The Planet Mark Certification Report Dunlop Systems and Components 1st January st December 2014

Contents About this Report Engagement Waste Water Travel Carbon Footprint Overview Building Comparison Improvement & Recommendations

Summary Carbon footprint includes both previous and current sites. Highlights: Carbon footprint (tCO 2 e)972.4 Per employee (tCO 2 e)13.0 Carbon footprint comparison-58.2% Comparison per employee-55.4% Next reduction target5% Data quality score15 out of 20 Used773,473kWh of electricity Used280,466kWh of natural gas Produced168tonnes of waste Used2,541m³ of water Travelled62,427km in fleet vehicles

Total Carbon Footprint SourceScopeUnit 1st January - 31st December 20131st January - 31st December 2014 % change (to restated) AmounttCO 2 e tCO 2 e Restated AmounttCO 2 e Building Electricity2kWh2,487, ,467.11, , % Natural Gas1m3570, , , % Waste Landfill - Mixed3tonnes % Recycled - Mixed, Metal, Wood, Cardboard, WEEE 3tonnes % Water Water Supply3m³6, , % Water Treatment3m³5, , % Travel Vehicle – Fleet - Diesel1Km71, , % TotaltCO 2 e 1,604.32, % No. employeesNumber80 75 Total per employeetCO 2 e % Total floor spacem2m2 11,148 5,634

Carbon Footprint by Scope tCO 2 e Restated 2014 % change (to restated) Scope 1 Natural Gas, Fleet , % Scope 2 Electricity 1, , % Scope 3 Waste, Water % Total1,604.32, %

Carbon Footprint by Location tCO 2 eElectricityNatural GasWasteWaterTravelTotal Holbrook Lane Prologis Park Total

Breakdown: Building Total building emissions were 953 tCO 2 e from electricity and gas consumption at both sites. tCO2e per m2 ElectricityNatural GasTotal Holbrook Lane Prologis Park

Breakdown: Waste Carbon emissions from waste disposal totalled 4.9 tCO 2 e. Emissions from landfill comprised 30% of the total emissions from waste, however only 3% of waste was disposed in this way.

Breakdown: Water 2,451 m 3 of water was used through business operations, generating a total of 2.7 tCO 2 e from water supply and treatment. Overall water usage has decreased by 60% since the previous reporting period.

Breakdown: Fleet Travel The total emissions travel in diesel fleet vehicles were 11.9 tCO 2 e from 63,427 kilometers travelled over the year.

Cost Analysis The table shows net costs related to activities reported in the carbon footprint, where available. Potential Cost Savings By reducing electricity by 5% over the coming year, you could save: £4, By reducing natural gas by 5% over the coming year, you could save: £5, By reducing waste use by 5% over the coming year, you could save: £ Total potential cost saving:£10, Source Cost Saving Building Electricity£231,879.00£80, £151, Natural Gas£166,248.81£113, £53, Waste Landfill-£ Recycled-£15, Water Water Supply £4, Water Treatment Travel Fleet - Diesel--- Total£402,763.26£210, £204,256.90

Comparison The total carbon footprint decreased by 58.2% since the previous year of reporting, a reduction of 1,355 tCO 2 e. The carbon emissions per employee decreased by 55.4%.

Recommendations & Improvement Target The Planet Mark toolkits provide advice and resources to support you towards achieving your carbon reduction target. You can access all our resources through the Planet First website using your unique login. Please contact your Planet Mark Account Manager if you require a login account. TopicToolkits Sustainability Strategy Sustainability Policy Template Carbon Savings Calculator Carbon Reduction Strategy Template Carbon Reduction Plan Template EnergyEnergy Toolkit WasteWaste Toolkit WaterWater Toolkit TravelTravel Toolkit EngagementSetting Up A Sustainability Champions Programme Sustainability Engagement Toolkit Do The Green Thing posters Planet Mark Case Study Template CommunicationPlanet First Digital Stickers Planet Mark Logo Press Release for Certification

About this report Company NameDunlop Systems and Components SectorManufacturing Reporting Period1st January st December 2014 Year Of Certification2nd Sites/OfficesSites in the UK and Europe. Coventry, UK site included in the carbon footprint. Total FTE Employees75 Total Internal Floorspace (m 2 )5,634 Data Collation LeadMick Canham, Project Director Significant Business ChangesSite move in April 2014, operating from new facility in June Standard & Methodology Refer to the Planet Mark Code of Practice for information on the methodology and standards used in the preparation of this report. All carbon emissions calculations are in accordance with the WRI/WBCSD Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Protocol and Defra emissions factors. Current reporting is in line with Defra 2014 and the base year reporting is in line with Defra Normalisation Comparisons of total carbon footprint assertion are based on normalised values. Normalisation matches reporting sources in both periods ensuring a like for like comparison. In accordance with Defra 2014, carbon emissions assertions are not retrospectively re-asserted to reflect changes in emissions factors. Restatement of baseline figures may occur to account for updates to our Code of Practice to ensure fair comparisons. Community ProjectA contribution to the Eden Project has been made as part of the Planet Mark certification Related Documents The Planet Mark Certificate The Planet Mark Improvement Toolkits The Planet Mark Marketing pack including The Planet Mark logo, digital assets and press release Prepared by:Monica Niermann, Head of Certification Date:06 February 2015

Data Quality See ‘Data Quality Matrix’ in The Planet Mark Code of Practice for more information Recommendations for improving data quality SCORE PREVIOUS SCORE Relevance of boundary33 Data completeness32 Transparency33 Data accuracy33 Consistency30 TOTAL SCORE15 out of 2011 out of 16 Relevance of boundary A good set of reporting sources has been included within the carbon footprint. A more accurate reflection of the organisational carbon footprint can be achieved by including reporting sources such as other business travel. Data completeness Most carbon emissions sources within the current carbon footprint boundary have been reported on. In future years, efforts should be made to include as much data as possible within the footprint boundary and record all relevant exclusions and omissions. TransparencyMost information on data compilation has been provided and information on the assumptions made. To increase transparency in the future, copies of utilities bills, information on how data has been compiled and a record of missing data and assumptions should be provided. Data accuracyMost data provided has been based on actual meter readings, invoices and receipts. In future, data should be sourced from actual readings and submitted on a monthly or quarterly basis through CloudApps. ConsistencyConsistent data has been provided compared to the previous reporting period. Efforts should be made to ensure that data quality is maintained and improved over time where possible. All data reported should be provided next year with equal or improved accuracy.

Caveats Details of boundaries and data treatments in the context of this report Operational Boundary ScopeUnit Organisational Boundary Data Collection Evidence Submitted NormalisationRestatement Omissions, estimates or extrapolations Electricity2kWh Both current and previous sites Primary source - invoices InvoicesNone 2013 emissions restated to account for well to tank emissions not reported in None Natural Gas1m3 Both current and previous sites Primary source - invoices InvoicesNone 2013 emissions restated to account for well to tank emissions not reported in None Landfill3tonnes Both current and previous sites Secondary source - estimated Data spreadsheet None Recycled3tonnes Both current and previous sites Secondary source - estimated Data spreadsheet None Water Supply3m³ Both current and previous sites Primary source - meter readings Invoices, meter readings None Cost analysis of water consumption excluded due to contested billing for Prologis Park site. Water Treatment 3m³ Both current and previous sites Primary source - meter readings Invoices, meter readings None Fleet - Diesel1KmAll Secondary source - manual logs None 2013 emissions restated to account for well to tank emissions not reported in None Paper3tonnesExcludedn/a

The Planet Mark, in partnership with The Eden Project Please consider your carbon footprint before printing this document.