Text Complexity Audience: 6-12 Content Area Teachers Module 1: Common Core Instruction for ELA & Literacy Area V Regional Superintendents of Schools Robert.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Outcomes 1. To explore the vertical alignment of the grade-level standards 2. To learn a process that can be used to further explore the standards 2.
Advertisements

Module 1: Common Core Instruction for ELA & Literacy Informational Text Audience: K-5 Teachers Area V Regional Superintendents of Schools Robert Daiber.
Copyright ©2011 Commonwealth of Pennsylvania 3.
1 K-2 Smarter Balanced Assessment Update English Language Arts February 2012.
Session 3: Text Complexity Audience: K – 5 Teachers.
Informational Text Audience: 6-12 ELA Teachers Module 1: Common Core Instruction for ELA & Literacy Area V Regional Superintendents of Schools Robert Daiber.
►Identify the importance of text complexity in disciplinary literacy. ►Compare the CCSS grade level expectations for text complexity. ►Identify the three.
Text Complexity Quantitative Qualitative Reader and Task.
Text Complexity AND THE COMMON CORE STATE STANDARDS Adapted from Kansas State Department of Education.
Lexile and Text Complexity Training Indian Knoll Elementary July 2012.
Range of Reading and Level of Text Complexity Stuart Greenberg Just Read, Florida! and the Office of Early Learning Florida Department of Education.
Common Core State Standards Professional Learning Module Series
Session 1: Understanding the Organization Audience: 6-12 ELA & Content Teachers.
Lexiles A Way to Determine Text Complexity. How do we know if the reading selections we are offering are challenging our students?
Module 1/ Chapter 1 Ramping Up for Complex Texts By Nancy Frey and Doug Fisher 1.1.
Facilitators: Teresa Roe English Language Arts Division Manager, TDS Latahshia Coleman English Language Arts Instructional Facilitator, TDS Session Outcomes.
Text Complexity and The KY Core Academic Standards for ELA and Literacy in History/Social Studies, Science & Technical Subjects Carole Mullins Eng/LA Regional.
ELA Coordinators Meeting: Close Reading and Text Complexity Tamra Gacek October, 2012 Literacy and Early Learning Unit Office of Teacher Effectiveness.
The What, the Why, and the How California Reading Association October 18, 2014.
Moving to the Common Core Janet Rummel Assessment Specialist Indiana Department of Education.
 State Standards Initiative.  The standards are not intended to be a new name for old ways of doing business. They are a call to take the next step.
A UGUST 2012 Elementary Literacy Standards. New Standards for Literacy Key Intended Learnings– Teachers will… Examine capacities of college and career.
A Conversation Across the Disciplines to Integrate Literacy into Middle & Secondary Classrooms Drs. Pixita del Hill Prado, Ellen Friedland, & Jevon Hunter.
COMMON CORE AND YOU! Science Literacy: Writing, Reading and Oral Language in CCSS. Susan Gomez Zwiep and Jody Skidmore-Sherrif K-12 Alliance CSTA October.
Simplifying Text Complexity Module 4. The Dilemma The difficulty in transitioning from high school to college and careers may be caused, in part, by a.
IMPLICATIONS FOR INSTRUCTION, ASSESSMENT AND LEADERSHIP! PRESENTED BY: SHERYL WHITE EDUCATOR LEADER CADRE- ELA CHAIR Common Core Shifts in English Language.
November 18 th, 2014 ELA Review and Adoption Committee.
ATP Science Teachers ELA Science Literacy Standards April 6, 2011 Becky W. Smith, Facilitator P12 Math Science Outreach of PIMSER.
UNDERSTANDING LEXILES Lancaster School District Department of Curriculum, Instruction & Assessment.
Elementary Principal’s Meeting January Reading Key Requirement of CCSS All students must be able to comprehend texts of steadily increasing complexity.
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Module 3: Text Complexity Tennessee Department of Education CTE High School Supporting Rigorous CTE Teaching and Learning.
ELA SCHOOL TEAM SESSION Welcome to EEA, 2012! 10/2/2015MSDE1.
Text Complexity Audience: 6-12 Content Area Teachers.
Session 2: Informational Text Audience: 6-12 ELA Teachers.
ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS MODULE 4 FEBRUARY 2013 Reading Common Core Focus: Text Complexity.
Overview of Text Complexity Text complexity is defined by: Qualitative 2.Qualitative measures – levels of meaning, structure, language conventionality.
Subtitle Text Complexity in Common Core State Standards Erin Thompson
Text complexity... Range of Reading and Level of Text Complexity CCSS 10. Read and comprehend complex literary and informational texts independently and.
Text Complexity and Close Reading for the Developing Reader Read 180 Common Core Kick-Off Judy Fuhrman K-12 Staff Developer.
Peg Isakson Legacy of Reading, LLC February, 2013.
Quantitative Analysis Flesch-Kincaid Grade Equivalent Flesch-Kincaid Grade Equivalent Lexile Measures: Sentence Length Number of Words in Text Average.
Session 6 Text Complexity ELA Educator Effectiveness Academy, Summer 2011 © Maryland State Department of Education.
Close Reading. AGENDA Demands of complex text on the reader Close reading tools for comprehending complex text Question and answer opportunities with.
Session 3: Text Complexity Audience: 6-12 ELA Teachers.
Collaborative Conversations
Essential Question: To deepen understanding of what makes texts complex as well as why and how we should read complex texts with students. 1 CFN 609 Principals'
The What, the Why, and the How California Reading Association October 23, 2015 This presentation can be found on SlideShare at
Text Is Foundation Presenter: Nicole A. Zdeb, Director of Academic Services at NWEA.
Literacy in the Common Core State Standards (CCSS) Reading, Writing, Vocabulary, Speaking/Listening and Language Standards for College- and Career-Readiness.
TEACHING WITH A FOCUS ON LEARNERS One model of Differentiation: Sousa and Tomlinson (2011) Differentiation and The Brain. Purpose: Understanding Text Complexity.
Digging Deep into Reading Informational Text CCSS Standards 1-3.
Standards Development Process College and career readiness standards developed in summer 2009 Based on the college and career readiness standards, K-12.
Introduction to the Instructional Materials Evaluation Tool (IMET): ELA
Module 1: Common Core Instruction for ELA & Literacy Informational Text Audience: Science, Social Studies, Technical Subject Teachers Area V Regional Superintendents.
Understanding Text Complexity. Session Goals Understand Emphasis on Text Complexity in the CCSS Define Text Complexity Look at the Implications of Text.
Text Complexity Audience: 6-12 ELA Teachers Module 1: Common Core Instruction for ELA & Literacy Area V Regional Superintendents of Schools Robert Daiber.
Academic Vocabulary Audience: 6-12 ELA & Content Area Teachers Module 1: Common Core Instruction for ELA & Literacy Area V Regional Superintendents of.
D 4 Understanding the Common Core State Standards & Assessment Katie McKnight, Ph.D.
Academic Vocabulary Audience: K – 5 Teachers Module 1: Common Core Instruction for ELA & Literacy Area V Regional Superintendents of Schools Robert Daiber.
Scaffolding the Complex Texts Required by CCCSS for ELD/ELA ELD CIA 13 February 2013 Lisa Burgess, ELD DWAST.
The New Illinois Learning Standards
COMMON CORE FOR THE NOT-SO-COMMON LEARNER
Best Practices in Implementing the 2010 ELA Standards
Module 1: Common Core Instruction for ELA & Literacy
Text Complexity in Common Core State Standards
The New Illinois Learning Standards
Why Choose Complex Text?
Module 1: Common Core Instruction for ELA & Literacy
Module 1: Common Core Instruction for ELA & Literacy
K-2 Smarter Balanced Assessment Update
Presentation transcript:

Text Complexity Audience: 6-12 Content Area Teachers Module 1: Common Core Instruction for ELA & Literacy Area V Regional Superintendents of Schools Robert Daiber ● Keri Garrett ● Marchelle Kassebaum ● Kelton Davis ● Larry Pfeiffer ● Susan Sarfaty ● Julie Wollerman

 Become familiar with the CCSS criteria for text complexity.  Become familiar with the “staircase” of text complexity from grade to grade.  Explore some strategies and resources for making the grade-appropriate texts accessible to all students. 2

 Reported decline in high-school level text ◦ More students are on track to being ready for college-level reading in 8 th and 10 th grade than are actually ready by the time they reach 12 th grade. (ACT)  Increased text difficulty of college/career texts ◦ College professors assign more periodical reading than high school teachers. ◦ The level of difficulty of scientific journals and magazines has increased.  Decline in school text complexity overall ◦ K-12 reading texts have actually trended downward in difficulty in the last half century. 3

 Complex text holds the vocabulary-, language-, knowledge-, and thinking-building potential of deep comprehension.  If students have not developed the skills, concentration, and perseverance to read challenging texts with understanding, they will read less in general.  Limited access to complex texts is an equity issue. ◦ The consequences are disproportionately harsh for students in poverty or high-mobility situations. 4

5

 Levels of meaning/purpose  Text structure  Language conventionality and clarity  Knowledge Demands: Life Experiences  Knowledge Demands: Cultural/Literary Knowledge  Knowledge Demands: Content/Discipline Knowledge 6

 Purpose and main idea ◦ Explicit? Multiple?  Structure ◦ Organization of the whole? Sections? Paragraphs? ◦ Sentence structures?  Language ◦ Familiar, contemporary? Specialized, arcane?  Perspective ◦ Familiar? Unusual? Multiple?  Background or content knowledge required? More text exemplars in Appendix B, Common Core State Standards for ELA & Literacy 7

 Language ◦ Contemporary, common  Structure ◦ Main distinctions explicitly stated in same order in paragraph one ◦ Main ideas of second paragraph cued by repetition of title. ◦ Short  Vocabulary ◦ Distinct ◦ Various terms for the two sides  Structure ◦ Topic sentence of first paragraph buried in the paragraph and in the sentence; “each side representing…”  Cultural knowledge ◦ American Revolution, Civil War ◦ Black enslavement 8 Less complex More complex

“MetaMetrics has realigned its Lexile ranges to match the Standards’ text complexity grade bands and has adjusted upward its trajectory of reading comprehension development through the grades to indicate that all students should be reading at the college and career readiness level by no later than the end of high school.” 9

10 Old Lexile Ranges Realigned Lexile Ranges

 Cognitive capabilities ◦ Attention, memory, critical analytic abilities  Motivation and engagement with task ◦ Purpose, interest in the content, confidence as a reader  Prior knowledge and/or experience ◦ Vocabulary, domain and topic, comprehension strategies, linguistic structures, discourse styles, genres  Reader’s purpose and intended outcome  Type of reading ◦ Skimming to get the gist, studying for retention More in Appendix A, Common Core State Standards in ELA & Literacy 11

 Non-text sources ◦ For example, multi-media and class discussions, build the foundation of vocabulary, language and content knowledge  Easier, supplemental texts ◦ can provide instructional-level reading material  Instructional scaffolding activities ◦ For example, teacher-facilitated read-alouds, discussion of text excerpts, partner reading, peer coaching  Explicit instruction ◦ on vocabulary, text structure, & comprehension strategies  Multiple texts 12

Confederate States of America United States of America Confederacy Confederates Union Unionists southern states southerners northern states northerners RebelsYankees 13

 For the Confederates _________________________________________________ (“new war of Independence”)  For the Unionists __________________________________________________ (“war to preserve the Union”)  For African Americans __________________________________________________ (“war about slavery”) 14 EconomyLabor System Philosophy of Government Confederacy Agricultural_______________ (Slave workforce) ________________ (States’ rights) Union ________________ (Industrial) ________________ (Wage labor) Strong federal government

 With partners, brainstorm scaffolding activities you might use with the text(s) you analyzed in the previous activity. 15

 Grade-appropriate materials for exposure to structures, content, vocabulary;  Instructional-level materials that allow them to progress;  Easy materials that allow them to practice. ◦ If familiar/interesting, material can be more challenging. ◦ If unfamiliar/uninteresting, material may need to be less challenging. 16

 What are the three factors used to assess text complexity in the Common Core State Standards?  Why have the Lexile ranges for grade bands been changed?  Why is it important that ALL students engage with the central, grade-appropriate complex text?  What are some comprehension/scaffolding strategies or activities that can make complex text more accessible to students with below-grade reading skills? 17

 In grade level teams, create lesson(s) that include one or more text exemplars from CCSS Appendix B. ◦ Include support/scaffolding strategies. ◦ In cross-grade level teams, identify topics or concepts around which to select texts so that students continue to build in-depth knowledge across grades. 18