Evaluating Training The Kirkpatrick Model.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SNDT Women's University Introduction to Evaluation and Assessments  Presented by Kathleen (Kat) Miller, Senior Consultant with Booz Allen Hamilton  4.
Advertisements

Training Evaluation Presentation by Ranjith Menon.
Succession and talent management
Copyright © Questionmark Corporation and/or Questionmark Computing Limited, known collectively as Questionmark. All rights reserved. Questionmark.
Fred Barranger (N72) John Wishall (N721B) 24 February 2015
Managing Learning and Knowledge Capital Human Resource Development: Chapter 11 Evaluation Copyright © 2010 Tilde University Press.
Unit 10: Evaluating Training and Return on Investment 2009.
Evaluating the Effectiveness of Your Training: Kirkpatrick’s 4 Levels Left Click to move to next slide and begin next audio. PRESS the F5 key to begin.
Evaluation is a professional and ethical responsibility and is a core part of PHN professional practice Commitment to evaluation helps build the PHN intelligence.
Evaluation in the Field: Putting Concepts into Action Janet Myers, PhD MPH Richard Vezina, MPH CAPS HIV Prevention Conference April 21, 2006.
Evaluating Training Programs. How can training programs be evaluated? Measures used in evaluating training programs Measures used in evaluating training.
Getting to a Return on Investment for Transportation Training Presented by: Victoria Beale, JD, SPHR Ohio LTAP Center Director August 1, 2012 – Grapevine,
Training and Development
The Role of Assessment in the EdD – The USC Approach.
‘Innovative Nutrition & Swallowing Training’ Leah Platt Community Dietitian September 2011.
Sina Keshavaarz M.D Public Health &Preventive Medicine Measuring level of performance & sustaining improvement.
Educational Solutions for Workforce Development Unit 8 – How to Evaluate Aim To provide an overview of how to effectively evaluate learning programmes.
Support the spread of “good practice” in generating, managing, analysing and communicating spatial information Training Needs Assessment (TNA) By: Rainer.
Evaluating Training Effort Organisations are under pressure to justify various expenses. Business heads and training managers are under pressure to prove.
Course on Data Analysis and Interpretation P Presented by B. Unmar Sponsored by GGSU PART 2 Date: 5 July
Kirkpatrick’s Levels of Evaluation
TRAINING EVALUATION WHAT? WHAT? WHY? WHY? HOW? HOW? SO WHAT? SO WHAT?
Evaluation and Case Study Review Dr. Lam TECM 5180.
Human Resource DevelopmentMuhammad Adnan Sarwar 1 Training and Development Human Resource Management.
This project is financed by the European Union 1 The project is implemented by a European Profiles S.A. led consortium Evaluation of Training By Senior.
Evaluating Teacher Training changing classroom practices Richard Lambert, Ph.D.
Systems Life Cycle. Know why it is necessary to evaluate a new system Understand the need to evaluate in terms of ease-of- use, appropriateness and efficiency.
Dr. Shulagna Sarkar Assistant Professor , Jt. Coordinator – PGDM – HRM
EVALUATION OF HRD PROGRAMS Jayendra Rimal. The Purpose of HRD Evaluation HRD Evaluation – the systematic collection of descriptive and judgmental information.
Ajay Sharma Country Manager & Head HR ST Ericsson India Coaching for Training Effectiveness.
Evaluation: what is it? Anita Morrison. What is evaluation? Evaluation… –…is the process of determining the merit, worth, or value of something, or the.
Technology Enhanced Learning at University - How can learning enhancement be demonstrated? Adrian Kirkwood & Linda Price IET, The Open University.
Strategic Human resource Management Training & Developing.
Chapter 4 TRAINING & DEVELOPMENT. Introduction Need for organizations to build and sustain competencies that would provide them with competitive advantage.
Evaluation: Methods & Concerns Otojit Kshetrimayum V.V. Giri National Labour Institute, Noida
3.4 How do businesses operate1 Unit 4.3 What Aids Decision Making?
SIUC Instructor Workshop Introduction to Assessment and Evaluation.
Program Evaluation DR. MAJED WADI. Objectives  Design necessary parameters used for program evaluation  Accept different views of program evaluation.
Kirkpatrick’s Four-Level Model of Evaluation
1 Training. Who needs training? When is training necessary? What makes training programs effective? How are training outcomes measured? Training Basics.
1 The project is financed from the European Union funds within the framework of Erasmus+, Key Action 2: Cooperation for innovation and the exchange of.
This project is financed by the European Union 1 The project is implemented by a European Profiles S.A. led consortium Evaluation of Training By Senior.
1 Training. Who needs training? When is training necessary? What makes training programs effective? How are training outcomes measured? Training Basics.
Employee Development Human Resource Management. Employee Training: Trends n Four economic and demographic trends u Unskilled and undereducated youth u.
Kaplan University Writing CenterSaturday, March 05, IX520 Needs Assessment and Evaluation in Education and Training Unit 7 Seminar September 13,
Output of Development Phase Training Title: Training Duration: Trainer: Seating: Target Population: Overall Training Objectives: After having attended.
Improved socio-economic services for a more social microfinance.
Educational Communication & E-learning
The Learning Practitioner: A performance in five acts
Evaluation Emma King.
Training Trainers and Educators Unit 8 – How to Evaluate
Delivery of Training & Monitoring & Evaluation
Project No EPP EL-EPPKA2-CBHE-JP ( ) UES TEAM
Evaluation of Information Literacy Education
BEST PRACTICES IN LIBRARY INSTRUCTION FORUM November 7, 2007
Chapter Six Training Evaluation.
NATIONAL 5 PHYSICAL EDUCATION
Training Trainers and Educators Unit 8 – How to Evaluate
Chapter 2 Performance Management Process
SPIRIT OF HR.in TRAINING EVALUATION.
GETTING ‘EVEN’ BETTER: FIVE LEVELS FOR PD EVALUATION
Education Theory and Practice B ETP520S
Presenter: Angelia Bendolph Harkcon, Inc.
Measuring Course Effectiveness
OD Interventions Unit-3.
Kirkpatrick’s Four Levels of Evaluation
Presentation transcript:

Evaluating Training The Kirkpatrick Model

The Four Levels Level 1: Reaction To what degree participants react favorably to the training Level 2: Learning To what degree participants acquire the intended knowledge, skills, attitudes, confidence, and commitment based on their participation in a training event Level 3: Behavior To what degree participants apply what they learned during training when they are back on the job Level 4: Results To what degree targeted outcomes occur as a result of the training event and subsequent reinforcement

Level One Reaction Reaction evaluation is how the delegates felt about the training or learning experience. 'Happy sheets', feedback forms. Verbal reaction, post-training surveys or questionnaires. Quick and very easy to obtain. Not expensive to gather or to analyse.

Level Two Learning Learning evaluation is the measurement of the increase in knowledge - before and after. Typically assessments or tests before and after the training. Interview or observation can also be used. Relatively simple to set up; clear-cut for quantifiable skills. Less easy for complex learning.

Level Three Behaviour Behaviour evaluation is the extent of applied learning back on the job - implementation. Observation and interview over time are required to assess change, relevance of change, and sustainability of change. Measurement of behaviour change typically requires cooperation and skill of line-managers.

Level Four Results  Results evaluation is the effect on the business or environment by the trainee. Measures are already in place via normal management systems and reporting - the challenge is to relate to the trainee. Individually not difficult; unlike whole organisation. Process must attribute clear accountabilities.