Provincial Forum on Improving Outcomes for Children, Youth & Families Edmonton, Alberta May 27 th, 2009 Bruce MacLaurin Faculty of Social Work University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Building a Policy Framework: Why Having Data Matters Lessons Learned from the Canadian Experience Strengthening Child Protection Systems in Their Response.
Advertisements

Opportunities for Prevention & Intervention in Child Maltreatment Investigations Involving Infants in Ontario Barbara Fallon, PhD Assistant Professor Jennifer.
RESPONDING TO INTIMATE PARTNER VIOLENCE IN THE CHILD WELFARE SYSTEM Judy Hughes Faculty of Social Work Shirley Chau School of Social Work University of.
Background Neighbourhood characteristics such as socio-economic status (SES) have been shown to correlate with poorer health outcomes, mortality rates,
PILOT PROJECT FOR THE CREATION OF A NATION-WIDE SYSTEM TO MONITOR NEGLECTED, ILL-TREATED AND SEXUALLY ABUSED CHILDREN, REPORTED TO AND TAKEN INTO CARE.
What is Take Two?. Take Two is a developmental therapeutic service for Child Protection clients who have suffered trauma and disrupted attachment due.
Centre for Research on Children and Families. Evidence-based management in child welfare services SSHRC Knowledge Impact in Society Initiative 2006 Plan.
Impact of foster care on sexual activity of maltreated youth Monica Faulkner, PhD, LMSW Center for Social Work Research The University of Texas at Austin.
Safeguarding children from harm: the availability and comparability of data to facilitate cross-national comparisons Emily R. Munro Centre for Child and.
What Happens in A Child Abuse/Neglect Investigation EDU 261.
A Judicial Perspective on Differential Response Anthony Capizzi Montgomery County Juvenile Court Dayton, Ohio September.
Decision Making in Child Protection. The Overlap of Welfare, CPS and Foster Care Welfare Families Families served by CPS Foster Care.
Scoping review to draw together data on safeguarding children and compare the position of England with that in other countries Emily Munro and Esme Manful.
Successful Solutions Professional Development LLC A Basic Approach to Child Safety Chapter 4 Mandated Reporting Law.
General Social Survey Housing, Family and Social Statistics Division.
How do McLean County Children Enter the Child Welfare System? McLean County Indicated reports FY 2010 SourceNumber Percent of total Law enforcement23350%
How do Champaign County Children Enter the Child Welfare System? Champaign County Indicated reports FY 2010 SourceNumber Percent of total Law enforcement22548%
How do Sangamon County Children Enter the Child Welfare System? Sangamon County Indicated reports FY 2010 SourceNumber Percent of total Law enforcement21638%
1 Child and Family Services Review Program Improvement Plan Kick-Off Division/Staff Name Date (7/30/07)
1 CFSR STATEWIDE ASSESSMENT LESSONS LEARNED (State) CFSR Kick Off (Date)
Findings From the Initial Child and Family Service Reviews
Risks of Reentry into the Foster Care System for Children who Reunified Terry V. Shaw, MSW University of California, Berkeley School of Social Welfare.
Recruiting Foster Families A Summary of the Department of Health and Human Services OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL REPORT May, 2002 National Resource Center.
Overview of the Child Welfare System International Center for Innovation in Domestic Violence Practice (ICIDVP)
Community Geriatric Mental Health Services
Trauma-Informed Care: Perspectives and Resources
Kids Help Phone The Child Protection System in Canada Presented at CHI International Consultation Alisa Simon, MPH Vice President, Counselling Services.
Collaborative Mental Health Care Pilot Program Bidder’s Conference October 27, 2014.
STATISTICSSTATISTIQUECANADA Aboriginal Labour Force Survey Province of Alberta.
CALL NOW SPECIAL TOPICS Inside The Numbers STATISTICS ON THE WORK WE DO.
©2008 National Association of Social Workers. All Rights Reserved. 1 Child Protection and Family Care Cora Hardy, LCSW Clinical Director Better Life Children.
AB 636 Mental Health/CWS Partnership Sacramento, CA 3/17/06 Barbara Needell, MSW, PhD Center for Social Services Research University of California at Berkeley.
Lakota Oyate Wakanyeja Owicakiyapi. The purpose of the LOWO Tiwahe Risk Assessment/Investigation is to protect children from risks of harm and to assess.
Abuse and Neglect Mandatory Reporting The Process of a Report Institutional tips.
Bringing Protective Factors to Life in the Child Welfare System New Hampshire.
Indicating Success in Public Child Welfare Child Outcomes, System Performance and the CFSR Process Susan Smith and Lisa Tuttle Casey Family Programs July.
An outcomes framework for Child Youth and Family Pathfinder Workshop 5 17 April 2002.
Societal Factors of Child Maltreatment: Focusing on the Role of Neighborhood Poverty Bong Joo Lee Seoul National University.
CHMDA/CWDA Partnership Series Child Welfare Services “It Takes a Village” Danna Fabella, Interim Director Contra County Employment and Human Services Department.
Rebecca A. Maynard, Ph.D. University of Pennsylvania December 1, 2009.
Youth Mental Health and Addiction Needs: One Community’s Answer Terry Johnson, MSW Senior Director of Services Senior Director of Services Deborah Ellison,
Workshop 1st International Society for Child Indicators Conference Chicago, IL June 26-28, 2007 Presenters: Brenda Moody, Amin Malik, Brad Bain, Yosi Derman.
Reporting Risk of Harm to DoCS. The Children and Young Persons (Care and Protection) Act 1998 provides the statutory basis for DoCS to provide care and.
University of Michigan1 Early Multidisciplinary Assessment Pilot Project Kathleen Coulborn Faller, Ph.D., A.C.S.W.
1 Effects of Abuse and Neglect on Child Development Dynamics of Abuse and Neglect: Signs of Maltreatment.
Innovations in Measuring Outcomes in Children’s School Performance and Social Functioning Manitoba’s Child Well-Being Windows Presenters: Linda Burnside.
Child Welfare Outcomes Integrating Outcomes into Our Core Business John McDermott May 2009.
1 Quality Counts: Helping Improve Outcomes for Pennsylvania’s Children & Families September 22, 2008.
Stemming the Tides Minnesota’s Child Maltreatment Prevention Programs Seventh Annual Citizen Review Panel Conference May 22, 2008 Brenda Lockwood, MN Dept.
Information About Child Abuse & Prevention By: Antonio Harris 1.
C hildren and F amily Research Center University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign School of Social Work TM Return to Care: What are the Factors Involved.
CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley A Quick and Dirty take on NIS-4 Sedlak, A.J., Mettenburg, J., Basena, M., Petta,
The significance of transition planning for placement change Barbara Dirienzo, Managing Attorney-Children’s Legal Services James Carlson, Chief Operations.
CHICAGO DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH OFFICE OF VIOLENCE PREVENTION 2010.
An Overview of the California Foster Care System Navigating the System.
NCADS Child Maltreatment 2000 Data about child abuse and neglect known to child protective Services (CPS) agencies in the United States in 2000.
Early Intervention Program & Early Family Support Services: Analyzing Program Outcomes with the Omaha System of Documentation Presented to: Minnesota Omaha.
Child Welfare FCSFC 485 Lecture 7 & 8 1. Overview Child Welfare Services Child maltreatment ▫Statistics ▫Risk and Resilience Child Abuse Prevention and.
Connecticut Department of Children and Families POLICY, PROTOCOLS, PRACTICE + PARTNERSHIPS SUSAN R. SMITH CHIEF OF QUALITY AND PLANNING CHILD FATALITY.
1 DHS Board Meeting Promoting Safe and Stable Families Program Overview Mark Washington Division of Family and Children Services August 18, 2010.
Family Assessment Response. Welcome & Introduction Introduce yourself to the group: 1.Name 2.Work location 3.Work title 4.What is it about FAR that brought.
DHS Board Meeting DFCS Subcommittee Report Performance Highlights July 21, 2010.
Alberta Centre for Child, Family and Community Research Child and Youth Data Laboratory CYDL Project One Symposium Child Intervention Family Support for.
The Children’s Aid Society of Brant Preliminary Findings Crown Ward Review 2011 February 28-March 10, 2011.
Not One More Child in Arapahoe County Arapahoe County Department of Human Services Children, Youth and Family Services 2012, 2013 and 2014 Child Abuse.
1 Department of Human Services (DHS)/Child Welfare Services (CWS) Branch Child & Family Services Review (CFSR) & Program Improvement Plan (PIP)
Melissa Van Wert, MSW, PhD
Child Maltreatment and Unintentional Injury
Centre for Research on Children and Families
Child maltreatment is an important public health issue
Presentation transcript:

Provincial Forum on Improving Outcomes for Children, Youth & Families Edmonton, Alberta May 27 th, 2009 Bruce MacLaurin Faculty of Social Work University of Calgary Using National and Provincial Data to Inform Outcomes for Child Welfare

Overview of Presentation  Overview of the Canadian Incidence Study of Reported Child Abuse and Neglect (CIS-2003) methodology  Understanding the increase in child maltreatment in Canada between 1998 and 2003  Review key findings of the Alberta Incidence Study of Reported Child Abuse and Neglect (AIS-2003) related to indicators of child welfare outcomes  Examine the relationship to the National Outcomes Indicator Matrix (NOM)

CIS-2003 Presentation Team: Nico Trocmé, Barbara Fallon, Bruce MacLaurin, Tara Black, Caroline Felstiner, Della Knoke & Catherine Roy Canadian Incidence Study of Reported Child Abuse and Neglect (CIS-2003)

CIS 2003 Background Second national study examining the incidence of reported child abuse and neglect. A national child health surveillance activity initiated by the Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC), Injury and Child Maltreatment Section of the Health Surveillance and Epidemiology Division. A partnership with PHAC, provincial and territorial governments, the First Nations Child and Family Caring Society, and Bell Canada. Conducted by a team of researchers from the Universities of McGill, Toronto, Calgary, Quebec, and Memorial.

Objectives of the CIS-2003  produce national estimates of the incidence of investigated maltreatment in Canada in 2003;  document changes from 1998 to 2003 & explore reasons for the change;  examine variations in types and severity of maltreatment;  explore the role of selected child and family characteristics on the incidence of maltreatment and on key service outcomes.

CIS 2003 Methods Used a modified version of the CIS-1998 instrument to document nature of maltreatment, key child and family characteristics and post- investigation services. Data collected directly from investigating social workers (except administrative data used in Quebec). Sample: –11,562 child investigations conducted by 936 child welfare workers in 55 sites across Canada + –administrative data on 2,638 investigations in 6 sites in Quebec. Limitations: –Limited to reports investigated by child welfare services. –Most data from Quebec could not be directly included. –Study not designed to make regional comparisons. –No follow-up beyond investigation

Rates and Numbers of Reported & Substantiated Investigations (CIS 2003, excluding Quebec ) / 1,000 children Substantiated 103,297 Suspected 28,053 Unsubstantiated 85, ,319

Increasing Rates of Reports & Substantiated Investigations (CIS 98-03, excluding Quebec ) 24.55/ / % ► 125% ► 47% substan- tiated 39% substan- tiated

Rates of reports per child vs. per family (CIS 98-03, excluding Quebec ) 86% ► 41%►

Differential Trends by Form of Substantiated Maltreatment: CIS 98/03 (excluding Quebec)

Summary Explanation of Increase in Investigations (CIS ) 125% increase in incidence of substantiated maltreatment: –Increase in substantiation rates. –More siblings per family being investigated. –Explosion of reports of emotional maltreatment and exposure to domestic violence.

AIS-2003 Presentation Team: Bruce MacLaurin, Nico Trocmé, Barbara Fallon, Megan McCormack & Lisa Pitman Alberta Incidence Study of Reported Child Abuse and Neglect (AIS-2003)

Physical Harm Noted For Cases of Substantiated Maltreatment (AIS-2003) 4% of Substantiated Child Maltreatment Investigations Indicate Serious Physical Harm Requiring Medical Treatment

Recurrence of Maltreatment For Cases of Substantiated Maltreatment (AIS-2003) 68% of Substantiated Maltreatment Investigations Have Previous Involvement with ACYS

Placement in Care for Cases of Substantiated Maltreatment (AIS-2003)

Child Functioning Issues for Cases of Substantiated Maltreatment (AIS-2003)

Caregiver Risk Factors For Cases of Substantiated Maltreatment (AIS-2003)

Household Risk Factors in Cases of Substantiated Maltreatment (AIS-2003)

Placement of Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal Children for Substantiated Cases (AIS-2003)

Safety 1 Recurrence 2 Injury Well-Being 3 School delay 4 Child Functioning Permanence 5 Placement 6 Moves in care & 7 Time in care Family & Community Support 8 Parenting Risks 9 Family Moves & 10 Ethno-cultural Placement Matching National Child Welfare Outcomes Indicator Matrix (NOM) Trocme, MacLaurin, Fallon, Shlonsky, Mulcahy & Esposito (2009)

Contact Information Bruce MacLaurin Assistant Professor Faculty of Social Work University of Calgary Tel: (403)