Page No. 1 STP-H3 Initial Operations POIWG #29 STP-H3 Splinter 27 Jan 2011 Capt Robert Plunkett, Program Manager, 281-483-2797,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Environmental Controls I/IG Lecture 14 Mechanical System Space Requirements Mechanical System Exchange Loops HVAC Systems Lecture 14 Mechanical System.
Advertisements

CONTROL SYSTEMS: WHAT THEY ARE
MISSION OPERATIONS DIRECTORATE CARGO INTEGRATION AND OPERATIONS BRANCH Brion J. Au Johnson Space Center/DO55.
PHEOS PSRR Concept of Operations. 2 Scope The purpose of the PCW-UVI Concept of Operations (ConOps) is to communicate how mission systems will operate,
Dale E. Gary Professor, Physics, Center for Solar-Terrestrial Research New Jersey Institute of Technology 1 3/16/2012OVSA Preliminary Design Review.
NeSSI AND ANALYZERS NeSSI AND ANALYZERS ISSUES AND DISCUSSION REGARDING THE SAM CONCEPT FROM THE ANALYZER SUPPLIERS PERSPECTIVE.
CXC Chandra X-ray Observatory Operations. CXC Overview 1. Mission and Observatory Description 2. Chandra Operations 3. Chandra X-ray Center Architecture.
GLAST LAT ProjectISOC CDR, 4 August 2004 Document: LAT-PR-04500Section 4.11 GLAST Large Area Telescope: Instrument Science Operations Center CDR Section.
Page 1HMI Team Meeting – January 26, 2005 HMI Mission Operations Rock Bush HMI Stanford Program Manager Stanford University
Solar Thermal Collectors and Application
Applied Transportation Analysis ITS Application SCATS.
The Relativity Mission, Gravity Probe B Experimental Design, Sources of Error, and Status Mac Keiser Snowmass 2001 July 4, 2001.
Server Virtualization: Navy Network Operations Centers
Undergraduate Space Research Symposium University of Colorado Boulder
Columbus Operations Columbus Control Centre 8 October 2009 Prague ASE XXII Congress Space – Opportunities for all An Overview to Columbus Operations Reinhold.
MEIDEX D - 1 MEIDEX – Operational Philosophy IAF Space Branch Major Meir Moalem.
Common PDR Problems ACES Presentation T. Gregory Guzik March 6, 2003.
Other Flight Pressure Systems Phase III Flight Safety Review 12 Jan 2009.
20a - 1 NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center Attitude Control System (ACS) Eric Holmes, Code 591 Joe Garrick, Code 595 Jim Simpson, Code 596 NASA/GSFC August.
Power Control System for a Concrete Durability Test Cabinet – Phase 2 Jacob Jameson Madhav Kothapalli Thomas Persinger Andrew Versluys.
MG 1/10/01 1 PCS SMOV-3B Review Objectives Overview Activity Descriptions Requirements.
1 Kenneth Osborne, 9/14/07 Inter Group communications at the Advanced Light Source. Overview of the different methods of communication between different.
GLAST LAT ProjectI&T&C Pre PDR Presentation– Oct. 2, I&T&C Organization Chart I&T&C Manager Elliott Bloom WBS I&T Engineer B. Grist WBS
Page 1 of 35 Achieving Over-The-Horizon Requirements Using Low Earth Orbit Satellites (LEOS) Presented by Eric Saikin.
All rights reserved © Altec ExoMars 2018 Rover Operations Control Centre Planned Organization of ROCC Operations I. Musso.
J1879 Robustness Validation Hand Book A Joint SAE, ZVEI, JSAE, AEC Automotive Electronics Robustness Validation Plan The current qualification and verification.
Excerpts from Tom Jackson’s slides shown at Nov 2013 SMAP CalVal workshop with comments added by E. Kim in green TJJ–1 Green comments added by E.Kim.
DSL Distributed Systems Laboratory ATC 23 August Model Mission: Magnetospheric Multiscale (MMS) Mission Goal “To study the microphysics of three.
USNA-203 Space Communications International Educational Network … Classroom Experience Navy SERB: 28 Aug 2002 Lt Col Billy R. Smith, Jr., USAF USNA Small.
START NICMOS COOLING SYSTEM ACTIVITY SUMMARY. 1/25/01Ken Pulkkinen2 START NCS ACTIVITY Applicable SMOV Requirements: J NICMOS Cooling System.
USAFA Department of Astronautics I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e Astro 331 Thermal Control Subsystem (TCS)—Intro Lesson 37 Spring.
Thermal Control Subsystem
Aquarius Mission Simulation A realistic simulation is essential for mission readiness preparations This requires the ability to produce realistic data,
1 Initial Study Task Mark Herring / Jordan Camp. 2 May 13, 2003 Topics Purpose of Initial Study Task Schedule and Format Task Description.
GLAST LAT Project LAT System Engineering 1 GLAST Large Area Telescope: LAT System Engineering Pat Hascall SLAC System Engineering Manager
GLAST Large Area Telescope LAT Flight Software System Checkout TRR Test Suites (Backup) Stanford Linear Accelerator Center Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope.
Improving Communication and Coordination in Highway Work Zones Kimberly Peters Incident Management Program Director, INDOT Event Date.
Tracing the JWST Proposal from User Interface to Commanding of an Instrument Margaret Meixner & WIT Balzano, Robinson & CMD.
P. Mokashi IES Team Meeting, SwRI 29 May IES (SwRI) Develop sequences (flight and EQM test) Develop tables, macros and patches if necessary Test.
GLAST LAT ProjectCDR/CD-3 Review May 12-16, 2003 Document: LAT-PR Section 5 IOC Subsystem 1 GLAST Large Area Telescope: IOC Subsystems WBS: 4.1.B.
Characteristics of remote sensing satellites. Satellites generally vary in their architecture Usually remote sensing satellites are having two plateforms.
POCC activities AMS02 meeting at KSC October 11 th 2010.
GLAST Large Area Telescope LAT Flight Software System Checkout TRR FSW Overview Sergio Maldonado FSW Test Team Lead Stanford Linear Accelerator Center.
1 MINUS EIGHTY DEGREE LABORATORY FREEZER FOR ISS (MELFI) MSFC Briefing February 2005 John Cornwell
MOL The Mission Operations Laboratory MOL The Mission Operations Laboratory NASA MSFC Huntsville, Alabama Preliminary Advanced Colloids Experiment – 2.
Introduction to Payload Planning Will Kirby (256)
Note: Glacier is launched unpowered and hardmounted in EXPRESS Rack 6 on Flight ULF2. For the following three weeks after activation or transfer, two 2-hour.
Visual Survey of HREP Ricardo C. Rodriguez POD Office Lead for HREP POIWG External Payload Splinter 25 Jul 2012 Approved for Public Release, Distribution.
Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center - Houston, TX CELLULAR BIOTECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS SUPPORT SYSTEM Biotechnology Specimen Temperature Controller (BSTC) Functional.
EO10-PPO-118 parcall /2/15 PARC/M.Cash MOON IMAGERY 0:10 Crew Commanding Time Critical Unattended Additional Activities TEXT FLEXIBLE MOON-CAMERA-FOCUS.
1 Space Test Program - Houston 4 Payload Overview POIWG, 26 Jul 2012.
Baseline Review 05/20/14 PARC/Martha Cash RapidScat EPF-SDX INSTALLATION-HEATERS ON ADAPTER and INSTRUMENT Crew Commanding Unattended Time Critical External.
Scenario use cases Szymon Mueller PSNC. Agenda 1.General description of experiment use case. 2.Detailed description of use cases: 1.Preparation for observation.
A two-stage system for the future cooling system.
Phil Dempsey ISS Vehicle Office July 15, 2014 Inspection Considerations from the ISS Program NASA In-Space Inspection Workshop 2014.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Attitude and Pointing Concepts for ISS Payload Operations NASA/JSC Marcella Mendoza Attitude & Pointing Office.
GENERATORS A Large Piece of Equipment That Gets Ignored!
ESA Payload Operations Overview: MSL August 07, 2009 / POIC-MSFC.
June 16, PMDIS TIM Shuttle Operations Coordinators (SOC) Roles & Responsibilities Beth Griggs Shuttle Operations Coordinator
Inventory and Stowage Overview Kay Standridge February 26, 2004 MSFC/ESA TIM #2.
NASA MSFC Mission Operations Laboratory MSFC NASA MSFC Mission Operations Laboratory Radiation Environment Monitor Kevin Hargrave EO
J1879 Robustness Validation Hand Book A Joint SAE, ZVEI, JSAE, AEC Automotive Electronics Robustness Validation Plan Robustness Diagram Trends and Challenges.
Launch and On-orbit Checkout
Integration and Test Organization Chart
Technology for a NASA Space-based Science Operations Grid Internet2 Members Meeting Advanced Applications Track Session April, 2003 Robert N. Bradford.
AMS Summary 16:00 on Fri 10 May 2019 (GMT 130) To
AMS Summary 16:00 on Mon 13 May 2019 (GMT 133) To
AMS Summary 16:00 on Tue 14 May 2019 (GMT 134) To
Presentation transcript:

Page No. 1 STP-H3 Initial Operations POIWG #29 STP-H3 Splinter 27 Jan 2011 Capt Robert Plunkett, Program Manager, , Darrin Walker, POCC Operations, , Bill Lopez, TReK Operations, , Tom Stegman, Lead Payload Engineer, , James McLeroy, Sustaining Engineering, , STP Contacts:

Page No. 2 Agenda  Operations Concept Review  Initial Operations Timeline  Primary and Secondary Payload Objectives  Continuous Operations  Questions for Cadre  Video Survey Requirements

Page No. 3 Operations Concept Review  STP provides overall Operations Management role  Complement of 4 payloads operate from remote POCCs – DISC operates from Naval Research Lab in Washington, DC – VADER operates from Air Force Research Lab in Albuquerque, NM – MHTEX operates from Northrop Grumman in Redondo Beach, CA – Canary operates from US Air Force Academy in Colorado Springs, CO – STP operates from Johnson Space Center in Houston, TX  Single command window – Individual payload commanding sequentially within command window  Flexible payload order and duration – Special payload specific 8 hr command windows arranged via OCR – Initial 6 week checkout period 8 hrs x 7 days a week – Continuous Operations 4 hrs x 5 days a week for 1 year or less  Use IVoDS, EHS and TReK workstations for voice communications, planning, commanding and telemetry – MHTEX and DISC have local TReK workstations – VADER & Canary use a remote Virtual Machine server setup by STP to access TReK and EHS resources – STP commands on an as needed basis

Page No. 4 Initial Operations Timeline Activation Phase Canary Special Command Window for baseline and PCU data take MHTEX Special Command Windows to adjust Heaters (not cmd intensive) Initial Video Survey using SSRMS before it moves off worksite Daily Internal Tagups to coord and obtain status first four days after install Standard Command Window Flight Plan STP-H3 Activities

Page No. 5 Payload Activities during the first few days  Activation (STP performs functional checkout) – After ELC installation, ELC/ExPA RPC is turned on (PRO command), SIU and TCM receive power  SIU Health & Status data starts flowing  VADER temperature analogs start flowing (not through SIU) – ISS discrete (PRO command) required to apply power to TCM heater relays – Functional test of STP-H3 is conducted (~75 commands) may take 8 hrs to complete on-orbit  Initial SSRMS Survey of STP-H3  MHTEX – Cooling loops required to be primed prior to operations – Requires “tweaking” heaters to  Ensure vapor spaces are cleared  Ensure condenser is not overdriven  Will request special 8 hr MHTEX Command windows (Priming 1 and 2) in addition to standard command window for 3 days to tweak heaters when necessary (not command intensive) – Survey of radiator surface

Page No. 6 Payload Activities during the first few days  DISC – Turn on and monitor temps – Verify DISC shutter is operational – Acquire and download a star field image – Download Optimization Test – Survey of DISC lens  Canary – Bake-out period satisfied by first day on-orbit – Functional tests and Calibration of download data – Activation prior to Plasma Contactor Unit turn on FD4 (sleep period)  Need baseline prior to space environment modification – Survey of Canary field-of-view and face  VADER – Command windows to tweak heaters and VEDs – Monitor temperature deltas and rates – Monitor temperatures on/around Aerogel MLI – Survey of front face, VED area and backside blanket

Page No. 7 MHTEX Primary Objectives  Objectives for new components should be met in first 4- 8 weeks  Goal to flight qualify the advanced capillary pumped loop system – Demonstrate a fully reliable startup and continued operation under normal expected operating conditions – Demonstrate heat pump functions as intended under varied thermal loading conditions – Investigate functionality of the advanced evaporator pump for application to a next generation CPL design  Achieve a steady state operation mode for ~336 hours (~ 2 weeks)

Page No. 8 MHTEX Alternate Startup Test and Secondary Objectives  Alternate Startup Test – Test will be performed once primary objectives are satisfied but before secondary objectives – Use the advanced evaporator instead of the starter pump to start the system – If it does not then the system will be re-primed and move on to secondary objectives  Secondary Objectives – Demonstrate a steady state operation mode throughout the remainder of the one year of operations – Modes will be modified to test varied thermal loading throughout the year – Commanding is expected to be much less intensive than the first 6 weeks of activation and checkout

Page No. 9 DISC Primary Objectives  Successful initial checkout of DISC camera – Acquisition and downlink of initial DISC image  Command & Data interface and verify camera electronics – Verification that DISC shutter is operating  Successful acquisition and downlink of one star field image – Done on FD13 or after Shuttle undock to acquire image in the normal ISS attitude  Successful correlation of ISS position with DISC aspect solution – Downlinked ISS data stored within the ODRC repository will be used for the ISS position truth data

Page No. 10 DISC Secondary Objectives  Acquire and downlink one star field image or a series weekly after FD13 – Correlate ISS position with DISC aspect solution – Verify ability to change DISC image acquisition settings by acquiring and downloading an image in each mode  Acquire and downlink of a series of star fields during a single orbit  Successfully correlate DISC aspect solution from a series of images acquired during the same orbit over time with the ISS attitude solution  Acquire and downlink a long integration DISC image  Determine ISS drift rates via long integration DISC image  Determine DISC limiting magnitude sensitivity  Long term characterization of star camera operation and performance over a 1-year period

Page No. 11 Canary Primary Objectives  Successfully complete functional checkout  Successfully complete calibration file download  Obtain and downlink a baseline of the space environment around ISS – Within current timeline this is best done prior to Plasma Contactor Unit activation but is not considered invalid if delayed  Obtain data from the Space Shuttle ISS re-rendezvous activity (STORRM DTO) – Multiple Space Shuttle jet firings are expected within close proximity to the ISS making it an ideal data collection for Canary Science – Space Shuttle has the most obtainable as-flown data

Page No. 12 Canary Secondary Objectives  Collect data from the relocation, docking and undocking of any ISS visiting vehicles  Collect data from an ISS Reboost Event  Collect data from the Plasma Contactor Unit operation  Collect data from other contamination events – Ammonia Leaks – Debris Avoidance Maneuvers – EVA/EVR activities – Payload venting through Vacuum Exhaust System – Water Dumps

Page No. 13 VADER Primary Objectives  Successfully complete functional checkout  Collect initial emissivity data for each state (colored and bleached) to verify switching capability and establish a baseline – Done by thermal cycling VEDs in colored and bleached states  Collect Aerogel temperatures to determine the thermal insulation capability  Increase cycles on VEDs to at least 100 (bleach-color=1, color-bleach=2, etc)  Obtain imagery from SSRMS Survey at one month on- orbit timeframe

Page No. 14 VADER Secondary Objectives  Further increase cycles (switching between modes) on VEDs as much as possible to simulate on-orbit lifetime  Collect lifetime switching at 1 mo, 3 mo, 6 mo, 1 year  SSRMS imagery will help with lifetime durability of both the aerogel material and electrochromic materials – SSRMS surveys include initial, one month then every 6 months

Page No. 15 Continuous Operations Phase  Begins after 6-week initial checkout period  Command Windows 4 hrs Mon to Fri  Canary and DISC to request special command windows to collect data – Standard command windows can be used to download data  SSRMS surveys every 6 months until STP-H3 deactivated  MHTEX – Demonstrate a steady state operation with varying modes throughout the remainder of the one year of operations  DISC – Each week acquire & downlink images to satisfy secondary payload objectives  Canary – Collect data from visiting vehicles and contamination events throughout the remainder of the one year of operations  VADER – Cycle through bleach & color modes throughout the one year on-orbit – SSRMS surveys will help with lifetime durability of aerogel and electrochromic materials

Page No. 16 Questions 1. When does STP need to submit OCRs for special command windows that occurred during the first week of ULF-6 mission (and entire docked phase)? – MHTEX priming – Canary data takes  PCU act, 41P Undock, ISS Reboost (potential), 42P Dock and STS-134 Shuttle STORRM DTO – DISC first star field image (after Shuttle undock) 2. Will POIC maintenance be suspended during docked phase of ULF6 mission? 3. During Activation and Checkout period can the PRO record commands sent to a log file (including HEX values) for potential troubleshooting purposes? 4. Does OC & PRO use the same PD Call List? Where can we review this information? 5. With 41P undock and 42P dock planned to occur while ULF-6 docked as well (involves DC-1 on MLM). Will the ISS attitude be changed for these events or does the approach change for these Progress vehicles or being Nadir everything is as usual?

Page No. 17 Survey Requirements Back of VADER-Aerogel Center of VADER face Center of Quad VED Canary Face and FOV DISC lens MHTEX Radiator Surface Surveys requested at initial install, 1 month then every 6 months until deactivation

Page No. 18 Canary Survey Requirements Canary Face Focus as close as practicable on the Canary face central window at Y ~ 11.5" covering at least the range X from " to ", Z from +31" to +39". Capture a picture of Canary's field of view taken along Canary's axis (X = -14", Z = -35") and looking back along Negative Y-axis. Pictures taken with lighting sufficient to see structures in/near field of view. Request field of view at least 20 degrees x 20 degrees. Done once while on-orbit.

Page No. 19 DISC desires a picture of the lens area which is on a 15 degree tilt. Four cardinal points around the perimeter of the lens center that account for the tilt are provided. The 4 points defining the area to focus on in ExPA coordinates are (17.108, 24.56, ), (16.717, , ), (16.326, 24.56, ), (16.717, , ). DISC Lens Area DISC Survey Requirements

Page No. 20 Image centered at ExPA coordinates 17.75, , to show an area of ~12"x12" which is the entire VADER face. Image centered at ExPA coordinates 0.25, , to show an area of ~12”x12” which is the entire VADER back. Done once preferably initial survey. VADER BACK VADER FRONT Image centered at ExPA coordinates 17.75, 14.00, will focus on a 4"x4" area to capture the state of the "Quad VED". VADER Survey Requirements

Page No. 21 MHTEX desires a picture of the surface of the radiator which is a 37.25" x 24" area. The center of the radiator in ExPA coordinates is ( , 2.897, 17.5). [Large white area in Picture.] MHTEX Survey Requirements