Design of Occupational Lenses

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Week 4 Soft lens fitting techniques and care
Advertisements

Specialty soft contact lenses
Vision after 40. Symptoms Reading is blurred Eye strain/headache Avoiding close work Holding reading materials at a distance.
Introduction to Refractive Error and Prescription Writing Walter Huang, OD Yuanpei University Department of Optometry.
FreeForm® Progressives
Vision and occupational health and safety. Looking after your eyes at work Visual comfort Eye protection.
Monovision for Presbyopia Insert name/ Practice name/ Logo here if desired.
TOKAI OPTICAL Back Surface Indoor Progressive [BS-Indoor]
ARAVIND EYE CARE SYSTEM A R A V I N D E Y E H O S P I T A L & Postgraduate Institute of Ophthalmology Madurai, India ARAVIND EYE CARE SYSTEM A R A V I.
Lens and its forms Faculty Aravind School of Optometry.
Easy and affordable to prescribe Widest field of view available Your patients will love it! OCUTECH, Inc.
Essentials on Optical Dispensing
Progressive Addition Lens and Dispensing
What is with all these Soft Contacts!? Krystle Kennedy, O.D.
Fitting BiOptic Telescopes: Determining Location and Mounting Angle with BiOptic Fitting Apertures Robert B. Greer, O.D., F.A.A.O. University of California,
 Gradually increase in power ◦ Upper portion = distance power ◦ Downward & inward = near power ◦ Inbetween is a progressive corridor where the lens power.
Homework Set 5: Due Wednesday, March, 17 From Chapter 5: P2, P8, P10, P11, From Chapter 6: P1, P2, P6, PM2,
Clinical Refraction Procedure Presented by T.Muthuramalingam.
PRESBYOPIA Presented by N.Pitchaimeena. Definition Inability to read the books at the normal reading distance of 33cm. The near point recedes beyond the.
Eyes and Vision [Name of Presenter] Doctor of Optometry.
Multifocal Intraocular Lenses & Contrast Sensitivity
Unilateral Implantation of Presbyopic Correcting IOLs – A Comparison of ReZoom, ReSTOR, Crystalens 5.0, and Crystalens HD Frank A. Bucci, Jr, MD Bucci.
BLOC 5: MULTIFOCAL LENSES Subject 16.- Multifocal lenses. Classification. Subject 17.- Bifocal lenses. Subject 18.- Progressive addition lenses.
Presbyopia Walter Huang, OD Yuanpei University Department of Optometry.
To be more comfortable near vision life
VISION DEFECTS.
New Patented Free-Form Technology Surpasses All Others in Thinness and Design.
New Patented Free-Form Technology Surmounts All Others in Thinness and Design SURMOUNT.
Óptico de Atención Primaria (Tahoma 10 negrita y alineado izquierda)
PRCTICAL DIFFICULTIES OF PROGRESSIVE LENS FITTING
Visual Fatigue Syndrome
Oktober 2004 PBO Seminar1 Impression ILT Hyperop Launch Feb. 05.
Lenses Are classified by their Focal Length. The distance from the optical center of a lens to the front surface of the imaging device.
Recent Advances in Intraocular Lenses Jim Schwiegerling, PhD Ophthalmology & Vision Sciences Optical Sciences.
Crossbows Optical Freeform Software.
Essilor International Copyright – Strictly Confidential Strategic Marketing / GBL Designs LIVE OPTICS Key Messages DMS / Strategic guidelines January 2009.
Cataract Surgery. What is a Cataract? A cataract is a clouding of the lens in the eye that affects vision. Most cataracts are related to aging. Cataracts.
F+E BG / Nadine Jung / Martin Zimmermann1 Contents of "Technical Product Information“ 1.Product details 2.Product comparison 3.General notes.
Advanced Optics for Ophthalmology
Computer Vision Title of presentation AAAAA BBBBB Dddd ffff gggg.
New Reading Progressive. New reading wide vision lens ロゴ LARGO.
Theme 5: Accommodation and Presbyopia Concept of Accommodation Extent of Accommodation Eye modifications during Accommodation The retinal image and the.
Theme 7: Optical neutralization of the ametropias Principle and value of neutralization. Influence of the vertex distance. Neutralization of the presbyopic.
BACK SURFACE PROGRESSIVE TOKAI BS SERIES. TOKAI BS SERIES 1) Back surface progressive 2) Back surface aspheric 3) Personal Design System a. Selectable.
Occupational Progressive Lenses Jim Sheedy
Canadian Association of Optometrists Myopia. Myopia, or Nearsightedness is a visual condition in which near objects are seen clearly, but distant objects.
Accommodation and Presbyopia Prof. Roger S. Anderson
Lifestyle and Refractive Factors Affecting Progressive Addition Lens Preference Padmapriya Ramamoorthy 1, James E Sheedy 2 and John Hayes 2 1 The Ohio.
Lifestyle and Refractive Factors Associated with Progressive Addition Lens Preference The Center for Ophthalmic Optics Research, The Ohio State University.
Progressive Addition Lenses (PALs) Sheedy JE. Progressive Addition Lenses – Matching the specific lens to patient needs. Optometry 2004;75(2): Sheedy.
Contact Lens for the Non Traditional Patient Shane R. Kannarr, OD Kannarreyecare.com.
Types of Wholesale Reading Sunglasses Did you know that you’re putting your eyes at risk by not wearing reading sunglasses? If you use reading glasses.
Enhanced Single Vision Lenses
Work easier, with less strain!
Enhanced Single Vision Lenses
Lensometry.
Marguerite B. McDonald, MD
Successfully Positioning youR Progressive Lens Upgrade
Prescribing Guidelines for Bifocals and PALs
Examination Techniques for Accuracy and Efficiency
“IMCMPALUSPTRMA GPPWWOLCFAVD”
Progressive Addition Lenses: Distortion & Directionalization
Lens Types & Terminology
Introducing.
Lenses Are classified by their Focal Length.
Examination Techniques for Accuracy and Efficiency
The' Indoor’ Multifocal Lens
Priya Ramamoorthy BSOptom, MS
Limited (Clear) distance Wide comfortable intermediate
The “Ideal Progressive”
Presentation transcript:

Design of Occupational Lenses Progressives / Alternative Multifocals

Jon Torrey VP, PRIO/Computer Vision Essilor of America

Background

Fundamental Shift in Use of Vision Past: Primarily distance vision Today: Intermediate/ near

Computer Use by Presbyopes Continues to increase: Number of individuals Hours/week/individual

Computer Use by Presbyopes Driven largely by specific applications: Email Social networking sites

Computer Use by Presbyopes Baby boomers: 1st generation to use computers through majority of career Continuing use into retirement

Computer Use by Presbyopes Nature of Presbyopia: Loss of Accommodative amplitude Necessitates a reliance on lenses to enable clear viewing at intermediate and near distances

LCD / Widescreen Displays Rapid acceptance of technology has compounded the need for improved intermediate viewing, and specifically wider intermediate areas within lenses

Optometrists’ Quotes “Up until now I basically gave up on these patients that have visual fatigue symptoms. I didn’t feel like I had anything to offer them in my clinical arsenal.” “There really isn’t enough products for us to pick from for dealing with some of these accommodative disorders that we’re identifying.”  “The progressives don’t cut it for those patients who spend great deals of time on the computer.”

Current Lenses: Design Limitations

Current Lens Designs: Limitations Given nature of intermediate viewing at 50 – 70 cm, current lenses available are less than optimum: SV – when set up for intermediate distance, no facility for more plus at near No clear viewing at full distance

Current Lens Designs: Limitations Bifocal – when set up “normally,” no clear area for intermediate distances Typical response is for wearer to tip head back and lean forward

Current Lens Designs: Limitations Bifocal – when set up for intermediate distances, with a small add for near viewing, wearer sacrifices clear distance vision

Current Lens Designs: Limitations General-purpose PAL: intermediate area is 3rd priority, after Distance and Near Intermediate area is narrow and located below center, requiring head tipping to see desktop screen clearly

Current Lens Designs: Limitations Near Variable Focus lenses: significant step forward in visual flexibility and comfort Many wearers still request full distance vision

Research – Design Preference Patient preference in lenses for computer use, comparing general-purpose PAL with Near-Variable Focus design 97% of subjects preferred NVF design (Essilor, 2004) 81% of subjects preferred NVF design (PRIO, 2004) 1) Source: Essilor of America – Lens Comparison Survey - October ‘04 (40 subjects ages 45+) USA 2) Source: PRIO Corporation – Lens Comparison Survey - August ‘04 (40 subjects ages 45+) USA

Computer/Intermediate Lens - Ideal Design?

Ideal Lens: Design Factors Feature set for ideal “occupational” lens for extended intermediate and near viewing would of course be a tradeoff between a variety of factors: Vertical placement of intermediate power Width of intermediate area Slope of power curve

Ideal Lens: Design Factors Percentage of prescribed add power delivered at fitting cross Corridor length Area of full distance power at top of lens Minimum B measurement required

Ideal Lens: Delivery Factors Just as important as the optical design factors are the “delivery” issues: Rx prescribing requirements for Doctor (distance, intermediate, or near Rx?) Fitting parameters for dispenser Ordering information needed by lab

Essilor ComputerTM An Ideal Compromise

Essilor ComputerTM Design Maximize intermediate area, both horizontally and vertically

Essilor ComputerTM Design Accommodate ergonomic needs of majority of wearers Screen ~60 cm ~4° ~30° ~30 cm ~45 cm Keyboard

Essilor ComputerTM Design AScalc [WNT] 2 DEGAUDED Deliver 60% of prescribed add at Fitting Cross

Essilor ComputerTM - Benefits Comfortable viewing at intermediate, near, and distance Wide clear intermediate area to see the entire screen (or other intermediate object) Some viewing at distance, to see across office No more head tipping

Essilor ComputerTM - Fitting Order just like normal progressive Dot center pupil Monocular Distance PDs 15 mm minimum Seg Ht 30 mm minimum B measurement Rx Range: -6.00 to +7.00D cyl to -4.00

Essilor ComputerTM - Uses Besides computer viewing: Any Intermediate / near activity Sewing Carpentry Auto repair Cooking Optometry Painting Scrapbooking

Essilor ComputerTM – Patient Wearing Trial

EC Lens – Patient Preference Wearers satisfied with current vision at computer PAL: n =33 1) Source: Essilor International – EC Lens Wearing Trial - October ‘05 (89 subjects ages 40+) UK, France

NOT satisfied with current vision: n = 30 EC Lens – Patient Preference Wearers not satisfied with current vision at computer NOT satisfied with current vision: n = 30 1) Source: Essilor International – EC Lens Wearing Trial - October ‘05 (89 subjects ages 40+) UK, France

Questions? Jon Torrey 503-781-8460 jtorrey@essilorusa.com Thank You! Questions? Jon Torrey 503-781-8460 jtorrey@essilorusa.com