Center for Urban Transportation Research | University of South Florida Performance Measurement.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to ITS Georgia 2005 Annual Meeting presented by Kenny Voorhies Cambridge Systematics, Inc. August 29,
Advertisements

Getting Started with Congestion Pricing A Workshop for Local Partners Federal Highway Administration Office of Operations.
Oakland Industrial Park Transportation Needs Assessment Study Sponsored by A service of Hampton Roads Transit Prepared by THE MARKETING SOURCE,
GREATER NEW YORK A GREENER Travel Demand Modeling for analysis of Congestion Mitigation policies October 24, 2007.
Tom Fairchild The R&D initiative of Arlington County Commuter Services.
Doing our Share to Clear the Air. Sustain-ability? Sustain-ability?  Ability to Sustain  Are there enough resources on planet Earth for all to have.
Vanpool 101 Vanpool Works for Transit Caryn Souza, Director, RideshareNation and Associate Director Community Transportation Association of America, Washington,
RideshareOnline.com New tools to help save money, time and the environment while helping people live more independently! Prepared for: 2010 Public Transportation.
2010 State of the Commute Survey Presentation National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board July 21, 2010 ITEM #12.
1 Providing Commute Choices to Employees Krute Singa.
Transportation Operations/Mobility in the Baltimore Region Customer Satisfaction Survey AMPO Operations Work Group September 28-29, 2006 Las Vegas.
May 7, 2013 Yagnesh Jarmarwala Phani Jammalamadaka Michael Copeland Maneesh Mahlawat 14 th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference.
Contents Regional Travel Options Bicycle Friendly Policies Potential for Converting Drive Alones Bicycling + Health and Wellness What is ZAP Twin Cites.
The Commute Trip Reduction (CTR) Law.  The CTR Law requires major employers - in Urban Growth Areas throughout Washington - to implement an employee.
Commuter Connections FY 2006 Work Program National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board May 18, 2005.
Connie Ruth, EPA Best Workplaces for Commuters The Advantages of Excellent Commuter Benefits Why your University or College Should Achieve the Best Workplaces.
An Intelligent Transportation System Evaluation Tool in the FSUTMS Regional Demand Modeling Environment By Mohammed Hadi, Florida International University.
11. 2 Public Transportation’s Role in a Greenhouse Gas Reduction Strategy Kevin Desmond King County Metro Transit Division Seattle, WA On behalf of the.
TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference Incorporating Pricing Strategies US Department of Transportation Incorporating.
Orange County Business Council Infrastructure Committee December 14, 2010 Draft Long-Range Transportation Plan Destination 2035.
GoBerkeley 1 goBerkeley: Integrating TDM and Parking Management into Downtown Berkeley Monday, October 28 th, 2013 Steer Davies Gleave 970 – 355 Burrard.
Transportation 101 June 12, Presenting Agencies  Southwestern PA Commission’s CommuteInfo program  GG & C Bus Company, Inc.  Mid Mon Valley Transit.
TSM&O FLORIDA’S STATEWIDE IMPLEMENTATION Elizabeth Birriel, PEElizabeth Birriel, PE Florida Department of TransportationFlorida Department of TransportationTranspo2012.
Welcome to the TSIP Project Webinar Planning Technical Working Group 28 July – 3:30 pm.
4-1 Model Input Dollar Value  Dollar value of time  Accident costs  Fuel costs  Emission costs.
 City of Hamilton – Transportation Sustainable Mobility Summit – October 27, 2013.
Transportation 101 August 7, Presenting Agencies  Southwestern PA Commission’s CommuteInfo program  IndiGO: Indiana County Transit Authority 
GO Airport Shuttle Don Eames The GO Group, LLC Board Member President/CEO GO The Airport Shuttle AGTA Meeting Ft. Myers, FL.
National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board February 19, 2013 ITEM #12.
Draft Transportation 2035 Plan for the San Francisco Bay Area ACT February 24, 2009.
1 Transportation Policy and Performance: The challenges and opportunities of performance-based programs Deputy Administrator Therese McMillan Federal Transit.
Convergence of Transportation Policy and RFID Enabler of Future Transportation Policy Chris Body Mark IV Vice President, Business Development.
David B. Roden, Senior Consulting Manager Analysis of Transportation Projects in Northern Virginia TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference.
0 Christopher A. Pangilinan, P.E. Special Assistant to the Deputy Administrator Research and Innovative Technology Administration, ITS Joint Program Office.
Florida Department Of Transportation District IV Office of Modal Development Commuter Choices 2004 Summit 2004 Summit.
Bigger Bang for the Buck Panel Discussion: Improving the ROI on Transit Investments with TDM.
10/22/021 Recent Innovations in Transportation Demand Management Peter Valk Transportation Management Services 12 th Annual UCLA Symposium on the Transportation/Land.
2004 State of the Commute Survey: Assessing the Impacts of Regional Transportation Demand Management National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board.
FY Commuter Connections TERM Analysis Results TBP Technical Committee December 5, 2014 ITEM #8.
D epartment of Transportation Metro Transit Division Rideshare Operations Syd Pawlowski, Supervisor “metropool – Nation’s First EV Vanpool” NAFA Green.
Business Logistics 420 Public Transportation
1 Presented to the Transportation Planning Board October 15, 2008 Item 9 Metrobus Priority Corridor Network.
Confidential. Property of vRide, Inc. Not to be disclosed without vRide’s prior written consent. Vanpool Program.
TPCC Presentation September 25, 2012 Missoula TDM Program Review Image fromFlickr prizrak2084.
GCAA Feb 17, Results 1.2 million miles of travel 600 tons of air pollution Each day these efforts reduce: Currently partnering with more than 1650.
Transportation 101 February 18, CommuteInfo Introducing… a better way to work.
Phase 2: Data Collection Findings and Future Steps.
UFCU Employee Mobility Program. Did you know?  Mobility programs can be marketed as part of employee benefits packages. Companies that offer these options.
Commuter Connections FY 2007 Work Program National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board Technical Committee March 3, 2006.
Jennifer Dill Marc Schlossberg Linda Cherrington Suzie Edrington Jonathan Brooks Donald Hayward Oana McKinney Neal Downing Martin Catala.
Travel Reliability – Reliable traffic flow is more important than reducing congestion – traffic congestion is often a sign of an area’s economic vitality.
A case–driven comparison of Freeway Performance Measurement Systems by Shailesh Deshpande.
December 17, 2010 Developing Transit Performance Measures for Integrated Multi-Modal Corridor Management.
Transportation Modeling – Opening the Black Box. Agenda 6:00 - 6:05Welcome by Brant Liebmann 6:05 - 6:10 Introductory Context by Mayor Will Toor and Tracy.
WELCOME! Employer Transportation Coordinator (ETC) Training Part 1: Orientation to the Commute Trip Reduction Law.
Draft System Performance Measures Input March 7, 2013 Transportation Research Board (ABE50) Committee on Transportation Demand Management.
2040 LONG RANGE PLAN UPDATE Congestion Management Process Plan (CMPP) Major Update February 24, 2016.
WELCOME! Commute Trip Reduction (CTR) Survey Briefing.
WIS DOT MCLARY MANAGEMENT PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT.
OneCommute People Vanpool Management Contacts Program Management Accounts Surveys Meetings/Events Transit Passes Program Plan Actuals Mode Counts Vehicle.
Calculating the benefits of Transit in North Carolina
75% of Hudson Valley residents drive alone to work
New Yorkers have the longest commute times in U.S.
Overview of Changes Made to CMAQ & System Performance Measures
Staten Island Commute Data
Our Suite of Services.
Kings County Commute Data
Increasing Access to Commuter Benefits
Chicago to Council Bluffs-Omaha
Performance Measurement
Presentation transcript:

Center for Urban Transportation Research | University of South Florida Performance Measurement

2 Performance Measures Questions to Ask How do you select your performance measures? What measures monitor progress in achieving goals and objectives? What measures highlight accomplishments? What measures give the reality of the situation?

3 Example: Reduce congestion – How can congestion be measured? Peak hour flow Vehicle trips per person per day Peak hour vehicle trips Time lost of traffic delays VMT

4 Other Possible Measures Marketing effectiveness – Awareness – Interest – Desire – Action – Market share Implementation activity – Adherence to schedule – Reliability Cost effectiveness Measures used by key stakeholders

5 Florida General Performance Indicators for Transit Passenger Trips Passenger Miles Vehicle Miles Revenue Miles Vehicle Hours Route Miles Total Operating Expenses Total Maintenance Expenses Total Capital Expenses Federal Contribution State Contribution Total Local Revenue Local Contribution Directly-Generated Non-Fare Revenue Passenger Fare Revenues Total Employee FTEs Operating Employee FTEs Maintenance Employee FTEs Administrative Employee FTEs Vehicles Available for Maximum Service Vehicles Operated in Maximum Service Spare Ratio (%) Total Gallons Consumed Total Energy Consume (KW- Hours)

6 Transportation Operations Measures of Effectiveness Customer satisfaction Extent of congestion - spatial Extent of congestion - temporal Incident duration Non-recurring delay Recurring delay Speed Throughput - person Throughput - vehicle Travel time – link Travel time – reliability (buffer time) Travel time – trip Source: National Transportation Operations Coalition

7 Performance Measures Spatial Extent of Congestion – Length of roadway within a predefined area and time period for which average travel time are 30% longer than unconstrained travel time Temporal Extent of Congestion – The time duration during which more than 20% of the roadway sections in a predefined area are congested Source: NTOC Performance measurement Initiative – Final Report

8 TDM Performance Measures Alternate mode usage (AMU) or non-Single Occupant Vehicle rate Average vehicle occupancy (AVO) Average vehicle ridership (AVR) Carbon footprint/emissions reduced Changes in delay Changes in speed Changes in travel time Cost per participant Cost per vehicle trip reduced Customer satisfaction Drive alone/Single Occupant Vehicle (SOV) rate Duration (average life) of carpools or vanpools Extent of congestion - spatial Extent of congestion - temporal Level of awareness of program Livability Mode split Non-recurring delay Number of bicycle commuters Number of carpool participants Number of commuters requesting assistance Number of commuters switching modes Number of companies participating in training or assistance programs Number of employer contacts Number of employers offering alternative work schedules Number of participants in events (e.g., Bike to Work Day) Number of referrals from existing customers Number of telework participants Number of transit passengers Number of vanpool participants Number of vans in service Number of vehicle trips eliminated Parking spots saved/parking needs reduced Placement rate for carpool and vanpool participants Recurring delay Throughput - person Throughput - vehicle Transit-oriented communities Travel time - reliability Travel time - trip Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) reduction Vehicle trip rate per employee

9 Florida Performance Measures (PM) – Outputs - Reach Performance MeasureWhat It Will Be Used to MeasureCollected by REACH Share of commuters aware of brand identity (brand to be determined by CAP to be CAP name or call to action (phone/web) Commuter services awareness General Public survey Profiles of TDM elements for each employer-client Employer outreach effectiveness (quantity/market penetration) Data will be used by CUTR to estimate cost/benefit of employer outreach program element using TRIMMS CAP Number of employers with telework programs and total number of employee-trips reduced by teleworking Employer outreach effectiveness (quality) CAP Number of employers with compressed work week and total number of employee-days not traveling to work due to CWW for each of these types of CWW programs: 4/40, 9/80 and other Employer outreach effectiveness (quality) CAP

10 FLORIDA PM – Outputs – Acquisition Performance Measure What It Will Be Used to Measure Collected by ACQUISTION Number of individuals requesting assistanceInterest in commuter servicesCAP logs Number of total requests for assistance (i.e., capture repeat customers) Level of effort in maintaining in commuter services CAP

11 FLORIDA PM – Outputs – Conversion Performance MeasureWhat It Will Be Used to MeasureCollected by CONVERSION Percent of drive alone commuters shifting to a commute alternative Effectiveness of commuter services in changing travel behavior Database (DB) survey and General Public (GP) survey Percent of commuters who currently use a commute alternative shifting to another alternative mode (e.g., from carpool to transit) Effectiveness of commuter services in increasing higher occupancy customers DB survey and GP survey Percent of commuters who currently use a commute alternative increasing their weekly frequency of commute alternative use Effectiveness of commuter services in increasing frequency of use DB survey and GP survey Number of vanpool passenger trips (directly operated and purchased transportation) Vanpool program effectivenessNTD report Number of vans operated in maximum serviceVanpool program effectivenessNTD report Actions to incorporate TDM into the land development process (see Incorporating TDM Into the Land Development) Establishing supportive environment for converting commuters Specific actions TBD by District and CAP

12 FLORIDA PM – Outputs – Retention and Loyalty Performance Measure What It Will Be Used to Measure Collected by RETENTION Avoidable customer turnoverMeasure of program growthCAP Percent of non-SOV commuters who revert to SOV Effectiveness of commuter services in retaining customers Database survey and General Public survey LOYALTY Overall customer satisfaction (with emphasis on quality, willingness to use services again and willingness to refer a friend) Customer satisfactionDatabase survey

13 FLORIDA PM – Outcomes Performance MeasureWhat It Will Be Used to MeasureCollected by Vehicle trip rate per 100 commuters (peak periods and total) Effectiveness of reducing congestion by reducing vehicles on the road Database survey Vehicle miles of travel (peak periods and total) per person Database survey Total and per-person unlinked passenger trips Accessibility Database survey and NTD Total and per-person passenger miles of travel AccessibilityDatabase survey and NTD

14 FLORIDA PM – Outcomes Performance MeasureWhat It Will Be Used to MeasureCollected by Customer satisfaction Overall satisfaction with the CAP programs and products Database survey Emissions reducedEnvironmental impactsDatabase survey Energy reducedEnergy impactsDatabase survey Total and per-person commuter savings Commuter impactsDatabase survey Duration of non-SOV mode Effectiveness of retention efforts and impact on life cycle costs Database survey Benefit/Cost Ratio Total costs and benefits from the employer outreach program TRIMMS model Cost-EffectivenessOutcomes by cost over the useful life of the program