Towards a methodology to define „Favourable Conservation Status“ for birds examples from Austria Michael Dvorak, BirdLife Österreich.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Natura 2000 in the Netherlands John Janssen Alterra, Wageningen (NL)
Advertisements

EC Habitats Directive (With focus on the marine environment) MARCOS Kick off meeting Åsa Andersson, February 2007.
WORKSHOP ON THE INTERACTION BETWEEN THE EIA AND THE NATURE DIRECTIVES Barcelona, October 2013 Case study based on Case C-342/05 And Case C-409/09.
1 CEER How to balance the public’s concerns and critical infrastructure construction Matti Vainio, Deputy HoU DG ENV – C.5, European Commission.
458 Estimating Extinction Risk (the IUCN criteria) Fish 458; Lecture 24.
Milan Janák Field Mapping Training Workshop, 13 – 17 June, 2011 Instructions for field inventory of species in Montenegro listed under Habitats Directive.
Priority Species Indicator Aichi Target 12: By 2020 the extinction of known threatened species has been prevented and their conservation status, particularly.
CEEWEB Academy III Strengthening civil participation in the implementation of EU nature conservation directives through the experiences gained by the 10.
Population Dynamics of the Northern Spotted Owl Reasons for Listing, Current Status, and Recovery Strategy May 8, 2014.
Defining Responsible Forest Management FSC Forest Certification Standards Defining Responsible Forest Management Version:
New Zealand Sea Lions Historic and Present Day Threats.
Factors of Extinction Why are some species more or less prone to extinction?
The 2010 Red List of Finnish species: the assessment work in practice Ilpo Mannerkoski Finnish Environment Institute Syktyvkar
WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT IN NEW BRUNSWICK. WHY MANAGE WILDLIFE? Provincial MANDATE to manage populations of all wild species, their habitats and use, for the.
DG Env.B21 EU nature directives András Demeter Enlargement coordinator Nature & Biodiversity Unit, Directorate-General Environment, European Commission.
1 Expert workshop on components of EEA Ecosystem Capital Accounts Focus on biomass carbon and biodiversity data 24/03/2015.
Natura EU ambitions for a coherent ecological network State of Play and Challenges Saskia Richartz Institute for European Environmental Policy.
ASSESSING AND MANAGING WILDLAND RECREATIONAL DISTURBANCE Stephen J. DeMaso, Fidel Hernández, and Leonard A. Brennan Caesar Kleberg Wildlife Research Institute,
Review of the implementation in England of the Habitats and Wild Birds Directives Nature Directors 23 May 2012 Robin Mortimer, Defra.
Prof. Dr. G. Van Hoorick Faculty of Law – Department of Administrative and Environmental Law pag. 1 COMPENSATORY MEASURES IN EUROPEAN NATURE CONSERVATION.
Rarity To determine what species or community is in dire need of conservation, we need to understand what rarity is. Deborah Rabinowitz (1981, 1986) described.
Rare, Threatened, & Endangered Wildlife What causes some species to become rare or extinct? How does management of rare, threatened, & endangered species.
What Does it Mean When >80 Equals Spotted Owl Habitat?
European Commission, DG Environment, Nature Unit
Review of the ecosystem condition account
Biodiversity Health Index Main Streams for Life John MacKinnon UNDP consultant June 2012.
Development of a process for setting Conservation Objectives Dr Rebecca Jeffrey Science and Biodiversity Section National Parks and Wildlife Service Ireland.
European Topic Centre on Biological Diversity EIONET NRC Meeting on Biodiversity October 2011, Copenhagen Progress.
THE NEW REPORTING SYSTEM Photo: Kristina Eriksson Mats Eriksson N2K Group.
Assessing status and trends of birds in the European Union: Assessing status and trends of birds in the European Union: Reviewing methods and experience.
Management of the coastal and marine environment: The legal framework of the European Union from the first EEC Directives to the Water Framework Directive.
What is it about? Presents first results of applying MAES analytical framework and outlines the advantages and constraints of European ecosystem assessments.
Setting conservation objectives for Natura 2000 François Kremer DG ENV.B.3 Expert Group Natura 2000 Management Meeting of 23 November 2011
The Habitats Directive in BANES A (brief) guide to the most commonly encountered legal issues.
Southern North Sea Marine Protected Areas – Proposed Fisheries Management Measures.
Natura 2000 site boundary changes a reminder of the reporting rules Expert Group on the Birds and Habitats Directives, 15 October 2014.
EEA Biodiversity, Agriculture and Forest work in 2010 and beyond EEA/NRC Agriculture Meeting 2010 Ivone Pereira Martins, HoG – Biodiversity, Agriculture.
IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature) risk of extinction The IUCN Red List assessment estimates risk of extinction What is the likelihood.
COMMISSION NOTE ON THE DESIGNATION OF SPECIAL AREAS OF CONSERVATION (SACs) Habitats Committee Brussels, 13 May 2011.
Developing conservation objectives © L. Campbell.
Platform Meeting Rudbøl, Denmark Olaf G. Christiani, DFNA.
Some Wildlife Census Techniques
REPORTING PURSUANT TO ART. 17 OF THE HABITATS DIRECTIVE
Ecosystem Health Index Main Streams for Life
Natura 2000, the Ecological Network of the European Union
CH16: Species Management
Principles and rationale for SAC/SPA designation and management
Structure of the guidelines Reminder on next steps
WP 2: Align / synchronise progress reporting under both directives
Carlos Romão | 23 March 2018 Joint meeting on biodiversity assessment and reporting under the MSFD and HBD Nature reporting under the Birds Directive.
Work on the coherence of data-flows / improving data-quality
Draft revised terms of reference Working Group on estuaries and coastal zones conservation issues.
Revised Art 12 reporting format
The new Article 12 reporting system under the Birds Directive
Conservation objectives: The favourable conservation status
Notes on Birds and Habitats Directives in Estonia
The IUCN Red List.
Measuring progress towards Target 1
Typical Species Included in the definition of ‘Favourable Conservation Status’ No definition given in the Directive For Article 17 assessments treated.
Dealing with change in Article 17 reporting
Setting conservation objectives for Natura 2000
PROVISIONS UNDER THE HABITATS DIRECTIVE RELEVANT TO NEEI
Conservation Guidance Concept Form
Population Conservation
Turbine collision risk for birds
CH16: Species Management
WP 2: Align / synchronise progress reporting under both directives
The State of Nature in the EU
Natura 2000 & Article 17 databases: their potential use in the frame of the Prioritised Action Framework (PAF) Frank Vassen, Unit D3 – nature conservation,
Measuring progress under Target 1 of the EU 2020 Biodiversity Strategy
Presentation transcript:

Towards a methodology to define „Favourable Conservation Status“ for birds examples from Austria Michael Dvorak, BirdLife Österreich

Article 7 Obligations arising under Article 6 (2), (3) and (4) of this Directive shall replace any obligations arising under the first sentence of Article 4 (4) of Directive 79/409/EEC in respect of areas classified pursuant to Article 4 (1) or similarly recognised under Article 4 (2) thereof, as from the date of implementation of this Directive or the date of classification or recognition by a Member State under Directive 79/409/EEC, where the latter date is later. Is the „Favourable Conservation Status“ relevant to the Birds Directive ?

Population dynamics data on the species concerned indicate that it is maintaining itself on a long-term basis as a viable component of its natural habitats The natural range of the species is neither being reduced for the forseeable future There is, and probably continue to be, a sufficiently large habitat to maintain its population on a long-term basis „Conservation Status“ is favourable when

Three sets of criteria Population Range Habitat

Population Population size Population trend Reproductive success Mortality Others

Range size of range number of occupied grid cells number of populations/sites

Habitat area of suitable habitat quality of habitat disturbance through human impact

Spatial scale European Union (single site/population) Special Protection Area Member State

Problems I Availability of data Rare species, restricted distribution Rare species, wide distribution Common species, restricted distribution Common species, wide distribution

Problems II interpretation of data Population fluctuations Factors outside breeding range climatic factors others

Assessments at the national level Red list status Population trend

Assessments at the site level species-specific combination of indicators (at least one per criterion)

Great White Egret IndicatorABC Population trend (10 yrs) stable or increase small decline (20-50 %) large decline (> 50 %) Number of colonies >7 >75-7 < 5 Reproductive success >1.4 juv. /pair juv./pair < 1 juv. /pair < 1 juv. /pair Area of reedbed not harvested or burnt > 50 % % < 25 %

Corncrake IndicatorABC Occurrence (last 10 years) (almost) yearly 4-8 years< 4 years max. number of calling males > 3 Indiv.2-3 Indiv.single birds Reproductive success regularlysingle cases no late mown grassland> 10 ha<10 hanone