Land Use Changes in Austin, Texas Colleen McGovern.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Harish Sangireddy The University of Texas at Austin.
Advertisements

The Use of Remote Sensing in Habitat Management for Wildlife Helen Holdsworth EES 5053 University of Texas at San Antonio December 2,
DETERMINING LAND DEVELOPMENT EFFECT ON SURFACE RUNOFF USING GIS.
Urbanization and Land Cover Change in Dakota County, Minnesota Kylee Berger and Julia Vang FR 3262 Remote Sensing Section 001/002.
Vegetation and Population Density in Urban and Suburban Areas in the U.S.A. Francesca Pozzi Center for International Earth Science Information Network.
Working with Raster Grids and Map Algebra Katherine Paybins, USGS.
Fundamentals of GIS Lecture 16: Data Input I: Selected Public Data Lecture notes by Austin Troy, University of Vermont © Using GIS--
Introduction to GIS Lecture 16: Public Data 1: USGS Data Sources Lecture notes by Austin Troy, University of Vermont © Using GIS--
Millions of ponds: distribution and significance of small artificial impoundments in the conterminous United States. W. H. Renwick, Department of Geography,
Urban Storm-Water Management Plan Utilizing Arc View and HEC-HMS College Station, Texas Kara Corcoran CVEN 689.
Hydrologic Model Preparation for EPA SWMM modeling Software Using a GIS Robert Farid CEE 424 GIS for Civil Engineers.
Land Use/Land Cover Assessment of Dane County, Wisconsin: Contemporary Trend and Future Projections By Eric Fabian.
The Impact of Land Use Changes on the Future Tree Distributions Presented by Jin-Oh Kim Community and Regional Planning School of Architecture University.
Land Use and Land Cover Change in the San Antonio and Guadalupe River Basins Rachel Mills Department of Marine Science November 20, 2008.
Geographic Information Systems Other Digital Data.
Utility of National Spatial Data for Conservation Design Projects Steve Williams Biodiversity and Spatial Information Center North Carolina State University.
Investigating Land Cover Change In Crow Wing County Emily Smoter and Michael Palmer Remote Sensing of Natural Resources and the Environment University.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Importance of Ground-Water Flow and Travel Time on Nitrogen Loading from an Agricultural Basin in.
1 Urban Growth Simulation A Case Study of Indianapolis Sharaf Alkheder & Jie Shan School of Civil Engineering Purdue University March 10, 2005.
Land Use/Land Cover Data Project Planning Team – March 9-10.
Saving the Chesapeake’s Great Rivers and Special Places High Resolution Land Cover Data in the Chesapeake Bay Chesapeake Conservancy.
Conversion of Forestland to Agriculture in Hubbard County, Minnesota By: Henry Rodman Cory Kimball 2013.
GTOPO30 Global 30-arc-second (1-km) elevation model - “Best available” global DEM - Initial release: March Widely used for climate modeling, land.
Josiah Emerson, Majory Silisyene, Cynthia Ratzlaff FR 3262 Section 1.
Land Processes Group, NASA Marshall Space Flight Center, Huntsville, AL Response of Atmospheric Model Predictions at Different Grid Resolutions Maudood.
Delineation of the Texas Hill Country Watersheds with Named Streams Team Members: Justin McInnis: Project Manager Matt Anding: Assistant Project Manager.
Thematic Workshop on Standardization and Exchange of Land Use and Cover Information Wednesday, April 27, 2005 Chicago, Illinois.
NASA IDS project meeting: Precipitation and LULC change datasets Hongjie Xie The University of Texas at San Antonio March 19, 2009 at Texas A&M, Corpus.
U.S. Department of the Interior Chesapeake Bay Watershed Land Cover Data Series 1984, 1992, 2001, and 2006 U.S. Geological SurveyThe Chesapeake Bay Program.
Development and Land Use Change: Central Potomac River Watershed
SPARROW Surface Water Quality Workshop October 29-31, 2002 Reston, Virginia Section 5. Comparison of GIS Approaches, Data Sources and Management.
Remote Sensing Classification Systems
Hill Country Associates Pedernales River analysis Team: Kelly Blanton, Erica Tice, William Weldon, and Paul Starkel.
GIS Data and Data Sources DEM, TIGER, DLG, LULC, Soils, DOQQ, DRG.
Jim Brasher – General Manager, Colorado County Groundwater Conservation District January 25, 2011 – LCRA Regional Council Meeting.
Using ArcGIS ModelBuilder for Conservation & Ag Drainage Projects Janell Weiss Nutrient Mgmt. Specialist/Ag Technician Darke Soil & Water Conservation.
Effect of Spatial Variability on a Distributed Hydrologic Model May 6, 2015 Huidae Cho Water Resources Engineer, Dewberry Consultants Part-Time Assistant.
Landscape Analysis: 1.Determine 1993 and 2001 Land Cover of the Sougahatchee Basin Sougahatchee Basin 2. Compare 2001 Land Cover to 1993 Land Cover 3.
Land Use / Land Cover Change in the Phoenix Metropolitan Area Lori Krider & Melinda Kernik
Data Sources for GIS in Water Resources by David R. Maidment, David G. Tarboton and Ayse Irmak GIS in Water Resources Fall 2011.
Evaluating and Mapping the Stability of Slopes in Napa County with a GIS-based Model Dongyuan Wang Ph.D candidate in geotechnical engineering The University.
Probability of Detecting Atrazine and Elevated Concentrations of Nitrate in Colorado’s Ground Water USGS Water-Resources Investigations Report
1 Florida Division of Emergency Management Richard Butgereit GIS Administrator Geospatial Collaboration.
Fundamentals of GIS Lecture 16: Data Input I: Selected Public Data Lecture notes by Austin Troy, University of Vermont © Using GIS--
1972 – 2001 Landscape Dynamics Wisconsin ha ( ac)
Wildfire Risk Assessment: Western Travis County, Texas Integrating GIS and Fire Modeling Jennifer Perry CE 394K GIS.
Introduction The Texas Hill Country’s regional population is expected to double in the next 20 years. Proper planning is required to ensure that this area.
Vector Data Input Chapter 4. Data Buy or make - sources Base map - layers Standards – accuracy Metadata As bad as the worst component.
An Analysis of Land Use/Land Cover Changes and Population Growth in the Pedernales River Basin Kelly Blanton-Project Manager Paul Starkel-Analyst Erica.
Land Cover Classification and Monitoring Case Studies: Twin Cities Metropolitan Area –Multi-temporal Landsat Image Classification and Change Analysis –Impervious.
The Effect of Urbanization to the surface-water runoff The comparison between the urbanized and undeveloped zones.
Water Quality in the Edwards Aquifer Katrina E. Mabin CE 394K GIS in Water Resources Dr. D. R. Maidment.
Citation: Moskal, L. M., D. M. Styers, J. Richardson and M. Halabisky, Seattle Hyperspatial Land use/land cover (LULC) from LiDAR and Near Infrared.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Data Integration of Layers and Features for The National Map March 31, 2003 E. Lynn Usery Michael.
Land cover change in the Travis county GIS in Water Resources Fall 2015 University of Texas at austin Julie C Faure.
Water Availability Modeling in the State of Texas CE 394 K.2 - Surface Water Hydrology University of Texas at Austin David Mason.
Land Use, Land Cover and Change Mapping Geog 115A.
Agricultural Land Use as it Relates to Land Slope James Plourde, Dr. Bryan Pijanowski Human-Environment Modeling & Analysis Laboratory Purdue University.
The Impact of Urbanization In Austin Texas and Surrounding Counties An analysis of land use and development Bryant Chambers University of Texas, Austin.
By: Reid Swanson Sam Soper. Goal: To describe land cover/use changes that have occurred in the Twin Cities Metro-Area from the 1991 to 2005 Quantifying.
Detect geographic and temporal patterns of land use and land cover change in China from 1982 to 2012 Yaqian He, Eungul Lee, and Timothy A. Warner May 5.
History of U.S.G.S Established on March 3, 1879
Geospatial Resources Texas A&M University Cecilia Smith, Ph.D.
Lake Travis: A GIS Study
Hill Country Associates Pedernales River analysis
Planning a Remote Sensing Project
Hill Country Associates Progress Report
Texas Urban Land Change
LEQ: What is land cover, and how is land cover classified
Presentation transcript:

Land Use Changes in Austin, Texas Colleen McGovern

Project Objective Study land use changes that have occurred in the Austin metropolitan area over the time period of 1980 to 1992, to examine urban sprawl. The studied area includes: Bastrop, Caldwell, Hayes, Travis, and Williamson Counties

Presentation Outline Background Information Classification System Data Sources Data Preparation Discussion of Results Conclusions

Background Information 1970s - importance of land use classification system became apparent Conference held on classification systems Anderson Classification System Datasets: Land Use and Land Cover Data & National Land Cover Data 2 Different Classification Systems First step: devise common classification system

Classification System ClassificationCode Developed Land1 Agricultural Land2 Grass & Rangelands3 Forest Land4 Water5 Wetlands6 Barren Land7

Data Sources Land Use and Land Cover Data (LULC) Developed by USGS Available for conterminous US and Hawaii 1- by 2-degree, 1:250,000 scale based quadrangle maps Limited number of 30- by 60-minute, 1:100,000 scale based maps 4 quadrangles used in analysis: Austin, Llano, San Antonio, and Sequin

Data Sources Cont National Land Cover Data (NLCD) Developed by USGS Available for conterminous US Files can be downloaded by state Image files with 30 meter resolution Texas-Southeast portion of NLCD used for analysis

Data Preparation

Data Preparation Cont.

Results

Results Cont.

Conclusions Difficult to compare the 2 different classification systems A standardized classification system should be used in the future GIS is a useful tool for working with land use data

Questions?