Language Games Offside!. Language Game Theory – Ludwig Wittgenstein An Austrian general said to someone: 'I shall think of you after my death, if that.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Michael Lacewing Religious belief Michael Lacewing © Michael Lacewing.
Advertisements

Verificationism and religious language Michael Lacewing
Religious Language Michael Lacewing
LUDWIG WITTGENSTEIN Early on in his philosophical career Witt put forward a picture theory of meaning’. First thought that the primary function.
Introduction to A2 Philosophy Homework: Background reading – ‘Questions about God.’ – Chapter 4 – God and Language, by Patrick J. Clarke.
This is the beginning of the “The Jabberwocky” by Lewis Carrol.
© Michael Lacewing Behaviourism and the problem of other minds Michael Lacewing
How to answer exam questions: Section 2 Matters of life and death
Synthesizing Information: Thinking Critically about Incorporating Sources into your research Kevin Klipfel, Information Literacy Coordinator, California.
The tripartite theory of knowledge
USING AND PROMOTING REFLECTIVE JUDGMENT AS STUDENT LEADERS ON CAMPUS Patricia M. King, Professor Higher Education, University of Michigan.
Religious Language Speaking about God Part 1. Why Religious language? The concept of a God is: Something other Something timeless We talk of things using.
“God talk is evidently non-sense” A.J. Ayer. Ayer is a logical positivist – a member of the Vienna Circle. Any claim made about God (including Atheistic)
Ludwig Wittgenstein EARLY: PICTURE THEORY LATER: LANGUAGE GAMES.
Ethical and religious language Michael Lacewing
Religious Language  Language is about communication  Religious language is a means of communicating about religion  This can be within three contexts:
Mock exam  27 th February  1 ½ hours  Both halves of the course – answer one question on each half.
Natural Law AS Revision
Non-cognitivism in religious faith and language Michael Lacewing
PS429 Social and Public Communication PS429 Social and Public Communication Week 4 (25/10/2005) Reading group discussion.
Ethics Lesson #3 Challenges to Ethics Much of this presentation comes from Questions that Matter, by Miller (Chapter 16)
KNOWLEDGE What is it? How does it differ from belief? What is the relationship between knowledge and truth? These are the concerns of epistemology How.
Science & pseudoscience – Part of chapter 3 Including guest appearance by religion & popular (but incorrect) culture.
This week’s aims To explain and analyse Bultmann’s approach to religious language To review the religious language unit To practise planning and writing.
LECTURE 19 THE COSMOLOGICAL ARGUMENT CONTINUED. THE QUANTUM MECHANICAL OBJECTION DEPENDS UPON A PARTICULAR INTERPRETATION WE MIGHT REASONABLY SUSPEND.
Epistemology revision Concept empiricist arguments against concept innatism:  Alternative explanations (no such concept or concept re- defined as based.
Year 9 Unit 1 – What is Truth?. About this unit… This unit provides for pupils to engage with the question of the nature of truth using examples of truth.
Is it possible to verify statements about God? The Logical Positivists would say no – God is a metaphysical being and it is impossible to empirically verify.
John Wisdom’s Parable of the Gardener AS Philosophy God and the World – Seeing as hns adapted from richmond.
Romans 14-15:13
Language Games L/O: To understand and be able to explain clearly what is meant by the term Language Games Starter: Recapping Myth and Symbol. Get into.
Apologetics WEEK 2- JANUARY 13 TH, How can you think your religion is the only true one?  Remember, we live in a world that has a Postmodern Worldview.
What is death? In your notes write a definition of the word death. The medical dictionary says: The cessation of all vital functions, demonstrated by an.
My Philosophy teacher wants to kill me! Ellie: I think Karen is going to kill me. Rosie: She doesn’t seem that bad to me; she never acts like she hates.
Criticisms of Flew Possible responses Hare – religious statements are unfalsifiable and non-cognitive but still play a useful role in life (parable of.
Religious Experience. Recap What is a religious experience? What are James’ four categories of religious experience? What are Swinburne’s five categories.
Michael Lacewing Religious belief Michael Lacewing © Michael Lacewing.
Religious language: cognitive or non-cognitive?
Religious language: the University debate
Homework due Complete all activities in the booklet up to page 26 Research and ensure you bring into college examples of creation myths, myths of good.
Religious responses to the verification principle
Verificationism on religious language
Ludwig Wittgenstein EARLY: PICTURE THEORY LATER: LANGUAGE GAMES.
The philosophical problems of the verification principle
Whereof one cannot speak, thereof one must remain silent.
Is this conversation meaningful or meaningless?
Language Games and the Via Negativa.
Reading material Articles: Tillich on symbols & Aquinas on analogy questions 1. What is art? 2. Does it open up new levels of reality for you? 3. Does.
Recap task Think of fifteen key terms associated with analogy Choose nine and add to the bingo grid Play bingo.
Using Analogy to Understand God
Do Religious Experiences prove God exists? Discuss in pairs.
Symbol and Myth Starter: Draw
THE ONTOLOGICAL ARGUMENT.
Religious beliefs, religious attitudes
The Verification Principle
What does the word ‘box’ mean?
Supportive evidence – different forms of myths to convey meaning: creation myths; myths of good against evil; heroic myths. Myths help to overcome.
Religious language Myths
RELIGIOUS LANGUAGE.
Flying pig spotted in Amazon Jungle…
Discussion: Can one meaningfully talk of a transcendent metaphysical God acting (creating sustaining, being loving) in a physical empirical world? Ayer.
01 4 Ethical Language 4.1 Meta-Ethics.
What is good / bad about this answer?
‘A triangle has three sides’
Religious Language as cognitive, but meaningless
By the end of today’s lesson you will
Is murder wrong? A: What is murder? B: What is the law on murder in the UK? A: Do you think murder is wrong? B: Do you think murder is wrong? ‘Garment.
Recap task Think of fifteen key terms associated with analogy Choose nine and add to the bingo grid Play bingo.
Religious beliefs, religious attitudes
A guide for the perplexed (who think it is all meaningless)
Presentation transcript:

Language Games Offside!

Language Game Theory – Ludwig Wittgenstein An Austrian general said to someone: 'I shall think of you after my death, if that should be possible'. We can imagine one group who would find this ludicrous, another who wouldn't.... Suppose that someone believed in the Last Judgement, and I don't, does this mean that I believe the opposite of him, just that there won't be such a thing? I would say: "not at all, or not always". Suppose I say that the body will rot, and another says "No. Particles will rejoin in a thousand years, and there will be a Resurrection of you". If someone said: "Wittgenstein, do you believe in this?" I'd say: "No." "Do you contradict the man?" I'd say: "No".... Suppose someone were a believer and said: "I believe in a Last Judgement," and I said; "Well, I'm not so sure. Possibly". You would say that there is an enormous gulf between us. If he said "There is a German aeroplane overhead", and I said " Possibly I'm not so sure" you'd say we were fairly near. It isn't a question of my being near him, but on an entirely different plane, which you can express by saying: "You mean something altogether different, Wittgenstein". The difference might not show up at all in any explanation of meaning…

Wittgenstein’s Language Game Approach A functional and postmodern approach to language Language statements are not ‘true or false’ but bear meaning to the speaker/person expressing themselves. In each ‘form of life’ language therefore is part of a ‘game’ – people part of each game communicate with each other. Each game has a ‘criteria of coherence’, which is only understood in relevance to that game. Religious Language is meaningful when used in the context of the correct ‘game’, hence believers understand each other. If one does not understand it, it is deemed a ‘category mistake’ e.g. a scientist physically looking for a ‘soul’.

Strengths: 1. A strength is that it gives believers a way to express the meaningfulness of religious language 2. At the same time explaining why atheists or people not in the language game do not understand the meaning. 3. It does not mean what is said is meaningless just that you do not know the rules of the game.

Weaknesses: 1. It removes the link between claims made with language and empirical evidence 2. Many believers speak of their faith as a true proposition which can be empirically verified. 3. Makes religion a select group which often goes against the Churches teachings

Strengths and Weaknesses of the Language Game approach Recognises the range of interpretations (non – cognitive) Boundaries for use of language Distinguishes it from other types One can be ‘initiated’ into the ‘game’ e.g. believers Defended against criticism by ‘category mistakes’ Each ‘criteria of coherence’ may be nonsense! Can claims be empirically tested? People outside the game are alienated Rules cannot be adapted Challenges are too easily rejected StrengthsWeaknesses

Language Game Questions In what way might ‘Language Games’ benefit the Religious Believer? Do you think ‘Language Games’ enable Religious Language to be more meaningful? Compare ‘Language Games to one of the other forms of language which we have encountered – which is the most problematic?