluted concentrations are 1-2 orders of magnitude.
Initiation of precipitation via the ice phase Part I: Microphysical processes Karoline Diehl University of Mainz, Germany Institute of Atmospheric Physics.
Impact of Cloud Microphysics on the Development of Trailing Stratiform Precipitation in a Simulated Squall Line: Comparison of One- and Two-Moment Schemes.
The Impact of cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) concentration and ice- nucleus (IN) concentration on clouds and precipitation in Hirlam Karl-Ivar Ivarsson.
1 Detailed Microphysical Model Simulations of Freezing Drizzle Formation Istvan Geresdi Roy Rasmussen University of Pecs, Hungary NCAR Research funded.
Part II: Implementation of a New Snow Parameterization EXPLICIT FORECASTS OF WINTER PRECIPITATION USING AN IMPROVED BULK MICROPHYSICS SCHEME Thompson G.,
B3. Microphysical Processes
Clouds (Condensed PPT)
Environmental Physics Laboratory, Institute of Physics Belgrade
Class #25: Friday, March 6 Clouds, fronts, precipitation processes, upper-level waves, and the extratropical cyclone Class #25: Friday, March 6, 2009.
H. Morrison, A. Gettelman (NCAR) , S. Ghan (PNL)
What are the causes of GCM biases in cloud, aerosol, and radiative properties over the Southern Ocean? How can the representation of different processes.
5. Formation and Growth of Ice Crystals
Microphysics of Cold Clouds
GCM activities in Ulrike Lohmann’s group
Review of Roesenfeld et al
 Return to #1 or proceed forward
Presentation transcript:

COPE PRESENTATION Process Modeling and Ice Nuclei

Current Status Show results from convective clouds near Chilbolton These are shallow clouds with tops around -7C Show rapid glaciation small amounts of primary ice deduced from measurements of aerosol followed by rapid glaciation Key issues Origin of first ice when does it form ? What are the ice nuclei, CCN number of droplets. Role of Organic and dust aerosol in this input from ACIDPRUF (lab studies of ice nucleation) Role of secondary ice (mainly Hallett-Mossop) but is splintering of supercooled raindrops important outside the H-M zone ? How does secondary ice contribute to the precipitation production in the cloud

B425 (22/01/09) - Run 1 (13:17-13:42z) Alt 1.3km (-1.0 ± 0.1ºC) (eastbound)

B425 (22/01/09) – Run 3 (13:56-14:15z) Alt 1.26km (-3.5 ± 0.3ºC) (eastbound)

B425 (22/01/09) – Microphysics summary Key: red dot =1Hz data point, diamond = median, circle = mean, blue dots = +/- one sd from mean

B425 (22/01/09) – Aerosol size measurements – Ground and Aircraft (PCASP)

Aerosol Cloud and Precipitation Interactions Model (ACPIM) (Connolly et al., 2009) run as a Microphysics Cloud Parcel model 1.Treats the hygroscopic growth and cloud activation of mixed aerosol including organic material (following Topping et al., 2005) 2.The activation of the ice phase using an IN parameterisation (eg DeMott et al., 2010) or results from laboratory experiments 3.The growth of ice particles by vapour diffusion, riming and aggregation 4.Precipitation 5.Secondary ice splinter production by Hallett- Mossop SIP process. Aerosol input to ACPIM includes: Observed size distribution and composition (here from AMS, WIBS, and filter analyses) sensitivity tests to: composition distribution (internal/external mixtures); updraught predicted CCN number (c.f. measured values below CB at % SS) cloud droplet number then other sensitivity tests examining primary IN and HM (SIP)

Sensitivity to increasing IN number (here by shifting T input in DeMott (2010) parameterisation) B425 (22/01/09) – ACPIM sensitivity tests to increasing IN number HM (switched on) Maximum Ice Crystal Concentration (L -1 ) Time (min) to reach 100 L -1 concentration HM (switched off) HM (high aerosol input)

B425 (22/01/09) – ACPIM simulations: Summary 2 1.HM powerful process – generating 3 orders magnitude more ice than IN parameterisations predict (e.g De Mott 2010) 2.Key to this: aerosol input (CCN number) – need large droplets to be present (formed by collision-coalescence) 3.IN number: Need sufficient primary ice particles to produce rimer particles and initiate HM (but if too many IN present then primary ice removes drops by Bergeron-Findeisen -turning HM process off) But what is the source of primary IN?

Model used extrapolate results up to higher temperatures B425 (22/01/09) – IN from ice nuclei Surface area dependent Active Sites concept obs spectrum & SAS at -7ºC give ~10 -2 L -1 IN

Developments needed Detailed measurement of aerosol input to cloud (size and composition) and on board aircraft. Measurements of first ice in the cloud (3V-CPI) for size distribution, CAS for polarisation, SID ? for very small ice particles Model needs improved treatment of ice nucleation by organic aerosol in particular, can we discriminate between dusts. Model needs to incorporate drop freezing as a source of splinters ? Use data and models to identify relative roles of primary nucleation and secondary ice in cloud development (dynamics and precipitation)