MARS15 Studies of Impact of LBNF Target/Horn Optimization on the Hadron Absorber 6 th High Power Targetry Workshop Merton College, Oxford April 12, 2016.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Target chase, decay and absorber cooling for LBNE A. Marchionni, Fermilab 8th International Workshop on Neutrino Beams & Instrumentation CERN, November.
Advertisements

CBM Calorimeter System CBM collaboration meeting, October 2008 I.Korolko(ITEP, Moscow)
Neutrinos from Stored Muons STORM Target Station Conceptual Design 15-April-2013 Kris Anderson Fermilab/Accelerator Division/Mechanical Support Department.
ISS, 23 September 2005E. Gschwendtner, CERN1 Beam Instrumentation at CNGS 1. Introduction 2. Layout 3. Beam Instrumentation 4. Summary.
Particle Production of a Carbon/Mercury Target System for the Intensity Frontier X. Ding, UCLA H.G. Kirk, BNL K.T. McDonald, Princeton Univ MAP Spring.
Pion yield studies for proton drive beams of 2-8 GeV kinetic energy for stopped muon and low-energy muon decay experiments Sergei Striganov Fermilab Workshop.
Status of T2K Target 2 nd Oxford-Princeton High-Power Target Workshop 6-7 th November 2008 Mike Fitton RAL.
May 17-19, 2000 Catalina Island, CA Neutrino Factory and Muon Collider Collaboration Meeting 1 Target Support Facility for a Solid Target Neutrino Production.
The JPARC Neutrino Target
1 Induced radioactivity in the target station and in the decay tunnel from a 4 MW proton beam S.Agosteo (1), M.Magistris (1,2), Th.Otto (2), M.Silari (2)
JHF2K neutrino beam line A. K. Ichikawa KEK 2002/7/2 Overview Primary Proton beamline Target Decay Volume Strategy to change peak energy.
D. Jason Koskinen FNAL Collab 12/ Geant4 NuMI Monte Carlo Uncertainties.
KT McDonald MAP Spring Meeting May 30, Target System Concept for a Muon Collider/Neutrino Factory K.T. McDonald Princeton University (May 28, 2014)
Fermilab Neutrino Beamline to DUSEL Mike Martens Fermilab PAC November 3, 2009.
NUMI NuMI Review of the Infrastructure – W, G & V 20 July 2001 WBS Page 1 1 Infrastructure Review - W.B.S Water Systems Water Systems –Upstream.
Institutional Logo Here Harold G. Kirk DOE Review of MAP (FNAL August 29-31, 2012)1 The Front End Harold Kirk Brookhaven National Lab August 30, 2012.
NuMI NuMI Overview NBI 2002 S. Childress (FNAL) 14 March ‘02 NuMI / MINOS Overview.
LBNF Neutrino Beam Jim Strait, Fermilab For the LBNF/DUNE Team
LAGUNA/LBNO WP4: secondary beam line status report M. Calviani, P. Velten, A. Ferrari, I. Efthymiopoulos, C. Lazaridis (CERN) + M. Zito, V. Galymov (CEA),
Ff f f f “Conventional” neutrino beams: Target requirements Phil Adamson 13 th January 2012.
GEANT Study of Electron ID and  0 Rejection for Containerized detectors Compare detectors in shipping containers to idealized continuous detector with.
Status of the NO ν A Near Detector Prototype Timothy Kutnink Iowa State University For the NOvA Collaboration.
WP2 Superbeam Work Breakdown Structure Version 2 Chris Densham (after Marco Zito version 1 )
Long Baseline Experiments at Fermilab Maury Goodman.
The NOvA Experiment Ji Liu On behalf of the NOvA collaboration College of William and Mary APS April Meeting April 1, 2012.
NuMI NuMI Target Hall Air System Review Introduction July 30, 2003 Jim Hylen / FNAL Page 1 NuMI Target Hall Air System Review Introduction Air system for.
1 Status of Neutrino Beamline Construction K. Nishikawa IPNS, KEK 2006 . 12 . 4.
120 GeV Targeting Neutrino beams utilizing 120 GeV protons from Project X Main Injector Jim Hylen Fermilab AAC meeting August 8, 2007 With thanks to Patrick.
Overlap of Project X and Beamline to DUSEL June 2, 2008.
F NuMI Beamline Accelerator Advisory Committee Presentation May 10, 2006 Mike Martens Fermilab Beams Division.
1 Target Station Design for Neutrino Superbeams Dan Wilcox High Power Targets Group, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory NBI 2012, CERN.
MARS15 RESULTS FOR THE LBNE-BLIP IRRADIATION TEST LBNE-BLIP Irradiation Test Meeting Fermilab February 19, 2010 Nikolai Mokhov FermilabAccelerator Physics.
Radiation Protection aspects for SHIP Doris Forkel-Wirth, Stefan Roesler, Helmut Vincke, Heinz Vincke CERN Radiation Protection Group 1 st SHIP workshop,
Interaction Length A. Murakami. L = (interaction length of proton in carbon by PDG) change of constant : means uncertainty of L (change 0.8, 0.9,
Activation around dump shielding, and design of beam line mask Mathieu Baudin, RP Genevieve Steele, EN-STI Helmut Vincke, RP.
Muon absolute flux measurement in anti-neutrino mode A.Ariga 1, C. Pistillo 1, S. Aoki 2 1 University of Bern, 2 Kobe University.
Carbon Target Design and Optimization for an Intense Muon Source X. Ding, UCLA H.G. Kirk, BNL K.T. McDonald, Princeton Univ MAP Winter Collaboration.
Recent Studies on ILC BDS and MERIT S. Striganov APD meeting, January 24.
IDS120j WITHOUT RESISTIVE MAGNETS ( 20 cm GAPS AND 15.8 g/cc W BEADS ) AZIMUTHAL DPD DISTRIBUTION STUDIES FOR: BP#1, SH#1, SHVS#1/LFL, SC#1+SC#2, BeWind.
Institutional Logo Here July 11, 2012 Muon Accelerator Program Advisory Committee Review (FNAL July 11-13, 2012)1 The Front End.
NuMI NBI2003 November 7-11, 2003 NuMI Target Jim Hylen / FNAL Page 1 NuMI Target Status, Testing, Support Module At NBI’02: Beam test results of Medium.
Considerations for an SPL-Beamdump Thomas Otto CERN in collaboration with Elias Lebbos, Vasilis Vlachoudis (CERN) and Ekaterina Kozlova (GSI) Partly supported.
April 26, McGrew 1 Goals of the Near Detector Complex at T2K Clark McGrew Stony Brook University Road Map The Requirements The Technique.
IDS120j WITH AND WITHOUT RESISTIVE MAGNETS PION AND MUON STUDIES WITHIN TAPER REGION, III ( 20 cm GAPS BETWEEN CRYOSTATS ) Nicholas Souchlas, PBL (9/4/2012)
NUMI NUMI/MINOS Status J. Musser for the MINOS Collatoration 2002 FNAL Users Meeting.
BNL neutrino beam. Optimization and simulations Milind Diwan June 10.
IDS120j WITHOUT RESISTIVE MAGNETS SEMGENTATION STUDIES FOR BEAM PIPE BEYOND FIRST CRYOSTAT ( 20 cm GAPS AND 15.8 g/cc W BEADS ) Nicholas Souchlas, PBL.
Simulation of heat load at JHF decay pipe and beam dump KEK Yoshinari Hayato.
IDS120j WITHOUT RESISTIVE MAGNETS SEMGENTATION STUDIES FOR BP#2 WITHIN FIRST CRYOSTAT AND RIGHT FLANGE OF Hg POOL INNER VESSEL ( 20 cm GAPS AND 15.8 g/cc.
NuMI PS Specs June 2001 S. Childress Page 1 NuMI NuMI requirements are for a very large fraction of the available Main Injector intensity over a period.
Status of UK contribution to LBNF beam and target system Chris Densham, Tristan Davenne, Otto Caretta, Mike Fitton, Peter Loveridge, Joe O’Dell, Andrew.
Long-Baseline Neutrino Facility LBNF LBNF Beamline Project Status and Plans Forward Vaia Papadimitriou LBNF Beamline Manager DUNE Collaboration Meeting.
NEAR DETECTOR SPECTRA AND FAR NEAR RATIOS Amit Bashyal August 4, 2015 University of Texas at Arlington 1.
Target Proposal Feb. 15, 2000 S. Childress Target Proposal Considerations: –For low z target, much less power is deposited in the target for the same pion.
Long-Baseline Neutrino Facility LBNF Beamline optimization schedule Vaia Papadimitriou LBNF Beamline Manager Accelerator and Beam Interface Group Meeting.
Design for a 2 MW graphite target for a neutrino beam Jim Hylen Accelerator Physics and Technology Workshop for Project X November 12-13, 2007.
Observation Gamma rays from neutral current quasi-elastic in the T2K experiment Huang Kunxian for half of T2K collaboration Mar. 24, Univ.
LBNE Target Pile & Decay Pipe Cooling Andy Stefanik and Ang Lee – Fermilab September 25, 2014.
Beamline for the LBNE Project Heidi Schellman for the LBNE collaboration.
T2K Target status PASI Meeting Fermilab 11 th November Chris Densham STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory On behalf of the T2K beam collaboration.
Long-Baseline Neutrino Facility LBNF News and brief overview of Beamline plans for the next few months Vaia Papadimitriou Beamline Technical Board Meeting.
LBNE 2.4MW Absorber NBI 2014 Presented by Brian Hartsell Contributions by: Kris Anderson, Yury Eidelman, Jim Hylen, Nikolai Mokhov, Igor Rakhno, Salman.
Measuring Nuclear Effects with MINERnA APS April Meeting 2011 G. Arturo Fiorentini Centro Brasileiro de Pesquisas Físicas On behalf of the MINERnA collaboration.
NuMI Flux, Leonidas Aliaga William & Mary July 25, 2012 Current Uncertainties And Future Plans International Workshop on Neutrino Factories, Super Beams.
Irradiated T2K Ti alloy materials test plans
The MiniBooNE Little Muon Counter Detector
J. Musser for the MINOS Collatoration 2002 FNAL Users Meeting
The BLAIRR Irradiation Facility Hybrid Spallation Target Optimization
News and brief overview of Beamline plans for the next few months
M. Calviani, A. Ferrari (EN/STI), P. Sala (INFN)
Presentation transcript:

MARS15 Studies of Impact of LBNF Target/Horn Optimization on the Hadron Absorber 6 th High Power Targetry Workshop Merton College, Oxford April 12, 2016 S. Striganov and N. Mokhov FermilabAccelerator Physics Center

Beamline Facility contained within Fermilab property ~ 21,000 m 2 4 Beamline for a new Long-Baseline Neutrino Facility MI-10 Extraction, Shallow Beam Constructed in Open Cut Constructed as Tunneled excavation All systems designed for 1.2 MW initial proton beam power (PIP-II). Facility is upgradeable to 2.4 MW proton beam power (PIP-III). Primary beam designed to transport high intensity protons ( GeV) to the LBNF target

3 MARS15 Source Term Simulations C-Baffle: OD=5.7cm, L=150cm ID=1.3 cm (normal) ID=3.0 cm (accident) C-target, 48 segments: 1cm(W)×2.67cm(H)×2cm(L) Starting with a proton beam at z = -7.3m from MC0, high-statistics runs for all the four scenarios to get source terms at z = m, i.e., 1.5m upstream the absorber spoiler

4 Energy Fluxes at Absorber Inclusive at 120 GeV (default) Exclusive at 120 GeV (LAQGSM)

Beam Hadron monitor Spoiler Water-cooled Al Mask blocks Aluminum core, 1 st 9 blocks are sculpted Water-cooled steel core Overall absorber: Poured concrete volume: 24,000 ft 3 Steel shielding: 2,500 ton Aluminum: 39 ton “Absorber core”: Spoiler block 5 Aluminum mask blocks 9 Sculpted Al blocks 4 Solid Al blocks 4 Central steel blocks which share the features: Water cooled Individually hung on removable modules Each 1 foot thick 5 Hadron monitor Insertion/extraction tower 4 m diameter Decay pipe Hadron Absorber as Designed up to Now

6 Spoiler and sculpted blocks provide about factor of two reduction of maximal energy deposition y:z = 1:1 Spoiler: Coulomb scattering of fast protons and earlier start of showers followed by divergence of products in a 1.5-m air gap upstream the core Sculpted core blocks: Lower core density around axis with a more uniform ED along z

7 Peak is Due to Fast Protons Inclusive at 120 GeV (default) Exclusive at 120 GeV (LAQGSM)

120 GeV primary proton beam, sigma_x=1.7 mm, beta_x= m, alpha=0 baffle radius cm, transverse target dimensions -2.7 cm x 1 cm Protons hitting nominal targetProtons missing nominal target 8

Peak at the Absorber is due to Protons Missing the Target 9 0.3% of beam misses target entirely, giving 0.9-cm RMS on absorber (7 kW) 13% of beam protons multiple scatter through target, giving 4.9-cm RMS (~300 kW)

10 Mitigation of the Peak at Normal Operation Adding graphite spoiler/wings at the target upstream with diameter equal to baffle ID (= 1.3cm) spanning over ~3 segments. 6-cm long wings ensure two-fold reduction of the peak proton flux. Can provide a factor of two safety margin for the current core design.

Optimized setup provides 33% increase of 75% CP sensitivity Nominal setup Optimized setup 11 nominal setup – 97 cm graphite target length, optimized setup cm graphite target length, nearly same transvers dimensions

Longer target: up to 20-fold reduction of pedestal Longer wings decrease peak: 100 times for 48-cm wings Full MC includes target, horns …,simple MC – target only 12

Power on absorber for 2.4 MW beam x*yNominal +12cm wings Optimized +48cm wings cm 2 kW 6* * * * Increase of target length reduces total energy deposition Wings decrease maximal energy deposition 13

Energy Deposition (mW/cm3) y-z Profile:4x10x5.35 cm bin Nominal – NuMI styleOptimized – LBNO style Maximum energy deposition density is about 5 times lower for optimized target 14

Energy Deposition (mW/cm3) y-z Profile: 1x1x5.33 cm bin Nominal – NuMI styleOptimized – LBNO style Peak energy deposition density is about 2 times lower for optimized target with no wings – same peak 15

Maximal energy deposition (mW/cm3) for different setups 16 nominaloptimized 0 cm optimized 12 cm optimized 24 cm optimized 48 cm simple* 48cm 4x10x5.35cm x1x5.35 cm * simple setup – optimized setup&absorber without spoiler and without sculpting Maximal energy deposition for optimized setup can be reduced up to 17 times by using wings. Even 12 cm wings decrease maximal energy deposition about 6 times. It is possible to consider simple absorber (without spoiler and sculpting) for optimized setup and target with wings.

Muon neutrino at far detector optimized setup: G4LBNF vs two MARS hadron-production models Linear scaleLog scale 17

Muon neutrino spectra at far detector – optimized setup: dependence on wings length Wings reduce muon neutrino flux less than few percent in region of interest (<5 GeV) cm wings48 cm wings

19 Muon/Hadron Fluxes (cm -2 s -1 ) with Steel Kern Rock Soil Z=360m, S=113 m Z=277 m, S=30 m Ground-water design goal Soil Rock ND L=459m, Z=456.7 m 30-m steel kern: R 1 =3.5m, R 2 =1.5m Muons Hadrons

Ratios of positive muon spectra in muon detectors –nominal/optimized 0cm – green, nominal/optimized 24cm – black, nominal/optimized 48cm – blue 20

Conclusions Using optimized (long) target with cm wings reduces maximal energy deposition in LBNF absorber 6-20 times. It is possible to consider simple absorber without spoiler and sculpted blocks for optimized setup. Such simple absorber can survive even for significantly increased beam power beyond 2.4 MW. Muon neutrino flux decreases a few percent for target with 48 cm wings and less than one percent with 24 cm wings for neutrino energies important for LBNF/DUNE experiment. High energy muon flux after fourth alcove is reduced by factor of 2-3 for long target setup. It significantly decreases ground water activation in rock after absorber. 21

Backup 22

Analytical model: convolution of multiple Coulomb and quasi-elastic and elastic scatterings Blue line – only MCR in target red line –MCR*elastic scattering pink – coherent elastic green – quasi-elastic 23

Muon neutrino in near detector - optimized setup: G4LBNF vs two MARS hadron-production models Linear scaleLog scale 24

Muon neutrino spectra in near detector – optimized case: dependence on wings length Wings reduce muon neutrino flux less than few percent in region of interest (<5 GeV) 25

Target Hall/Decay Pipe Layout 26 DECAY PIPE SNOUT DECAY PIPE UPSTREAM WINDOW WORK CELL 50 TON CRANE Decay Pipe: 194 m long, 4 m in diameter, double – wall carbon steel, helium filled, air-cooled. Target Chase: 2.2 m/2.0 m wide, 34.3 m long air- filled and air & water-cooled (cooling panels). Sufficiently big to fit in alternative target/horns. Cooling panels Bea m 5.6 m ~ 40% of beam power in target chase ~ 30% of beam power in decay pipe Main alternatives for gas atmosphere: N 2 or He

27 Hadron Absorber The Absorber is designed for 2.4 MW ~ 30% of beam power in Absorber 515 kW in central core 225 kw in steel shielding Core blocks replaceable (each 1 ft thick) Beam Muon Shielding (steel) Beam Muon Alcove Sculpted Al (9) Hadron Monitor Absorber Cooling Core: water-cooled Shielding: forced air-cooled Flexible, modular design

Energy Deposition (mW/cm3) y-z Profile:4x10x5.35 cm bin Nominal – NuMI style Optimized – LBNO style + 24cm wings Maximum energy deposition density is about 14 times lower for optimized target with 24 cm wings 28

Energy Deposition (mW/cm3) y-z Profile: 1x1x5.33 cm bin Nominal – NuMI styleOptimized – LBNO style+24cm wings Peak energy deposition density is about 11 times lower for optimized target with 24cm wings 29

Energy Deposition (mW/cm3) y-z Profile:4x10x5.35 cm bin Nominal – NuMI style Optimized – LBNO style + 48cm wings Maximum energy deposition density is about 21 times lower for optimized target with 48-cm long wings 30

Energy Deposition (mW/cm3) y-z Profile: 1x1x5.33 cm bin Nominal – NuMI style Optimized – LBNO style + 48cm wings Peak energy deposition density is about 21 times lower for optimized target with 48-cm long wings 31

Energy Deposition (mW/cm3) y-z Profile:4x10x5.35 cm bin Nominal – NuMI style Optimized – LBNO style + 48cm wings Maximum energy deposition density is about 14 times lower in simple absorber without spoiler and sculpted blocks (optimized target with 48-cm long wings) 32

Energy Deposition (mW/cm3) y-z Profile: 1x1x5.33 cm bin Nominal – NuMI style Optimized – LBNO style + 48cm wings Maximum energy deposition density is about 14 times lower in simple absorber without spoiler and sculpted blocks (optimized target with 48-cm long wings) 33