Key Features of the Manchester Induction Framework Jenny Wragge, Project Manager, Induction Project 2012-13.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Student Support & Development Personal Tutors Event September 2007.
Advertisements

The Employability Enhancement Theme Dr Graeme Roberts 20th December 2004.
Customised training: Learner Voice and Post-16 Citizenship.
PQF Induction: Small group delivery or 1-1 session.
WELCOME AND INTRODUCTION
inspiring professional higher education Greater than the sum of the parts: using the AUA’s CPD Framework for team development SDF Spring.
The International Postgraduate Student Experience – QAA perspective Dr Laura Bellingham Research, Development and Partnerships Group UKCGE workshop Thursday.
HM Inspectorate of Education 1 The Quality Framework for Scottish FE Colleges Angus Allan, HMIE.
Labour Market Planning LMDA Service Delivery Advisory Group September 28, 2006 CONFIDENTIAL – NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION.
The UK Quality Code for Higher Education Jenny Beaumont LTC February 2012.
Revalidation and Code review update November 2014.
Facilitators: Janet Lange and Bob Munn
Transforming lives through learning Profiling and Profiles Sheila Quigley.
Towards the Development of a Subject Specific Mathematics Teaching Component Michael Grove, Duncan Lawson and Bill Cox.
MOOCs and the Quality Code Ian G. Giles PFHEA Medical Education
Promoting individualism and retaining identity in mass higher education: academic advising for the 21st Century Nicola Andrew and Ruth Whittaker.
Leeds for Life Directors of Learning and Teaching Forum 17 March 2008.
we help to improve social care standards Care Certificate
‘The Changing Landscape’. ‘ To inspire all students across the 3rivers learning trust to become successful learners, through learning a coherent, stimulating.
Launch of Quality Management System
Implementing a framework for employability Penny Renwick, Pro Vice Chancellor, Manchester Metropolitan University.
Designing for inclusion and the role of the disability practitioner Caroline Davies and Tina Elliott IMPACT Associates Eileen Laycock, Disability Manager.
Middle School Recommendations December Middle School Design Team (MSDT) 1. Support for the Middle School Model as Implemented in APS 2. Focus on.
Presentation to BESD IDP Leaders
1 “So who wants to lead a mathematics department?” Developing Future Secondary Subject Leaders for Mathematics – Collaborative Action Research Project.
Embedding quality – a quality enhancement driven approach Jill Morgan Assistant Dean, Learning and Teaching, Quality Enhancement, School of Arts and Media.
East Renfrewshire – Better Community Engagement Staff Workshops – October 2010.
DEVELOPING AND SHARING RESOURCES Embedding Learning Development to enhance student experience.
EQARF Applying EQARF Framework and Guidelines to the Development and Testing of Eduplan.
Building Change Capability ‘To put in place the processes and people to support change within STFC’ Draft Blueprint Design v0.1 Project Manager: Steve.
The Art of the Designer: creating an effective learning experience HEA Conference University of Manchester 4 July 2012 Rebecca Galley and Vilinda Ross.
Local Transport Plan 3 Vision and Issues. The Local Transport Plan Will replace LTP2, which expires 31 March must have LTP3 approved and operative.
The Personal Tutoring System Background for new personal tutors and other student support staff.
Your Ambulance Service Foundation Trust Consultation.
#ShapeRMIT project update, developing strategy and next steps: 1 September 1.
Key features of the University of Manchester Professor Cathy Cassell Deputy Director (Academic) Sarah Featherstone Head of Undergraduate Services Original.
Kevan MA Gartland Special Advisor & Professor of Biological Sciences Lesley McAleavy Development Officer (Engage) GCU Feedback Strategy.
Nef (the new economics foundation) Co-producing Lambeth what’s possible? Lucie Stephens and Julia Slay nef, October 2011.
We help to improve social care standards Feb 2014 The Care Bill England.
Developing a Quality Framework for Community Languages Schools Dr Tim Wyatt Dr Bob Carbines Erebus International Victorian Annual Conference 7 July 2007.
FLAGSHIP STRATEGY 1 STUDENT LEARNING. Student Learning: A New Approach Victorian Essential Learning Standards Curriculum Planning Guidelines Principles.
Club Committee Training – The Importance of Club Development Tuesday 20 th April 2010.
Future Directions Celia Hunt Head of Strategy, Learning and Funding.
Supporting the Outcomes-based Approach Presentation – Public Bodies Workshops Summer 2009 Performance Division.
Every Child Matters Workshop 4 Implications for headteachers and senior managers in schools.
Performance Management A briefing for new managers.
Validated Self Evaluation of Alcohol and Drug Partnerships Evidencing Implementation: The Quality Principles – Care Inspectorate/The Scottish Government.
Southend Together Secretariat 21 st February Developing Southend Together’s Sustainable Community Strategy
School Accreditation School Improvement Planning.
Creating an Integrated Picture of Student Engagement across the Scottish Higher and Further Education Sectors. Eve Lewis Head of sparqs with support from.
What Works?: Headline Finding and Key Messages University of Leicester Student Retention and Success Project Authors: Dr. Chris Cane Dr. Jon Scott Professor.
Edinburgh Shadow Strategic Planning Group Friday 19 June 2015 Welcome Back.
The Role of Technology in Building Schools for the Future and the Primary Capital Programme Nina Woodcock Head of Capital Building Programmes.
Customised training: Diversity, community cohesion and citizenship.
Implementing the HEAR: a Strategic Institutional Perspective Dr Tim Westlake Director for the Student Experience.
NYCC Scrutiny Committee Strategy “Putting the Learner First” Planning for Future Delivery.
WARRINGTON CULTURAL STRATEGY FRAMEWORK
QAA COLLABORATIVE PROVISION AUDIT DRAFT REPORT. QAA CPA Process Submission by the University of Self Evaluation Document (SED) (December 2005) Selection.
Overview Training for Nottingham’s Commissioning Framework Liz Jones Head of Partnership Policy, NCC Nick Weatherall, Commissioning Officer, NCVS.
Strategic Plan: Goals, Objectives & Success Measures Administrative Forum, South Campus June 17,
Performance and Development Cycle
Thursday 2nd of February 2017 College Development Network
The Long March towards Embedding Employability
Quality Assurance and Enhancement at The University of Edinburgh
The University of the Future: Preparing for Curriculum Refresh
The positive impact of personal advising training
PROJECT CHARTER Welcome and Induction Phase 2 and 3 - INDUCTION
Board of Trustees Update
Promotions to Senior Lecturer Briefing Sessions January 2019
Prof John O’Halloran Deputy President & Registrar
Presentation transcript:

Key Features of the Manchester Induction Framework Jenny Wragge, Project Manager, Induction Project

INTRODUCTION

Today’s session Journey So FarImportance of InductionUnderlying Objectives of the Framework What you can do nowGovernance Next Steps for the ProjectQuestions

The Journey So Far … January 2013 Began Feb – April 2013 Summer 2013 Draft for Feedback Autumn 2013 Framework approved January - February 2014 Launch & Implementation Consultation

IMPORTANCE OF INDUCTION

University Priorities (December 2013) Goal 2 Improving Student Experience Personalised support Online Support Quality and Supply of Teaching Spaces Learning Through Research STUDENT SUCCESS

Induction at the heart of Student Success Employability Attainment Retention Induction

A platform for success Culture,Values &Expectations Support,Wellbeing &PersonalDevelopmentCourseOrganisation AcademicSkills +++ Developing the relationship with the University School community: Peer Support Academic Adviser Friends on course Lecturers / Researchers Wider University community: Union, Hall, Volunteering, University College, Sport … + PSS Staff Student success is underpinned by a foundation of a strong sense of community and belonging. Induction has the objectives of providing ‘tools for success’ and supporting students to identify with their programme/area of study (School community) and the wider University: 8 Purpose & Objectives

OBJECTIVES What is the Induction Framework meant to do?

Consistency for Students –Outcomes consistent, methods flexible (10-14) Underpinning Principles (22) Key Content: Tools for Success (16-20) Ongoing Cycle – tools provided; not all at once Partnership with Students Continuous Improvement

ACTION! What you can do now

What to do next Start to use the framework to plan induction in your School or subject area –To what extent will your existing provision deliver the outcomes? –Is there anything you need to change? –Map your existing provision against the induction principles –Audit your content – are all the ‘tools’ covered? Involve students in both planning and review Try new stuff - and tell us about how it went. What didn’t work as much as what did. (You can help others avoid inventing the square wheel!) Do what you can to ensure or promote the idea that induction should be continually reviewed, adjusted and improved

GOVERNANCE Support. Monitor. Review.

Objectives Continuous Improvement Dialogue with Students Sharing practice between and within Faculties Consistency of experience for students Institution knows framework adhered to Roles and Responsibilities Schools - delivery Faculties – support Schools, monitoring Management Group – monitor, review, support Faculties DSE – resources, good practice, events, support

Framework launched/ reviewed & updated Management Group DSE Framework briefings provided DSE/Faculties Activities planned to meet outcomes in framework Faculties & Schools Autumn Review of Induction- reflection on the success of arrival and return? School / Faculty SSLC Management Group Adjustments made; good practice captured; lessons and unintended consequences identified Faculties & Schools Workshop / event to share good practice DSE Spring Review of Induction Reflecting on the success of activity that has taken place and planning for next year. School / Faculty SSLC Management Group Management Group report to SEMG  Evaluation/reflection built in at two specified stages  Student contribution embedded  Responsive: opportunity to adjust in year; students see the benefit  Incorporates stakeholder engagement at different levels

Do it Review it Improve it Do it again

Next Steps for the Project Set up sub-group of TLMG to oversee Implementation Phase Set up systems for monitoring and review Understand and implement the Faculty role; develop guidance; establish location for central support for induction – and what that entails Establish as ‘business as usual’ by the end of July …