Access to Information in Canada Andrea Neill, Assistant Information Commissioner Office of the Information Commissioner of Canada To “Democracy Study Tour”

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Procedural Safeguards
Advertisements

Freedom of Information Act 2000 and the PCT Audit Procedure Background: The Act was passed in November The Act will be fully in force by January.
1 Opening the Door: Access to Government Information A primer for Media Students Mohawk College Sept. 18, 2002 Bob Spence Communications Co-ordinator Office.
Presentation to OAS officials/ representatives 2 nd October, 2012.
29e CONFÉRENCE INTERNATIONALE DES COMMISSAIRES À LA PROTECTION DES DONNÉES ET DE LA VIE PRIVÉE 29 th INTERNATIONAL DATA PROTECTION AND PRIVACY COMMISSIONERS.
Research and the Health Information Act Rachel Hayward Office of the Information and Privacy Commissioner of Alberta.
The New Mediation Regulation October 16, 2012 Commissioner Derrick L. Williams.
Institute of Municipal Finance Officers & Related Professions
The UK Freedom of Information Act – A Practical Guide for Academic Researchers Cambridge Wednesday, 16 February 2011.
Regulatory Body MODIFIED Day 8 – Lecture 3.
Jasminka Dzumhur, Ombudsperson of BiH “Role of national human rights institutions” Ljubljana, 1. December 2014.
Towards a Freedom of Information Law in Qatar Fahad bin Mohammed Al Attiya Executive Chairman, Qatar National Food Security Programme.
THE RIGHT TO INFORMATION ACT – 2005 (Central Act No.22 of 2005) K. Ambarish, IAS., (Retd.) Chief Consultant, AMR-APARD Rajendranagar, Hyderabad.
Session 4: Good Governance: How SAIs influence Good Governance in Public Administration Zahira Ravat 27 & 28 May 2014.
1 OVERVIEW PRESENTATION FREEDOM OF INFORMATION (SCOTLAND) ACT 2002.
Inter-American Model Law on Access to Information.
United States Army Freedom of Information Act (Freedom of Information Act Managerial Training)
South African Human Rights Commission Presentation to the Portfolio Committee on Correctional Services ‘ Strengthening the Judicial Inspectorate of Correctional.
Privacy Law for Network Administrators Steven Penney Faculty of Law University of New Brunswick.
1 Freedom of Information (Scotland) Act 2002 A strategic view.
Protecting information rights ­ advancing information policy.
City of Tshwane GDS August Reputation promise/mission The Auditor-General of South Africa has a constitutional mandate and, as the Supreme.
Supervision and regulation of banking system duty is given to a autonomous organization called Banking Regulation and Supervision Agency. BRSA is public.
DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT SERVICES OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL.
Privacy & Personal Information Prepared by the CBC Law Department CONFIDENTIAL – FALL 2011.
Principles of Local Governance: Covering local governmental legislations and compliance issues IMFO WOMEN IN LOCAL GOVERNMENT FINANCE CONFERENCE 07/02/13.
Calloway County Schools CONFIDENTIALITY TRAINING Protection of Personal Information School Year
BC Public Libraries November, 2008 Privacy Principles.
Page 1 Committee presentation An overview of the external audit process and types of audits 12 May 2010.
OPEN GOVERNMENT: IMPLICATIONS FOR INVESTIGATORS Elizabeth Tydd Information and Privacy Commission CEO NSW Information Commissioner November 2014.
Internal Review under the Freedom of Information Law 2007 Carole Excell, FOI Coordinator.
U.S. Department of Education Safeguarding Student Privacy Melanie Muenzer U.S. Department of Education Chief of Staff Office of Planning, Evaluation, and.
Elected Officials and Health Department Records Indiana Public Health Foundation February 27, 2008.
Briefing to the Portfolio Committee on Economic Development Department on the audit outcomes for the 2013/2014 financial year Presenter: Ahmed Moolla October.
Title of Presentation in Verdana Bold Managing the Government Agenda Priorities and Planning Presentation Canada School of Public Service August 1, 2007.
Policy and Procedure for the Handling of Complaints against the AG Consultation with the Standing Committee on the Auditor-General 9 April 2008 Wandile.
Canada’s Access to Information Act Measuring Up? Panel 3: Select Country Cases April 28, :15 Americas Regional Conference on the Right of Access.
MR THEMBA WAKASHE DIRECTOR-GENERAL DEPARTMENT OF ARTS AND CULTURE PRESENTATION OF THE DAC LEGISLATIVE PROGRAMME 2010 TO THE PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE OF ARTS.
Parliamentary Committees in Democracies: Unit 6 Government Accountability and Parliamentary Committees.
1 The Public Interest Disclosure (Whistleblower Protection) Act.
Access to Information: Bolivia Main Headline Goes Here Special Meeting of the Juridical and Political Affairs OAS December 13, 2010 Laura Neuman Access.
Sharing Information (FERPA) FY07 REMS Initial Grantee Meeting December 5, 2007, San Diego, CA U.S. Department of Education, Office of Safe and Drug-Free.
Tax Court of Canada THIRD PARTY INFORMATION IN MAKING ASSESSMENT INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF TAX JUDGES Lucerne, Switzerland September 4, 2015 The Hon.
Key Messages Nigeria July Key Messages Congratulations to the Nigerian Government for adopting this important piece of legislation. Your President.
The Health Information Protection Act. What is the Health Information Protection Act (HIPA)? HIPA is legislation that speaks to access to, and protection.
Leveraging the Power of the Ombudsman to Influence Change and Improve Governance Suzanne Legault Interim Information Commissioner of Canada International.
Reforms in the Albanian Public Procurement System 7 th Regional Public Procurement Forum Tbilisi, Georgia May 16-19, 2011 PUBLIC PROCUREMENT AGENCY 1.
Practical Analysis of Obstacles Encountered by Legal Services as Part of Access to Information Requests Presentation to the Canadian Institute at the Conference.
Search and Preparation Fees: Electronic Records Effects of the Federal Court Reference on Investigations under the Access to Information Act (the Act)
Andrea Neill Assistant Information Commissioner of Canada CAPA Conference Ottawa November 23,
"LET THE SUNSHINE IN" Proactive Disclosure of Information: The Essential Wave of the Future Access and Privacy Conference 2009 Andrea Neill Assistant Commissioner.
Reaping the Benefits of Open Government By Suzanne Legault, Interim Information Commissioner Office of the Information Commissioner of Canada Canada School.
Presented by Ms. Teki Akuetteh LLM (IT and Telecom Law) 16/07/2013Data Protection Act, 2012: A call for Action1.
Freedom of Information Act ‘What you need to know’ Corporate Information Governance Team Strategic Intelligence.
Freedom of Information Requests. Information Management Framework Access to Information Access to Information Environmental Information Regulations 2004.
Freedom of Information (Cont’d) Promise and Perils November 30th, 2006.
1 Office of the Information Commissioner of Canada September 28, 2010 Balancing Openness and the Public Interest In Protecting Information Vanessa R. Brinkmann.
The Access to Information Act in Canada: taking stock of 30 years Suzanne Legault Information Commissioner of Canada December 5, 2013.
Information Commissioner
Audit of predetermined objectives
Oversight Models: The Canadian Experience
The Office of the Information Commissioner of Canada
GUKEYEH GUK’EH GU’SANI Kaska Dena Good Governance Act
(Portfolio Committee on Justice and Correctional Services)
Privacy principles Individual written policies
Principles of Administrative Law <Instructor Name>
Canada: The Perfect Case Study
WHAT TO EXPECT: A CROWN CORPORATION’S GUIDE TO A SPECIAL EXAMINATION
Essentials of the legal environment today, 5e
The Freedom of Information and Data Protection Legislation An Overview
Presentation transcript:

Access to Information in Canada Andrea Neill, Assistant Information Commissioner Office of the Information Commissioner of Canada To “Democracy Study Tour” Participants Ottawa, February 3, 2011

Right of Access  Access to information is recognized as a quasi- constitutional right by the Supreme Court of Canada “The purpose of access to information legislation is to facilitate democracy by helping to ensure that citizens have the information required to participate meaningfully in the democratic process and that politicians and bureaucrats remain accountable to the citizenry.”  The Act supersedes all other Canadian legislation unless expressly stated otherwise  The right of access is limited to Canadians and people/corporations present in Canada 2

Access to Information in Canada 3

Presumption of Openness  The Access to Information Act (ATIA) is based on a presumption in favour of disclosing government-held information  It provides “a right of access to information in records under the control of a government institution”  It is “not intended to limit in any way access to the type of government information that is normally available to the general public” 4

Access to Information Act and Privacy Act  Personal information is an exemption under the Access to Information Act  For purposes of the ATIA, personal information is defined in the Privacy Act (PA)  Disclosure of personal information under the ATIA is authorized if it is in accordance with the PA 19.(1)Subject to subsection (2), the head of a government institution shall refuse to disclose any record requested under this Act that contains personal information as defined in section 3 of the Privacy Act. Where disclosure authorized (2) The head of a government institution may disclose any record requested under this Act that contains personal information if (a) the individual to whom it relates consents to the disclosure; (b) the information is publicly available; or (c) the disclosure is in accordance with section 8 of the Privacy Act. 5

Coverage of the Access to Information Act Applies to:  Departments and agencies  Crown corporations and Officers of Parliament recently added by the Federal Accountability Act Does not apply to:  Parliament  Ministers’ Offices  Courts 6

Exceptions to Access - Exemptions  “Necessary exceptions to the right of access should be limited and specific.”  Categories of exemptions  Mandatory  Discretionary  Tests  Injury  Class  Public interest overrides possible for personal information and third party information 7

Exceptions to Access - Exemptions 8

Exceptions to Access - Exclusions  Published material or material available for purchase, library and museum material, and material placed in National Archives  Information of the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation that relates to its journalistic, creative or programming activities (general administration information covered)  Information of Atomic Energy of Canada Limited (general administration information covered)  Cabinet confidences, e.g. memoranda, discussion papers, agenda, briefing materials and draft legislation 9

Time Limited Exemptions and Exclusions  Law enforcement- 20 years  Personal information (deceased- 20 years individuals)  Advice to government- 20 years  Intent to publish- 90 days  Cabinet documents- 20 years 10

Key Players Government institution  Head responsible  Delegates authority to Access to Information and Privacy Coordinator President of Treasury Board “Designated Minister”  Government-wide administration, e.g. policies and guidelines  Compiles Info Source  Reviews records management Minister of Justice  Responsible for legal aspects of legislation Privy Council Office  Certifies Cabinet confidences 11

Processing Requests  30 calendar days from receipt of request  “Reasonable” extension possible, e.g. volume and consultations  Must release any part of a record or information not exempt  Disclose document or cite exemptions - notify requester of right to complain 12

Fees  Application  Search and preparation (paper, s, etc.)  Reproduction No fees  5 free hours search and preparation  Shipping  Records review  Waiver if less than $25  Waiver if public interest in disclosure 13

Oversight Models in Canadian Jurisdictions 14

Information Commissioner of Canada Officer of Parliament  Appointed by Parliament  Independent / arm’s length to government of the day  7 year mandate Ombudsman  Protects rights of requesters under the Act  Advocates benefits of open government  Encourages participation of citizens in democratic process  Fosters enhanced accountability and transparency 15

Office of the Information Commissioner Complaints Resolution and Compliance Branch  Carries out investigations and dispute resolution efforts to resolve complaints Policy, Communications and Operations Branch  Monitors federal institutions’ performance under the Act  Provides strategic advice and direction to address systemic and policy issues  Leads external relations with the public, the government and Parliament  Provides administrative management and ATIP functions Legal Services Branch  Represents the Commissioner in court cases  Provides legal advice on investigations and legislative and administrative matters. Human Resources Branch 16

Complaints Types of complaints  In addition to complaints about institutions’ refusals to provide access to requested records, requesters can complain about fees, time extensions, language of records, format of records or any other matter regarding access to records. Complaints resolution  Strong investigative powers, including subpoenas and hearings  Can administer oaths  Can enter any premises of any government institution and search for and seize documents  No order-making powers – orders issued pursuant to Judicial Review  Resolves complaints through mediation and persuasion 17

Complaints – Caseload 18

Redress – Federal Court  Any person who has been refused access to a record or a part thereof may, once the Information Commissioner’s report of findings has been received, apply to the Court for review  The Commissioner can also apply for review or act on behalf of an access requester with the requester’s consent  The Federal Court reviews the institution’s decision, not the Commissioner’s recommendations  The burden of proof lies with the party opposing disclosure of the records (normally the head of an institution)  If the Court finds that the head of an institution was not authorized to refuse disclosure, it will order that the records, or parts thereof, be released 19

State of Access to Information in Canada  The Access to Information Act has not changed significantly over 28 years  Numerous calls for overhaul reform since its adoption  Several policy reviews conducted  To date, piecemeal reform generated by triggering events but no comprehensive amendments to the Act 20

Significant Amendments Sanctions for obstructing right of access  The provision calls for fines of up to $10,000 and jail terms of up to 2 years for anyone who interferes with the right of access to information by destroying, falsifying or concealing a record or directing any person to do so Duty to Assist  The provision imposes a duty on institutions to make every reasonable effort to:  assist persons in connection with their requests for access to records under the control of the institution  to respond to the request accurately and completely, and  subject to regulations, provide access to the record in the format requested 21

Public Awareness  Reports to Parliament  Annual Reports  Special Reports, e.g. Report Cards  Advises Parliament  Appearances before the Standing Committee on Access to Information, Privacy and Ethics  Supports freedom of information certificate program at the University of Alberta  Intervenes in judicial review of significant cases 22

Public Awareness 23

Assessing Performance Compliance  The Office of the Information Commissioner monitors performance of federal institutions Report cards to assess the performance of institutions in responding to requests  6 out of 10 performed below average  30 day timeline becoming the exception rather than the norm  Greater use of time extensions for longer periods of time 24

Systemic Issues Deficiencies in information management  Exacerbated by the rapid pace of technology resulting in more time required to retrieve records and missing records  Growth in the volume of pages reviewed and processed Increasing number of consultations between institutions Insufficient qualified personnel Lack of leadership 25

Performance: Longer Waits... Time to complete access requests % 9.7% 0% 3.2%

… For Less Information Disclosed 27 *Information completely excluded or exempted, provided informally, or which could not be processed Source: Info Source Bulletins, Treasury Board Secretariat Disposition of requests over ten years Percentage Change Requests Completed 18,48924,70926,62129,47330,53033,28435,427 All Information Disclosed 41%27%28%23%18% 16%-24% Information Disclosed in Part 34%43%46%50%55%56%62%28% Other25%30%26%27% 26%22%3%

Improving Performance Leadership  Properly assess, resource and improve information management  Develop an integrated human resource plan to address gaps and support professionalism of access personnel through formal training and certification standards  Establish criteria to measure the performance of institutions in meeting their obligations under the Act Institutional level  Allocate adequate resources  Review processing methods to improve efficiency and timeliness  Improve tracking and reporting mechanisms 28

Looking to the Future - Challenges  Most significant change – information technology  Open government initiatives  Public-private sector partnerships  Global, knowledge-based service economy  Expectations of Canadians –Culture of service – most government information should be readily available and free –New generation of users born in electronic age 29

Legislative Modernization  Canada’s Access to Information Act must be strengthened to meet today’s imperatives  Work is urgently needed to modernize it from a legislative perspective and to align it with more progressive regimes both nationally and internationally  Order-making powers  Proactive disclosure schemes  Universal right of access  Public education mandate 30

Office of the Information Commissioner QUESTIONS??? 31