IEEE 1680.4 4.6.2.1 Required – End-of-life processing requirements For all end of life equipment collected by manufacturer under 4.6.1.1:  The manufacturer.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
AIRWORTHINESS ASPECTS OF AIRCRAFT LEASING
Advertisements

WTO, Trade and Environment Division
December 2005 EuP Directive : A Framework for setting eco-design requirements for energy-using products European Commission.
Course Material Overview of Process Safety Compliance with Standards
International Recognition System for Accreditation
Accreditation 1. Purpose of the Module - To create knowledge and understanding on accreditation system - To build capacity of National Governments/ focal.
Options for Regulation and the Impact of Regulation on the Marketplace 29 November 2005 Alan Kent
International Laboratory Accreditation Cooperation (ILAC) & International Accreditation Forum (IAF) 13 th International Legal Metrology Conference Sydney,
School for drafting regulations Nuclear Safety Decommissioning Vienna, 2-7 December 2012 Tea Bilic Zabric.
EMS Auditing Definitions
RC14001 ® Update GPCA Responsible Care Committee September 23, 2013.
1Having confidence in certification CASCO Comms/ International Organization for Standardization.
Overview of NSF Standards Process and Joint Committee Formation Sustainable Water Contact Products Stakeholder Meeting October 30, 2012.
Proposed Rules to Help Ensure the Safety of Imported Food 1.
Life Cycle Assessment Overview of LCA and Methodology October 30, 2012.
An introduction to the National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program Sally Bruce, Chief for the National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program.
QUALITY INDUSTRY NATIONAL CONFERENCE “EMPOWERING FUTURE QUALITY PROFESSIONALS” What is Conformity Assessment? D. Iain Muir Senior Manager: Compliance Management.
U D T Workshop on the Pressure Equipment Directive, Warsaw June 2004 INTERFACES BETWEEN NATIONAL LEGISLATION AND DIRECTIVE 97/23/EC SYSTEM OF ENSURING.
Codes, Standards & Conformity Assessment GP Russ Chaney CEO, The IAPMO Group
NOTIFIED BODIES EC MARKING. index  Notified Bodies. Activities  Notification procedure  Role of accreditation  Notified Bodies cooperation  Notified.
Commissioning of Fire Protection and Life Safety Systems Presented by: Charles Kilfoil Bechtel National Waste Treatment Plant Richland WA.
1 Augean plc Hazardous waste management services.
WHY CONFORMITY ASSESSMENT?. What is conformity assessment?  Conformity assessment is the name given to processes that are used to demonstrate that a.
CONFORMITY ASSESSMENT FOR THOSE WHO DID NOT ATTEND CA CONFORMITY ASSESSMENT (CA) PROCEDURES INCLUDE: SAMPLING AND TESTING INSPECTION CERTIFICATION.
| Folie | Folie 2 ISO approach to GHG-inventory QA/QC UNFCCC Workshop on National Systems April 2005, Bonn Doris.
2008 New York - Member Forum Council for Responsible Jewellery Practices, Ltd. Overview of CRJP.
Waste Electrical & Electronic Equipment (WEEE). Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (WEEE) Directive Work started in the year 1994 To device a strategy.
CERTIFICATION In the Electronics Recycling Industry © 2007 IAER Web Site - -
Directive 2000/53/EC on End-of-Life Vehicles
Conformity assessment – Standards and CEOC’s involvement Annual Conference 31 of May 2010 in Vienna Dipl.-Ing. Gerd-Hinrich Schaub CEOC International.
Product Stewardship: Putting It into Practice GCWellon, Manager, Responsible Care Methanex Corporation June 2010.
Ecolabel Sector - Service for Environmental Certifications ISPRA- National Italian Institute for Environmental Protection and Research Dr. Stefania Minestrini.
Overview of the NSF 375 Draft Sustainability for the Water Treatment and Distribution Industry October 30, 2012.
“The Quality Infrastructure in Lebanon” Export Norms, Quality Control and Competitiveness FUTURE PROGRAMME Prepared By Ali Berro Director of Quality Programme.
UNECE – SIDA “ SOUTH EAST EUROPE REGULATORY PROJECT” FIRST MEETING OF REGULATORS FROM SOUTH EAST EUROPEAN COUNTRIES PRESENTATIONFROM THE REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA.
Specific Safety Requirements on Safety Assessment and Safety Cases for Predisposal Management of Radioactive Waste – GSR Part 5.
More Sustainable E-waste Management © SERI – Home of the R2 Standard 8/6/15.
International Atomic Energy Agency Roles and responsibilities for development of disposal facilities Phil Metcalf Workshop on Strategy and Methodologies.
Solid Waste Management Plans Update Webinar Training March 5, 2014.
Webinar FSSC audit report 7th september 2015
5 th ITU Green Standards Week Nassau, The Bahamas December 2015 Standards, Guidelines and Best Practices Applicable to the Environmentally Sound.
Agreement concerning the adoption of uniform conditions for periodical technical inspections of wheeled vehicles and the reciprocal recognition of such.
Voluntary Standards and Government: Working Together A Positive Collaboration Benefits Both the Public and Private Sectors Presentation by Mary C. McKiel,
Deputy Head of Federal Accreditation Service Sergey V. Migin Approximation of accreditation systems of European Union and Russia.
Workshop on Accreditation of Bodies Certifying Medical Devices Kiev, November 2014.
Confidence with competence The Development of European Accreditation Daniel PIERRE EA Vice-Chairman.
Firefighter Emergency Escape Systems New York State Department of Labor Public Employee Safety and Health (PESH)
1 The WTO Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade Basic Concepts and Member Obligations.
Technology Services – National Institute of Standards and Technology Conformity Assessment ANSI-HSSP Workshop Emergency Communications December 2, 2004.
Metrology & Accreditation – Their Role in the Global Market Presented at the 2009 NCSLI Conference San Antonio, Texas 30 July 2009 by Roxanne Robinson.
Organization and Implementation of a National Regulatory Program for the Control of Radiation Sources Program Performance Criteria.
BEST PRACTICES FOR CONDUCTING AN ON-SITE RECYCLING VENDOR REVIEW Presented by: Marvin Howell, Analytical Services, Inc.
Harmonised use of accreditation for assessing the competence of various Conformity Assessment Bodies Dr Andreas Steinhorst, EA ERA workshop 13 April 2016,
OVERVIEW ON THE MONGOLIAN SYSTEM OF CERTIFICATION AND ACCREDITATION BYAMBAA.S Specialist, Strategic planning and policy integration department of MASM.
How Can the Federal Electronics Challenge (FEC) Help You? Federal Environmental Symposium June 5, 2007 Cate Berard U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
1 Recycling Electronics: the R2 Effort Karen Pollard EPA, Office of Resource Conservation & Recovery June, 2009.
Preparation for Re-use of Electrical & Electronic Equipment Julie-Ann Adams
1Johannesburg South Africa SMA May International Organization for Standardization.
IECEE CB-FCS Full Certification Scheme
Global Solar Certification Network
Strategy for conformity of non-standard cryogenic equipment
Introduction to the Definition of Solid Waste Final Rule
the Republic of Kazakhstan
Emanuele Riva – IAF Vice-Chair
USAid presentation, Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan
Emulsion Task Force Meeting
Overview on the Regulations and Technical Requirements for E-Waste Management in Rwanda. RURA.
INTERFACES BETWEEN NATIONAL LEGISLATION AND DIRECTIVE 97/23/EC
EU Food Safety Requirements: - Hygiene of Foodstuffs -
HKAS Accreditation Service for Certification of Management System of RCHE Service Providers Mr WONG Wang-wah Assistant Commissioner for Innovation and.
Presentation transcript:

IEEE Required – End-of-life processing requirements For all end of life equipment collected by manufacturer under :  The manufacturer must either provide evidence of participation in, or conformance to, a program sanctioned or required by the jurisdiction for the collection and recycling of the covered product in that jurisdiction;  Or must utilize initial service providers that achieve one of the following:  Initial service provider is certified to a qualified electronics recycling standard by an Independent Certification Body, such as “The Responsible Recycling (R2) Standard for Electronics Recyclers”, or “e-Stewards Standard for Responsible Recycling and Reuse of Electronic Equipment.”  If allowed by the qualified electronics recycling standard, the Initial Service Provider can demonstrate conformity to that standard as defined below.  Certification by an independent certification body to qualified electronics recycling standard  Second or third party audit reports indicating conformance to the qualified electronic recycling standard  “Independent Certification Body” is a body that has been accredited by a national accreditation body, and is a signatory to the International Laboratory Accreditation Cooperation (ILAC) Mutual Recognition Arrangement (MRA) or the International Accreditation Forum (IAF) Multilateral Recognition Arrangement (MLA).

Required – End-of-life processing requirements (cont.) A qualified electronics recycling standard shall either meet the following Minimum Technical Requirements a) through h), or meet Consensus Development Requirement i), below:  Minimum Technical Requirements a) The standard is applicable within the country(s)/region(s) being declared to, and is applicable to the scope of equipment covered by this criterion. b) The standard acknowledges that legal requirements have precedence to those within the standard. c) The standard includes a definition for “materials of concern” (or analogous term identifying materials with toxic or hazardous characteristics) and requires initial service providers to have a written management plan for these materials that protects human health and the environment. d) The standard requires that initial service providers shall maintain, review annually, and update as needed, an environmental, health and safety management system. e) The standard requires that material intended for reuse, repair, refurbishment, remanufacturing, recycling and/or disposal shall be transported in accordance with applicable trade and transporting laws of the exporting and importing countries. f) The standard requires the initial service provider to dispose of “materials of concern” in a hazardous disposal facility unless otherwise required by law or alternatively they may be incinerated in a waste-to-energy facility if the facility is designed and tested to demonstrate safe capture and/or destruction of such materials and their hazardous byproducts. g) The standard requires that initial service providers shall control, document and track the material flow of all equipment, components, and materials covered by the standard, that pass through its facilities. h) The standard requires initial service providers to track all “materials of concern” to final disposition, and to ensure that the downstream take-back service providers are meeting the requirements of items c) through h).  Consensus Development Requirement a) The standard (1) relates directly to the environmental impact of recycling electronics materials, (2) was developed or adopted by a voluntary consensus standards body 2, and (3) requires intellectual property (IP) relevant to the standard be made available by the IP owner on a non-discriminatory, royalty-free or reasonable royalty basis to all interested parties.

NSF End-of-service/end-of-life management In jurisdictions where manufacturer can control the selection of the initial service provider, manufacturer shall ensure that all registered equipment and, or components (including lease returns, warranty returns, trade-ins) forming the whole or part of the product covered by criterion are prepared for reuse and, or initially treated at a facility(s) operated by an initial service provider that is certified by an accredited certification body to one or more of the following standards:  EN Collection, logistics and treatment requirements for WEEE;  e-Stewards Standard for Responsible Recycling and Reuse of Electronic Equipment;  Responsible Recycling (“R2”) Standard for Electronics Recyclers; and, or  WEEELABEX Treatment Standard. Certification bodies shall be accredited by an International Accreditation Forum member accreditation body ( to certify to the specific standard identified. The NSF Joint Committee on the Environmental Leadership Standard for Servers may add standards to the above list of recognized standards, provided the standard meets requirements a) through i) in criterion of the IEEE Standard for the Environmental Assessment of Imaging Equipment.

12.1.2End-of-service/end-of-life management (cont.) In countries where there are no initial service providers certified by accredited certification bodies to any of the above recycling standards, manufacturers shall have 18 months before use of such certified initial service providers is required for conformance with this criterion. During that grace period manufacturers may, for conformance with this criterion, either:  Utilize initial service providers that meet requirements a) through i) in criterion of the IEEE Standard for the Environmental Assessment of Imaging Equipment, as confirmed through second- or third-party audits, or  Legally export taken-back equipment or components to a facility in another country that can legally import such materials and that is certified to one of the above recycling standard by an accredited certification body.

Directional Guidance Discussion  How should “qualified standards” be defined?  How should Initial Service Providers be qualified?  What should be the minimum technical performance requirements for a standard to qualify?  What equipment should be covered by the criterion?  Proposals for reconciliation of the equipment processing criteria?

Comparison of Key Differences Criterion ElementIEEENSF 1) Qualified Electronics Recycling Standards – the recycling standards that Initial Service Providers must be conformant with in order for a manufacturer to use their services to meet this criterion Meets minimum technical requirements a) – h) or Consensus development requirement Note: manufacturer’s technical performance specifications are eligible if they meet minimum technical performance requirements Provides list of qualified standards Additional standards can be added through NSF continuous maintenance process, if the standard meets minimum technical performance requirements of a) – i) 2) Approval/qualification process for Initial Service Providers to demonstrate conformance to the qualified electronics recycling standard Certified by independent certification body or 2 nd or 3 rd party audit findings Certified by accredited certification body with IAF accreditation 18 month grace period in countries with no certified ISP

Comparison of Key Differences Criterion ElementIEEENSF 3) Minimum technical requirements that a recycling standard must meet to become a Qualified Electronics Recycling Standard? a – h (modification of a- i) For example: f) The standard requires the initial service provider to dispose of “materials of concern” in a hazardous disposal facility unless otherwise required by law or alternatively they may be incinerated in a waste-to- energy facility if the facility is designed and tested to demonstrate safe capture and/or destruction of such materials and their hazardous byproducts. References a- i For example: g) The standard disallows the initial service provider from utilizing: Incineration and waste-to-energy facilities for materials that contain mercury, halogenated compounds, and beryllium, at a minimum. Non-hazardous disposal facilities for disposing of equipment, components, or materials derived from them, which contain “materials of concern,” except as required by law. 4) Equipment covered under this criterion End of life equipment All equipment collected by manufacturer, including equipment recovered under End of service and end of life equipment recovered under Includes warranty returns, lease returns and trade ins

Comparison of Key Differences Criterion ElementIEEENSF 5) When a manufacture must select an Initial Service Provider that meets a Qualified Electronics Recycling Standard If not participating or conforming to program sanctioned or required by the jurisdiction In jurisdictions where they have control over selection of Initial Service Provider

Directional Guidance Discussion  How should “qualified standards” be defined?  How should Initial Service Providers be qualified?  What should be the minimum technical performance requirements for a standard to qualify?  What equipment should be covered by the criterion?  Proposals for reconciliation of the equipment processing criteria?