1 Some updates on water and other items… Stony Brook HBD Crew…

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Prototype Progress… The Stony Brook Crew & Bob Azmoun, Craig Woody.
Advertisements

inFire HTC speed Furnace Webinar
Introduction to Plasma-Surface Interactions Lecture 6 Divertors.
T. Trimpe Body Tube Nosepiece Objectives Stage Clips Light Ocular lens (Eyepiece) Arm Stage Coarse Adjustment Fine Adjustment.
Benji Lewis APS April Meeting Hadron Blind Detector implementation during PHENIX Run-10 Benji Lewis On behalf of the PHENIX Collaboration.
Preliminary Quintuple GEM CsI Ring Imaging Cherenkov Detector S.A. Zajac*, T.K. Hemmick*, K. Dehmelt*, T.E. Videbaek*, & M.A. Blatnik** *Stony Brook University.
1 Stony Brook Update Getting Serious about HBD East T.K. Hemmick for the Tent Crew.
1 Some Water Extreme Calculations TK Hemmick for the Tent Crew.
CsI Photocathode Production and Testing
01/07/08I. Ravinovich1 HBD Update Ilia Ravinovich DC Meeting, January 9, 2008.
U NDERSTANDING THE M ICROSCOPE. UNDERSTANDING MAGNIFICATION A microscope’s power refers to the amount of magnification. Power can be computed if you know.
Preliminary Results from a Trial Beam Test of the Small HBD Prototype at LEGS Bob Azmoun BNL HBD Working Group Meeting May 10, 2005.
1 Stony Brook Update T.K. Hemmick for the Tent Crew.
HBD Performance Estimates Zvi Citron 3 April 2008 HL Meeting.
1 Alexander Milov QM2006, Shanghai Nov 15, 2006 Construction and expected performance of the Hadron Blind Detector for PHENIX experiment at RHIC Alexander.
ATLAS Calorimeter Argon Gap Convection Test Bed Brian Cuerden 24 Apr
Heidi Maiers Portrait Sculptor
PHENIX WEEKLY PLANNING 10/05/06 Don Lynch. 10/05/06 Weekly Planning Meeting 2 PHENIX Shutdown Overview Task_NameStart_DateFinish_Date PHENIX Shutdown.
Sasha Milov EC/DC meeting March 9, Assembly and testing facility. Sasha Milov March 9, 2005 Sequence of operations Glove Box Evaporator Other needs.
1 Thomas K Hemmick May 17 th, The Gas Electron Multiplier: GEM Thomas K. Hemmick Stony Brook University.
1 Flux Transport by Convection in Late-Type Stars (Mihalas 7.3) Schwarzschild Criterion Mixing Length Theory Convective Flux in Cool Star.
Itzhak Tserruya, BNL, Aug. 11, Itzhak Tserruya Weizmann Institute, Israel BNL, Upgrades Meeting, Aug. 11, 2004 HBD: Infrastructure and Integration.
The First Microscopes Antony Van Leeuwenhoek ( ), is given credit as the “Father of Microscopy”. He developed simple microscopes that used only.
Prototype Tests and Construction of the Hadron Blind Detector for the PHENIX Experiment at RHIC Craig Woody Brookhaven National Lab For the PHENIX Collaboration.
ATLAS Calorimeter Argon Gap Convection Test Bed April 25,
IN PREPARATION FOR PHD CANDIDACY REVIEW SKY D ROLNICK 10/29/08 Measuring Chiral Symmetry Restoration via low-mass e+e- pairs in Heavy Ion Collisions.
1 HBD Update: DC Meeting June 2006 Thomas K Hemmick for the HBD Crew…
12/12/09 MPGD 神戸大学 1 Yusuke Komatsu A B. Azmoun B, C. Woody B, K. Ozawa A University of Tokyo A,Brook Haven National Lab. B.
1 HBD update Itzhak Tserruya DC Upgrades meeting, January 14, 2005 NIM paper II: Generic R&D ~ completed Full scale prototype construction Pending issues.
High Gain Mystery of WS(1-5) Solved (Hopefully…) C.Woody HBD Meeting April 13, 2010.
Itzhak Tserruya, July 7,  Towards HBD Proposal  Ongoing activities and plans for the next two months Itzhak Tserruya HBD meeting at BNL, September.
Measurement of J/  -> e + e - and  C -> J/  +   in dAu collisions at PHENIX/RHIC A. Lebedev, ISU 1 Fall 2003 DNP Meeting Alexandre Lebedev, Iowa State.
HBD CDR Gas System and Monitoring Craig Woody BNL DC Upgrades/EC Meeting March 9, 2005.
10/26/06Takao Sakaguchi, BNL1 Hadron Blind Detector for the PHENIX experiment at RHIC Takao Sakaguchi Brookhaven National Laboratory For the PHENIX Collaboration.
Measurement of photons via conversion pairs with PHENIX at RHIC - Torsten Dahms - Stony Brook University HotQuarks 2006 – May 18, 2006.
Ralf Averbeck Stony Brook University Hot Quarks 2004 Taos, New Mexico, July 19-24, 2004 for the Collaboration Open Heavy Flavor Measurements with PHENIX.
1 PUTTING TWO AND TWO TOGETHER To accumulate things You can’t possibly use Is a burdensome Form of conceit. Or in other words: Never have two pairs of.
HBD Status for Run 10 C.Woody For the HBD Group Collaboration Meeting January 15, 2010.
Future Possibilities for Measuring Low Mass Lepton Pairs in Christine Aidala for the Collaboration Quark Matter 2002, Nantes.
PHENIX WEEKLY PLANNING 12/7/06 Don Lynch. 12/7/06 Weekly Planning Meeting 2.
The Q Weak Experiment Event tracking, luminosity monitors, and backgrounds John Leacock Virginia Tech on behalf of the Q Weak collaboration Hall C Users.
1 HBD: Update and Schedule Itzhak Tserruya DC Meeting, BNL, April 13, 2005 Outline:  Full scale prototype status  Light source test  Construction Schedule.
1 HBD Update Back to the Future T.K. Hemmick for the HBD crew.
Update on the HBD Craig Woody BNL DC Meeting May 11, 2005.
Collection of Photoelectrons from a CsI Photocathode in Triple GEM Detectors Craig Woody Brookhaven National Lab B.Azmoun 1, A Caccavano 1, Z.Citron 2,
Green House Effect and Global Warming. Do you believe that the planet is warming? 1.Yes 2.No.
Robert Pak VTX Meeting Sept. 7, 2004 VTX. Robert Pak VTX Meeting Sept. 7, 2004 PHENIX Central Region From VTX Proposal (dims in mm) HBD is standalone.
1 Alexander Milov CIPANP06 June 02, 2006 Hadron Blind Detector for PHENIX experiment at RHIC Alexander Milov (for the PHENIX collaboration) Jun 02, 2006.
PHENIX Safety Review Overview of the PHENIX Hadron Blind Detector Craig Woody BNL September 15, 2005.
HBD Status Report from Run 9 Craig Woody BNL DC Meeting July 8, 2009.
HBD Report Craig Woody BNL DC Meeting January 7, 2009.
1 HBD Commissioning Itzhak Tserruya DC meeting, BNL December 13, 2006 Progress from October 3 to November 28, 2006.
Collection of Photoelectrons from a CsI Photocathode in Triple GEM Detectors C. Woody B.Azmuon 1, A Caccavano 1, Z.Citron 2, M.Durham 2, T.Hemmick 2, J.Kamin.
Lab Activities: Chamber Baking & Mixing Station Flushing Claudio Curtis Dan PPS meeting 22 June, 2011.
1 Sasha Milov Phenix focus HBD June 20, 2006 Hadron Blind Detector for low mass di-leptons in PHENIX Sasha Milov (PHENIX focus on HBD) Jun 20, 2006.
Il Ring Imaging CHerenkov (RICH) detector a Jefferson Lab – Hall A.
1 HBD Update Itzhak Tserruya DC meeting, May 7, 2008 May7, 2008.
1 Stony Brook Update Back to the Future T.K. Hemmick.
Measurement of photons via conversion pairs with the PHENIX experiment at RHIC - Torsten Dahms - Master of Arts – Thesis Defense Stony Brook University.
Preparations to Install the HBD for Run 6 Craig Woody BNL PHENIX Weekly Meeting January 26, 2006.
Search for a New State of Matter A state of matter not seen since the first few microseconds after the Big Bang is the object of study of P-25 physicists.
Initial Performance of the PHENIX Hadron Blind Detector at RHIC Craig Woody Brookhaven National Lab For the PHENIX Collaboration N IEEE Nuclear.
T. Trimpe Body Tube Nosepiece Objectives Stage Clips Light Ocular lens (Eyepiece) Arm Stage Coarse Adjustment Fine Adjustment.
Solar Water Heating Bob Ramlow Chapter 3: Types of Solar Water Heaters Bruce Hesher Engineering Technology Brevard Community College.
Update on HBD Activities at BNL Craig Woody BNL HBD Working Group Meeting November 16, 2004.
Motion and Energy. Motion What is Motion? Position is the location of an object. Motion is a change in position over time. Motion has two parts: distance.
1 Update from the Tent Thomas K Hemmick for the Tent People.
Richard Petti For the PHENIX Collaboration
Feb 23, 2010 Pick up a sheet from the front Read both sides
Flux Transport by Convection in Late-Type Stars (Hubeny & Mihalas 16
Presentation transcript:

1 Some updates on water and other items… Stony Brook HBD Crew…

2 Assumptions: The water evolves from the interior. The water evolves from the interior. –Many proofs of this…it is a certainty. The gas evolution rate is STRONGLY dependent upon temperature. The gas evolution rate is STRONGLY dependent upon temperature. –This is why we heat…to drive off the water. While heating strongly we flowed vigorously (off scale…likely > 6 l/min). While heating strongly we flowed vigorously (off scale…likely > 6 l/min). We have taken “breaks” from high temp and high flow to provide baseline points. We have taken “breaks” from high temp and high flow to provide baseline points.

3 Assumptions II: If the gas/gas-system has a baseline water content this should be an additive constant to the total If the gas/gas-system has a baseline water content this should be an additive constant to the total In the above equation…w if the water content at any moment, w 0 is that start rate, and g 0 is the baseline of the gas/gas-system. In the above equation…w if the water content at any moment, w 0 is that start rate, and g 0 is the baseline of the gas/gas-system. We assume that w 0 is a constant if measurements have same flow and temperature. We assume that w 0 is a constant if measurements have same flow and temperature. We have made two careful measurements 9 heating-days apart at 3 l/min flow and T=24 C We have made two careful measurements 9 heating-days apart at 3 l/min flow and T=24 C

4 What is the baseline water? We measured the baseline of the gas system is ~ 5.1 ppm at 1.0 l/min. We measured the baseline of the gas system is ~ 5.1 ppm at 1.0 l/min. –Also measured 5 ppm at 3 l/min!! We can bracket the truth by using 0-6ppm as the baseline contribution w/o the HBD. We can bracket the truth by using 0-6ppm as the baseline contribution w/o the HBD. Using these assumptions, we can solve the equations for the cleaning of the HBD and extrapolate into the future how long it takes to solve the problem with present techniques. Using these assumptions, we can solve the equations for the cleaning of the HBD and extrapolate into the future how long it takes to solve the problem with present techniques.

5 The two accurate measures. Two data conditions: Two data conditions: –3 l/min –24 C (accelerator off) –Overnight to plateau. We’ll do 3 cases: g 0 =0, g 0 =5.1, g 0 =6 We’ll do 3 cases: g 0 =0, g 0 =5.1, g 0 =6 t(10 ppm) is time when CHAMBER ALONE is 10 ppm t(10 ppm) is time when CHAMBER ALONE is 10 ppm TimeWater (days)(ppm) g 0 =0 g 0 =5.1 g 0 =6 t=0 t=9 t(10 ppm)

6 What if the flow is reduced??? We’re using today to get some more baseline measurements at lower flow. We’re using today to get some more baseline measurements at lower flow. We’ll again calculate chamber alone. We’ll again calculate chamber alone. We make a simple model that assumes that the contribution of the HBD itself is constant rate: We make a simple model that assumes that the contribution of the HBD itself is constant rate:  =37,w 0 =21  =27,w 0 =15.9  =25,w 0 =15 3 l/min t(10)=27.5 days t(10)=12.5 days t(10)=11.1 days 1.5 l/min t(10)=53 days t(10)=31 days t(10)=27.5 days 1.0 l/min t(10)=68 days t(10)=42 days t(10)=37.6 days

7 Flow DOES NOT scale as expected! Reducing flow from 3 l/min to 1.5 l/min increases water concentration from 16.5 ppm to 23 ppm. Reducing flow from 3 l/min to 1.5 l/min increases water concentration from 16.5 ppm to 23 ppm. Would have predicted: Would have predicted: We have not discovered the source of this discrepancy on our calculations… We have not discovered the source of this discrepancy on our calculations… We looked for differences in the gas (different flow rate through purifier?) and found none. We looked for differences in the gas (different flow rate through purifier?) and found none. Direction of discrepancy in the good direction. Direction of discrepancy in the good direction.

8 “Staged” turn on of the heat… With 1.5 l/min flow (23 ppm) we turned on ONLY the bottom row of preamps without cooling flow... With 1.5 l/min flow (23 ppm) we turned on ONLY the bottom row of preamps without cooling flow... –Note with detector on its side, this is 6 preamp boards. –Water content rises to 38 ppm… Additionally turned on side heaters. Additionally turned on side heaters. –At first water rises REALLY fast (headed over 50) so heaters turned down to 33 C. –Water content stable at 48 ppm. Water rise at same  T would have been much higher due to side heaters. Water rise at same  T would have been much higher due to side heaters. Both heat sources are still quite effective in driving water… Both heat sources are still quite effective in driving water…

9 What if the running temp is increased? Turning on the preamps is our minimal heat input to the chamber. Turning on the preamps is our minimal heat input to the chamber. The pre-amp heat pushes water up. The pre-amp heat pushes water up. The pre-amp cooling takes water down. The pre-amp cooling takes water down. Equilibrium T is orientation-dependent. Equilibrium T is orientation-dependent. VERY HARD TO ESTIMATE FULL EFFECTS!!! VERY HARD TO ESTIMATE FULL EFFECTS!!! My bottom line belief is that we need to schedule 1-2 months of heating in the hall prior to the run to ensure success. My bottom line belief is that we need to schedule 1-2 months of heating in the hall prior to the run to ensure success. We have the time, if we can expedite: We have the time, if we can expedite: –Turn on of electronics & electronics cooling. –Turn on of thermofoil heaters.

10 Heater placement/Window supports: Six heaters: Six heaters: –2 North, 2 South, 2 mid 7 Window Supports 7 Window Supports –Thick middle one. –3 thin to each side. Cheese-head window screws Cheese-head window screws –Given “no-go” with taller screws. –Cheese heads flush with frame. GO!!! GO!!! Last thing a Au nucleus sees before death

11 Cooling System: Electronics Cooling System installed. Electronics Cooling System installed. Thin (0.010”) mylar straws. Thin (0.010”) mylar straws. Lucite hold downs. Lucite hold downs. Measured P=2.5” water, F=5 cfm (perfect) Measured P=2.5” water, F=5 cfm (perfect)

12 Transportation Designed and built transport frame. Designed and built transport frame. Rich Hutter & Matt Durham built the frame on Saturday. Rich Hutter & Matt Durham built the frame on Saturday. Two-“L” design: Two-“L” design: –Top “finds” detector (not other way around) –VERY VERY rigid. –Snakes into west with detector upright  on back  upright gets west of all rails. –Front L removed (maybe one piece, probably many) –Detector lifts onto rails, slides east to beampipe. We will install the detector into frame today. We will install the detector into frame today. Frame & gas cart strapped onto a palette to allow simple on/off of truck. Frame & gas cart strapped onto a palette to allow simple on/off of truck. Delivery to hall at ~9:30 AM (we cannot pick up truck on Labor Day!!!) Delivery to hall at ~9:30 AM (we cannot pick up truck on Labor Day!!!)

13 Relativistic Heavy Ion Group >100x All Pairs Combinatorial Pairs Signal Pairs PHENIX Experiment at RHIC has finished its 6 th run! Time for Upgrades!!  *  e + e - provides direct radiation from plasma phase Huge combinatorial background mostly due to γ +X  e + e - +X & π 0   e + e - (small angle pairs). New detector vetoes small angle pairs to reduce background: Direction tagging Cherenkov detector reduces background by a factor of X. Beyond present State of the Art… Triple-Stacked Gas Electron Multipliers (GEM) made photosensitive by evaporated CsI coating. HV photoncharged GEM CsI Readout photoelectron ionization Cherenkov light forms “blobs” on an image plane (r BLOB ~3.36cm) e-e- e+e+