Development of international conventions and rules ACS Conference on Shipping and Shipbuilding 2012-8-22 Hochiminh City.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
2010, 15th July Hong Kong Convention How to use IHM at SRFs M.Sc Beyza Doyduk – Global Practice Ship Recycling.
Advertisements

INTERTANKO Latin American Panel Lima, Peru 13 – 14 September IMO GOAL-BASED SHIP CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS Gary Horn Director, Structures & Hydrodynamics.
“MLC-Risk Assessment Challenges & Pilot Methodology”
Speech by Chinese Shipbuilding Industry ( CSNAME &CANSI ) Contents 1. The acceptation of IMO PSPC standard 2. Preparation done by Chinese shipbuilding.
Leading the way; making a difference Ballast Water Management Current situation and challenges Oslo, September 25 th 2012 Erik Ranheim Senior Manager Research.
Update on Ballast Water Management Latin American Panel Meeting Cartagena, Columbia November 1, 2011.
Workplan Priorities INTERTANKO Mission Provide Leadership to the Tanker Industry in serving the World with safe, environmentally sound and efficient.
| 1 | 1 REDUCING THE IMPACT OF SHIPPING ON THE ENVIRONMENT DECARBONISATION.
Shipping Community Bureau Veritas Training Course For the benefit of business and people.
NAMEPA 2014 Annual Conference New York City Canada and North American Emission Control Area RDIMS #
NAMEPA 2014 World Maritime Day Observance Cozumel, Mexico Canada's Experience with the North American Emission Control Area RDIMS #
Leading the way; making a difference North American Panel March 17, 2014 BALLAST WATER MANAGEMENT JOSEPH ANGELO DEPUTY MANAGING DIRECTOR.
Guidance and Application
Regulations & Requirements
Coating Performance Standard A Review PCE - PSPC Workshop Amsterdam February 2007 Session 1.
1 Houston Tanker Event 2007 Houston, TX 26 March 2007 Common Structural Rules for Tankers Gary Horn, P.E. Director, Technology ABS Houston.
Introduction to MLC 2006 ILO Maritime Labour Convention 2006
How the IMO is meeting the challenges of dealing with maritime safety and security – an overview Neil Frank R. Ferrer Ocean Concerns Office Department.
Leading the way; making a difference Young Professionals in Shipping Network, Hong Kong Changing the Environment – a look at the less traditional roles.
National Marine Educators Association “How the Modern Cruise Industry is Regulated and Operates” June 30, 2015 Newport, Rhode Island Bud Darr Senior VP.
SMS 105 – BV Rules.
Classification Societies – Contribution to Martime Safety Gesa Heinacher-Lindemann LL.M., Legal Director.
24/03/2006 Introduction to IMO Performance Standard for Protective Coating and IACS Common Structural Rules BV Surveyor’s Training Development Department.
Client Name is.... Dr Lynda Speed
SEAFARING CAREERS: RAISING THE PROFILE * A FLAG STATE PERSPECTIVE Presented By: Rear Admiral Robert C. North President, North Star Maritime, Inc. Regulatory.
October 2009 Klaus Grensemann, Division WS 23 St. Petersburg 1 Development and Implementation of an Overall E-Navigation Strategy.
Mediterranean MoU 7th Committee Meeting on PSC Alexandria, EGYPT 31st January - 2nd February A Presentation by INTERTANKO Port State Control Capt.
LONG RANGE IDENTIFICATION AND TRACKING (LRIT) A FLAG STATE PERSPECTIVE
Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles Second level Third level Fourth level Fifth level 1 Tanker Outlook – Singapore 2006 Key.
” JOHN B. LACSON FOUNDATION MARITIME UNIVERSITY Best Practices in Maritime Education and Training “Views of a Shipowners’ Association” 29 January 2008.
INTERCARGO International Association of Dry Cargo Shipowners Presentation to the Public Forum, Anchorage March 29th, 2005.
Leading the way; making a difference INTERTANKO HELLENIC - MEDITERRANEAN PANEL Athens, March 2012 Update on the Environmental Committee’s Activities by.
Prevention of pollution by harmful substances in packaged form
Balance between Intellectual Property Rights and Design Transparency Tripartite meeting Beijing, 8 th - 9 th Nov *** A GBS-related issue *** O Kitamura.
Tripartite Meeting Seoul, Korea, September 2009 Safety & SOLAS Agenda item 4.1 Goal-Based Standards --- application and compliance --- Toshiro Arima.
Maritime Labour Convention, 2006
Ballast Water Management DEPUTY MANAGING DIRECTOR
1 IACS Common Structural Rules INTERTANKO LATIN AMERICAN PANEL Rio de Janeiro, 25 April 2006.
INTERTANKO LATIN AMERICAN PANEL MARITIME SECURITY: LATEST DEVELOPMENTS LATEST DEVELOPMENTS AT IMO JOSEPH J. ANGELO DIRECTOR, REGULATORY AFFAIRS AND THE.
Maritime Training & Human Element Section IMO IMO Regional Seminar on Familiarization with The 2010 Manila Amendments to the STCW Convention and Code Mumbai.
Maritime Environmental Regulations & the Challenges of Compliance
The Future of Yacht Recycling “overview on regulatory compliance” Albert Willemsen ICOMIA Environment Consultant.
Leading the way; making a difference GREEN4SEA Athens Forum April 9, 2014 UPDATE ON BALLAST WATER MANAGEMENT JOSEPH ANGELO DEPUTY MANAGING DIRECTOR.
Tripartite Meeting Tokyo, September 2007 Ship Recycling An Overview of Regulatory and Industry Developments Presented by INTERTANKO and ICS on behalf of.
Leading the way; making a difference EXPONAVAL – TRANSPORT 2014 December 3, 2014 Environmental Regulatory Challenges Facing the Maritime Industry JOSEPH.
Leading the way; making a difference Lunchtime Seminar October 10, 2012 Ballast Water Management JOSEPH ANGELO DEPUTY MANAGING DIRECTOR.
Anti-Trust/Competition Law Compliance Statement INTERTANKO’s policy is to be firmly committed to maintaining a fair and competitive environment in the.
INTERCARGO International Association of Dry Cargo Shipowners Bulk Carrier Issues Mr Rob Lomas January 2008.
Leading the way; making a difference NOx Tier III requirements 1. 1.The NOx Tier III enforcement date of 1 January 2016 is kept for already designated.
IndustriALL Global Union
Leading the way; making a difference Ballast Water Management State of Affairs Hong Kong, 26 November 2013 Tim Wilkins INTERTANKO Senior Manager - Environment.
Leading the way; making a difference Ballast Water Management State of Affairs October 2013 Tim Wilkins INTERTANKO Technical Seminar Busan, 21 October.
1 IMO Goal-based Standards A shipbuilders ’ opinion September 20, 2007 The Shipbuilders ’ Association of Japan NISHIYAMA, goro.
The ICS/ISF Shipping Industry Flag State Performance Table
PORT STATE CONTROL For MODU or MOUs. Why Port State Control (PSC)?  Everybody knows today why ports States have been obliged to set up Port State control.
SNEC – ACS SEMINAR ON SAFE NAVIGATION & THE ENVIRONMENT 22 March 2013, Seoul IMO Regulatory Development Liang Jing Deputy General Manager China Classification.
GBS for Oil Tankers and Bulk Carriers
9th Annual Colloquium of the IUCN Academy of Environmental Law – South Africa Nengye LIU, PhD Candidate, Faculty of Law, Ghent University Prevention.
EEB Clean Air Seminar 20 Nov Lisbon Air Pollution from ships Portuguese perspective.
GCC CODE “THE SAFETY REGULATIONS FOR SHIPS THAT ARE NOT COVERED BY THE INTERNATIONAL CONVENTIONS” THE CABINET RESOLUTION NO.(29) OF 2013.
MLC Recruitment & Placement
3rd Asia-Pacific Water Summit
The Polar Code Rear Admiral Steven D. Poulin United States Coast Guard
International Maritime Organization
PREVENTION OF AIR POLLUTION FROM SHIPS
IMO MSC 96 Summary Report London, 11 to 21 May 2016 BUREAU VERITAS
OUR VISION World class seaport of choice
The ICS/ISF Shipping Industry Flag State Performance Table
International Seminar on Ship Recycling
Keith Manch Director of Maritime New Zealand
Presentation transcript:

Development of international conventions and rules ACS Conference on Shipping and Shipbuilding Hochiminh City

Contents 1 Introduction 2 Overview of major international maritime conventions up to Layout of international maritime quality supervision 4 Conclusions

I. Introduction Promote the development of IMO Conventions and Class Society Rules Technology development Market segmentation Protection of Environment OSH Risk Management Safety Quality Prevention pollution from ships Satisfy the public demands

II. Status of international maritime conventions up to

GBS and CSR-H Goal-based ship construction standards for bulk carriers and oil tankers. apply to II.1 SOLAS building contract on/after 1 July 2016 keel laying on/after 1 July 2017 delivery date on/after 1 July 2020 or For BC & OT of 150 m in length and above. single deck, with top-side tanks and hopper side tanks, excluding ore carriers and combination carriers. or Gaps analysis Fatigue Life, Residual Strength, Structural Redundancy, Human Element, Design Transparency, Structural Accessibility. partial inconformity Recycling inconformity Challenge: conformity with GBS (more robust ships) and EEDI (more efficient ships)

GBS and CSR-H  1 July 2012, first draft of CSR-H  IACS Industry Presentation on CSR-H in  Busan, 3 September 2012, KR  Shanghai, 5 September 2012, CCS  Tokyo, 7 September 2012, NK  July – Dec. 2012, first industry review  31 March, 2013, second draft of CSR-H  Apr – June. 2012, second industry review  31 Aug. 2013, third draft of CSR-H  Sept.-Nov., approval by TC of IACS  1 Jan. 2014, adoption by IACS  30 June, 2014, submitted to IMO for GBS verification II.1 SOLAS

Noise Code  Code on Noise Levels on Board Ships has been approved by MSC 90, presumably be effective on or after 1 July Apply to ships of not less than 1,600 gross tonnage the keel of which is laid or which is at a similar stage of construction on or after [1 July 2014]. II.1 SOLAS ① new buildings cost increased ; noise-control measures ; improve workmanship ; new technology predicting noise levels ; difficulties in Noise level control in some area ; acoustic design for new buildings ; ② more difficulties in ship delivery 。 Influences

Polar Code Main structure of the Polar Code is settled, hopefully completed in 2014  Scope : ① Safety Structure Stability Fire Protection Life Saving Machinery Water-tight Integrity ② Environment Protection II.1 SOLAS Accommodation Communication Navigation Crew Operation Emergency Control Balance between environment protection and shipping, science research and resource exploitation.

E-Navigation  E-navigation is the harmonized collection, integration, exchange, presentation and analysis of marine information on board and ashore by electronic means to enhance berth to berth navigation and related services for safety and security at sea and protection of the marine environment.  Purpose : meet present and future needs through harmonization of marine navigation systems and supporting shore services. II.1 SOLAS

E-Navigation Structure II.1 SOLAS

Asbestos  “From 1 January 2011, for all ships, new installation of materials which contain asbestos shall be prohibited.”  (Two key questions) : 1. How to verify? IACS issued UI SC 249 to unify the way of implementation of this SOLAS regulation by ROs, which was approved by MSC Threshold of asbestos 1% or 0.1% II.1 SOLAS

Testing watertight boundaries  SOLAS requirements (II-1/11) The forepeak, double bottom (including duct keels) and inner skins, and tanks which are intended to hold liquids (which form part of the watertight subdivision of the ship), shall be tested for tightness and structural strength with water to a head corresponding to relevant design pressure.  IACS proposal for SOLAS amendment and new guidelines 1.MSC 86/23/13 ((Cook Islands, Marshall Islands, IACS)) 2.DE 56/16 and DE 56/INF.11 (IACS) 3.Supporting papers by China, Japan and Korea (shipyards’ quality systems, e.g. ISO 9001)  DE 56 generally agreed with IACS proposal as well as the C/J/K suggestions  Question: 1.Refinement of the draft guidelines (technical aspect) 2.Shipyards’ quality systems (options) II.1 SOLAS

123 II.2 MARPOL 34 Design and construction requirements for new building-ships ) Operation and management requirements for classed-ships Financial lever control requirements for all ships in future

123 4 II.2 MARPOL NO X emission regulationSO X emission regulation

II.2 MARPOL Original ECA—SOx  Baltic Sea  North sea Added ECA —NOx 、 SOx  North America

123 4 II.2 MARPOL ScrubberExhaust Gas Recycle (EGR)Selective Catalytic Reduction

II.3 Load Line Convention No major amendments to the LLC recently 2nd generation staility criteria SLF is developing the 2nd generation criteria. There are new stability failure modes i.e. pure loss of stability, parametric roll, surf-riding/Broaching, excessive acceleration based on dead ship condition. Mandatory fitting of stability instrument on all oil tanker UK et al proposed new requirements ( MSC 90/13/3 ) under MARPOL 、 IBC and IGC.

Manila Amendments to the STCW Convention, adopted at Manila Diplomatic Conference June 2010, entered into force on 1st January 2012 , 5-year transition period. Strengthened the requirements for issue and registration of certificates, and registration/hours of rest/medicine and alcohol control etc., and added the responsibilities of shipping company, designate works to competent seafarers who have undergone trainings for knowledge update. There’re large number of seafarers in Asia who should go through training/certificate/registration process again. II.4 STCW Convention)

1 Entry into force shall subject to the following: 1.Ratifications by no less than 15 States ; 2.The combined merchant fleets of these States constitute not less than 417 million gross tonnage ; 3.Combined maximum annual ship recycling volume of the States mentioned above during the preceding 10 years constitutes not less than 12,500,000 gross tonnage ; 4.Enter into force: twenty-four months after meeting the above-mentioned requirements (expected: around 2016). II.5 Hong Kong Convention 23

123 Shipyard: Improve the management and control on supply chain to deal with the potential legal and economic risks. To prevent risks such as claim and ship abandonment caused by installation of unqualified products onboard. Ship in service: IHM shall be updated throughout the service of the ship. Ship to be recycled: Hazardous Materials shall be recycled and environmentally soundly dealt with by the approved recycling facilities as per the requirements of the Convention and IHM. II.5 Hong Kong Convention

123 EU new regulation : ① PSC Inspection Guidelines, developed on May ② Draft EU Regulation on Ship Recycling, expected to enter into force in ③ Ban on the Use of Asbestos on Board ships, released by Netherlands Administration, December 2011.

1 2 The condition for entry-into-force of BWM : 30 States; 35% of the gross tonnage of the world’s merchant shipping; Effective twelve months after the condition is met. Status a s of 31 July 2012 : 35 States , 27.95% of the gross tonnage of the world’s merchant shipping. The condition for entry-into-force is about to be met with a few major flag States signing in. II.6 BWM

1 2 Major problems: Very small percentage of world fleet has installed the BWMS onboard; No transition period for ships of certain category; The uncertainty of the sampling and analysis method on BWMS used during port State inspection discourages ship owners from early installation before the entry into force of BWM Convention; Whilst the uncertainty of entry into force of the BWM Convention still remains, an early installation of BWMS will mean additional cost and relatively lower function; Alternative methods of ballast water treatment are also under development. II.6 BWM

1 2 II.7 MLC The condition for entry-into-force of MLC : 30 ILO m embers ; 33% of the gross tonnage of ships; twelve months after the date of registered ratifications 。 c urrent condition : 29 ILO m embers , 58.5% of the gross tonnage of the world’s merchant shipping 。 Estimate : 30 ILO m embers by 2012 ; the Convention will enter into force by 2013.

1 2 The Convention covers fair treatment of crew for their work, safe and sound work/live environment, welfares including safety protection and health care etc. The shipbuilding and shipping industry should pay attention to: -Updating company/shipboard management systems (incl. wages/welfares); -training -seafarers’ accommodation and prevention of noise and vibration for new ships - Unclearness in the implementation of MLC due to different work mechanism in between ILO and IMO II.7 MLC

III. Layout of international maritime quality supervision

III. International quality and control system in maritime sector Shipping Shipbuilding Class Society/ROs Flag State, Class Society/ROs PSC, EU, USCG, P&I, Vetting System Administration, Class Society/ROs Quality, Safety, SCF, Bank Flag State Flag State, QACE, ACB, Ro Code, PSC IMO, ILO, III Code, PSC

III. International quality and control system in maritime sector  Who is the administration of shipyard? Flag State or Shipyard’ s country?  ISO 9000 not adequate ( need ISO 14000/18000);  Safety of surveyors;  Regional requirement (EU and others);  SCF, Information transparency and IPR;  Future development and EFQM.

From technical aspect : Driving force of the market. From government and exterior driven to self-driven. Independent research and development, Innovation of science and technology. Identify the target,new generation ship type development, market segmentation. ship types matched the market demands is the key point to the purchase order. Technology IV. Conclusions Quality From quality aspect : The highest practical standard. From being regulated to self-regulated. Production process optimization. Process management, high-quality ships. Pursuit of excellence( EFQM )

 Stronger Asian voice and influence on the development of international maritime conventions and rules is necessary, doable and on the way.  Essential for a healthy and sustainable development of world shipping and shipbuilding industry

Thank you for your kind attention!