Preliminary Design Review Clear Lake High School Team Rocket.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
University of Florida Hybrid Rocket Team’s Mile High Club
Advertisements

University of Florida PDR Presentation. Vehicle Design Diameter: 5.86 Length: 135 Static Stability Margin: 1.4 Total Weight: 23.6 lbs.
BYU Rocket Team Special thanks to:
Preliminary Design Review. Rocket & Payload Schematic.
UAA Rocketry PDR Presentation NASA Student Launch
P RELIMINARY D ESIGN R EVIEW University of North Dakota Frozen Fury Rockety Team.
“ The Other Woman ” National Association of Rocktry Level Three Certification Project By Steve Laird NAR #86948.
Critical Design Review NASA University Student Launch Initiative University of Nebraska–Lincoln
Student Launch Project Preliminary Design Review January 10, 2014.
Launch Lug – helps to guide the rocket upward until it reaches enough velocity for the fins to engage. Parachute – assists in the safe recovery of the.
Illinois Space Society Tech Team USLI CDR Presentation.
Project Λscension. Vehicle Dimensions Weight: 19.6 Ib Length: in (9 ft. 4.5 in) Diameter: 6 in Fin Semi-Span: 6 in.
RezRiders. Mission statement Through the USLI program the Northwest Indian College Space Center’s RezRiders Team enhances its involvement in science,
Flight Readiness Review March Vehicle Criteria Testing and vehicle design Bulkheads: 9-Ply ½” birch plywood made by Public Missiles, Ltd or ¼ inch.
NASA CDR Presentation Spring Grove Area High School.
St. Vincent – St. Mary FRR Presentation NASA Student Launch Initiative.
NASA SLI 2010 Mulberry Grove High School Flight Readiness Review Measurement of UVB Radiation Absorption by Cloth Material at Different Altitudes and Measurement.
Student Launch Project Critical Design Review February 28, 2014.
Flight Readiness Review Atomic Aggies. Final Launch Vehicle Dimensions Diameter 5.5” Overall length: inches Approximate Loaded Weight: lb.
Launch Vehicle Propulsion Payload Recovery Vehicle Dimensions Total length of inches 4.0” Airframe (3.9” Inside diameter) Fin span of 3.91” Separates.
Critical Design Review of “Mach Shock Reduction” Phase II January 2008 Statesville, NC.
Launch Vehicle  Launch Vehicle Summary  The length of the rocked is inches, and the mass is ounces.  We have a dual Deployment Recovery.
Illinois Space Society Tech Team USLI FRR Presentation.
CDR Clear Lake's Team Rocket 2929 Bay Area Blvd. Houston, TX
Rocket Based Deployable Data Network University of New Hampshire Rocket Cats Collin Huston, Brian Gray, Joe Paulo, Shane Hedlund, Sheldon McKinley, Fred.
Rocket Based Deployable Data Network University of New Hampshire Rocket Cats Collin Huston, Brian Gray, Joe Paulo, Shane Hedlund, Sheldon McKinley, Fred.
Project Λscension. Vehicle Dimensions Weight: 87.2N/19.6Ib Length: in. Diameter: 6in. Fin Semi-Span: 6in.
Team Members:Tony Guzzo Eric Jacob Bill Liewehr Alex Schlaupitz Design of a Level 2 Rocket for the Wisconsin Space Grant Consortium Advisor: Dr. William.
 Vehicle dimensions, materials, and justifications  Static stability margin  Plan for vehicle safety verification and testing  Baseline motor selection.
Safety ► The safety officer for the entire team is Maia Madrid. ► During launch we will follow NAR safety rules and regulations. ► We will follow standard.
The Rocket Men Project One Giant Leap. Final Launch Vehicle Dimensions Rocket Length in. Rocket Mass- 171 oz. Top Body Tube Length in. Bottom.
University of Arkansas Senior Project- When Pigs Soar.
FRR Presentation IF AT FIRST YOU DON’T SUCCEED, TRY AGAIN… AND AGAIN AND AGAIN AND AGAIN.
University of Florida Rocket Team Critical Design Review Presentation.
Critical Design Review Presentation Jan. 20, 2011.
Atomic Aggies CDR. Final Launch Vehicle Dimensions Diameter 5.5” Overall length: inches Approximate Loaded Weight: lb.
Flight Readiness Review “Analysis of Atmospheric gamma radiation as a Function of Altitude by means of Scintillator Probe” St. Thomas High School, Houston,
Project Ares University of Central Florida NASA Student Launch 1/28/2015.
The Rocket Men Project One Giant Leap. Dimensions Rocket Length in. Rocket Mass- 171 oz. Top Body Tube Length in. Bottom Body Tube Length-
D EPARTMENT OF M ECHANICAL AND A EROSPACE E NGINEERING HIGH POWERED ROCKETRY CLUB PDR PRESENTATION 1.
HARDING UNIVERSITY FLYING BISONS A Study of Atmospheric Properties as a Function of Altitude Flight Readiness Review.
University Student Launch Initiative Preliminary Design Review University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Team Rocket.
NUSTA RS NASA Student Launch MAV Challenge 2016 Preliminary Design Review 6 November 2015 Northwestern University | 2145 Sheridan Road | Evanston, IL
NUSTA RS NASA Student Launch MAV Challenge 2016 Critical Design Review 15 Janurary2015 Northwestern University | 2145 Sheridan Road | Evanston, IL
January 14,  Length: inches  Diameter: 6 inches  Mass: oz. / lbs.  Span: 22 inches  Center of Gravity: inches 
FAMU PDR Presentation. Table of Contents Vehicle dimensions, materials, and justifications Static stability margin Plan for vehicle safety verification.
Critical Design Review Presentation Project Nova.
D EPARTMENT OF M ECHANICAL AND A EROSPACE E NGINEERING HIGH POWERED ROCKETRY CLUB CDR PRESENTATION 1.
PLANTATION HIGH PDR PRESENTATION Team 1. VEHICLE DIMENSION & MATERIALS.
Flight Readiness Review UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH ALABAMA CONNER DENTON, JOHN FAULK, NGHIA HUYNH, KENT LINO, PHILLIP RUSCHMYER, & ANDREW TINDELL MENTOR : RICHARD.
UCF_USLI Preliminary Design Review David Cousin Freya Ford Md Arif Drew Dieckmann Stephen Hirst Mitra Mossaddad University of Central Florida.
Project Aegis Preliminary Design Review Team Members:
College of Engineering
2018 First Nation Launch - Flight Readiness Review
NASA USLI Preliminary Design Review
Eric building the fin mount.
Critical Design Review February 2, 2015
Critical Design Review
LESSON LD02 The Model Rocket
Final Readiness Review
2019 First Nation Launch – FRR Virtual Review
2019 First Nation Launch – PDR Virtual Review
LESSON LD02 The Model Rocket
2019 First Nation Launch – Oral Presentation
Dual-Deploy Launch Checklist
2019 First Nation Launch – CDR Virtual Review
Plantation High SL team 1
Target Altitude Safety Document
2019 First Nation Launch – Oral Presentation
Presentation transcript:

Preliminary Design Review Clear Lake High School Team Rocket

Initial vehicle dimensions, materials and justifications Nose cone Public Missiles - PNC Plastic nose cone, Material: Polystyrene PS – Nose shape: Hollow Ogive, Len: In., Dia: In. Wall thickness: In. Body Tube: Public Missiles Ltd. - PT Airframe tube, Material: Kraft phenolic – OD: In., ID: In. – Three Total with lengths of 16”, 28”, and 24” – 1” body tubes will be glued to the center of each coupler to serve as placeholders. Bulkhead Public Missiles - BP Was BP-06, Material: Birch (four, two surrounding each coupler section) Tube coupler: Public Missiles Ltd. - CT Coupler: tube, Material: Kraft phenolic – OD: In, Len: In. – One for each electronics bay (payload and recovery) Body Tube: Public Missiles Ltd. - PT Airframe tube, Material: Kraft phenolic – OD: In., ID: In., Len: In. Fin set: Public Missiles - FIN-C-09 - Fins, Material: G10 fiberglass – Planform: trapezoidal, Root chord: In., Tip chord: In., Semi-span: In., Sweep: In., Mid-Chord: In. Misc: Location: In. From the base of Body Tube: Thickness: In. Profile: square Centering ring Public Missiles - CR Was PML CR-14, Material: Aircraft plywood (Birch) – OD: In., ID: In., Len: In. – Three surrounding motor mount tube Motor Mount Tube: Public Missiles Ltd. - PT Airframe tube, Material: Kraft phenolic – OD: In., ID: In., Len: In. Boat Tail: Public Missiles - TC Transition (or tailcone) from 3.9 to 3.0, Material: Urethane – Solid transition: Fwd. Dia: In., Len: In., Rear Dia: In. Font body insert: Len: In., OD: In., Rear body insert: Len: In., OD: In.

Initial Motor Selection and Justification We chose the K485 motor because we believed that the power from the motor, even though it burned for a smaller length of time, would be enough to allow the team to collect enough data from the payload. This was revised to a K185 because the team believes that a longer burn time will allow for more data collection, increasing the chances for a good data set.

Plan for Vehicle Safety Verification We verify the vehicle safety through simulations affirming that the center of pressure is below the center of gravity on the rocket. The RSO will check the rocket before launch to verify safety checks.

Baseline Payload Design The payload will be constructed in such a way that all mission critical hardware and equipment used in the experiment will be contained within a dedicated upper section of the rocket. This design provides easy access to said hardware and equipment, and therefore simplifies troubleshooting and any revisions, modifications, reconfigurations, and repairs needed to the payload.

Plan for Payload Safety Verification The payload’s internal components will be protected from thermal extremes by a thermally insulating material (or materials) and from stresses caused by G-force and shock by being seated in a shock reducing configuration.

Baseline Recovery System Design Recovery Subsystem – Main Parachute: Public Missiles - PAR-96R - 96 in. nylon, Material: Rip stop nylon – Shape: Round Dia: In., Spill hole: In. Drogue Parachute: Public Missiles - PAR-18R - 18 in. nylon; drogue only, Material: Rip stop nylon – Shape: 8 sided Dia: In., Spill hole: In. Altimeters- MiniAlt/WD, RRC2 Ejection Charges- Four low current electric matches Shock Chord : Kevlar, 30’ for each parachute

Plan for Recovery System Safety Verification The parachutes will be carefully folded and will be placed a great distance from the motor to prevent burns. The RSO will check the parachutes to make sure they are easily removable and will not tangle when opening mid-flight.

Thrust to Weight Ratio – The T:R ratio is 3.144, or 185:58.8 – The max T:R ratio is 5.948, or 350:58.8 Static Stability Margin – The static stability margin is 3.66