Friday 1 st December 2006 Careers & Employment Workshop Group B: Policy.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Welcome to Site Management Amy Thompson. Agenda I.Foundation Introductions Setting the Session Agenda II.Site Management Principles III.Site Management.
Advertisements

A Review of Grievances and Complaints Procedures Jan Stuart, Senior Consultant Human Resources Beverley Hill, Manager Equity and Diversity The University.
Head teacher Performance Management
Child Safeguarding Standards
HR Manager – HR Business Partners Role Description
Barry G Holland – Consulting Psychologist
The Draft SEN Code of Practice November What the Code is Nine chapters Statutory guidance on duties, policies and procedures relating to Part 3.
Session Objectives: For Mentors to know:
Working with HLTAs/TAs Dr John Woollard SEND Day 2015.
FACULTY OF HEALTH Capacity to Practise Safely – Students with Disability Undertaking Healthcare Courses Mike Spurr.
1 Introducing the Victorian Curriculum Reform 2004 Consultation Paper 2004 Consultation Paper A Framework of ‘Essential Learning’ April 2004.
1 Disability Standards for Education 2005 Issues for Parents, Primary Caregivers and Other Persons Involved with the Student.
School Development Planning Initiative
Information and advice Care Act Outline of content  Introduction Introduction  What the Act says: a duty on local authorities What the Act says:
Children’s Social Care Workload Management System (WMS) A Two-fold approach DSLT 16 th November 2010 Updated with new SWRB standards.
1 Question 5 : Are they well led? Supporting staff Temporary Staffing MAST Staff Appraisals.
The Role of the SEND Governor
Jubail Industrial College is pleased to announce short courses in Management For more information, please contact: Special Programs Industrial Relations.
Implementing the new Workload Policy Heads of School Workshop April 2010.
Access Planning in Partnership to support Students with Disabilities.
ACADEMIC INFRASTRUCTURE Framework for Higher Education Qualifications Subject Benchmark Statements Programme Specifications Code of Practice (for the assurance.
Little Acorns Preschool SEND Policy and Local Offer 2015.
Integration, cooperation and partnerships
Purpose of the Standards
Selly Oak Nursery School What can I expect of Selly Oak Nursery School if my child has Special Educational Needs? Open and honest communication A partnership.
SUBTITLE DAY, MONTH, YEAR Accreditation Support for Teachers Introduction to Accreditation at Proficient Teacher Module 5 of 5.
1 CHCOHS312A Follow safety procedures for direct care work.
 VASSP Managing Education Support Staff Underperformance Presenter : Robyn Buckeridge Victorian Association of State Secondary Principals.
Governor Introductions How long since your appointment? What type of governor and school? How many meetings attended so far? What do you hope to get out.
Draft Code of Practice – General Consultation / Implementation Sue Woodgate.
February 8, 2012 Session 3: Performance Management Systems 1.
Adapted from a presentation by Mark Lieu Academic Senate for California Community Colleges - Leadership Institute 2006 Academic Senate for California Community.
Future Aspirations Dr Maire Shelly Associate Postgraduate Dean North Western Deanery.
Special Educational Needs and Disability in our school
Copyright  2005 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd PPTs t/a Australian Human Resources Management by Jeremy Seward and Tim Dein Slides prepared by Michelle.
Implementation of the Essential Standards The Australian Quality Framework (AQTF) is the national set of standards which assures nationally consistent,
3-MINUTE READ Draft SEN Code of Practice: for 0 to 25 years.
The Personal Tutoring System Background for new personal tutors and other student support staff.
Personal Tutoring. Purposes of this session To confirm our understanding of the purposes and procedures of the Personal Tutoring Scheme To identify key.
ASSESSMENT TASK 5 PRESENTATION ON : THE LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES. THE LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES. THE LEVEL OF THE STAKEHOLDER. THE LEVEL OF THE STAKEHOLDER.
Teaching and Supporting Students with Vision Impairments An Australian Universities Teaching Committee Funded Project WAANU Conference March 2005.
Duke Ellington “A problem is a chance for you to do your best.”
Page 1 Fall, 2010 Regional Cross Sector Meeting Elements of an Effective Protocol.
Year 1 School Based Training Briefing 2. Have you: developed an understanding of how children learn? developed an understanding of the range and diversity.
Information for External Examiners involved in Academic Collaborative Provision - 12 Nov 2014.
Copyright  2005 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd PPTs t/a Australian Human Resources Management by Jeremy Seward and Tim Dein Slides prepared by Michelle.
The Right Support Ron Crichton Senior Psychologist GCC Education Services June 2011 Education Services.
Towards a health and wellbeing service framework a discussion paper for consultation.
SENJIT Code of Practice update and SEND Support Plans.
TAA1 TEACHER WORKSHOP Learning and Innovation. PROGRAM OUTLINE Workshop Introduction Overview of the TAA Scheme Outline of the TAA1 Process TAA 1 Action.
SESSION SIX YOU ARE NOT ALONE SERVICES WHICH ARE AVAILABLE TO HELP.
OFFICIAL – SENSITIVE English Language Requirement for Public Sector Workers Draft Code of Practice Consultation.
Assessment Validation. MORE THAN YOU IMAGINE ASQA (Australian Skills Quality Authority) New National Regulator ASQA as of 1 July, 2011.
Employment Skills for Communications Technology..
Angela McKinnon Child health lead Aberdeenshire CHP NHS Grampian Jan 2015.
Ofsted’s approach to safeguarding in inspections Nick Gadfield HMI National Advisor Cross Ofsted Safeguarding ALP conference, 24 March 2010.
Attendance Advisory Panels 1. Outcomes Understanding of the purpose of Attendance Advisory Panels (AAPs) as part of a plan for restoring attendance Familiarity.
The Common Assessment Framework (CAF) & Lead Professional (LP)
SPECIAL EDUCATIONAL NEEDS & DISABILITY CODE OF PRACTICE 2015 HOW THIS APPLIES TO FURTHER EDUCATION.
LLR LSCB MULTI-AGENCY SAFEGUARDING PROCEDURES 3.7 Escalation of Concerns and Resolving Practitioner Disagreements
Thursday 30 th November 2006 Teaching & Learning Workshop Group C Prac Placements/Workplace Learning.
SEN, disability and the EYFS
NURS 3043 ELA 5 Transition to Practice
Careers & Employment Workshop
OHS Staff Introduction Training
Gem Complete Health Services
Welcome to the CSBM operational workshop:
Assessing educational/training competencies of trainers of trainers
CEng progression through the IOM3
Presentation transcript:

Friday 1 st December 2006 Careers & Employment Workshop Group B: Policy

POLICY “Employment rates for people with a disability must be improved.” There is a range of policy issues which are relevant to career development and employment for people with disability. There is a range of policy issues which are relevant to career development and employment for people with disability. These include the impact of “Welfare Reform”, industrial relations legislation and institution policies relating to the provision of careers and employment. This Workshop will consider these and other issues including: accommodations in real world employment accommodations in real world employment Registration Board and workplace requirements Registration Board and workplace requirements transition from study/training to work – whose responsibility? transition from study/training to work – whose responsibility?

OBJECTIVE: “Identify what we can do now to improve policies and transition processes” POLICY “Employment rates for people with a disability must be improved.” There is a range of policy issues which are relevant to career development and employment for people with disability. These include the impact of “Welfare Reform”, industrial relations legislation and institution policies relating to the provision of careers and employment. This Workshop will consider these and other issues including: accommodations in real world employment accommodations in real world employment Registration Board and workplace requirements Registration Board and workplace requirements transition from study/training to work – whose responsibility? transition from study/training to work – whose responsibility?

“Communication, Partnerships and Issues Resolution” Trudy Haak & Mike Spurr

Key issues for DLOs: How do we minimise conflict & negative outcomes for students How do we share the conciliatory role we are often locked into How do we promote a consistent approach to the resolution of communication breakdown Introduction

As a teacher how does one identify and implement reasonable accommodations for individual students, engage them in their responsibility to learn and resolve arising issues, all in a way that optimises learning opportunities for all students in the class? Whilst it is appropriate for a teacher to accommodate the needs of individual students, it is also appropriate for individual students to accommodate the needs of all other students in the class, in accordance with Government legislation and institutional policies and procedures. Context

This Showcase Presentation will introduce for discussion processes whereby teaching staff are able to: exercise professional judgment to ensure that decisions relating to addressing teaching and learning issues are made in accordance with institutional policies and procedures; access collegial support and advice for their interactions with students with complex issues; support students’ needs through consistent provision of ‘reasonable accommodations’ whilst providing optimum learning experiences and minimising risk for all students and self; problem solve using an ‘Issue Identification & Resolution Procedure’; and implement action resolution processes which provide clear and explicit communication across all stakeholders.

ISSUE If issues relating to academic progress occur, it is important for students to raise these with the relevant academic school. Students report most issues to lecturers, tutors, sessional teaching staff, practicum placement supervisors and general staff via phone or brief verbal communication, often at a busy time.

This can result in unproductive outcomes because the student often is unclear about the issue in the first instance and the staff person notified, in responding ‘on the run’, provides: a response which is incorrect or inconsistent with responses provided to other students; doesn’t have the authority to act on the issue; passes on incorrect information to another staff member; or simply forgets in the hustle and bustle of their working day. Importantly also, there is no written record kept of the issue and response. Any or all of these ingredients can lead to the build up of complex issues and risk of the student making a formal complaint.

Example – UTAS Operational Procedure Related UTAS Policy Ordinance 8 Student Complaints Code of Conduct for Teaching and Learning The Academic Progress Issues Resolution Procedure outlines the steps required to meet the University’s commitment to resolving issues relating to students’ academic progress.

Procedure To address issues which impact on academic progress through their course, students are expected to notify the Unit Coordinator via as to the nature of the issue. These issues include: Personal, family or health issue affecting attendance or performance Health condition or disability affecting attendance or performance Interpersonal or communication misunderstanding Assessment Once notified the Unit Coordinator will respond via to students to: address the issues, with other staff as necessary; and/or arrange a meeting with the student; and/or refer the student to appropriate UTAS services for students.

Issues Resolution Guidelines for Unit Coordinators Principles 1.Take a supportive approach. Good practice = minimised risk. 2.Aim for early intervention by encouraging students to raise issues in order to prevent small issues from becoming complex and large. 3.View the student as the client and work to develop a partnership with them in the resolution of issues. 4.Use professional judgement and always refer to UTAS/School policies and procedures. This removes the individual from the process. 5.Provide an informed, considered response. Consult with colleagues, UTAS service providers and the Head of School.

Guideline Checklist 1.Accurately identify the issue and strategies for resolution: Issue 1 Is it a teaching and learning issue generated by the STUDENT or the STAFF member? ResolutionIdentify how the STUDENT is to address the learning issue or the STAFF member is to address the teaching issue? Issue 2Is it a health condition, severe family or personal issue impacting on the student’s ability to undertake study? Resolution Refer the student to a Disability Adviser or Student Counsellor and/or identify reasonable accommodations, ‘to enable flexible adjustment of course requirements in order to reduce the implications of the issue on study, whilst maintaining academic standards’.

Issue 3Is it an interpersonal misunderstanding or conflict issue? ResolutionClarify the roles and responsibilities of all parties involved. Initiate conflict resolution if required. Issue 4Is it a disruptive behaviour issue? ResolutionAddress the behaviour in accordance with the processes contained within the online UTAS Services and Support, Staff Resources: Addressing Disruptive Student Behaviour Disruptive Student Behaviour Agreement

2. Seek advice and/or assistance with Issues Management from Student Services. 3. Clearly and explicitly communicate and document the issues and resolution strategies agreed upon by all parties. 4. Maintain an accurate record of the issues and resolutions.