2 nd Division ManCOM MEETING 2015 May 21, 2015 IGB Training Center.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PD Plan Agenda August 26, 2008 PBTE Indicators Track
Advertisements

M & E for K to 12 BEP in Schools
COMPETENCY-BASED PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL SYSTEM FOR TEACHERS (CB-PAST)
GUIDELINES ON THE PREPARATION OF DAILY LESSONS
MU Center for SW-PBS College of Education University of Missouri Behavior Intervention Plans: Monitoring Student Progress.
Ministry of Public Health and Sanitation Ministry of Medical Services PERFORMANCE REPORTING 1.
Thank you for joining us for Monitoring Progress Toward IEP Goals The presentation will begin momentarily. RIGHT REASON TECHNOLOGIES YOUR SOLUTION FOR.
SOP Melody Lin, Ph.D. Deputy Director, Office for Human Research Protections Director, International Activities Santiago, Chile August.
System Accreditation. An international institution that brings together three of the largest U.S.-based accreditation agencies: Southern Association of.
ORGANIZATION. 2 Problem scenario  Develop an organizational chart for your laboratory showing lines of authority from the head of the organization to.
Campus Staffing Changes Positions to be deleted from CNA/CIP  Title I, Title II, SCE  Academic Deans (211)  Administrative Assistants.
Etc Objective: The pupils I teach will achieve their agreed individual targets this year and 50% will exceed their targets Timelines and QA Identification.
Performance management guidance
National Trail Local School District 3 year-District Improvement Plan April 2009.
Designing and Implementing An Effective Schoolwide Program
TEAM MADRAS: Are YOU on the team? Madras Middle School Professional Development Plan Proposal by Donna Eskut - July 2013 Presented to Madras.
Administrative Evaluation Committee – Orientation Meeting Dr. Christine Carver, Associate Superintendent of Human Capital Development Mr. Stephen Foresi,
DepED Order No. 79 s IMPLEMENTING GUIDELINES ON THE GRANT OF STEP INCREMENT FOR TEACHERS WITH SPECIALIZATION IN SCIENCE AND/OR MATHEMATICS A.The.
Los Angeles County Office of Education Division for School Improvement School Site Council (SSC) Training September 9 th 2008 Anna Carrasco From presentation.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
RELCAAP National Seminar-Workshop RELCAAP National Seminar-Workshop on Updating Strategies in Communicative Language Teaching: Support to School - Based.
Iowa’s Teacher Quality Program. Intent of the General Assembly To create a student achievement and teacher quality program that acknowledges that outstanding.
LOUGHBOROUGHCOLLEGE Business Support Self Assessment
SACS Coordinators Meeting Non-Academic Units Wednesday, January 9, 2013 Timothy Brophy – Director, Institutional Assessment Cheryl Gater – Director, SACS.
Leadership Team Meeting March 24,  Project Based Approach  Cross Functional Project Teams  Projects Support Multiple Operational Expectations.
Effective Coaching for Success Presenter: Dr. Wendy Perry 2015.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
Department of School Improvement
NEASCNEASC Standards Committees Kick-off Today’s Topic: Overview of the NEASC Game Plan and instructions for today’s work.
Medicine Hat School District #76 PLC’s Building Capability Through Collaborative Learning Developing tomorrow’s citizens through improved learning, living.
MISSOURI PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENTS An Overview. Content of the Assessments 2  Pre-Service Teacher Assessments  Entry Level  Exit Level  School Leader.
Presented by: LORNA DIG-DINO 20 th National ManCom Meeting NEAP- Region XI, Davao City February 23, 2010.
Training Program Proposal December  Review ~ of The Educational Technology Plan from Donegal’s Strategic Plan  Analysis ~ of Donegal’s School.
N C B S S H.
What is Expected in Updating Your SIP? Metro-Nashville Public School System School Improvement Plan Process September 2008.
Reform Model for Change Board of Education presentation by Superintendent: Dr. Kimberly Tooley.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction California Career Technical Education Model Standards Update.
Improvement Planning Mischele McManus Infant/Toddler and Family Services Office of Early Childhood Education and Family Services July 20, 2007
Orientation and Summer Institutes Implementer’s Forum October 2005 Susan Barrett PBIS Maryland.
Transforming the Learning, Teaching, and Leadership Environment Summer Institutes 2001 Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction/Association of Washington.
Intervention and Support Inclusion Questions. Early and Strategic  How does the school provide purposeful early intervention and support to lift the.
Lincoln Elementary Math and Science Learning Academy.
BISD Update Teacher & Principal Evaluation Update Teacher Evaluation Committee November 29,
Organizational Process The activities conducted by an educational institution or school is called organizational process Which consist of series of steps.
Title III Application Process Maria Garcia-Morales (717) Title III Program Manager Pennsylvania Department of Education.
Foundations for Learning Campaign Laying solid foundations for learning PRESENTATION TO THE EDUCATION PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE Mrs Palesa Tyobeka Deputy Director-General:
Strategic Planning Deanna Herwald Vice President-Quality Management Systems.
School Improvement Plan
School practice Dragica Trivic. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FROM TEMPUS MASTS CONFERENCE in Novi Sad Practice should be seen as an integral part of the.
Workshop on SHS Implementation Planning Updates on SHS Planning and Implementation.
School Improvement Updates Accreditation (AdvancED) Process ASSIST Portfolio for Schools May 2016 Office of Service Quality Veda Hudge, Director Donna.
February 25, Today’s Agenda  Introductions  USDOE School Improvement Information  Timelines and Feedback on submitted plans  Implementing plans.
Create a Cadence of Accountability July 21, 2016.
The Individual Education Plan (IEP)
Learning Resource Plan Adjustment Coordinating Principal-LILA
MUHC Innovation Model.
Wethersfield Teacher Evaluation and Support Plan
Implementing guidelines on the school calendar for sy
Global Youth Tobacco Survey (GYTS): Proposal Development
Instructional Technology Plan Overview
The School Mentor 9/19/2018.
Foothill College Accreditation Self-Study Update
Math Management Binder ©
IPCRF for T1-3 WILHELMINA P. MATA, Ph.D.
Gary Carlin, CFN 603 September, 2012
Be Prepared: Federal Program Monitoring
The School Site Council
Safeguarding for Leaders
Course Preparation Check List
Course Preparation Check List
Presentation transcript:

2 nd Division ManCOM MEETING 2015 May 21, 2015 IGB Training Center

To do List: Preliminaries ManCom Proper - Reading and Approval of Previous Minutes - Suspension of House Rules for a) Accomplishment Reports and Updates b) DepED Order No. 8, s c) Paalam-Salamat - IPC of SHs and Teachers - Other matters Closure

IPC for School Heads

IPC of Teachers

What will SHs do with the IPC? 1.Discuss with adopters and among peers in the cluster 2.Translate Performance Indicators into specific activities, tasks, or outputs relevant to the AIP/SIP of the school 3.Use prescribed template 4. Submit output to the division office for SDS Approval

KRAsPerformance IndicatorsMajor Immediate OutputsTime Frame Instructional Leadership (20%) 100% of required number of lesson plans/DLL’s of each teacher inspected and evaluated (weekly) with two lapses within the semester 1. Teacher A Teacher B Teacher C - 75 June – October % of the regular meetings conducted within the semester with two lapses June - 2 July - 1 August - 2 September - 2 October - 2 (refer to your AIP) 100% of the needs based clinical supervision conducted/provided within the semester with two lapses Number of Teachers Needing Clinical Supervision = Specify time Frames here based on ISP or AIP 2% increase in NAT results attained NATs ( ) = Target = Refer to program targets in SIP Individual Performance Commitment Inventory of Major Immediate Outputs (School Heads) Period Covered: _____________________

KRAsPerformance IndicatorsMajor Immediate OutputsTime Frame Instructional Leadership (20%) 100% of the implementation of IM’s monitored within the semester with two lapses. Teacher A = (number of IMs) Teacher B = Teacher C = Refer to LPs LGs, etc 100% of the implementation of teaching strategies monitored within the semester with two lapses. Teacher A= Teacher B = Teacher C = Refer to LPs, LGs, etc 1 intervention program / innovation per learning area across grade levels developed and implemented within the semester with two lapses English = (name or title of intervention) Science = Filipino = HEKASI = Mathematics = EPP = ESP = Refer to Students’ intervention needs Individual Performance Commitment Inventory of Major Immediate Outputs (School Heads) Period Covered: _____________________

KRAsPerformance IndicatorsMajor Immediate OutputsTime Frame HR Management and Development (15%) 100% of needs-based INSET’s conducted within the rating period without lapses INSET needs: Filipino = (number of trainings needed) English = Mathematics = (Copy of TNA results) Based on TNA 100% of teachers’ loads and assignments matched with expertise and students’ needs in the last week of May 2015 without lapses Form 29, 30, 31 (A and B)Adhere to timelines 100% of teachers / staff performance appraised and submitted within the rating period without error Teachers’ IPCs Teachers” IPCRs Proof s of Accomplishment Follow Appraisal time lines 1 school succession program prepared within the semester without error Copy of the School Succession Programs (both retirement and promotion) Based on Staff Profile / Inventory Timelines Individual Performance Commitment Inventory of Major Immediate Outputs(School Heads) Period Covered: _____________________

KRAsPerformance IndicatorsMajor Immediate OutputsTime Frame HR Management and Development (15%) 100% of needs-based INSET’s conducted within the rating period without lapses INSET needs: Filipino = (number of trainings needed) English = Mathematics = (Copy of TNA results) Based on TNA 100% of teachers’ loads and assignments matched with expertise and students’ needs in the last week of May 2015 without lapses Form 29, 30, 31 (A and B)Adhere to timelines 100% of teachers / staff performance appraised and submitted within the rating period without error Teachers’ IPCs Teachers” IPCRs Proof s of Accomplishment Follow Appraisal time lines 1 school succession program prepared within the semester without error Copy of the School Succession Programs (both retirement and promotion) Based on Staff Profile / Inventory Timelines Individual Performance Commitment Inventory of Major Immediate Outputs (School Heads) Period Covered: _____________________

KRAsPerformance IndicatorsMajor Immediate OutputsTime Frame Parents’ Involvement and Community (10 %) 100% of resource generation within the rating period is supported by stakeholders without shortfall / deficiency (List resources to be generated and the stakeholders engaged/involved) Refer to AIP 100% of the scheduled regular meetings with parents within the rating period conducted without lapses. (List down planned meetings with parents per teacher involvedAdhere to timelines in the AIP 100% of the Alumni planned activities implemented within the rating period without lapses/deficiencies List of alumni -planned activities Follow time lines in the AIP 75% of stakeholders M & E engagement/involvement in monitoring of programs implementation within the rating period facilitated without lapses List of stakeholders involved in M and E and schedules of M and E activities Adhere to AIP Timelines Individual Performance Commitment Inventory of Major Immediate Outputs (School Heads) Period Covered: _____________________

KRAsPerformance IndicatorsMajor Immediate OutputsTime Frame Teaching Learning Process (30 %) 100% of the required number of daily lesson plans/lesson logs submitted on prescribed dates without lapses. List of Lessons / Lesson Logs per teacher (school may device a tracking form or checklist) Based on Lesson Scope and Sequence Plan 100% of the total number of learners achieved 75% mastery level in all learning areas within the rating period with at most 2 lapses. List of learners per class per learning area CPL per class period/ competency taught Raw Test/assessment results Adhere to CO / SDO timelines 100% of the characteristics of positive, productive and safe learning environment complied with within the rating period without lapses. Use the CFSS indicators Follow time lines in the AIP Pupils’ Outcome (30) 100% of subjects/learning areas taught have complete and accurate class record/s within the rating period without lapses. Class Records with raw data Adhere to AIP Timelines Individual Performance Commitment Inventory of Major Immediate Outputs (Teachers) Period Covered: _____________________

Individual Performance Commitment Inventory of Major Immediate Outputs (Teachers) Period Covered: _____________________  prepared at the beginning of the Rating Period / during the preparation of the IPC  helps both the rater and the ratee determine how PIs can be complied with and how to generate/produce desired outputs

Individual Performance Commitment Inventory of Major Immediate Outputs (Teachers) Period Covered: _____________________  attached to IPC when submitting to approving authority for approval

QUESTIONS???

Due dates: IPC with attachments June 15, 2015 Scope: Teachers - June 2015 – March 2016 SHs - January – June July – December 2015

Appraisal for January – June 2015: What to submit: 1. IPCR (Jan- June) (using IPC for Jan – June approved or not) -with corresponding MOVs 2. Part II 3. Part III 4. Part IV Due Date: July 15, 2015 To whom: Rater