Data summary – “alleles” Threshold Over threshold, peaks are labeled as allele events All-or-none allele peaks, each given equal status Allele Pair 8,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
DNA Identification: Mixture Weight & Inference
Advertisements

Overcoming DNA Stochastic Effects 2010 NEAFS & NEDIAI Meeting November, 2010 Manchester, VT Mark W Perlin, PhD, MD, PhD Cybergenetics, Pittsburgh, PA Cybergenetics.
DNA Identification as an Information Science
New York State Police TrueAllele ® Casework Developmental Validation Cybergenetics © New York State DNA Subcommittee March, 2010.
Combining DNA Evidence for Greater Match Information
Finding Truth in DNA Mixture Evidence Innocence Network Conference April, 2013 Charlotte, NC Mark W Perlin, PhD, MD, PhD Cybergenetics, Pittsburgh, PA.
TrueAllele ® Challenges in Court and Culture Cybergenetics © th Annual DNA Technology Educational Seminar Centre of Forensic Sciences and the.
How Inclusion Interpretation of DNA Mixture Evidence Reduces Identification Information American Academy of Forensic Sciences February, 2013 Washington,
Creating informative DNA libraries using computer reinterpretation of existing data Northeastern Association of Forensic Scientists November, 2011 Newport,
Preventing rape in the military through effective DNA computing Forensics Europe Expo Forensics Seminar Theatre April, 2014 London, UK Mark W Perlin, PhD,
Coding a Safer Society through Computer Interpretation of DNA Evidence Cybergenetics © MATLAB Virtual Conference March, 2014 Mark W Perlin, PhD,
Probabilistic Software Workshop September 29, 2014 TrueAllele® Casework Mark W. Perlin, PhD, MD, PhD.
TrueAllele ® Interpretation of DNA Mixture Evidence 9 th International Conference on Forensic Inference and Statistics August, 2014 Leiden University,
How TrueAllele® Works (Part 1)
Probabilistic Software Workshop September 29, 2014
TrueAllele ® Casework Validation on PowerPlex ® 21 Mixture Data Australian and New Zealand Forensic Science Society September, 2014 Adelaide, South Australia.
Using TrueAllele ® Casework to Separate DNA Mixtures of Relatives California Association of Criminalists October, 2014 San Francisco, CA Jennifer Hornyak,
Revolutionising DNA analysis in major crime investigations The Investigator Conferences Green Park Conference Centre May, 2014 Aylesbury, Buckinghamshire.
No DNA Left Behind: When "inconclusive" really means "informative" Schenectady County District Attorney’s Office January, 2014 Mark W Perlin, PhD, MD,
Challenging DNA Evidence The Fifth Judicial District of Pennsylvania Criminal Division February, 2015 Pittsburgh, PA Mark W Perlin, PhD, MD, PhD Cybergenetics,
Revolutionising DNA analysis in major crime investigations The Investigator Conferences Green Park Conference Centre May, 2014 Aylesbury, Buckinghamshire.
Solving Cold Cases by TrueAllele ® Analysis of DNA Evidence Finding Closure: The Science, Law and Politics of Cold Case Investigations October, 2014 Pittsburgh,
TrueAllele ® Mixture Interpretation Cybergenetics © th Annual DNA Technology Educational Seminar Centre of Forensic Sciences and the Promega.
DNA Mixture Statistics Cybergenetics © Spring Institute Commonwealth's Attorney's Services Council Richmond, Virginia March, 2013 Mark W.
More informative DNA identification: Computer reinterpretation of existing data Ria David, PhD Cybergenetics, Pittsburgh, PA Cybergenetics ©
DNA Identification Science: The Search for Truth Cybergenetics © Summer Research Symposium Duquesne University July, 2010 Mark W Perlin, PhD,
Computer Interpretation of Uncertain DNA Evidence National Institute of Justice Computer v. Human June, 2011 Arlington, VA Mark W Perlin, PhD, MD, PhD.
Touch DNA in the Massereene Attack Cybergenetics © Continuing Legal Education Allegheny County Courthouse February, 2012 Mark W Perlin, PhD,
TrueAllele ® Modeling of DNA Mixture Genotypes California Association of Crime Laboratory Directors October, 2014 San Francisco, CA Mark W Perlin, PhD,
How TrueAllele ® Works (Part 2) Degraded DNA and Allele Dropout Cybergenetics Webinar November, 2014 Mark W Perlin, PhD, MD, PhD Cybergenetics, Pittsburgh,
TrueAllele ® Genetic Calculator: Implementation in the NYSP Crime Laboratory NYS DNA Subcommittee May 19, 2010 Barry Duceman, Ph.D New York State Police.
Reanimating Zombie™ DNA Penn State Dickinson Law School September, 2012 State College, Pennsylvania Mark W Perlin, PhD, MD, PhD Cybergenetics, Pittsburgh,
Computer interpretation of touch DNA mixtures Seminar for Chiefs of Police in Western Pennsylvania May, 2014 Allegheny County, PA Mark W Perlin, PhD, MD,
Separating Familial Mixtures, One Genotype at a Time Northeastern Association of Forensic Scientists November, 2014 Hershey, PA Ria David, PhD, Martin.
Cybergenetics Webinar January, 2015 Mark W Perlin, PhD, MD, PhD Cybergenetics, Pittsburgh, PA Cybergenetics © How TrueAllele ® Works (Part 4)
Cracking the DNA mixture code – computer analysis of UK crime cases Forensics Europe Expo Forensic Innovation Conference April, 2014 London, UK Mark W.
Unleashing Forensic DNA through Computer Intelligence Forensics Europe Expo Forensic Innovation Conference April, 2013 London, UK Mark W Perlin, PhD, MD,
Rapid DNA Response: On the Wings of TrueAllele Mid-Atlantic Association of Forensic Scientists May, 2015 Cambridge, Maryland Martin Bowkley, Matthew Legler,
Compute first, ask questions later: an efficient TrueAllele ® workflow Midwestern Association of Forensic Scientists October, 2014 St. Paul, MN Martin.
TrueAllele ® interpretation of Allegheny County DNA mixtures Cybergenetics © Continuing Legal Education Allegheny County Courthouse February,
Virginia TrueAllele ® Validation Study: Casework Comparison Presented at AAFS, February, 2013 Published in PLOS ONE, March, 2014 Mark W Perlin, PhD, MD,
TrueAllele ® Computing: All the DNA, all the time Continuing Professional Development Sydney, Australia March, 2014 Mark W Perlin, PhD, MD, PhD Cybergenetics,
Murder in McKeesport October 25, 2008 Tamir Thomas.
When Good DNA Goes Bad International Conference on Forensic Research & Technology October, 2012 Chicago, Illinois Mark W Perlin, PhD, MD, PhD Cybergenetics,
DNA Mapping the Crime Scene: Do Computers Dream of Electric Peaks? 23rd International Symposium on Human Identification October, 2012 Nashville, TN Mark.
Mark W Perlin, PhD, MD, PhD Cybergenetics, Pittsburgh, PA Cybergenetics © Duquesne University October, 2015 Pittsburgh, PA What’s in a Match?
Open Access DNA Database Duquesne University March, 2013 Pittsburgh, PA Mark W Perlin, PhD, MD, PhD Cybergenetics, Pittsburgh, PA Cybergenetics ©
Jack Ballantyne and Mark Perlin International Conference on Inference and Statistics, July , Seattle, WA.
Objective DNA Mixture Information in the Courtroom: Relevance, Reliability & Acceptance NIST International Symposium on Forensic Science Error Management:
DNA-led investigation through computer interpretation of evidence Pennsylvania State Police Training Seminar Hershey, PA April, 2014 Mark W Perlin, PhD,
Understanding DNA Pennsylvania Conference of State Trial Judges Mid Annual Meeting Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts Judicial Education Department.
Issues with DNA Evidence, Past and Future Washington County Bar Association March, 2016 Washington, PA Mark W Perlin, PhD, MD, PhD Cybergenetics, Pittsburgh,
Seventh Annual Prescriptions for Criminal Justice Forensics Program Fordham University School of Law June 3, 2016 DNA Panel.
Understanding DNA Evidence Beaver County Courthouse March, 2016 Beaver, PA Mark W Perlin, PhD, MD, PhD Cybergenetics, Pittsburgh, PA Cybergenetics ©
DNA: TrueAllele® Statistical Analysis, Probabilistic Genotyping
A Match Likelihood Ratio for DNA Comparison
Shedding Light on Inconclusive DNA: TrueAllele® Computer Analysis
Explaining the Likelihood Ratio in DNA Mixture Interpretation
Virginia TrueAllele® Validation Study: Casework Comparison
Mark W Perlin, PhD, MD, PhD Cybergenetics, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
Suffolk County TrueAllele® Validation
TrueAllele for DNA Mixtures
Solving Crimes using MCMC to Analyze Previously Unusable DNA Evidence
Investigative DNA Databases that Preserve Identification Information
DNA Identification: Inclusion Genotype and LR
DNA Identification: Mixture Interpretation
Exonerating the Innocent with Probabilistic Genotyping
Using probabilistic genotyping to distinguish family members
Mining the Mixture: A DNA Analyst Explains (2)
Presentation transcript:

Data summary – “alleles” Threshold Over threshold, peaks are labeled as allele events All-or-none allele peaks, each given equal status Allele Pair 8, 8 8, 11 8, 12 8, 14 11, 11 11, 12 11, 14 12, 12 10%12, 14 14, 14

Probability of inclusion (PI) Simple formula: For all "alleles" over threshold, add up their frequencies, and square the number ( ) 2 = (.765) 2 =.585 Threshold match statistic is 1/PI 1/(.585) = 1.71 Computer match statistic is 35 Calculation at locus D13S317

Match statistic comparison DNA locus Likelihood ratio (LR)

Information comparison Jeans 280 thousand (5) 2 quadrillion (15) T-shirt 630 thousand (5) 4 quadrillion (15) Method Combined PI TrueAllele

Validated genotyping method Perlin MW, Sinelnikov A. An information gap in DNA evidence interpretation. PLoS ONE. 2009;4(12):e8327. Ballantyne J, Hanson EK, Perlin MW. DNA mixture genotyping by probabilistic computer interpretation of binomially-sampled laser captured cell populations: Combining quantitative data for greater identification information. Science & Justice. 2013;53(2): Perlin MW, Hornyak J, Sugimoto G, Miller K. TrueAllele ® genotype identification on DNA mixtures containing up to five unknown contributors. Journal of Forensic Sciences. 2015;in press. Greenspoon SA, Schiermeier-Wood L, Jenkins BC. Establishing the limits of TrueAllele ® Casework: a validation study. Journal of Forensic Sciences. 2015;in press. Perlin MW, Legler MM, Spencer CE, Smith JL, Allan WP, Belrose JL, Duceman BW. Validating TrueAllele ® DNA mixture interpretation. Journal of Forensic Sciences. 2011;56(6): Perlin MW, Belrose JL, Duceman BW. New York State TrueAllele ® Casework validation study. Journal of Forensic Sciences. 2013;58(6): Perlin MW, Dormer K, Hornyak J, Schiermeier-Wood L, Greenspoon S. TrueAllele ® Casework on Virginia DNA mixture evidence: computer and manual interpretation in 72 reported criminal cases. PLOS ONE. 2014;(9)3:e92837.

Preserves more match information TrueAllele CPI Perlin MW, Legler MM, Spencer CE, Smith JL, Allan WP, Belrose JL, Duceman BW. Validating TrueAllele ® DNA mixture interpretation. Journal of Forensic Sciences. 2011;56(6):

Preserves more DNA evidence Perlin MW, Belrose JL, Duceman BW. New York State TrueAllele ® Casework validation study. Journal of Forensic Sciences. 2013;58(6):

CPI information CPI million Combined probability of inclusion Perlin MW, Dormer K, Hornyak J, Schiermeier-Wood L, Greenspoon S. TrueAllele ® Casework on Virginia DNA mixture evidence: computer and manual interpretation in 72 reported criminal cases. PLOS ONE. 2014;(9)3:e92837.

MIX05: Thresholds not reproducible National Institute of Standards and Technology Two Contributor Mixture Data, Known Victim 31 thousand (4) 213 trillion (14)

SWGDAM 2010 guidelines Threshold Higher threshold for human review Under threshold, alleles less used Allele Pair 8, 8 8, 11 8, 12 8, 14 11, 11 11, 12 11, 14 12, 12 0%12, 14 14, 14

Modified CPI information CPI million mCPI

MIX13: An interlaboratory study on the present state of DNA mixture interpretation in the U.S. Coble M, National Institute of Standards and Technology 5th Annual Prescription for Criminal Justice Forensics, Fordham University School of Law, MIX13: Thresholds falsely include