Linac4 DTL Beam Dynamics 1Jean-Baptiste Lallement – Mini-workshop on DTL design - 13/09/2011 Mini-workshop on DTL design – 13 September 2011 JB Lallement,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MEBT Design Considerations The beam energy in the MEBT is sufficiently low for the space charge forces to have a considerable impact on the beam dynamics.
Advertisements

LINAC4 and 3 MeV test stand at CERN
Laboratori Nazionali di Legnaro (Italy) DTL design status A. Pisent.
Emittance dilution due to misalignment of quads and cavities of ILC main linac revised K.Kubo For beam energy 250 GeV,
Emittance dilution due to misalignment of quads and cavities of ILC main linac K.Kubo For beam energy 250 GeV, TESLA-type optics for 24MV/m.
ESS End-to-End Optics and Layout Integration Håkan Danared European Spallation Source Catania, 6 July 2011.
Code parameters optimization & DTL Tank 1 error studies Maud Baylac, Emmanuel Froidefond Presented by JM De Conto LPSC-Grenoble HIPPI yearly meeting, Oxford,
Main Linac Simulation - Main Linac Alignment Tolerances - From single bunch effect ILC-MDIR Workshop Kiyoshi KUBO References: TESLA TDR ILC-TRC-2.
Recirculating pass optics V.Ptitsyn, D.Trbojevic, N.Tsoupas.
Cell-Coupled Drift Tube Linac M. Pasini, CERN AB-RF LINAC4 Machine Advisory Committee 1 st meeting CERN January 29-30, 2008.
ESS DTL beam commissioning
SRF Results and Requirements Internal MLC Review Matthias Liepe1.
Field and Phase Error Studies in Normal Conducting Structures LLRF and Beam Dynamics in Hadron Linacs – EuCARD2 Workshop Ciprian Plostinar
Beam tolerance to RF faults & consequences on RF specifications Frédéric Bouly MAX 1 st Design Review WP1 - Task 1.2 Bruxelles, Belgium Monday, 12 th November.
Chopping Simulations Results M. Garcia Tudela, JB. Lallement, PA. Posocco, A. Lombardi, G.Bellodi, M. Eshraqi, E. Sargsyan, L. Hein 1 17/06/2010.
1 Status of EMMA Shinji Machida CCLRC/RAL/ASTeC 23 April, ffag/machida_ ppt & pdf.
DTL: Basic Considerations M. Comunian & F. Grespan Thanks to J. Stovall, for the help!
Experience from the Spallation Neutron Source Commissioning Dong-o Jeon Accelerator Physics Group Oak Ridge National Laboratory May 9, 2007.
January 5, 2004S. A. Pande - CAT-KEK School on SNS MeV Injector Linac for Indian Spallation Neutron Source S. A. PANDE.
Operated by the Jefferson Science Associates for the U.S. Depart. Of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Alex Bogacz, Dogbone RLA – Design.
LINAC4 COMMISSIONING A.Lombardi BCC 8-19 Nov 09 Linac4 BCC Nov 2009Alessandra Lombardi.
PROTON LINAC FOR INDIAN SNS Vinod Bharadwaj, SLAC (reporting for the Indian SNS Design Team)
ADAM meeting Geneve, SCDTL study for ERHA C. Ronsivalle, L. Picardi.
FNAL 8 GeV SC linac / HINS Beam Dynamics Jean-Paul Carneiro FNAL Accelerator Physics Center Peter N. Ostroumov, Brahim Mustapha ANL March 13 th, 2009.
ICFA-HB 2004 Commissioning Experience for the SNS Linac A. Aleksandrov, S. Assadi, I. Campisi, P. Chu, S. Cousineau, V. Danilov, G. Dodson, J. Galambos,
Beam breakup and emittance growth in CLIC drive beam TW buncher Hamed Shaker School of Particles and Accelerators, IPM.
MP - HIPPI General meeting, Abingdon October 28-30, Side Coupled Linac Design at CERN Side Coupled Linac Design at CERN M. Pasini, Abingdon September.
Module 5 A quick overview of beam dynamics in linear accelerators
LIU Day – 11 th april 2014 ALESSANDRA LOMBARDI LINAC4 COMMISSIONING OVERVIEW.
3 MeV test stand measurement plans A. Lombardi for the LINAC4 team 10/01/2013BCC MeV test stand measurements1.
Marcel Schuh CERN-BE-RF-LR CH-1211 Genève 23, Switzerland 3rd SPL Collaboration Meeting at CERN on November 11-13, 2009 Higher.
DRAFT: What have been done and what to do in ILC-LET beam dynamics Beam dynamics/Simulations Group Beijing.
Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U.S. Depart. Of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Alex Bogacz,
THE LINAC4 RFQ – Experience with Design, Fabrication and Tuning C. Rossi and the RFQ Project Team GSI Review – 20 November 2013.
LINAC4 transfer line – optics M. Eshraqi, L. Hein, A. Lombardi (BE-ABP) LINAC4 transfer lines : m (from PIMS out to foil); m new line,then.
A.Saini, K.Ranjan, N.Solyak, S.Mishra, V.Yakovlev on the behalf of our team Feb. 8, 2011 Study of failure effects of elements in beam transport line &
Warm linac simulations (DTL) and errors analysis M. Comunian F. Grespan.
1 Error study of non-scaling FFAG 10 to 20 GeV muon ring Shinji Machida CCLRC/RAL/ASTeC 26 July, ffag/machida_ ppt.
Drift Tube Linac CDR Introduction, general aspects
1 & 2 JUNE 2015 – LLRF – BEAM DYNAMICS WORKSHOP URIOT Didier What is taken into account in simulations LLRF – Beam dynamics Workshop.
Beam dynamics and linac optics studies for medical proton accelerators
1 Superconducting linac design & associated MEBT Jean-Luc BIARROTTE CNRS-IN2P3 / IPN Orsay, France J-Luc Biarrotte, 1st Myrrha design review, Brussels,
DTL: Basic Considerations M. Comunian & F. Grespan Thanks to J. Stovall, for the help!
3 MeV Measurements at Lianc4 1 Veliko Dimov (for the source and linac team) (J-B Lallement, J. Lettry, A. Lombardi, D. Fink)
Review of Alignment Tolerances for LCLS-II SC Linac Arun Saini, N. Solyak Fermilab 27 th April 2016, LCLS-II Accelerator Physics Meeting.
ILC Main Linac Beam Dynamics Review K. Kubo.
From Beam Dynamics K. Kubo
Linac4 status and perspectives
Experience with beam instrumentation at Linac4
Linac4 M. Vretenar for the Linac4 design team
Linac4 Beam Characteristics
eRHIC FFAG Lattice Design
Physics design on the main linac
HIPPI yearly meeting, sep28-sep
Progress in the Multi-Ion Injector Linac Design
Tolerances: Origins, Requirements, Status and Feasibility
Part2: Cavities and Structures
LINAC4 commissioning plans etc.
Pulsed Ion Linac for EIC
Collective Effects and Beam Measurements in Particle Accelerators
Part2: Cavities and Structures
MEBT1&2 design study for C-ADS
Negative Momentum Compaction lattice options for PS2
Physics Design on Injector I
Studies on orbit corrections
DTL M. Comunian M. Eshraqi.
ERL Director’s Review Main Linac
Status of the JLEIC Injector Linac Design
XFEL Beam Dynamics Activity at CANDLE
Multi-Ion Injector Linac Design – Progress Summary
Presentation transcript:

Linac4 DTL Beam Dynamics 1Jean-Baptiste Lallement – Mini-workshop on DTL design - 13/09/2011 Mini-workshop on DTL design – 13 September 2011 JB Lallement, A. Lombardi, E. Sargsyan.

DTL Layout 2Jean-Baptiste Lallement – Mini-workshop on DTL design - 13/09/2011 Tank 1 39 Cells Tank 2 42 Cells Tank 3 30 Cells EMQ Steerer 2 βλ1 βλ

3 possible focusing schemes FODO (FD)FFDD FFDD and FD No « exotic » schemes.

Transverse Focusing Scheme 4Jean-Baptiste Lallement – Mini-workshop on DTL design - 13/09/2011 FFDD FFDD ! FFDD less sensitive to quadrupole gradient and alignement errors. FD in tank 1  106 T/m for the first quad. PMQ focusing45 mm in tank 1 and in the end-cups. 80 mm in tank 2&3. EMQ 105 mm in intertank 1-2.

Longitudinal Parameters 5Jean-Baptiste Lallement – Mini-workshop on DTL design - 13/09/ MV/m -35° to -24° 3.3 MV/m -24° 3.3 MV/m -24° Phase is adjusted at tank transitions to compensate the missing gap(s).

Beam Dynamics “Choices” 6Jean-Baptiste Lallement – Mini-workshop on DTL design - 13/09/2011 Tranverse phase advance at zero current less than 90°. Smooth variation of the phase advance. Avoid resonnances.

Jean-Baptiste Lallement – Mini-workshop on DTL design - 13/09/20117 Hofmann resonance diagram 0 mA 30 mA 63 mA 80 mA Diagram obtained with “E2E” beam.

DTL Beam Dynamics (1) 8Jean-Baptiste Lallement – Mini-workshop on DTL design - 13/09/2011

DTL Beam Dynamics (2) 9Jean-Baptiste Lallement – Mini-workshop on DTL design - 13/09/2011 Having PMQ focusing in the DTL does not limit the flexibility of the Linac. By adjusting EMQs in the MEBT and at structure transitions, we are able to match the beam for any current from 0 to 80 mA (100…). 20 mA 40 mA 63 mA 80 mA Range of Possible Beam Current in Linac4, Lallement J-B, CERN-BE-Note

Error studies / Definition of tolerances 10Jean-Baptiste Lallement – Mini-workshop on DTL design - 13/09/2011 Transverse error studies : Stay below the limit of 1 W/m at 5% duty cycle! - Quadrupole misalignments. - Quadrupole gradient errors. - Input beam error : 0.3 mm, 0.3 mrad (1 σ cut at 3 σ). X, Y (1 σ) Roll (1 σ) Pitch & Yaw (1 σ) Gradient ± 0.1 mm± 1 mrad± 2 mrad± 0.5 % Loss Control and Steering Strategy for the CERN LINAC4, A. Lombardi et al, CERN-AB-Note

Error studies / Definition of tolerances 11Jean-Baptiste Lallement – Mini-workshop on DTL design - 13/09/2011 Longitudinal error studies. - Static errors. Errors up to 2% can be accepted, provided enough RF power to bring the average field in each tank to nominal value. - Dynamic errors. Klystron phase and amplitude should be controlled ideally to ± 0.5% ± 0.5°. ± 1% ± 1° is still acceptable. Remanent beam error : 6 keV Alignment and Field Error Tolerance in Linac4, A. Lombardi et al, CERN-ATS-Note

Conclusion Several years of studies summarized in 10 slides… Linac4 DTL beam dynamics design is: - Robust: - Respect of the beam dynamics “laws”. - RF and transverse tolerances defined to preserve nominal performances. - Flexible: The choice of having PMQ focusing does not limit the flexibility in beam current. Hope to measure tomorrow (2013) what we have today on paper… Jean-Baptiste Lallement – Mini-workshop on DTL design - 13/09/201112

Thank you for your attention 13 Jean-Baptiste Lallement – Mini-workshop on DTL design - 13/09/2011

14 Jean-Baptiste Lallement – Mini-workshop on DTL design - 13/09/2011

15 Jean-Baptiste Lallement – Mini-workshop on DTL design - 13/09/2011

Error Studies – E2E Beam