Promoting a Sustainable Culture of Assessment Faculty of Arts Half Day retreat on assessment September 17, 2009 University of Southern Queensland Australia.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Qualifications Update: National 5 Drama Qualifications Update: National 5 Drama.
Advertisements

Introducing Unit Specifications and Unit Assessment Support Packs for Drama National 3 to 5.
PQF Induction: Small group delivery or 1-1 session.
Developing an Effective Tracking and Improvement System for Learning and Teaching Achievements and Future Challenges in Maintaining Academic Standards.
Comparison of Teacher-Centered and Learner-Centered Paradigms From Figure 1-2 in Huba and Freed, Learner-Centered Assessment on College Campuses: Shifting.
[Insert faculty Banner] Consistency of Assessment
ANDREA REID EMPLOYABILITY COORDINATOR THE UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND BRISBANE, AUSTRALIA Business smart: a 3-phase approach to inducting new students.
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
CEET Conference 2011 Funding VET for Social Inclusion Competitive tendering and contestable funding in VET: approaches to supporting access and equity.
Renewed Outcomes-based Curriculum 6-9. Purpose for Renewal Teacher feedback –Provide concise & coherent curriculum –Time allocations have not changed.
Consistency of Assessment
Curriculum, Instruction, & Assessment
A TAFE Development Centre Workshop: Digging into VET Policy An exploration of VET policy directions at state and federal levels: The policy context for.
University of Delaware Experience It Yourself: An Introduction to Problem-Based Learning Institute for Transforming Undergraduate Education George Watson.
Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European
CPD4k Skills Competitions, CIF & PS
Australia’s Vocational Education & Training (VET) System  Nationally agreed  Strong industry leadership and engagement  Provides skills and knowledge.
Centre for University Pathways and Partnerships Social Inclusion – the UTAS context Prof Sue Kilpatrick & Dr Susan Johns.
Principles of Assessment
Session 8: Cross sectoral collaboration: future directions in Australia Presented by: Neville MooDepartment of Education and Training Craig SetterDepartment.
Rediscovering Research: A Path to Standards Based Learning Authentic Learning that Motivates, Constructs Meaning, and Boosts Success.
Dharmadeo Luchoomun1 Joe McLuckie1, and Maarten van Wesel2 Prepared By: Aiswarya Gopal Ramya Ravi.
Assessment of Higher Education Learning Outcomes (AHELO): Update Deborah Roseveare Head, Skills beyond School Division Directorate for Education OECD 31.
Margaret J. Cox King’s College London
© Myra Young Assessment All rights reserved. Provided for the use of participants in AM circles in North Lanarkshire Council.
Professor Daniel Khan OBE Chief Executive OCN London.
University of Strathclyde Faculty of Education A long history in the field of teacher education (Early Years, Primary and Secondary) and the graduate training.
Reform and change in Australian VTE and implications for VTE research and researchers By Aurora Andruska 20 April 2006.
Oregon State Board of Education January 19, 2012.
Prof. György BAZSA, former president Hungarian Accreditation Committee (HAC) CUBRIK Workshop IV Beograd, 13 March, 2012 European Standards and Guidelines.
Quality Assurance in a Changing World María José Lemaitre INQAAHE Conference Abu Dhabi, March 2009.
Introducing Unit Specifications and Unit Assessment Support Packs Art & Design National 3, 4 & 5.
Lin Martin Vice-President, Deakin University. Low SES, regional and remote and Indigenous students TAFE will not help improve higher education equity.
A good place to start !. Our aim is to develop in students ; Interest in & enjoyment of historical study; Skills for life long learning; The capacity.
Using Electronic Portfolios to Assess Learning at IUPUI. Trudy Banta, et. al. Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis 2007.
TDA perspective of HE in FE in Australia Association of Colleges (AoC) & Learning and Skills Improvement Service (LSIS) Seminar Pam Caven Director Policy.
Problem-Based Learning. Process of PBL Students confront a problem. In groups, students organize prior knowledge and attempt to identify the nature of.
ANZAM WORKSHOP 2009 Peter Noonan. Framework for Review Terms of Reference Excluded innovation and research which was to be dealt with in Cutler Review.
“The great end of education is to discipline rather than furnish the mind; to train it to the use of its own powers, rather than fill it with the accumulation.
Peer Review: Promoting a quality culture Associate Professor Gordon Suddaby & Associate Professor Mark Brown Massey University New Zealand Contact details:
FLAGSHIP STRATEGY 1 STUDENT LEARNING. Student Learning: A New Approach Victorian Essential Learning Standards Curriculum Planning Guidelines Principles.
Strengthening Student Outcomes in Small Schools There’s been enough research done to know what to do – now we have to start doing it! Douglas Reeves.
Qualifications Update: Health and Food Technology Qualifications Update: Health and Food Technology.
Programming the New Syllabuses (incorporating the Australian Curriculum)
Trade Training Centres in Schools Program. COAG – a new era of cooperation “workhorse of a nation” An end to the blame game Underpinned by a common commitment.
Session Objectives Analyze the key components and process of PBL Evaluate the potential benefits and limitations of using PBL Prepare a draft plan for.
Problem-Solving Approach of Allied Health Learning Community.
Curriculum Renewal in the Faculty of the Professions: Overview.
The quality assurance of tertiary education in New Zealand
Enhancing Cohort Identity in Legal Education
Making Assessment Feedback Manageable Professor Carol Evans
Learn Local Quality Preaccredited Teachers Community of Practice Moderation Workshop South East Victoria ACFE Region 5 th August 2015.
Assessment Information Evening 17 th September 2015.
1 DEMONSTRATION PROJECTS TO ENSURE STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES RECEIVE A QUALITY HIGHER EDUCATION PROGRAM Performance Measurement, Program and Project Evaluation.
Integration of Australian Curriculum English Implementation Workshops Term 3, 2015.
King Saud University, College of Science Workshop: Programme accreditation and quality assurance Riyadh, June 13-14, 2009 III.1 The accreditation report:
Promoting a Sustainable Culture of Assessment Faculty of Business First year assessment September 17, 2009 University of Southern Queensland Australia.
CDIO: Overview, Standards, and Processes (Part 2) Doris R. Brodeur, November 2005.
Building Strong Library Associations | Library Associations in Society: An Overview DAY 1 Session 3 What is the context of Library Associations in your.
The Transformation of Social Care Janet Walden 13th November 2008.
ASSESSMENT WITHOUT LEVELS Age Appropriate Learning.
Good teaching for diverse learners
Practice focused learning:
Thursday 2nd of February 2017 College Development Network
Assessment Without Levels
Quality and Qualifications Ireland and its Functions
Quality assurance and curriculum development
Unit 7: Instructional Communication and Technology
Planning a cross- curricular topic
How inclusive is my module... and yours?
Presentation transcript:

Promoting a Sustainable Culture of Assessment Faculty of Arts Half Day retreat on assessment September 17, 2009 University of Southern Queensland Australia Professor Marcia Devlin (PhD) Deakin University, Australia

Overview Views of assessment The new Australian higher education context Why assess? Assessment of learning Assessment for learning Challenges and opportunities for SUQ Your questions and comments

How academic staff view teaching and learning 1. What course content should be taught? (“What do I need to cover in class?”; “Which guest speakers should I use?”) 2. What are my teaching objectives? (“How will I best get this content across in class?”) 3. How will I assess student learning? (“Exam or assignment – group or individual?”) Assessment can be (often is) the final consideration

How students view teaching and learning 1. In what ways am I going to be assessed? (“When’s the assignment due?”; “How much is the exam worth?”) 2. What are my learning objectives? (“How do I get the best mark?”; “Should I bother with the lectures?”) 3. What content do I need to know? (“I’ll skip that tute and go to the library to get the books I need “) Assessment is usually the first consideration

How academic staff view teaching and learning How students view teaching and learning 1. What course content should be taught? (“What do I need to cover in class?”; “Which guest speakers should I use?”) 1. In what ways am I going to be assessed? (“When’s the assignment due?”; “How much is the exam worth?”) 2. What are my teaching objectives? (“How will I best get this content across in class?”) 2. What are my learning objectives? (“How do I get the best mark?”; “Should I bother with the lectures?”) 3. How will I assess student learning? (“Exam or assignment – group or individual?”) 3. What content do I need to know? (“I’ll skip that tute and go to the library to get the books I need “) Assessment can be (and often is) the final consideration Assessment is usually the first consideration 9 Adapted from AUTC Assessing Student Learning website

Views of assessment Assessment serves several purposes, including: Certifying student learning (assessment OF learning) Guiding student learning (assessment FOR learning) Equipping students for post-graduation life (assessment FOR learning) Which is/are most important at USQ?

The Australian context At a glance (Public universities, 2007 figures, rounded): - 1 million students enrolled in Australia - 74% domestic students; 26% international students - 70% undergraduate; 28% postgraduate students (2% in enabling/non-award courses) - 15% low socio-economic status students - 1.3% Indigenous students _full_year_.htm

The Australian context Review of higher education – the ‘Bradley Review’ Expert Panel’s final report released on 17 December ages/ReviewofAustralianHigherEducationReport.asp x

The Australian context Federal government response to the review: Transforming Australia’s Higher Education System nsformingAustraliasHESystem.aspx

Future directions for tertiary education 1.A new student-centred, demand driven, higher education system * A target that by 2025, 40% of Australian year olds will have a bachelor level or above qualification. * From 2012 universities will be funded on the basis of student demand. * From 2010, the current cap on over enrolment will be raised from 5 to 10 percent and removed completely in * A new national regulatory and quality agency for higher education to be created (TEQSA).

Future directions for tertiary education 2. Tertiary education pathways for the future * National regulatory arrangements for Vocational Education and Training (VET) to be developed alongside the proposed higher education regulator. * Australian Qualifications Framework Council will be commissioned to improve connectivity between the university and VET sectors. * The role of Skills Australia will be expanded to provide Government with advice on the effectiveness of the higher education and VET system in meeting Australia’s labour market needs. * A new single tertiary education sector ministerial council, with representatives from the Commonwealth, states and territories will be formed.

Future directions for tertiary education 3. Greater possibilities for all Australians * A target that by 2020, 20% of higher education enrolments at undergraduate level should be from low socio-economic backgrounds. * Funding for quality teaching and research in regional Australia will be examined and new arrangements introduced. * The Government will provide $2 million towards a feasibility study into the possible merger of two universities to improve access and support for regional students. * The Government will work closely with the Indigenous Higher Education Advisory Council (IHEAC) to improve higher education access and outcomes for Indigenous Australians.

Universities of the future More students: From a wider range of backgrounds With a wider range of experiences and expectations With a wider range of social capital With a wider range of university preparedness More accountability for universities A greater focus on learning outcomes and standards

Assessment in the future “To achieve the Government’s ambitious attainment targets there will … need to be an increased emphasis on improving the student learning experience in order to boost retention, progress and ultimately, completion rates” (p.15).

Assessment in the future Bradley recommendation That the Australian Government commission…work on …new quality assurance arrangements for higher education …This would involve: –– a set of indicators and instruments to directly assess and compare learning outcomes ; and –– a set of formal statements of academic standards by discipline along with processes for applying those standards. Government response To be progressed through TEQSA.

Assessment of or for learning? Q: Why assess? A1: To certify learning Why is this important? How is this best achieved? How academic staff view teaching and learning 1. What course content should be taught? (“What do I need to cover in class?”; “Which guest speakers should I use?”) 2. What are my teaching objectives? (“How will I best get this content across in class?”) 3. How will I assess student learning? (“Exam or assignment – group or individual?”) Assessment can be (often is) the final consideration

Assessment of or for learning? Q: Why assess? A2: To guide learning Why is this important? How is this best achieved? How students view teaching and learning 1. In what ways am I going to be assessed? (“When’s the assignment due?”; “How much is the exam worth?”) 2. What are my learning objectives? (“How do I get the best mark?”; “Should I bother with the lectures?”) 3. What content do I need to know? (“I’ll skip that tute and go to the library to get the books I need’) Assessment is usually the first consideration

Assessment of or for learning? Q: Why assess? A3: To equip students for post-graduation life Why is this important? How is this best achieved? ment-futures/

How to do assessment for (and of) learning (now and later) Four suggestions 1. 'Authentic' and investigative activities 2. Integrative activities 3. Modelling and practice 4. Working with peers

1. 'Authentic' and investigative activities Authentic tasks reflect what occurs in settings beyond the educational environment. Tasks may need to be simplified to avoid student overload 1.1 Authentic presentation 1.2 Projects and research-oriented investigations

1. 'Authentic' and investigative activities (cont). 1.1 Authentic presentation The outcomes of tasks are represented in formats used in real practice settings, e.g. oral reports rather than written ones, presentations to community groups, reports to managers, and the like.

1. 'Authentic' and investigative activities (cont). 1.2 Projects and research-oriented investigations These require investigation planning and theoretical and/or empirical exploration which leads to an outcome justified by evidence.

1. 'Authentic' and investigative activities (cont). Would these be appropriate in an Arts context?

1. 'Authentic' and investigative activities (cont). Would these be appropriate in an Arts context: to conduct assessment of learning?

1. 'Authentic' and investigative activities (cont). Would these be appropriate in an Arts context: to conduct assessment of learning? to conduct assessment for learning?

2. Integrative activities Integrative activities link different kinds of work within a unit of study, across units and stages and/or between the course and practice settings. Students assemble and re-process their work from different sources or parts of the course, often reflecting on and analysing their own work.

2. Integrative activities Students repackage earlier assignments to prompt reflection on themes beyond those for which the tasks were originally completed.

2. Integrative activities Would these be appropriate in an Arts context?

2. Integrative activities Would these be appropriate in an Arts context: to conduct assessment of learning?

2. Integrative activities Would these be appropriate in an Arts context: to conduct assessment of learning? to conduct assessment for learning?

3. Modelling and practice Students experience models of good work Use of model answers or worked examples in a metacognitive way Peer discussion of model answers/worked examples Students see how an expert would approach a problem by engaging with detailed examples Seeing teachers work through problems posed to them Observing the lecturer explain how an expert approaches an issue, noting the features relevant to practising for themselves, noting what they know and don't know, and identifying ways of bridging gaps.

3. Modelling and practice Would these be appropriate in an Arts context?

3. Modelling and practice Would these be appropriate in an Arts context: to conduct assessment of learning?

3. Modelling and practice Would these be appropriate in an Arts context: to conduct assessment of learning? to conduct assessment for learning?

4. Working with peers In most employment, working effectively with peers is critical. Being able to collaborate, get feedback and contribute to peer learning is important for future professional development 2 ideas: 1.Structured activities, supplemented with debriefing arrangements, to prepare students for working with peers 2.Peer feedback on attempts at tasks

How to do assessment for (and of) learning Four suggestions 1. 'Authentic' and investigative activities 2. Integrative activities 3. Modelling and practice 4. Working with peers

Challenges for SQU? Current: Staff conceptions of assessment? Staff development? Sessional staff understanding of assessment? Students taking responsibility? Future: Greater staff demands? Changes to student cohorts? Stakeholder expectations?

Opportunities for SQU? Positive change to students’ experiences and learning outcomes Multiple agendas being addressed (assessment of AND for learning) (student learning AND externally validated standards) Incorporation of assessment as a central part of teaching and learning Coherent, whole of institution approach to proactively manage current and future challenges

Your questions and comments