Aligning Teacher Effectiveness to the Common Core Standards March 7, 2013 Sandra Alberti Student Achievement Partners.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
So what is so visionary about standards? Sandra M. Alberti, Ed.D. Student Achievement Partners.
Advertisements

Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) August Core Principles of OIP  Use a collaborative, collegial process which initiates and institutes Leadership.
APS Teacher Evaluation Module 9 Part B: Summative Ratings.
LDC Lessons Learned The Coaching Perspective. Lessons Learned Teachers need to know what supports are available and R- group space is a great place to.
A Key Piece of the Puzzle: The EQuIP NGSS Rubric & Delaware’s NGSS Implementation Plan Shelley Rouser and John Moyer Delaware Department of Education.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
EngageNY.org Identifying CCSS-Aligned Instruction Recognizing Effective Instructional Practices.
Division of School Effectiveness1 Common Core State Standards: Transitioning from Awareness to Implementation December 1, 2011 Rutledge Conference Center.
Putting the Core into Practice: Instructional Practice Guides
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) Facilitating District-wide Improvement in Instructional Practices and Student Performance.
Summer Institutes 2013 Change Teacher Practice Change Student Outcomes.
Professional Learning in the Learning Profession Effective Practice  Increased Student Learning Frederick Brown Director of Strategy.
Louisiana Reading Association Update April 21, 2012.
Standards Aligned System April 21, 2011 – In-Service.
EduCore ™ Tools for Teaching Sherida Britt Efrain Mercado.
Math Instructional Practice Guides RESA 3 Principals’ Forum March 17 th, 2015.
DeAnn Huinker & Kevin McLeod University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Designing High Quality Professional Development Knowledge, Management, & Dissemination Conference.
February 8, 2012 Session 3: Performance Management Systems 1.
Our Leadership Journey Cynthia Cuellar Astrid Fossum Janis Freckman Connie Laughlin.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
One Voice – One Plan Office of Education Improvement and Innovation MI-CSI: Do Stage Implement Plan and Monitor Plan.
APS Common Core State Standards: Turning Dreams into Reality for All Kids! Linda Sink, APS Chief Academic Officer January 19, 2012 MC 2 Leadership Conference.
Common Core Implementation Update SEPTEMBER 4, 2014 CAMBRIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT.
CIV 1 Lincoln County Administrators Total Instructional Alignment.
Instruction aligned to Iowa Core: What does it look like? #CCSS.
Implementing Mathematics Common Core Module 1-2: Helping Students Orient to the Thinking of Others Janda Lannigan, Traci Loftin, Sarah Roggensack, Denise.
1 Common Core State Standards High School ELA Session Three: March 3, 5, 6, 8, 10, 2014.
Public Charter School Grant Program Workshop Aligning Teacher Evaluation, Professional Development, Recruitment and Retention March 3, 2014.
Common Core State Standards: The Shifts and their Implications Sandra Alberti Student Achievement Partners.
EngageNY.org Principals’ Session: Identifying CCSS Aligned Instruction in Writing.
ISLLC Standard #2 Implementation
Full Implementation of the Common Core. Last Meeting Performance Tasks Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium Upcoming Accountability Measure Strong teaching.
APS Common Core State Standards: Turning Dreams into Reality for All Kids! Linda Sink, APS Chief Academic Officer January 19, 2012 MC 2 Leadership Conference.
Implementing the Common Core Sandra M. Alberti Student Achievement
What is HQPD?. Ohio Standards for PD HQPD is a purposeful, structured and continuous process that occurs over time. HQPD is a purposeful, structured and.
INTRODUCTION TO COMMON CORE STATE STANDARDS A Different Pair of Lenses 1 December 2, 2010 Albuquerque Public Schools Instructional Coaches.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
Student Achievement Partners – Who We Are 1 Who we are: SAP is a nonprofit organization founded by three of the contributing authors.
Intro to TPEP. A new evaluation system should be a model for professional growth, supporting collaboration between teachers and principals in pursuit.
Activity 4 Systems of Professional Learning Module 5 Grades K–5: Focus on Deepening Implementation.
After lunch - Mix it up! Arrange your tables so that everyone else seated at your table represents another district. 1.
CCSS Road Map: The goal of implementing the Common Core State Standards is to ensure that instruction in our schools is changing dramatically.
Common Core State Standards: Supporting Implementation and Moving to Sustainability Based on ASCD’s Fulfilling the Promise of the Common Core State Standards:
Common Core Where have we been and where we are going…
Instructional Leadership and the Iowa Core ELA Standards Great Prairie AEA Burlington: April 9, 2013 Ottumwa: April 16, 2013.
1. Administrators will gain a deeper understanding of the connection between arts, engagement, student success, and college and career readiness. 2. Administrators.
March 23, NYSCSS Annual Conference Crossroads of Change: The Common Core in Social Studies.
Ohio Department of Education March 2011 Ohio Educator Evaluation Systems.
Effective Professional Development. Copyright © 2013 New Teacher Center. All Rights Reserved. Blackboard Collaborate Communication Tools 3.
Leading and Learning in a Time of Change #CCSS.
Candidate Assessment of Performance Conducting Observations and Providing Meaningful Feedback Workshop for Program Supervisors and Supervising Practitioners.
Common Core State Standards: So, What’s New?: The Shifts Sandra Alberti Student Achievement Partners Integrating.
WCPSS Coaching Framework Strengthening Consistency, Cohesion, and Clarity for Coaches in WCPSS.
Activity 5a Systems of Professional Learning Module 5 Grades K–5: Focus on Deepening Implementation.
SAS What is a coach to do? Classrooms for the Future/21st Century Teaching and Learning with Technology, Pennsylvania Department of Education.
Elementary Math Work – Spring 2013 Des Moines Public Schools Mathematics Expectation: All students will demonstrate mastery of the rigorous Common Core.
Literacy Design Collaborative (LDC) – A Teacher Tool for Implementing the CCSS AGENDA October 4 th and 5 th 2012 Outcomes: Self- reflections on how the.
Calibrating Feedback A Model for Establishing Consistent Expectations of Educator Practice Adapted from the MA Candidate Assessment of Performance.
Alignment as a Systemic Tool Classroom Instruction.
Presentation of Professional Development Modules for Common Core State Standards Student Achievement Partners, Inc. Sandra Alberti July 11, 2012.
What about Instructional Materials? Sandra Alberti Student Achievement Partners.
Instructional Practice Guide: Coaching Tool Making the Shifts in Classroom Instruction Ignite 2015 San Diego, CA February 20, 2015 Sandra
State of the Standards #CCSS.
Bringing it All Together Focus on Curriculum Development & Instructional Delivery Focus on Instructional Practices Focus on Instructional Alignment Where.
Instructional Practice Guides Reflecting on Practice
Showcase of Resources: achievethecore.org
Comprehensive Planning
Empowering Practitioners to Lead the Core
Instructional Practice Guide: Coaching Tool
Empowering Practitioners to Lead the Core
Presentation transcript:

Aligning Teacher Effectiveness to the Common Core Standards March 7, 2013 Sandra Alberti Student Achievement Partners

The Shifts in Action: Aligning Instructional Practice to the Requirements of the Common Core Successful implementation of the CCSS will require important shifts, not only in content but in instructional practice. The Standards alone will not yield the full impact of Common Core State Standards, teachers will do this. Current widely adopted teacher observation frameworks are not yet designed to fully address the requirements of the Common Core. 2 Supporting teachers and achieving the promise of the CCSS requires aligned systems of professional development and evaluation

Developing Clear and Consistent Expectations for Instructional Practice To ensure clear and consistent expectations for instructional practice in a manner that is respectful to teachers, it will be necessary to: Create clear, measurable, subject-specific guidance on Common Core aligned instructional practice. Adjust existing subject-neutral teacher observation frameworks so that the structures invite evidence of Common Core aligned instructional practice. Ensure that, where appropriate, expectations for instructional practice – both subject-neutral and subject-specific – are grounded in the Common Core Shifts. 3

Guiding Principles for Tool Design Invites shared responsibility Scalable and informs continuous improvement Humane and fair in its substance and timing Allows for clear and practical implementation. Enables evidence of teacher practice and student work to be gathered and communicated to inform continuous development and provide information about implementation of the Common Core. Designed to be implemented in a respectful manner. Makes sure that teachers have the resources & support to do what is being asked of them. Makes the full picture of expectations over time available and clear. Aligned with other tools and supports for teachers Designed to inform a system that supports the ongoing development of teachers. Linked to high quality tools and supports. Able to form the backbone of professional development. Aligned with the Common Core Designed to increase teachers’ understanding of and support for the Core Standards. Grounded in specific and measurable practices that support the Core Standards. Leads to appropriate alignment of expectations across the system (i.e., teachers, principals, schools). Invites teachers to take ownership in the development of the tool. 4

Instructional Practice Evidence Guides 5 Instructional Practice Evidence Guides have been developed for ELA/Literacy (K-2, 3-5, 6-12) and Mathematics (K-8). The evidence guides are: Designed to guide assessment of effective integration of the Common Core shifts into instructional practice. Intended to support teachers in developing their practice, and to help coaches or other instructional leaders in supporting them to do so. For example, through: ‒Teacher self-reflection ‒Teacher-to-teacher learning in PLCs, grade-level meetings or other collaborative structures ‒Coaching and feedback from instructional coaches or leaders

6

7

8

9

10 Task: Select one section of the Evidence Guide for each group member to focus on while watching the video lesson. Video linkVideo link As you watch the video, use the Instructional Practice Evidence Guide to gather evidence of CCSS integration in the lesson. As you watch, consider: What statements in the section you focused on were evident? Not evident? How did you know? (What evidence did you gather?) What did you not see? What questions do you have? What steps could be taken to support this teacher in developing this practice? Activity: Using the Evidence Guide to Observe Practice

Group Reflection – Implications for Your Work In district teams, discuss implications of our discussion today for your work: 1.What opportunities exist for using the tools discussed today? 2.What are potential challenges/roadblocks? 3.What is your next step? 11

Useful Websites for Continuing this Work Resources on Common Core State Standards, including Publishers’ Criteria, PD modules, link to Basal Alignment Project and more. commoncore.americaachieves.org Lesson videos and teacher reflection on the Shifts 12

13

14

Continue to engage with the shifts The Essential WebQuest Follow us on 1.Shifts 2.PD modules 3.Close reading exemplars 4.Areas of focus in mathematics 5.Basal Alignment Project 6.Publishers Criteria ‒K-8 Mathematics ‒K-2 ELA/Literacy ‒3-12 ELA/Literacy 15