Is Anybody Actually Using This? Gaining Insight to Technology Ownership and Use for Planning and Purchasing Elizabeth German, Web Services Coordinator Anita R. Dryden, Digital & Web Projects Fellow Damon Camille, Training, Assessment & Statistics Coordinator University of Houston Libraries
Overview Introduction, overview Why you need this information: Mobile/personal device growth Limited funding, can’t support every device/platform/etc. Importance to planning and purchasing Ways to address: national data local surveys usage data What we did at UH Why we did a local assessment Setting up & conducting survey, decisions, challenges, etc. How it compared to national data Wrap-up, future challenges Brainstorm/participatory something: what is most important for you to know? Device ownership, importance for schoolwork, etc? Q&A
Why do I need to know about this?
Technology is changing, fast! Obviously, huge issue for libraries! What should we adopt and support? Devices as well as software platforms Next big thing vs. old standbys – how to balance
You can’t do it all! Can’t support every new device Make informed decisions based on user needs
Three things to consider: 1.What devices do we need to provide for our users? 2.What devices do our users own/use that we need to support? 3.Is our network capacity at an appropriate level to support new levels of device use?
Importance vs. Ownership
What should we provide? No universal answer, varies with user population High Importance Low Ownership Not completely cut and dry, but can help set priorities
What should we support? Regardless of whether we’re providing it! High Importance Any Ownership Levels of support? Providing optimized content Hands-on training and troubleshooting Not always under our control, but keeping ahead of trends can help us be prepared
Can our network handle it? Very important to plan for this EX: mobile traffic after holidays May be out of your control, but you can advocate if you have data
How can I get this information?
What’s a librarian to do? You have options but the underlying idea is that understanding your population and their needs is necessary. Choose what’s right for you. National Surveys Usage data Local surveys
National Surveys Pros Statistically significant Provides analysis Trends Cons Might not ask the question Need to look at several reports Might not match your population There are many national surveys out there about technology ownership. Surveys are conducted by research centers or think tanks Survey a large number respondents Examples: Pew Research Center / Educause Center for Applied Research
Reports Smith, Aaron. “35% of American adults own a smartphone”. Pew Research Center, es.aspx es.aspx Dahlstrom, Eden. “ECAR Study of Undergraduate Students and Information Technology, 2012”. EDUCAUSE Center for Applied Research, r-study-undergraduate-students-and-information- technology r-study-undergraduate-students-and-information- technology-2012
Example: ECAR Study of Undergraduate Students 2012
Usage Data Pros Easy to gather Unbiased Actual user behavior Able to see trends Cons Unable to ask “why” Must do analysis yourself Might not answer question Data that you are already collecting on your users Weblogs and Google Analytics Gives information like browser, OS, devices
Example: Google Analytics
Local Surveys Pros Ask the questions you want Survey your own population Cons Time intensive Limited population IRB might be needed Skills Survey to your local population Collect and analytics your own information
Case Study at University of Houston
Why do our own study? Campus demographics Commuters First-generation 2 nd most ethnically diverse institution in the US Specific interest in topics not covered in other studies Locations of use Brands Internet connections
About the survey Summer 2011 IRB approval Conducted in November - December 2011 Random sample of undergraduates 221 responses Structure with “grid” questions
Survey Instrument - SurveyMonkey
Devices Owned
Devices used for “School”
Devices used on campus
Surprising Results! The surprise is that there were no surprises Our students’ responses lined up extremely neatly with national survey data Minor differences in tablet ownership, likely due to timing
Comparing to National Surveys Technology OwnershipECARPewUH Laptop87%88% Printer81%N/A80% Stationary gaming device66%58%68% iPod (Pew and UH: any MP3 player) 62%84% Smartphone (Pew: any cellphone) 55%96%76% Desktop computer53%59%64% Netbook11%N/A22% Tablet computer (ECAR: iPad only) 8%5%22%
Issues Low response Time commitments IRB complications Brand issues
Brand Issues Cell phone, not web- enabled - RAW Cell phone, not web-enabled - CLEANED Cell phone, web- enabled - RAW Cell phone, web- enabled - CLEANED Smart phone - RAW Smart phone - CLEANED Nokia HTC T-MobileProvider - T-MobileT-MobileProvider - T-MobileNokia n/aHTC IphoneiPhoneIphoneiPhoneIphoneiPhone Motorola (plan to buy: Samsung/Motorola/HT C)Motorola NA HtcHTC Samsung LG samsungSamsungsamsungSamsungsamsungSamsung blackberryBlackberry IPhone 4iPhoneIPhone 4iPhone N/ADROID GALAXYDroid DROID GALAXYDroid
Benefits Understanding locations where things are used Getting a baseline for population use and technology ownership Knowledge that national data reflects UH population
What’s Next? Rely on national data for planning purpose Only survey when something specific to answer Apply to participate in ECAR Share data with campus IT partners
Discussion
Questions for Discussion What new technologies (devices, software, platforms, etc.) do you expect to adopt in the next year? Do you feel that your users still rely on the “old standbys”, or do they lean more towards hot new technology? Have you conducted an assessment at your institution about device ownership? Are there other data sources you’re aware of that you use? How do you make the decision to adopt something new? Who else in your organization do you need to partner with for technology projects?