Seminar 18 Response to Intervention January 21, 2016 Facilitators: Geneviève Légaré Natalie Knott Katie Brown.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Agenda - January 28, 2009 Professional Learning Community – Jefferson HS Learning by Doing What does the data tell us? ITED results SIP Goals Data Questions.
Advertisements

Cooking Matters Gold Standards. Implementing the Standards Cooking Matters has developed a list of key behaviors and actions or Gold Standards that should.
Academy 2: Using Data to Assess Student Progress and Inform Educational Decisions in Culturally Responsive RTI Models Academy 2: Culturally Responsive.
Comprehensive, Integrated, Three-Tiered (CI3T) Models of Prevention: Why does my school – and district – need an integrated approach to meet students’
Comparison of Teacher-Centered and Learner-Centered Paradigms From Figure 1-2 in Huba and Freed, Learner-Centered Assessment on College Campuses: Shifting.
Comparison of Teacher-Centered and Learner-Centered Paradigms From Figure 1-2 in Huba and Freed, Learner-Centered Assessment on College Campuses: Shifting.
AVID Elective Overview
WELCOME to WELCOME to Implementation Training for: The Revised Ontario Curriculum for Canadian and World Studies Grades 9 and 10.
CRITICAL THINKING STRATEGY- INQUIRY CIRCLES. Corner One  Have never heard of Inquiry Circles Corner Two  Have heard of ‘The Inquiry Circles’ but have.
Response to Intervention By: Angelique Gunderson.
Staff Development Day 1 – August 31, 2010 Staff Development Day 2 – September 1, 2010.
Mathematics Framework: Instructional Strategies and Modeling June 26, :30-3:30.
Welcome Back Review of Day 1 Feedback Agenda Review for Day 2.
Comprehensive Curriculum Framework for Tiered Instruction: A Response to Intervention Model Sarah Jackson, M.Ed. Sandra Hess Robbins, M.Ed. Sanna Harjusola-Webb,
Planning Interventions for Instructional Success Working with Fiction Text.
PUT TITLE HERE Student Success 2011 Summer Program NAME OF YOUR MODULE HERE DAY 2 Student Success 2011 Summer Program Facilitating Learning Teams using.
Information Literacy, Reflective Practice and Critical Thinking: How do they Interrelate? UWE, Bristol 2007.
Project-Based Learning
Translating Standards Into Curriculum: The Lead Standards Approach.
Customer Focus Module Preview
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Preparing and Applying Formative Multiple Measures of Performance Conducting High-Quality Self-Assessments.
Weather vs. Climate Inquiry Nicole Glen Bridgewater State College
Classroom Management Strategies Part II
Professional Development to Practice The contents of this presentation were developed under a grant from the US Department of Education to the Missouri.
Reading in the Content Area 604 P Session 4. Bringing Students and Texts Together Involves plans and practices that result in active student engagement.
CUTM 4012: Methods of Teaching English Week 6: Writing – Part 1.
Mathematics Teacher Leader Session 1: The National Mathematics Strategy & Modelling Exemplary Teaching 1.
Content Area Reading Strategies Before, During, and After Reading.
OSSE School Improvement Data Workshop Workshop #1 January 30, 2015 Office of the State Superintendent of Education.
Assistant Principal Meeting August 28, :00am to 12:00pm.
Supporting Behavior in the Classroom
CFI: Quality Review Institute Division of Accountability and Achievement Resources Division of School Support August-September 2009 Network Leaders’ Guide.
New Teachers’ Induction January 20, 2011 Office of Curriculum and Instruction.
Advancing Assessment Literacy Setting the Stage I: Engaging Stakeholders.
Content Area Reading, 11e Vacca, Vacca, Mraz © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. 0 Content Area Reading Literacy and Learning Across the.
Curriculum Mapping: its MANY benefits of investing time and effort.
Supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. EHR Learning Community Forum The Four Hats of Leadership Focus on Coaching and Consulting.
Planning Interventions for Instructional Success Part 1 Working with Fiction Text.
Welcome Back!. ACS Curriculum Guides Wednesday, June 17, 2009 Day 3.
Inquiry and the IB. Stuents do not learn by doing. on what they have done. Rather, they learn by and.
PRINCIPAL SESSION 2012 EEA Day 1. Agenda Session TimesEvents 1:00 – 4:00 (1- 45 min. Session or as often as needed) Elementary STEM Power Point Presentation.
“The great end of education is to discipline rather than furnish the mind; to train it to the use of its own powers, rather than fill it with the accumulation.
Presented by the SRHS Literacy Team.  Recap Last Meeting  Focus For Today - Steps 1 And 2  Activity  Homework.
Personal Success Plan Collaborative Groups Hall County Schools Educational Technology Conference, July 29, 2010.
Ms. Fisher Mrs. Kebert Ms. Spaulding Mrs. Walker.
Strengthening Instructional Leadership in Mathematics Principals – January 8, :00AM – 12:00PM.
Mellons Bay School Inquiry Model Explore, Challenge, Learn! Be the best you can.
Inquiry-Based Learning How It Looks, Sounds and Feels.
Using Resources to Implement Workshop Planning for Reading Instruction.
Lead Teach Learn PLC Fundamental IV: Multi-Tiered System of Supports.
1 NH PACE Tier 2 Leadership PLC Session 1 September 28, 2015.
Introduction to STEM Integrating Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math.
AVID Program Advancement Via Individual Determination [L. avidus]: eager for knowledge.
Instructional Leadership Planning with Indicators of Quality Instruction.
Before we get started… Jot down notes about how you solved this problem. Solve 18 x 5 in your head. If you’d like, you can download the materials for this.
Lead Teach Learn PLC Fundamental I: Core Curriculum & Instruction Session 3.
Staff Meeting 18/8/08. Agenda  Vision of K 12  Innovative Classrooms  Effective Pedagogy  Professional Learning Options  Expectations for Term 3.
Metacognition to Motivate Learning
Assessment For Today’s Classrooms™ Module 2 Making an Impact.
UDL Academy Session 7 Cohort 2 May 3, Goals for today To finalize work on your team deliverables for the UDL Academy: – 3-4 UDL lessons in UDL Exchange.
MODULE 2 INTRODUCTION AND MODULE OVERVIEW INFORMATION STANDARDS KNOWLEDGE AND SKILLS ASSIGNMENTS.
MODULE 3 INTRODUCTION AND MODULE OVERVIEW STANDARDS KNOWLEDGE AND SKILLS ASSIGNMENTS.
4:00 – 4:05pm Welcome and Introductions 4:05 – 4:20pm Ice Breaker 4:20-4:30 pm Norms 4:30 – 5:00pm Journaling 5:00 – 5:30 pm Enquiry activity stations.
AISI October 27, Essential Questions: What does it mean to be an AISI teacher leader? What does “leading” mean? What is critical thinking?
ELT 329 ACTION RESEARCH Week 4
The Year of Core Instruction
Seeing is Believing: Accelerating Professional Learning
Module 1. Identifying Concepts and Skills
Reflective Problem Solving Collaborative Problem Solving
Exploring Foundational Principle:
Presentation transcript:

Seminar 18 Response to Intervention January 21, 2016 Facilitators: Geneviève Légaré Natalie Knott Katie Brown

Intention and Outcomes Learning intention: to develop a general understanding of Response to Intervention(RTI) in order to make connections to the collaborative inquiry process used in EBP, keeping data in mind. Learning outcomes  to identify the key concepts of RTI  to compare and contrast RTI models  to identify issues pertaining to the implementation of RTI in Quebec  connect the RTI process to the collaborative inquiry process keeping the focus on data

Warm Up 3 WORDS 1.Brainstorm as many concepts from Seminar 17 you remember 2.Pick 3 which are the most meaningful to you and write one per post-it. 3.Meet with one person and share one idea. We will have you change partners 3 times.

Agenda 1.Welcome 2.Learning for Us 1.AM: Understanding RTI a)Knowledge Activation b)Brief overview of RTI c)Compare and Contrast RTI Models d)Sharing 2.PM: Making connections to EBP a)Data emphasis b)Implementation issues for the Quebec context 3.Wrap-up

Knowledge Activation Individual Brainstorm: What do you know about RTI? 1.In your green book write, list, map all you know about RTI. 2.Think about the key concepts.

Basic Overview

Compare and Contrast RTI Models 1.Using the materials provided, explore the different models of RTI.  Compare and contrast the key features of each model. (Brainstorm the features your group would like to explore, in order to guide your work.) 2. In your team use the chart paper provided to present the information you have gathered.

Sharing Each group be asked to share what they have discovered. When called upon, add any new information your group has found.

RTI… Tier 1: If 80% of your students do not meet proficiency level of your screening tool, focus on your Tier 1 teaching. If 80% or more of your students are proficient, start looking at Tier 2. The Tiers differ with respect to number of students in an intervention group, Time and frequency of interventions Interventions take place outside of classroom teaching. Tiers imply an order but, in RTI, the students enter and leave the Tiers as needed and as soon as their needs are identified. Students do not succeed in school because of will and skill Problems. Teacher teams take the lead in skill problems. Leadership team can take the lead on will problems (attendance, motivation, behavior).

Reflection In your green book take the time to reflect on what you have learned, discussed etc.

Data and RTI 1.Choose one of the four corners to work at. 2.Answer the questions on the chart paper provided: In this Tier … a)What are we trying to find out? b)What data should we use? c)What issues might we be faced with when implementing this framework in Quebec Schools? d)Other….

Reflection In your green book take the time to reflect on what you have learned, discussed etc.

Wrap Up