TEAM Visions Conference March 5, 2015 – University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire Presented and prepared by Manjula Joseph, Jennifer Harrison, and Anne Wallisch.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PD Plan Agenda August 26, 2008 PBTE Indicators Track
Advertisements

Iowa Core Leadership Session 1 for Welcome!!
NOTE: To change the image on this slide, select the picture and delete it. Then click the Pictures icon in the placeholde r to insert your own image. CONNECTING.
Student Growth Measures in Teacher Evaluation
Enhancing Education Through Technology Round 9 Competitive.
September 2013 The Teacher Evaluation and Professional Growth Program Module 2: Student Learning Objectives.
Parents As Partners Mrs. Lord Grade 3. Goals My goals for each child are the same. I hope for each child to grow socially, emotionally, and academically.
Mathematics and Science Partnership Grant Title IIB Information Session April 10, 2006.
Steve Klass, Nadine Bezuk & Jane Gawronski
A Mathematics Specialist Program: Its Structure and Impact on Practicing Elementary Teachers Nadine Bezuk & Susan Nickerson.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Preparing and Applying Formative Multiple Measures of Performance Conducting High-Quality Self-Assessments.
“Charting the Course Together” Implementing the Common Core State Standards -Mathematics- Middle School Leadership Teams February 6, 2014.
How Do You Know Students Learned What You Just Taught? Lee Ann PruskeRosann Hollinger Bernard Rahming Mathematics Teaching Specialists, Milwaukee Public.
Math RtI Kickoff Meeting. Welcome/Introductions Mike Klavon K-12 Math Consultant Robyn Lucas K-5 Math Consultant Sara Gortsema Early Intervention Project.
Chapter 2 Ensuring Progress in the General Curriculum Through Universal Design for Learning and Inclusion Each Power Point presentation can be viewed as.
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
An Overview of the New HCPSS Teacher Evaluation Process School-based Professional Learning Module Spring 2013 This presentation contains copyrighted material.
Teaching and Learning Elementary Math November 27, :30 am – 12:30 pm.
WELCOME TO MRS. AAGAARD’S THIRD GRADE CLASS!.
Curriculum Update January What are the big projects? Fall 2013 – Math Common Core Implementation Fall 2014 – English/Language Arts Common Core Implementation.
Pomona Unified School District Standard Practices for Data Analysis Silvia San Martin Teacher Specialist Research and Assessment.
Math Liaison Meeting September 2014 Presenter: Simi Minhas, Math Achievement Coach Network 204.
The Oregon System for Teacher and Administrator Professional Growth and Support System Focus on Student Learning and Growth Goals October
At the Mitchell Institute 22 Monument Square, Suite 404 Portland, Maine GreatSchoolsPartnership.org.
Grade 7 Pre-Algebra Extended Session April 26, :30-11:00 Room 606.
Common Core State Standards (CCSS) September 12, 2012.
Marietta Rives, DE Consultant, Co-Chair of Instruction & Assessment Team Jan Norgaard, AEA 13 Associate Director, Network Team Member Deb Johnsen, AEA.
AGENDA  A teacher’s perspective  Barb Schmidt Stevens High School  Acacia Trevillyan South Park Elementary  Review steps to create a quality CFA 
Ms. Elliott 3 rd Grade Back to School Night. Welcome to Third Grade!  Tonight’s parent information will include:  Introduction and Goals  Classroom.
College Board EXCELerator Schools Site Visit Preparation.
Math Study Group Meeting #1 September 16, 2014 Facilitator: Simi Minhas Math Achievement Coach, Network 204.
Including Student Growth in Educator Evaluation Day 3 Monitoring and Adjusting January, 2014.
ELA: Focus on Collaborative Conversations & Writing FCUSD Instructional Focus Meeting Sara Parenzin September 20, 2012 Welcome! Please sign in and start.
Parma City School District Professional Learning Model Committing to the Core Rethinking Mathematics & Literacy for the 21 st Century LITERACY COACHES.
ITI 2014 Presenter Orientation. Mission: Dorchester School District Two leading the way, every student, every day through relationships, rigor and relevance.
What is HQPD?. Ohio Standards for PD HQPD is a purposeful, structured and continuous process that occurs over time. HQPD is a purposeful, structured and.
ISLN Network Meeting KEDC SUPERINTENDENT UPDATE. Why we are here--Purpose of ISLN network New academic standards  Deconstruct and disseminate Content.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
Teresa K. Todd EDAD 684 School Finance/Ethics March 23, 2011.
WEST CENTRAL WISCONSIN NEW TEACHER INITIATIVE CONSORTIUM WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 8, :30 – 8:30 TONI VELURE ABBY JENSEN Evaluating Student Work.
Medicine Hat School District #76 PLC’s Building Capability Through Collaborative Learning Developing tomorrow’s citizens through improved learning, living.
Engage, Inquire and Inspire IMSS Leadership Institute Fall 2012.
The Teacher Evaluation and Professional Growth Program Module 6: Reflecting and Planning for Next Year December 2013.
Literacy Coaching: An Essential “Piece” of the Puzzle.
P.R.I.D.E. School Professional Day :45 am- 3:30 pm.
Welcome to the SCMP 2 Grades 3-5 Fall Content Day.
1. What can effective planning with technology look like? 2. How do we support our teachers in their planning in this digital age? 3. How might TPACK.
Multi-year Professional Development projects that are proven to be:  Replicable builds capacity for ongoing PD and collaboration  Sustainable establishes.
SACS/CASI District Accreditation  January 2007  April 2007  May 2007  January – April 2008  Board Approval for Pursuit of District Accreditation.
Instructional Leadership Planning with Indicators of Quality Instruction.
National Board Study Group Meeting Dan Barber 5 th Grade Teacher, Irwin Academic Center
PIIC/PLN UPDATES AIU3 Coaches’ Workshop September 11, 2014.
Daily Math Review 2 nd Grade February 6, :30 – 3:45pm.
Elementary Math Work – Spring 2013 Des Moines Public Schools Mathematics Expectation: All students will demonstrate mastery of the rigorous Common Core.
Instructional Leadership: Planning for Improvement.
Welcome Arts Teachers October 19, 2011 Professional Development.

Instructional Leadership Supporting Common Assessments.
PLCs Professional Learning Communities Staff PD. Professional Learning Committees The purpose of our PLCs includes but is not limited to: teacher collaborationNOT-
Improving Mathematical Number Sense & Technology Integration Teacher Quality Grant Peyton Forest Elementary Atlanta Public Schools Atlanta, GA July 23,
Day Two: February 25, :30-3:00. Series Goals Participants will have the opportunity to:  Work collaboratively to:  Deepen their knowledge of the.
Learning Management System
TAP Math: Teachers and Administrators Partnering for Mathematics Learning Mathematics and Science Partnership Grant Department of Education funded through.
February 8, 2017.
Welcome to Second Grade Curriculum Night
Strong Start Math Project
Component 4 Effective and Reflective Practitioner
Connecticut Core Standards for Mathematics
Connecticut Core Standards for Mathematics
Information July 15, 2015.
Presentation transcript:

TEAM Visions Conference March 5, 2015 – University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire Presented and prepared by Manjula Joseph, Jennifer Harrison, and Anne Wallisch

Agenda  9-10am: Pre-Assessment – DTAMS  10-10:20am: Introductions  10:20-11:20am: Problem of the day & Getting to know you  11:20-12pm: Professional Learning Communities & Logistics  12-12:30pm: Lunch  12:30-1:45pm: Student Thinking Activity  1:45-2pm: Reimbursement  2-3pm: Pre-Assessment - MIST

Pre-Assessments  DTAMS – Diagnostic Teacher Assessments in Mathematics & Science  Purpose is completely for project evaluation and assessment to guide in designing professional development mathematical content.  Individual scores will never be made available to anyone outside of the project leaders and will be identified with a 4- digit ID, not your name.  Please show all work on the test itself.  Thank you!

Introducing TEAM Leaders  Anne Wallisch   Jennifer Harrison   501 Hibbard Humanities Hall, University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire, Eau Claire, WI  Manjula Joseph 

Who Are We?  MSP District Membership  Amery  Clayton  Clear Lake  Shell Lake  Plum City  St. Croix Falls  Turtle Lake  Siren  Elmwood

TEAM Project Goals  Goal 1: Strengthen the mathematics content knowledge of regular and special education teachers, grades 4-8  Goal 2: Enhance mathematics pedagogical content and assessment practice to provide support for ALL students  Goal 3: Establish a relationship between and among participants and partners to sustain teachers’ on-going professional collaboration, leading to instructional change and teachers’ growth.  Goal 4: Improve student achievement in mathematics, grades 4-8.

Icebreaker – Problem of the Day  Discuss with your team and respond to student #5’s thinking.  Think about:  What does this student seem to understand mathematically?  What questions would you like to ask this student?

Getting to know you …  In groups, discuss and record responses on post-its. Then place on appropriate chart paper.  What do you know about the Mathematical Practices?  What do you know about the Progressions?  What do you know about the CCSSM? (i.e. what was the point?)  What is the most important part of participation in the TEAM Project for you?

Professional Learning Communities  By May 15, should have met 2 times  First time could be with full local PLC  Second time with TEAM grant PLC to discuss what you want to bring to the table for the summer meetings  Please post notes from your first PLC meeting on D2L by April 1  Anne will visit – make sure to include her in setting your PLC meeting dates

PLC Meeting Considerations  Do you have a local PLC?  What can we do to help you get there?  What kind of PD has your team had in the last 3 years, if any?  Pretend we have no CCSSM, what kind of work are you doing with the Mathematical Practices?  Do you have common grade-level assessments, formative & summative?  What do you believe are the lowest trend areas in mathematics (e.g. algebraic thinking, number & computation, etc.)?  Collect a range of de-identified student work related to number & operations.

Logistics  D2L Login Information  Summer Academy dates, times, places  Tuesday-Friday, July 7-10, 2015  Monday-Wednesday, July 20-22, 2015

LUNCH $10 will be reimbursed – claim on your travel form

Analyzing Student Work: Multiplication & Division  Consider student work from 2 nd to 5 th grade  Our focus is to think about the following:  Describe in detail what you think each child did in response to these problems.  Explain what you learned about these children’s understandings.

Children’s Invented Algorithms  In your table groups you will be visiting each table for 5-10 minutes  Folders of student work at each table  3 rd, 4 th, or 5 th grade students  Respond to the following  Describe in detail what you think each child did in response to these problems.  Explain what you learned about these children’s understandings.  Consider and add to the chart paper as you move from table to table

An elementary school has 24 classes. If there are 32 children in each class, how many children are there at the school?

Hattie had 544 candies to share with her friends. She gave each of her 17 friends the same amount of candy. How many candies did each friend get?

The student council picked 896 apples and packaged them in bags with 35 apples in each bag. How many bags did they fill?

 Considering the student work we have looked at:  What specific connections do you see in comparing the students’ invented algorithms for multiplication versus division?

 Considering our discussions and what we’ve learned about children’s understandings of multiplication and division  How can we use this to help us think about teaching multiplication and division?

Further Reading – Posted on D2L  Children’s Invention of Multiplication and Division Algorithms  Article includes some of the strategies discussed today as well as others.

Reimbursement  Mileage, Lodging, Meals  Fill out travel expense report form with your name, address, and social security number  Include where you drove from, where conference is, name of conference (Visions Conference), total mileage, and total reimbursement amount  Make sure to sign it  School District Substitute  Send official invoice to Jennifer Hibbard Humanities Hall, University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire, Eau Claire, WI 54702)

Pre-Assessments  MIST – Mathematics and the Institutional Setting of Teaching  Purpose is completely for project evaluation and assessment to guide in designing professional development mathematical content.  Individual responses will never be made available to anyone outside of the project leaders and will be identified with a 4- digit ID, not your name.  Please provide responses to all items.  Thank you!

We look forward to seeing you again this summer!

Twelve children were sharing 228 M & M’s. How many should each child get?

The student council picked 896 apples and packaged them in bags with 35 apples in each bag. How many bags did they fill?

There are 810 fifth-graders at the District Olympics. They are placed in teams of 6. How many teams will there be?

Hattie had 544 candies to share with her friends. She gave each of her 17 friends the same amount of candy. How many candies did each friend get?

The student council picked 896 apples and packaged them in bags with 35 apples in each bag. How many bags did they fill?

Videos  Javier, 5 th grade, multiplication  Brooke, 5 th grade, multiplication  Rosa, 1 st grade, division  Shannon, 3 rd grade, division Phillip, R., Cabral, C., & Schappelle, B. Searchable IMAP Video Collection: Children’s mathematical thinking clips. Integrating Mathematics and Pedagogy