CIS Working Group 2A ECOSTAT Overall Approach to the Ecological Classification 01 July 2003 D/UK WGL CIS 2A.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Convention of the Protection and Use of Transboundary Watercourses and International Lakes Setting the scene for Session 1 National information systems.
Advertisements

The European Eutrophication Activity and the UWWT and Nitrate Directives Ana Cristina Cardoso.
WFD Stakeholder Meeting 2 February 2007 WFD Environmental Standards Rob Hitchen WFD Team, Defra.
How close are we in the Water Framework Directive’s Implementation ? Paul C.M. Frintrop Institute for Inland Water Management and Waste-Water Treatment.
Module 3: Environmental Objectives, Programme of Measures, Economic Analysis, Exemptions Environmental Objectives Yannick Pochon Afyon, 2015.
The EU Water Framework Directive and Sediments The Water Framework Directive was transposed into law in EU Member States at the end of Nearly two.
Water Framework Directive – Coastal issues Will Akast Catchment Delivery Manager-Suffolk.
Extension of the EEA European Topic Centre’s Work Program to the West Balkan Countries in the field of water Norman Green, NIVA Nov 2006, Belgrade.
MODULE 1 Water Framework Directive, Relation of WFD with Daughter Directives, River Basin Management Planning, Water Bodies, Typology, Classification Environmental.
South Eastern River Basin District - Environmental Quality Standard Development-
Fish migration from a Water Framework Directive perspective
Mats Wallin Swedish Univ. of Agricultural Sciences Dept. of Environmental Assessment Catarina Johansson Swedish Environmental Protection Agency Development.
Indicators to communicate progress towards good status WG DIS, April 2015.
Bárbara Willaarts 1,2, Mario Ballesteros 2 and Nuria Hernández-Mora 3 1 Observatorio del Agua-Fundación Botín 2 CEIGRAM-Universidad Politécnica de Madrid.
MODULE 1 Water Framework Directive, Relation of WFD with Daughter Directives, River Basin Management Planning, Water Bodies, Typology, Classification River.
Water.europa.eu Water Framework Directive - a framework for Community action in the field of water policy Marieke van Nood WFD Team, DG ENV.D.2, European.
© WRc plc 2010 Agenda item 3b: Summary of WISE electronic delivery: presentation of an example.
Seite Foto Pulkau Foto Gebirgsbach General chemical and physico- chemical elements – Type-specific assessment of rivers in Austria Karin Deutsch.
A Practical Approach: The General Physico-Chemical Quality Elements and the Classification of Ecological Status.
Management of the coastal and marine environment: The legal framework of the European Union from the first EEC Directives to the Water Framework Directive.
Water Director Meeting 30th November 2006, Inari / SF WFD and Hydromorphology Technical report on “Good practice in managing the ecological impacts of.
Europe-wide monitoring obligations under the EU Water Framework Directive Jos G. Timmerman Institute for Inland Water Management and Waste Water Treatment.
DIRECTIVE 2000/60/EC 2 nd MEETING CHEMICAL MONITORING ACTIVITY (CMA) BRUSSELS, 17 th NOVEMBER 2005 Chemical Monitoring Activity Draft Outline of a Guidance.
Framework for the intercalibration process  Must be simple  Aiming to identify and resolve big inconsistencies with the normative definitions and big.
11 juni 2007 Ecological classification in the Netherlands1 Diederik van der Molen Ministry of Transport, Public Works and Water Management CIS workshop.
1 European Topic Centre on Water Workshop on: Identification of surface water bodies under the Pilot River Basin Initiative Monitoring Water Bodies Steve.
River Basin Management Plan Steps, Status and Objectives.
TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE FOR THE CONVERSION OF RBPAPs INTO RBMPs MONITORING INCEPTION WORKSHOP ISTAMBUL February Alfredo CORROCHANO CODORNÍU Carmen.
Building WFD into impact assessment Richard Sharp Geomorphology IEMA webinar Thursday 31 March 2016.
Monitoring, assessing and classifying the environment
REFCOND EU Water Framework Directive project funded by the European Commission DG Environment Included in the EU Water Directors “Common Strategy on.
Dave Jowett, Chair UK Marine Task Team
CIS guidance document on E-Flows
Synthesis of the intercalibration process Working group 2.5.
GOOD ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS IN THE PROPOSED MARINE STRATEGY DIRECTIVE
Purpose Independent piece of legislation, closely integrated in a larger regulatory framework (complement to WFD): prevent deterioration protect, enhance.
GEP vs. GES.
Carolin Meier & Daniel Hering (University of Duisburg-Essen)
Development of a protocol for identification of reference conditions, and boundaries between high, good and moderate status in lakes and watercourses (REFCOND)
WG ECOSTAT: Good Ecological Potential (GEP)
Claire Vincent Environment and Heritage Service United Kingdom
COAST Lisbon February Claire Vincent Environment and Heritage Service United Kingdom.
Philippe QUEVAUVILLER
The normal balance of ingredients
Definition and Establishment of Reference Conditions
EU Water Framework Directive
Project 2.7 Guidance on Monitoring
of the Work Programme 17. March 2003
Ongoing work on CIS Guidance Article 4.7
Which is the real scope of the Guidance ?
CIS Working Group 2A ECOSTAT SCG Meeting in Brussels
on Identification and Designation of Heavily Modified and
confidence in classification
Comparison of methodologies for defining Good Ecological Potential
Alternative Methodology for Defining Good Ecological Potential (GEP)
WG 2.3 REFCOND Progress report for the SCG meeting 30 Sep-1 Oct 2002
EU Water Framework Directive
Common Implementation Strategy for the Water Framework Directive
Legal issues and compliance checking in WFD implementation SCG meeting 5-6 November 2008 Jorge Rodríguez Romero, Unit D.2, DG Environment, European.
Working Group 2A ECOSTAT Guidance for the intercalibration process Wouter van de Bund Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability.
FITTING THE ITALIAN METHOD FOR EVALUATING LAKE ECOLOGICAL QUALITY FROM BENTHIC DIATOMS (EPI-L) IN THE “PHYTOBENTHOS CROSS-GIG” INTERCALIBRATION EXERCISE.
WFD CIS 4th Intercalibration Workshop
UK Technical Advisory Group
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
Concept paper on the assessment of WFD River Basin Management Plans
WG A ECOSTAT Draft Mandate
EU Water Framework Directive
Typology and Intercalibration Typology System
Defining Reference Conditions Setting Class Boundaries
Summary overview of methods used to define GEP in practice by countries represented in the ad-hoc group Dr. Ursula Schmedtje.
Presentation transcript:

CIS Working Group 2A ECOSTAT Overall Approach to the Ecological Classification 01 July 2003 D/UK WGL CIS 2A

Purpose The purpose is to provide guidance on how the Directive’s ecological classification schemes should work. For this purpose ==> all biological, hydromorphological, physico- chemical and chemical elements must be taken into account ==> all water categories (rivers, lakes etc) have to be considered not only for natural but also for artificial and heavily modified water bodies The overall guidance paper is based mainly on REFCOND, COAST, HMWB and MONITORING guidance documents !

What are the main Issues ? The overall approach has to clarify: (1) Roles of Parameters indicative for Quality Elements (2) Relationship of the List of Elements in Annex V Table 1.1 and the normative Definitions in Annex V Table 1.2 (3) Roles of the Elements in the Ecological Classification

Parameters and Elements  Although MS may use parameters indicative of the condition of each quality element in their monitoring programmes,  the ecological status or potential class of a water body should be determined at the quality element level rather than at the level of each individual parameter.  A particular quality element may require consideration of the monitoring results for several parameters indicative of that quality element.  The use of non-biological indicators for estimating the condition of a biological quality element may complement the use of biological indicators but it cannot replace it.

Biological quality ?Parameters or quality elements? elements Aquatic flora*composition & abundance Phytoplanktoncomposition, abundance & blooms Benthic invertebratescomposition, abundance, sensitive taxa & diversity Fishcomposition, abundance, sensitive taxa & age structure * Macrophytes & phytobenthos Quality Elements and Parameters

many detailed quality elementsquality elements + parameters statusquality elements status quality elements parameters one out – all out limit Multi metric approach Single element approach

Biological Elements

List of Biological Elements

Definition and Roles of Biological Quality Elements The values of the biological quality elements must be taken into account when assigning water bodies to any of the ecological status and ecological potential classes

Hydromorphological Elements

List of Hydromorphological Elements

Definition and Roles of Hydromorphological Quality Elements  The values of the hydromorphological quality elements must be taken into account when assigning water bodies to the high ecological status class and the maximum ecological potential class  For the other status classes, the hydromorphological elements are required to have conditions consistent with the achievement of the values specified for the biological quality elements

Chemical and Physico-chemical Elements

List of Chemical and Physico-chemical Elements

Definition of Physico-chemical Quality Elements  The values of the physico-chemical quality elements must be taken into account when assigning water bodies to the high and good ecological status class and the maximum and good ecological potential class  For the other status classes, the physico-chemical elements are required to have conditions consistent with the achievement of the values specified for the biological quality elements

Roles of Physico-chemical Quality Elements  The general physico-chemical quality elements must comply with the ranges or levels established so as to ensure ecosystem functioning and the achievement of the values specified for the biological quality elements  The concentrations of specific pollutants must not exceed EQSs set in accordance with Annex V, Section WFD

Roles of Chemical Quality Elements  The priority substances should only be taken into account in the classification of surface water chemical status and not in the classification of ecological status to avoid double counting  Similarly compliance with EQSs for other substances for which environmental quality standards have been set at Community- level (Annex IX) should also be taken into account in the classification of surface water chemical status and not in the classification of ecological status/potential

Stepwise Approach for the Ecological Classification

Classify as moderate status Classify on the basis of the biological deviation from reference conditions Is the deviation moderate? Yes No Classify as poor status Is the deviation major? Yes Classify as bad status Greater Classify as high status Do the estimated values for the biological quality elements meet reference conditions? Yes Do the physico- chemical conditions meet high status? Yes Do the hydro- morphological conditions meet high status? Yes Do the estimated values for the biological quality elements deviate only slightly from reference condition values? Yes Classify as good status Do the physico-chemical conditions (a) ensure ecosystem functioning and (b) meet the EQSs for specific pollutants? Yes No Relative roles of biological, hydromorphological and physico- chemical quality elements in ecological status classification

Classify as moderate status Classify on the basis of the biological deviation from reference conditions Is the deviation moderate? Yes No Classify as poor status Is the deviation major? Yes Greater Classify as bad status Greater Classify as high status Do the estimated values for the biological quality elements meet reference conditions? Yes Do the physico- chemical conditions meet high status? Yes Do the hydro- morphological conditions meet high status? Yes Do the estimated values for the biological quality elements deviate only slightly from reference condition values? Yes Classify as good status Do the physico-chemical conditions (a) ensure ecosystem functioning and (b) meet the EQSs for specific pollutants? Yes No Relative roles of biological, hydromorphological and physico- chemical quality elements in ecological status classification The values of the relevant biological quality elements for the surface water body reflect those normally associated with that type under undisturbed conditions, and show no, or only very minor, evidence of distortion; i.e. the biological quality elements correspond totally, or nearly totally, to undisturbed conditions. The general physico-chemical quality elements correspond totally or nearly totally to undisturbed conditions. The values for these elements must remain within the ranges normally associated with undisturbed conditions. The values of the specific synthetic pollutants must be close to zero and at least below the limits of detection of the most advanced analytical techniques in general use. The values of the specific non-synthetic pollutants must be within the range normally associated with undisturbed conditions. The values for the hydromorphological quality elements correspond totally or nearly totally to undisturbed conditions. The values of the relevant biological quality elements for the surface water body show low levels of distortion resulting from human activity, but deviate only slightly from those normally associated with the surface water body type under undisturbed conditions. The relevant biological communities deviate substantially from those normally associated with the surface water body type under undisturbed conditions. Large portions of the relevant biological communities normally associated with the type are absent. The values for the general physico-chemical quality elements must comply with the ranges or levels established so as to ensure: (a) the functioning of the type specific ecosystem; and (b) the achievement of the values specified for the relevant biological quality elements. The values of the specific pollutant quality elements are not in excess of the environmental quality standards (EQS) set at Member State level in accordance with the procedure laid down in Annex V, section (a) The values for the biological quality elements differ moderately from the type specific communities or; (b) the values for the biological quality elements differ moderately and the physico-chemical quality element values are less than good or; (c) the values for the biological quality elements are better than moderate but the physico-chemical quality element values are less than good or; (d) the values for the biological quality elements differ moderately but the physico-chemical quality element values are good.

Classify as poor potential Is the deviation major? Yes Greater Classify as bad potential Greater Classify as moderate potential Classify on the basis of the biological deviation from MEP Is the deviation moderate? Yes No Yes Do the physico- chemical conditions meet MEP? Yes Classify as MEP, map as good and above potential Yes Do the hydromorphological conditions meet MEP? Do the estimated values for the biological quality elements meet MEP? Do the estimated values for the biological quality elements deviate only slightly from MEP? Yes Classify as good and above potential Do the physico-chemical conditions (a) ensure ecosystem functioning and (b) meet the EQSs for specific pollutants? Yes No Relative roles of biological, hydromorphological and physico-chemical quality elements in ecological potential classification The hydromorphological conditions are consistent with the only impacts on the surface water body being those resulting from the artificial or heavily modified characteristics of the water body once all mitigation measures have been taken to ensure the best approximation to ecological continuum, in particular with respect to migration of fauna and appropriate spawning and breeding grounds. The mitigation measures should not include those that would have a significant adverse effect on the specified uses of the water body or the wider environment. The general physico-chemical quality elements correspond totally or nearly totally to the undisturbed conditions associated with the surface water body type most closely comparable to the artificial or heavily modified body concerned. The values for these elements must remain within the ranges normally associated with undisturbed conditions. The values of the specific synthetic pollutants must be close to zero and at least below the limits of detection of the most advanced analytical techniques in general use. The values of the specific non-synthetic pollutants must be within the range normally associated with undisturbed conditions. The values of the relevant biological quality elements for the surface water body reflect the MEP hydromorphological conditions of the closest comparable surface water body type. Relevant Quality Elements = Lake (V No )