Maximal Unitarity at Two Loops David A. Kosower Institut de Physique Théorique, CEA–Saclay work with Kasper Larsen & Henrik Johansson; & work of Simon.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Bill Spence* Oxford April 2007
Advertisements

Maximal Unitarity at Two Loops David A. Kosower Institut de Physique Théorique, CEA–Saclay work with Kasper Larsen & Henrik Johansson; & with Krzysztof.
N =4 Supersymmetric Gauge Theory, Twistor Space, and Dualities David A. Kosower Saclay Lectures Fall Term 2004.
1 Top Production Processes at Hadron Colliders By Paul Mellor.
Today’s algorithm for computation of loop corrections Dim. reg. Graph generation QGRAF, GRACE, FeynArts Reduction of integrals IBP id., Tensor red. Evaluation.
Twistors and Pertubative Gravity including work (2005) with Z Bern, S Bidder, E Bjerrum-Bohr, H Ita, W Perkins, K Risager From Twistors to Amplitudes 2005.
Maximal Unitarity at Two Loops David A. Kosower Institut de Physique Théorique, CEA–Saclay work with Kasper Larsen & Henrik Johansson; & work of Simon.
Introduction to On-Shell Methods in Quantum Field Theory David A. Kosower Institut de Physique Théorique, CEA–Saclay Orsay Summer School, Correlations.
Maximal Unitarity at Two Loops David A. Kosower Institut de Physique Théorique, CEA–Saclay work with Kasper Larsen & Henrik Johansson; & work of Simon.
Maximal Unitarity at Two Loops David A. Kosower Institut de Physique Théorique, CEA–Saclay work with Kasper Larsen; & with Krzysztof Kajda & Janusz Gluza.
Maximal Unitarity at Two Loops David A. Kosower Institut de Physique Théorique, CEA–Saclay work with Kasper Larsen & Henrik Johansson; & work of Simon.
Maximal Unitarity at Two Loops David A. Kosower Institut de Physique Théorique, CEA–Saclay work with Kasper Larsen & Henrik Johansson; & work of Simon.
On-Shell Methods in Field Theory David A. Kosower International School of Theoretical Physics, Parma, September 10-15, 2006 Lecture IV.
On-Shell Methods in Field Theory David A. Kosower International School of Theoretical Physics, Parma, September 10-15, 2006 Lecture II.
On-Shell Methods in Field Theory David A. Kosower International School of Theoretical Physics, Parma, September 10-15, 2006 Lecture V.
On-Shell Methods in Field Theory David A. Kosower International School of Theoretical Physics, Parma, September 10-15, 2006 Lecture III.
Structure of Amplitudes in Gravity I Lagrangian Formulation of Gravity, Tree amplitudes, Helicity Formalism, Amplitudes in Twistor Space, New techniques.
Structure of Amplitudes in Gravity II Unitarity cuts, Loops, Inherited properties from Trees, Symmetries Playing with Gravity - 24 th Nordic Meeting Gronningen.
Recurrence, Unitarity and Twistors including work with I. Bena, Z. Bern, V. Del Duca, D. Dunbar, L. Dixon, D. Forde, P. Mastrolia, R. Roiban.
Results in N=8 Supergravity Emil Bjerrum-Bohr HP 2 Zurich 9/9/06 Harald Ita Warren Perkins Dave Dunbar, Swansea University hep-th/0609??? Kasper Risager.
Beyond Feynman Diagrams Lecture 3 Lance Dixon Academic Training Lectures CERN April 24-26, 2013.
Unitarity and Factorisation in Quantum Field Theory Zurich Zurich 2008 David Dunbar, Swansea University, Wales, UK VERSUS Unitarity and Factorisation in.
Queen Mary, University of London Nov. 9, 2011 Congkao Wen.
New Methods in Computational Quantum Field Theory David A. Kosower Institut de Physique Théorique, CEA–Saclay Higgs Symposium University of Edinburgh January.
On-Shell Methods in Gauge Theory David A. Kosower IPhT, CEA–Saclay Taiwan Summer Institute, Chi-Tou ( 溪頭 ) August 10–17, 2008 Lecture III.
SQG4 - Perturbative and Non-Perturbative Aspects of String Theory and Supergravity Marcel Grossmann -- Paris Niels Emil Jannik Bjerrum-Bohr Niels Bohr.
Computational Methods in Particle Physics: On-Shell Methods in Field Theory David A. Kosower University of Zurich, January 31–February 14, 2007 Lecture.
The Harmonic Oscillator of One-loop Calculations Peter Uwer SFB meeting, – , Karlsruhe Work done in collaboration with Simon Badger.
Twistors and Perturbative QCD Yosuke Imamura The Univ. of Tokyo String Theory and Quantum Field Theory Aug.19-23, 2005 at YITP tree-level Yang-Mills 1.
Twistor Inspired techniques in Perturbative Gauge Theories including work with Z. Bern, S Bidder, E Bjerrum- Bohr, L. Dixon, H Ita, W Perkins K. Risager.
Recursive Approaches to QCD Matrix Elements including work with Z. Bern, S Bidder, E Bjerrum-Bohr, L. Dixon, H Ita, D Kosower W Perkins K. Risager RADCOR.
On-Shell Methods in Gauge Theory David A. Kosower IPhT, CEA–Saclay Taiwan Summer Institute, Chi-Tou ( 溪頭 ) August 10–17, 2008 Lecture II.
Benedikt Biedermann | Numerical evaluation of one-loop QCD amplitudes | DESY 2011 Numerical Evaluation of one-loop QCD Amplitudes Benedikt Biedermann Humboldt-Universität.
Bootstrapping One-loop QCD Scattering Amplitudes Lance Dixon, SLAC Fermilab Theory Seminar June 8, 2006 Z. Bern, LD, D. Kosower, hep-th/ , hep-ph/ ,
1 On-Shell Methods for Precision Calculations for the LHC Princeton LHC Workshop, March 23, 2007 Zvi Bern, UCLA with Carola Berger, Lance Dixon, Darren.
1 On-Shell Methods in Perturbative QCD ICHEP 2006 Zvi Bern, UCLA with Carola Berger, Lance Dixon, Darren Forde and David Kosower hep-ph/ hep-ph/
Computational Methods in Particle Physics: On-Shell Methods in Field Theory David A. Kosower University of Zurich, January 31–February 14, 2007 Lecture.
Darren Forde (SLAC & UCLA). NLO amplitudes using Feynman diagram techniques The limitations. “State of the art” results. New techniques required Unitarity.
Twistors and Gauge Theory DESY Theory Workshop September 30 September 30, 2005.
N =4 Supersymmetric Gauge Theory, Twistor Space, and Dualities David A. Kosower Saclay Lectures, II Fall Term 2004.
Computational Methods in Particle Physics: On-Shell Methods in Field Theory David A. Kosower University of Zurich, January 31–February 14, 2007 Lecture.
Unitarity and Amplitudes at Maximal Supersymmetry David A. Kosower with Z. Bern, J.J. Carrasco, M. Czakon, L. Dixon, D. Dunbar, H. Johansson, R. Roiban,
Soft and Collinear Behaviour of Graviton Scattering Amplitudes David Dunbar, Swansea University.
Universality in W+Multijet Production David A. Kosower Institut de Physique Théorique, CEA–Saclay on behalf of the B LACK H AT Collaboration Z. Bern, L.
Darren Forde (SLAC & UCLA) arXiv: (To appear this evening)
On-Shell Methods in Gauge Theory David A. Kosower IPhT, CEA–Saclay Taiwan Summer Institute, Chi-Tou ( 溪頭 ) August 10–17, 2008 Lecture I.
Computational Methods in Particle Physics: On-Shell Methods in Field Theory David A. Kosower University of Zurich, January 31–February 14, 2007 Lecture.
Computational Methods in Particle Physics: On-Shell Methods in Field Theory David A. Kosower University of Zurich, January 31–February 14, 2007 Lecture.
Benedikt Biedermann | Numerical evaluation of one-loop QCD amplitudes | ACAT 2011 Numerical Evaluation of one-loop QCD Amplitudes Benedikt Biedermann Humboldt-Universität.
Computational Methods in Particle Physics: On-Shell Methods in Field Theory David A. Kosower University of Zurich, January 31–February 14, 2007 Lecture.
Loop Calculations of Amplitudes with Many Legs DESY DESY 2007 David Dunbar, Swansea University, Wales, UK.
From Twistors to Gauge-Theory Amplitudes WHEPP, Bhubaneswar, India January 7 January 7, 2006.
Twistor Inspired techniques in Perturbative Gauge Theories-II including work with Z. Bern, S Bidder, E Bjerrum- Bohr, L. Dixon, H Ita, W Perkins K. Risager.
NLO Vector+Jets Predictions with B LACK H AT & SHERPA David A. Kosower Institut de Physique Théorique, CEA–Saclay on behalf of the B LACK H AT Collaboration.
On-Shell Methods in QCD: First Digits for BlackHat David A. Kosower Institut de Physique Théorique, CEA–Saclay on behalf of the BlackHat Collaboration.
V +Jets at Next-to-Leading Order with BlackHat David A. Kosower Institut de Physique Théorique, CEA–Saclay on behalf of the BlackHat Collaboration Carola.
On-Shell Methods in Quantum Field Theory David A. Kosower Institut de Physique Théorique, CEA–Saclay LHC PhenoNet Summer School Cracow, Poland September.
On-Shell Methods in Quantum Field Theory David A. Kosower Institut de Physique Théorique, CEA–Saclay LHC PhenoNet Summer School Cracow, Poland September.
June 19, 2007 Manchester1 High-Energy Electroweak Physics Parallel Session Zoltan Kunszt, ETH, Zurich Unitarity Cuts and Reduction of Master Integrals.
Song He Institute of Theoretical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing.
From Maximal Helicity to Maximal Jets David A. Kosower Institut de Physique Théorique, CEA–Saclay and Institute for Advanced Study 30 Fermilab, March.
Darren Forde (SLAC & UCLA) arXiv: [hep-ph], hep-ph/ , hep-ph/ In collaboration with Carola Berger, Zvi Bern, Lance Dixon & David.
Amplitudes from Scattering Equations and Q-cuts
Trees in N=8 SUGRA and Loops in N=4 SYM
Complete QCD Amplitudes: Part II of QCD On-Shell Recursion Relations
Unitarity Methods in Quantum Field Theory
On-Shell Meets Observation or, the Rubber Meets the Road
Modern Methods for Loop Calculations of Amplitudes with Many Legs
Analytic Results for Two-Loop Yang-Mills
Computation of Multi-Jet QCD Amplitudes at NLO
Presentation transcript:

Maximal Unitarity at Two Loops David A. Kosower Institut de Physique Théorique, CEA–Saclay work with Kasper Larsen & Henrik Johansson; & work of Simon Caron- Huot & Kasper Larsen , & in progress ICHEP 2012, Melbourne July 5, 2012

Amplitudes in Gauge Theories Basic building block for physics predictions in QCD NLO calculations give the first quantitative predictions for LHC physics, and are essential to controlling backgrounds: require one-loop amplitudes   many talks For some processes (gg  W + W −, gg  ZZ) two-loop amplitudes are needed For NNLO & precision physics, we also need to go beyond one loop

So What’s Wrong with Feynman Diagrams? Huge number of diagrams in calculations of interest — factorial growth 2 → 6 jets: tree diagrams, ~ 2.5 ∙ 10 7 terms ~2.9 ∙ loop diagrams, ~ 1.9 ∙ terms But answers often turn out to be very simple Simple results should have a simple derivation — Feynman (attr) Want approach in terms of physical states only: remove contributions of gauge-variant off-shell from the start

On-Shell Methods Use only information from physical states Use properties of amplitudes as calculational tools – Factorization → on-shell recursion ( Britto, Cachazo, Feng, Witten,… ) – Unitarity → unitarity method ( Bern, Dixon, Dunbar, DAK,… ) – Underlying field theory → integral basis Formalism For analytics, independent integral basis is nice; for numerics, essential Unitarity

Unitarity-Based Calculations Bern, Dixon, Dunbar, & DAK, ph/ , ph/ Replace two propagators by on-shell delta functions  Sum of integrals with coefficients; separate them by algebra Generalized Unitarity : pick out contributions with more than two specified propagators Maximal Generalized Unitarity: cut all four components of loop momentum to isolate a single box Britto, Cachazo & Feng (2004)

Quadruple Cuts Work in D=4 for the algebra Four degrees of freedom & four delta functions … but are there any solutions? Yes, but they are complex: e.g. k 1 2 = 0 = k 4 2

Solutions are complex The delta functions would actually give zero! Need to reinterpret delta functions as contour integrals around a global pole Reinterpret cutting as contour replacement

Two Problems We don’t know how to choose the contour Deforming the contour can break equations: is no longer true if we deform the real contour to circle one of the poles Remarkably, these two problems cancel each other out: requiring the vanishing forces a 1 = a 2 in a general contour

Box Coefficient Go back to master equation Deform to quadruple-cut contour C on both sides Solve: No algebraic reductions needed: suitable for pure numerics Britto, Cachazo & Feng (2004) A B DC

Massless Planar Double Box [ Generalization of OPP: Ossola & Mastrolia (2011); Badger, Frellesvig, & Zhang (2012) ] Here, generalize work of Britto, Cachazo & Feng, and Forde Take a heptacut — freeze seven of eight degrees of freedom One remaining integration variable z Six solutions, for example

Need to choose contour for z within each solution Jacobian from other degrees of freedom has poles in z: 8 distinct solutions aka global poles once one removes duplicates Note that the Jacobian from contour integration is 1/J, not 1/|J|

Picking Contours We can deform the integration contour to any linear combination of the 8; which one should we pick? Need to enforce vanishing of all total derivatives: – 5 insertions of ε tensors  4 independent constraints – 20 insertions of IBP equations  2 additional independent constraints Seek two independent “projectors”, giving formulæ for the coefficients of each master integral – In each projector, require that other basis integral vanish – Work to O ( ε 0 ); higher order terms in general require going beyond four-dimensional cuts

Contours Up to an irrelevant overall normalization, the projectors are unique, just as at one loop More explicitly,

Massive Double Boxes Massive legs: 1; 1 & 3; 1 & 4 Master Integrals: 2 Global Poles: 8 Constraints: 2 (IBP) + 4 (ε tensors) = 6 Unique projectors: 2 Massive legs: 1 & 3; 1, 2 & 3 Master Integrals: 3 Global Poles: 8 Constraints: 1 (IBP) + 4 (ε tensors) = 5 Unique projectors: 3 Massive legs: all Master Integrals: 4 Global Poles: 8 Constraints: 0 (IBP) + 4 (ε tensors) = 4 Unique projectors: 4

Summary First steps towards a numerical unitarity formalism at two loops Criterion for constructing explicit formulæ for coefficients of basis integrals Four-point examples: massless, one-mass, two-mass double boxes