1 Instructional Framework & Teacher Evaluation. 2 Welcome Name School, Assignment, Years in Education One thing you are hoping to get out of today!

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SCHOOL LEADERS: THE KEY TO SUCCESSFUL INDUCTION
Advertisements

Denver Public Schools Diving Into the Revised Framework LE.1 Demonstrates knowledge of, interest in, and respect for diverse students’ communities and.
The Road to Powerful Instructional Practice Through the 5D+™ Teacher Evaluation Rubric Alaska Staff Development Network April 10, 2013 Copyright © 2013.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Module 2: Using Instructional and Leadership Frameworks in Educator Evaluation 1.
Imagine you are in the classroom of a highly effective teacher:  What would you see?  What would you hear?  What would the students be doing or saying?
5D+ Teacher Evaluation Model Professional Learning Phase 1
Creating Highly Effective Building Leadership Teams 18 critical components to help you identify your Building Leadership Team’s level of implementation.
Cape Flattery TWSSP Workshop September 14, Pausing Paraphrasing Posing Questions Putting ideas on the table Paying attention to self and others.
EVIDENCE WITH 5D+ FOR FITNESS/HEALTH, PERFORMING ARTS, CTE AND SPECIAL EDUCATION STACEY KRUMSICK, ICFFS DEBBIE LINDGREN & MARTY NEYMAN-HEALTH & FITNESS.
A Continuum of Interventions Experienced with NTI Teachers/Coaches Session 1.
Welcome Back Review of Day 1 Feedback Agenda Review for Day 2.
Session 3: Living a Lesson Part 1 (Elementary)
© 2012 Common Core, Inc. All rights reserved. commoncore.org NYS COMMON CORE MATHEMATICS CURRICULUM A Story of Units Module Focus Grade 2- Module 4.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Preparing and Applying Formative Multiple Measures of Performance Conducting High-Quality Self-Assessments.
Welcome What’s a pilot?. What’s the purpose of the pilot? Support teachers and administrators with the new evaluation system as we learn together about.
1 Let’s Meet! October 13,  All four people have to run.  The baton has to be held and passed by all participants.  You can have world class speed.
Rhode Island Model Academy for Personnel Evaluating Teachers Day One Professional Practice.
Our Leadership Journey Cynthia Cuellar Astrid Fossum Janis Freckman Connie Laughlin.
Student Growth 2.0 Fall,  Face-to-Face Sessions  Student Growth 2.0  Rater Agreement Practices  TPEP/ Washington State Learning Standards.
STEM Leadership Welcome! As you arrive, please form groups of 6 people. Help yourself to snacks and drinks. Sign in and grab your name tent or.
Examining Monitoring Data
Welcome to... Doing Teacher Evaluation Right: 5 Critical Elements 9/9/2015PBevan, D.ED.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Preparing Educators for Rater Agreement and Sustainability: Planning for Professional Learning.
Public Charter School Grant Program Workshop Aligning Teacher Evaluation, Professional Development, Recruitment and Retention March 3, 2014.
Including Student Growth in Educator Evaluation Day 3 Monitoring and Adjusting February,
From Answer Finding to Doing K–5 Mathematics Breakout Session Introduction to Professional Learning for New Teachers August 24–26, 2015 Office of Curriculum,
Compass: Module 2 Compass Requirements: Teachers’ Overall Evaluation Rating Student Growth Student Learning Targets (SLTs) Value-added Score (VAM) where.
EngageNY.org Changing Culture through Protocols Session 6, November 2013 NTI.
Including Student Growth in Educator Evaluation Day 3 Monitoring and Adjusting January, 2014.
Overview of the 3-8 ELA Curriculum Modules New to NTI Principals Session 1.
Idaho Principal Evaluation Process & Principal Observation Lisa Colón, Idaho State Department of Education Matt Clifford, Ph.D., American Institutes for.
Elementary District Professional Development October 14, 2011 Welcome! Please put on a name tag with your name and school, find any open seat and introduce.
EngageNY.org Strengthening Writing through Student-Engaged Assessment.
Strategies for Implementing the 5D+ Purpose and Student Engagement Dimensions in the Classroom Hosted by Julie Milder.
Session Materials  Wiki
Introduction to Kentucky’s Professional Growth and Effectiveness System and Framework for Teaching.
STEM Leadership STEM Leadership February 4, 2014.
EngageNY.org Living a Lesson Part 1 (Secondary) Session 3, November 2013 NTI.
Shelly Rider AMSTI-USA Director.  To understand the effects of the Common Core State Standards on mathematical classroom instruction  To recognize the.
Blaine and Mount Vernon TWSSP Workshop September 21, 2013.
Understand the purpose and benefits of guiding instructional design through the review of student work. Practice a protocol for.
Capstone in Reflective Teaching Week 3 1/30/10
EngageNY.org Overview of the 3-8 ELA Curriculum Modules Session 1A, February 2014 NTI.
Secondary District Professional Development October 14, 2011 Welcome! Please put on a name tag with your name and school, find any open seat and introduce.
1. What can effective planning with technology look like? 2. How do we support our teachers in their planning in this digital age? 3. How might TPACK.
A Signature Tool of The Institute for Learning
Creating a Climate for Professional Learning Communities
Overview of the 3-8 ELA Curriculum Modules New to NTI Teachers/Coaches Session 1.
RLT Writing Part 2 April 20, Activator Polarity Management ▪ Example ▪ 2 posters ▪ Upside (+) and downside (-) comments ▪ Gallery walk.
Goal Setting in Educator Evaluation Sept. 11 th,
Overview of the 3-8 ELA Curriculum Modules
Supporting the Shifts through Aligned Curriculum PLEASE SIT WITH YOUR RESEARCH TEAMS November Common Core Ambassadors.
Mission The Center for Educational Leadership (CEL) is dedicated to eliminating the achievement gap that continues to divide our nation’s children along.
 SEP Administrative Institute December 11, 2012 Professional Learning Communities & LCCI Survey Data.
Welcome Back STLN January 27, Agenda Welcome Recap of November Updates ? What’s Next? Tasks/ Work analysis Break More looking at student work Lunch.
EDRS 698 Capstone in Reflective Teaching Week 1 1/16/10.
#kyscinet Welcome Back Scan the QR code while waiting for the meeting to begin to get into the padlet.
Materials for today’s session  Shared website – Wiki   Wireless.
Welcome! CKEC Science Teacher Leader Network November 23, 2015
Office of Curriculum,Instruction, and Professional Learning Division of Teaching and Learning Date Elementary Science Meets Elementary Mathematics Metric.
Teacher Evaluation & CEL 5 D
Instructional Practice Guide: Coaching Tool Making the Shifts in Classroom Instruction Ignite 2015 San Diego, CA February 20, 2015 Sandra
Student Growth 2.0 NCESD Fellows November 17 th,
Curriculum that Brings the Common Core to Life Session 1 Elementary
Curriculum that Brings the Common Core to Life Session 1 Secondary
Guest WIFI Password: Back to school!
Reading Closely For Textual Details
Cooperating Teacher Training
SUPPORTING THE Progress Report in MATH
Our Leadership Journey
Presentation transcript:

1 Instructional Framework & Teacher Evaluation

2 Welcome Name School, Assignment, Years in Education One thing you are hoping to get out of today!

1.Pausing. 2.Paraphrasing. 3.Posing questions. 4.Putting ideas on the table. 5.Paying attention to self and others. 6.Presuming positive intentions. 7.Pursuing a balance between advocacy and inquiry. Norms of Collaboration

Learning Targets Describe how the new teacher evaluation model differs from the old model. Develop understanding of how the state 8 criteria and the 5D framework connect. Develop understanding of how the 5D instructional framework and the 5D+ rubric connect.

I can tell a colleague how the new teacher evaluation model is different from the old model. I can describe key ideas that connect dimensions to indicators within and across the 5D framework and 5D+ Rubric. I can provide evidence from video/classroom for 5D+ rubric indicators. Success Criteria

How is the new teacher evaluation process different from the old process? Evaluation Observation Evidence Satisfactory Principal driven Evaluation Observation Evidence Satisfactory Principal driven Evaluation Observation Evidence Basic to Distinguished Teacher driven

Learning Targets Describe how the new teacher evaluation model differs from the old model. Develop understanding of how the state 8 criteria and the 5D framework connect. Develop understanding of how the 5D instructional framework and the 5D+ rubric connect.

I can tell a colleague how the new teacher evaluation model is different from the old model. I can describe key ideas that connect dimensions to indicators within and across the 5D framework and 5D+ Rubric. I can provide evidence from video/classroom for 5D+ rubric indicators. Success Criteria

An Instructional Framework is: A set of descriptions of teaching behaviors. Linked to improve student learning. Based on Research and the work of Practitioners.

The 5D instructional framework as the foundation and support for: Observation and analysis of teaching and learning. Evidence-based conversations. Collaborative, inquiry stance.

The 5D instructional framework as a tool: A “lens” for classroom observations. A guide for teachers. A reference during lesson planning and staff meetings about instructional practices. The entry point into the teacher evaluation rubric.

Core Ideas in Each Dimension Equity: each and every student. Student role in their own learning:. agency and ownership. Student independence with the learning. Rigorous intellectual work.

Learning Targets Describe how the new teacher evaluation model differs from the old model. Develop understanding of how the state 8 criteria and the 5D framework connect. Develop understanding of how the 5D instructional framework and the 5D+ rubric connect.

I can tell a colleague how the new teacher evaluation model is different from the old model. I can describe key ideas that connect dimensions to indicators within and across the 5D framework and 5D+ Rubric. I can provide evidence from video/classroom for 5D+ rubric indicators. Success Criteria

Dimension Activity Discuss with your table the possible “look fors” (evidences)of your dimension. Watch Video: During video jot down the “look fors” (evidences) that you see or hear. Share with your table. Share out with whole group.

17 Thermometer Check What does this mean for me in my classroom? I have concerns/questions about?

18 Lunch 1 hour

19 Learning Targets Describe how the new teacher evaluation model differs from the old model. Develop understanding of how the state 8 criteria and the 5D framework connect. Develop understanding of how the 5D instructional framework and the 5D+ rubric connect.

20 I can tell a colleague how the new teacher evaluation model is different from the old model. I can describe key ideas that connect dimensions to indicators within and across the 5D framework and 5D+ Rubric. I can provide evidence from video/classroom for 5D+ rubric indicators. Success Criteria

Inquiry-based growth model, not a checklist Joins instructional leaders and teachers in co learning. Shared and common vision of high quality teaching. Accessible and actionable. Classroom observations, teacher and student artifacts, continuous conversation. Equity is embedded in each dimension. The 5D+ Teacher Evaluation Rubric

Dimension

Subdimension

Indicator

Indicator Number

Performance Levels

Progressive Performance Level Language

Classroom Environment & Culture * Review Classroom Environment & Culture dimension on framework. Highlight and take notes: Start at Basic Identify what’s different at each level Pay attention to frequency words, and, or, teacher, student, commas.

29 5D Framework Thinking Routine: Classroom Environment &Culture Think/ Puzzle/ Explore

30 Match rubric indicator to framework bullets. Write rubric indicator number beside appropriate bullet(s). Explain to a partner what kind of evidence you would expect see for each indicator. Video Share with group the evidences you saw and heard Classroom Environment & Culture: What Do You Hope to See?

Connection to State 8

32 Break 15 minutes

Professional Collaboration & Communication Highlight and take notes: Start at Basic Identify what’s different at each level Pay attention to frequency words, and, or, teacher, student, commas.

34 5D Framework Thinking Routine: Professional Collaboration & Communication Think/ Puzzle/ Explore

35 Match rubric indicator to framework bullets. Write rubric indicator number beside appropriate bullet(s). Explain to a partner what kind of evidence you would expect see for each indicator. Share with group the evidences you saw and heard Professional Collaboration & Communication

Connection to State 8

39 “Compass Points” for Teacher Evaluation Look at your sticker and identify your number (1,2,3, or 4) Move to your groups assigned number. On chart paper complete activity on following slide.

“Compass Points” for Teacher Evaluation What EXCITES you about the new teacher evaluation process? What WORRIES you about the new teacher evaluation process? What NEEDS do you have to assist you as you move onto the new evaluation system? What SUGGESTIONS do you have as we move forward?

Connecting Framework to Lesson Planning

Learning Targets Describe how the new teacher evaluation model differs from the old model. Develop understanding of how the state 8 criteria and the 5D framework connect. Develop understanding of how the 5D instructional framework and the 5D+ rubric connect.

I can tell a colleague how the new teacher evaluation model is different from the old model. I can describe key ideas that connect dimensions to indicators within and across the 5D framework and 5D+ Rubric. I can provide evidence from video/classroom for 5D+ rubric indicators. Success Criteria

Reflection/Evaluation