If You Build It – They May Not Come! Sam Corbett, UC San Diego 2008 Sustainability Conference August 2, 2008 How to advance sustainable transportation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
University District Zoning and Planning Regulatory Review Project Overview and Summary For Winter 2008 Public Meetings.
Advertisements

Transport.tamu.edu TAMU Mode Split Survey October 2011.
December 3, 2014| Nadine Navarro Manager, Smart Commute, Metrolinx NEW DIRECTIONS FOR SMART COMMUTE, METROLINX.
Core Campus Parking Analysis Executive Facilities Committee: Discussion FEB
1000 El Camino Real Menlo Park, CA Phone Fax An Economic Evaluation of the 2005 IEPR Michael C. Keeley,
Transportation Demand Management: Transport Canada Initiatives Canadian TDM Summit, November RDIMS
PARKING COMMISSION. CITY PARKING SYSTEM SPACE COUNT BY FACILITY.
Markham Centre TDM and Land Development Case Study ACT Canada – TDM Summit October 21, 2008.
Overcoming Barriers to Smart Growth: Surprisingly Large Role of Better Transportation Modeling based on a paper presented at the ACEEE Summer Study August.
Dr Lina Shbeeb Minister of Transport. Jordan
LOGO 1 Sustainable Transportation Research and Practical Needs for Asian Countries Pawinee IAMTRAKUL, Thammasat University 24 November 2009 Asian Institute.
UCSF Child Care Status Report
CONGESTION PRICING Traffic Solution or Tax Scheme?
Parking and Transportation Technical Advisory Subcommittee Update April 21, 2010.
Doing our Share to Clear the Air. Sustain-ability? Sustain-ability?  Ability to Sustain  Are there enough resources on planet Earth for all to have.
TRANSPORTATION POLICY COMMITTEE FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS PROFESSIONAL AND TECHNICAL STAFF COUNCIL ALUMNI CENTER APRIL 2, 2003.
SOM LRDP Discussion Historic trends and projection of growth in size of clinical and research faculty (assumptions need to be challenged and data validated)
Parking and Transportation Services Presentation December 2, 2008.
1 WHY STREETLINE? The Clemson University Story: A holistic approach to creating sustainable, cost effective parking and transportation management solutions.
Transportation Services Update Faculty Senate - December 11, 2014.
Business Logistics 420 Public Transportation Lectures 8: The Performance and Condition of Transit in the United States.
Bikes are the answer! Meeting transportation, financial and Climate Action Plan goals with bicycle programs.
Less Traffic, Better Places Rethinking Parking Policy Patrick Siegman Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates.
Basic Social Marketing Principles and Process. Outline Social marketing process: Identify goals Segment and target Develop the “4 p’s” –Product, price,
Module 3 SMART PARKING 1. Module 3 Smart Parking Goals for Smart Parking Balance parking supply and demand Consider innovative parking management policies.
Centers and Corridors Parking Project Boise Land Use and Transportation Committee Meeting June 22,
Alamo Region Livability Summit Local Plans: The Decade of Downtown Ben Brewer Wednesday, August 21, 2013 San Anto Cultural Arts “La Paleta” 1.
TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference Houston, Texas May 2009 Ann Arbor Transportation Plan Update-- Connecting the Land Use & Transportation.
11. 2 Public Transportation’s Role in a Greenhouse Gas Reduction Strategy Kevin Desmond King County Metro Transit Division Seattle, WA On behalf of the.
Orange County Business Council Infrastructure Committee December 14, 2010 Draft Long-Range Transportation Plan Destination 2035.
Reacting to Trends Rising gas prices! Decreasing public funding for transportation. TDM becoming more needed in new development. Modified tax benefit.
PTIS Project Update October 26 – 28, PTIS Project Objective Recommend transit investments and land use strategies for urban and rural Fresno County.
Beyond the Environment: Socio- Economic Sustainability & Meaningful Community Input in Land Use Decisions Sarah Muller March 7 th, 2008.
South Lake Union On-Street Parking Plan November 1, 2005.
OSU Transportation Services Faculty Senate Update December 11, 2014.
Washington Park Alliance (WPA) Neighborhood Workshop Parking & Transportation Management Plan Oregon Zoo - Cascade Grille April 27,
Transport.tamu.edu The mode of transportation I use to get to campus the majority of the time is: Drive alone3826 (49 %) Carpool526 (7 %) Ride Transit2277.
2004 State of the Commute Survey: Assessing the Impacts of Regional Transportation Demand Management National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board.
GHG Reduction Strategies Survey Results October 15, 2013 Policy Advisory Committee.
ELearning Committee Strategic Plan, A Brief History of the ELC Committee Developed and Charged (2004) CMS Evaluation and RFP Process (2004)
UC San Diego Transit and Shuttle Funding Issues Fall Quarter 2009.
UCSD Student Center: The Center of a Green Campus ENVS 664 Ta-You Huang Oct 16 th, 2012.
Urban Sprawl Government notices problems in the 1980s –Urban sprawl –Car ownership rising (1960: 113/ : 422/1000) –Little housing for low income.
Alameda County Transportation Services – CCBA Panel Reducing Our Carbon Footprint from Transportation Phillip Kobernick, Alameda County General Services.
GCAA Feb 17, Results 1.2 million miles of travel 600 tons of air pollution Each day these efforts reduce: Currently partnering with more than 1650.
JUNE 27, 2013 ARB INFORMATIONAL UPDATE: ASSOCIATION OF BAY AREA GOVERNMENTS’/ METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION’S DRAFT SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES STRATEGY.
NAROPA UNIVERSITY Strategic Plan As Voted On By Naropa’s Board of Trustees “Deliver Distinction With Excellence” September 19, 2008.
San Diego Trolley. Current Current/future expansion Propose extension.
UCLA TRANSPORTATION Getting to Campus. Sustainable Transportation UC Goals – Carbon-Neutrality in Operations by 2025 – Sustainability Practices by 2020.
Road Impact Fee Update Discussion Item June 21, 2011 Transportation Impact Fee Update Discussion Item June 21, 2011.
TDM - Vancouver Experiences Strategic Transportation Planning, Sustainability Group TDM - Vancouver Experience October 21 st ACT TDM Summit 2008 Jo Yee.
1 COALITION NAME Workplace Charging Challenge Presenter Title Date.
Data Driven Transportation Office Ramses Madou Stanford Parking & Transportation Services CHESC 2014.
From Here to There: Transportation Demand Strategies to Support the Grounds Plan at the University of Virginia Presented by Chris Conklin, P.E.
1 National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board September 21, 2005 Gasoline Prices and Commuting Alternatives.
Long-Range Planning for a Green Transportation Program: The UCLA Experience Presented to: UC/CSU/CCC Sustainability Conference July/August 2008 Renee A.
Key Trends Shaping Transportation System Management Operations Timothy Papandreou CIO, Director Office of Innovation San Francisco Municipal Transportation.
Affordable Rental Housing Plan A PEACE INITIATIVE March 19, 2010.
2012 AITPM Conference Parking Supply Restriction and Mode Shift at QEII Medical Centre: A Case Study Jacob Martin, Senior Transport Planner Cardno.
City Council – Project Update September 14, 2015.
Sustainable Transportation in Campus Planning and Capital Projects Charlotte Strem Acting Director Physical and Environmental Planning UC Office of the.
Sustainability Programs
Parking and Transportation Master Plan Executive Summary
Planning and Parking Forum
Kings County Commute Data
If You Build It – They May Not Come!
TAMU Mode Split Survey October 2011.
Drive alone 3826 (49 %) Carpool 526 (7 %) Ride Transit 2277 (29 %)
Downtown Parking Update Parking Advisory Committee
Presentation transcript:

If You Build It – They May Not Come! Sam Corbett, UC San Diego 2008 Sustainability Conference August 2, 2008 How to advance sustainable transportation AND save your campus $50 million

Background on UC Growth Trends Related to Transportation  As a system, we are expecting to increase student enrollment by 22% by 2020 – an increase of approximately 48,000 FTE students.  As student enrollments increase, commensurate staff and faculty increases will also occur.  Many campuses have a LRDP goal of housing up to 50% of students on campus.

Background on UC Growth Trends Related to Transportation  From a transportation perspective, we are actively pursuing more sustainable transportation practices.  At UC San Diego, we had plans to build 13 parking structures to add 11,500 parking spaces by  However, only 3 of these parking structures were built and we’re currently pursuing transportation demand management approaches instead of building more parking structures.

LRT Station Options UC San Diego Campus Buildout

UC San Diego Parking and Transportation Study  Study evaluated future parking demand accounting for population growth, impacts upon parking supply, and projected campus mode splits.  Campus parking goal is not to exceed parking occupancy standard of 95% - parking occupancy is currently 80% during peak periods.  Key finding: additional parking structures are not necessary if transportation demand management techniques are aggressively pursued to meet transportation needs of future campus population.

UCSD Population and Parking Utilization ( to )

Parking Occupancy by Neighborhood

Influencing Factors upon Parking Demand  Price of gas – oil prices have more than doubled in the past 4 years and will likely continue to increase.  Cost of parking – UC San Diego parking permit prices have increased by 61-66% since which has kept demand flat.  Availability of alternative transportation – UCSD’s very strong commitment to alternative transportation has reduced drive alone rates from 66% in 2001 to 49% in 2008; this trend is likely to continue.

U.S. Average Retail Gasoline Price, Regular Grade (Per Gallon)

UCSD Commute Mode Split (1996 – 2008)

University Costs to Accommodate Campus Commuters

Parking Structure Costs StructureCostTotal SpacesNet Spaces Cost per Net Space La Jolla Medical Center $30 M1000 $29,130 University Center$27.1 M800 $33,875 Revelle$50.3 M $39,530 School of Medicine$33.1 M $42,205 Muir$55.5 M $43,455

Projected Monthly Parking Permit Fees ( ) StructureReserved Permit Faculty Permit Staff PermitStudent Permit Approx. % Increase (07/08 – 12/13) No Structures$210$112$96$7321% UCSDMC-LJ$217$116$101$7625% University Center$239$128$111$8437% School of Medicine$249$133$115$8843% Revelle$275$148$127$9658% Muir$284$150$131$9963%

UC San Diego’s TDM Initiatives to Meet Transportation Needs Policy MeasureExpected Reduction in Parking Demand Expand and market alternative transportation options to include carpooling, vanpooling and public transit 2,500 – 3,000 spaces Encourage bicycling and improve conditions for bicycling and other non-motorized transportation 200 – 300 spaces Restrict parking for resident freshmen 1,000 spaces Total3,700 – 4,300 spaces

Lessons Learned  Let the prices do the planning – increasing costs of driving/parking are naturally leading people to more sustainable transportation options.  Go green – sustainability and fiscal responsibility are integrally connected and often complement each other.  Communication is key – extensive campus outreach was critical to getting unanimous vote from our advisory committee to not build additional parking structures.  Be creative – in the carbon-constrained world in which we live, we must question assumptions and constantly find new and better ways of doing our business and serving our customers.

Back to the Future…

QUESTIONS? This concludes the American Institute of Architects Continuing Education Systems Program.