IT Governance Purpose: Information technology is a catalyst for productivity, creativity and community that enhances learning opportunities in an environment.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT PLAN Technology Domain Annual Progress Report Lakewood School District # 306.
Advertisements

Campus Wide Microsoft Agreement for Desktop Suite Education Enrolment Solutions (EES agreement)
Class Capture at the Dr. Sue Clabaugh Asst. Director, Learning Technologies & Environments Division of Information Technology University of Maryland College.
IT Governance Purpose: Information technology is a catalyst for productivity, creativity and community that enhances learning opportunities in an environment.
Technology Steering Group January 31, 2007 Academic Affairs Technology Steering Group February 13, 2008.
CANHEIT | On the EDGE | June 15-18, 2008 | University of Calgary University of Alberta’s Consolidated IT Budgeting Process Rob Lake Information Technology.
Summer IT Project Update Tech Talk September 11, 2007.
Wireless Directions University of California, Davis Wireless Technology Team February, 2001.
Technology Steering Group January 31, 2007 Academic Affairs Technology Steering Group February 13, 2008.
IT in Education. No. of Students Enrollment Rate Annual Increase Employees Schools Budget General Education 1,100,000 98,7% 6% 47, US$M.
So You Want to Switch Course Management Systems? We Have! Come Find Out What We’ve Learned. Copyright University of Okahoma This work is the intellectual.
National Finance Center’s 2008 Customer Forum EmpowHR 9.0 Billy Dantagnan Teracore.
Successful Model for Campus-Wide Technology Management CLASSROOM TECHNOLOGY, SUPPORT AND REMOTE SITE CONTROL Successful Model for Campus-Wide Technology.
Caring. Learning. Integrity. Respect. Technology Support for Algonquin’s Mobile Learning Environment Version 2 September Edu-t ne.
IT Governance Purpose: Information technology is a catalyst for productivity, creativity and community that enhances learning opportunities in an environment.
1 IT Governance 2006 Strategy/Business Case Presentation Department of Human Services.
Fairport Central School District Administrative Cabinet Let’s Talk …Technology Vision Trina Marquez Director of Technology Operations February 2007.
Server Virtualization: Navy Network Operations Centers
1 Faculty Council IT Committee C-13 February 4, /4/2010.
Digital High School Program. Lincoln HS Vision Statement It is our vision to produce –problem solving, critical thinkers who are –responsible citizens.
Student Success Fee for Cal Poly Pomona September 26, 2012 Academic Senate.
Natick Public Schools Technology Update January 26, 2009 Dennis Roche, CISA Director of Technology.
IT Initiatives FY 13 Academic Technology Advisory Committee 26 November 2013.
1. 1. Overview: Telecommunications Project  Planning and implementation (2007-today) 2. Discussion: Proposal to Improve Infrastructure  Upgrade horizontal.
Arlington Independent School District More Than A Remarkable Education Technology Overview Summer Leadership August 5, 2010.
ITS Update – Fall 2015 Sept 2, 2015 John Levay. Background Over last year, broad consultation with academics on classrooms Coordinator’s forums ITS/FMS/CAE/Library.
Natick Public Schools Technology Update April 28, 2008 Dennis Roche, CISA Director of Technology.
IT Governance Purpose: Information technology is a catalyst for productivity, creativity and community that enhances learning opportunities in an environment.
CLASSROOM REVIEW BOARD Proposal Presentation to the UTFAB Tuesday, March 1, 2005, 5 PM, Library Tom Maher, Dir. of OIS,
IT Governance Purpose: Information technology is a catalyst for productivity, creativity and community that enhances learning opportunities in an environment.
Natick Public Schools Technology Update April 23, 2007 Dennis Roche, CISA Director of Technology.
Top Issues Facing Information Technology at UAB Sheila M. Sanders UAB Vice President Information Technology February 8, 2007.
IT Governance Purpose: Information technology is a catalyst for productivity, creativity and community that enhances learning opportunities in an environment.
August 13, 2014 Information Technologies & Resources.
IT Governance Purpose: Information technology is a catalyst for productivity, creativity and community that enhances learning opportunities in an environment.
Hill City High School 185 High School Students 25 High School Staff Smartboard and projector in each classroom.
UCSB Projects & Progress 2011 UC Santa Barbara Projects & Progress 2010 A brief look at some of the things we’ve been working on this past year.
Total Cost of Ownership for Technology Resources at Mission College Description and Recommendations.
Physical I&IT Infrastructure Proposal Presentation to the UTFAB Monday, February 16, 2003, 4-5 PM, 202 Weber Pat Burns, IAVPIIT,
Classroom Refresh Overview eTech is funding ongoing replacement of (and improvements to) classroom equipment Initial SmartClassroom renovations began in.
Informational Update Student Success Fee Funded Project Status Emerging Technologies & Instructional Technologies Committees IT Governance Executive Committee.
Texas STaR Chart School Technology and Readiness.
George Clooney High School School Administrators: Deide Fischer Rosemary Januszyk Lynn Robinson Susan Wycislo 2006 – 2009 Technology Plan Home of the.
Recommendations for: Upgrading Technology Enhanced Learning Spaces Upgrade of Computers in Open & College Labs IT Governance Executive Committee January.
Created By: Erin McAlister Christiana Elder Sherene Mayner Freddie Martinez.
{ North East ISD Technology Plan North East ISD Technology Plan By Dilene Witt-Nelson EDLD 5362 ET 8040.
IT Governance Purpose: Information technology is a catalyst for productivity, creativity and community that enhances learning opportunities in an environment.
Immaculate Conception School’s Updated Technology Plan Updated – 2015.
Updates & Recommendations from Instructional Technology Committee Computers in College Labs IT Governance Executive Committee March 28, 2014 Meeting IT.
Presentation to the UTFAB Presentation to the UTFAB Monday March, 9 th, 2015 Monday March, 9 th, 2015 By – Douglas Satterfield By – Douglas Satterfield.
Presentation to the UTFAB Presentation to the UTFAB Monday, April 21, 2014 Monday, April 21, 2014 By – Douglas Satterfield By – Douglas Satterfield Classroom.
Welcome!. The State of St. Cloud University.
Digital Learning Update Board Business Meeting February 9, 2016.
IT Governance Purpose: Information technology is a catalyst for productivity, creativity and community that enhances learning opportunities in an environment.
Presentation to the UTFAB Presentation to the UTFAB December, 1 st, 2014 December, 1 st, 2014 By – Douglas Satterfield By – Douglas Satterfield Classroom.
Presentation to the UTFAB Presentation to the UTFAB Tuesday, March 1, 2011 Tuesday, March 1, 2011 By – Douglas Satterfield By – Douglas Satterfield Classroom.
Classroom Technology Upgrade Plans Create Opportunities INSTRUCTIONAL AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SERVICES (IITS) SPRING 2016.
Technology Fee Presentation
State of Technology at MSJC
Technology Support Strategy for UNI Learning Spaces
State of Technology at MSJC
Hi-Tech Classroom Replacement Cycle Update
Executive Committee Meeting [DATE]
Enterprise Content Management Owners Representative Contract Approval
March 9, 2017 Technology committee.
ITMI Computer Lab Renewal GBA 573 Summer 2004 Jeffrey Preston
Executive Committee Meeting [DATE]
Measure E Technology Update
Superintendent Goals Update MAY 7, 2013
IT Next – Transformation Program
Presentation transcript:

IT Governance Purpose: Information technology is a catalyst for productivity, creativity and community that enhances learning opportunities in an environment of unlimited demands and limited resources. Executive Committee Meeting Action Items Presentation January 30, 2015 Adopting a strategic approach to information technology planning, budgeting and implementation at Cal Poly Pomona.

Administrative Technology Working Group Presenter: Glendy Yeh

Administrative Technology Working Group Four Recommendations: Curriculum Database (Curriculog) Mobile Application (Blackboard vs. Modo Labs) Digital Signage (Visix) eRecruit (PeopleSoft Candidate Gateway) Recommendations

Administrative Technology Working Group Curriculum Database Background Selection Criteria - Intuitive user interface - Additional functionalities - Integration with PeopleSoft and Acalog - Reporting capabilities

Administrative Technology Working Group Implementation - Schedule: Planned launch date - May 2015 High level milestones: Requisition – February 2015 Configuration and setup – March to early April 2015 Communication – April 2015 Testing and user training – mid April to May Risks: Resources Priorities Curriculum Database

Administrative Technology Working Group Background Selection Criteria - Provides the same or more functionalities - Easy to use and customizable - Integration with PeopleSoft Student System - Comparable in annual cost Mobile Application

Administrative Technology Working Group Implementation - Schedule: Planned launch date – Mid June 2015 High level milestones: Requisition – February 2015 Configuration and setup – March to mid May 2015 Testing and fine tuning – Late May 2015 Communication and software release – June Risks: Resources Priorities Costs associated with software renewal Mobile Application

Administrative Technology Working Group Background Implementation Service - Benefits - Process Shared ownership and responsibility Governance and Support Structure Implementation: - Schedule: On-going - Risks: Low to none Digital Signage

Administrative Technology Working Group Background Goals - Standardize and streamline recruitment process - Enhance productivity - Reduce paper consumption and generate cost savings eRecruit

Administrative Technology Working Group Implementation - Schedule: Two-phased implementation – 2015 to 2016 High level milestones: Phase 1 – Winter to Summer 2015 Phase 2 – Summer 2015 to winter Risks: Resources – technical and functional Priorities eRecruit

Emerging Technology Working Group Presenter: Gabriel Kuri

Emerging Technology Working Group Wireless Recommendations Evaluate areas on campus for expanded wireless and improve existing wireless infrastructure to support additional load of wireless on campus. Three areas were identified for expanded wireless coverage: Bronco Commons Rose Garden Engineering Meadow

Emerging Technology Working Group Wireless Recommendations Cost Breakdown Bronco Commons Cost: $19,000 6 Wireless APs Rose Garden Cost: $16,000 4 Wireless APs Engineering Meadow Cost: $15,500 6 Wireless APs

Emerging Technology Working Group Wireless Recommendations Wireless Coverage Map

Emerging Technology Working Group Wireless Recommendations Additional Wireless Recommendations Upgrade the Airwave Wireless Management Platform Cost: $57,000 Upgrade the Wireless Controllers to 10Gig Cost: $40,000

Emerging Technology Working Group Wireless Recommendations Summary of Wireless Expenditures Expanded Wireless: $50,500 Airwave Management Upgrade: $57,000 10G Wireless Upgrade: $40,000 Work to Begin Spring 2015 and Complete Fall 2015 Minimal Risk Associated with Project Wireless Total: $147,500

Emerging Technology Working Group Network Recommendations Upgrade University Network with Cisco Route/Switch hardware. Spend $200K per year over 5 years for upgrades of Academic areas; subsequent years require approval of $200K expenditure IT will fund upgrade of Administrative areas Students representatives unanimously approved to continue with Cisco as University network infrastructure.

Emerging Technology Working Group Network Recommendations Summary of Network Expenditures Core and Distribution Upgrades to Begin Summer 2015 Work to be complete by end of 2015 Calendar Year Minimal Risk Associated with Project. Some Downtime to be expected for core and distribution upgrades during Summer. Network Total for Academic Areas: $200,000

Emerging Technology Working Group Summary of Recommendations Recommendations from Emerging Tech Working Group: Fund wireless expenditures for expanded wireless coverage and upgraded wireless infrastructure. Continue using Cisco route/switch hardware for network infrastructure Fund network infrastructure upgrades using Cisco hardware over 5 years.

Instructional Technology Working Group Presenter: Kevin Morningstar

Instructional Technology Working Group Replacement of Classroom Lectern Computers Recommendation #1 - Background/Findings 75% of all Windows PCs and over 80% of Mac computers used in lecterns are out-of-date Approximately 180 lectern computers are currently in use that are more than four years old Slow performance is a daily fact of life for faculty with long boot times and diminished software performance IT Staff do what they can to keep the equipment operational

Instructional Technology Working Group Replacement of Classroom Lectern Computers Recommendation #1 – Funding Recommendation Replace instructional Windows and Mac lectern computers that are more than four years Designate up to $230,000 in Student Success Fee funding for this recommendation Surplus funds not required for the purchase of lectern computers, be reallocated to fund additional projector replacements

Instructional Technology Working Group Replacement of Classroom Lectern Computers Recommendation #1 – Schedule & Milestones February/March – Purchase Process - Designate computer quantities and configurations as part of the campus’ Bulk Buy May/June – Receive Equipment - Per Bulk Buy schedule receipt of equipment anticipated in late May to early June June thru August – Image/Deploy Computers – Installed during Summer as classrooms are available All computers will be installed prior to the start of Fall Term

Instructional Technology Working Group Replacement of Classroom Lectern Computers Recommendation #1 – Risks Risk Assessment: Very Low Equipment costs higher than anticipated resulting in fewer units purchased and/or delayed delivery Possible missing software on new lectern computers requiring reload of application Accidental loss of older software if re-installation package is not available

Instructional Technology Working Group Replacement of Classroom Projectors Recommendation #2 - Background FY 13/14, recommended the full upgrade of eight classrooms and 50 projector replacements Evaluated the size of the equipment replacement backlog across campus with 43 TELS rooms alone Common to see classes being taught in a darkened room, as the existing projectors are not be readable in any other lighting conditions Determined that a more effective course of action would be to replace as many projectors as possible

Instructional Technology Working Group Replacement of Classroom Projectors Recommendation #2 - Findings Projectors are often five or more years old and are only capable of projecting a lower resolution XGA image Laptop and projector technology today has moved to wide angle 16:10 type formats. Newer projectors are capable of 6,500 lumens making it possible to teach with the lights on in the classroom Image resolution has also significantly improved from the 1024x768 standard Projectors will provide an immediate improvement to the image quality and are ready for subsequent improvements

Instructional Technology Working Group Replacement of Classroom Projectors Recommendation #2 - Funding Recommendation Committee recommends that up to $280,000 in Student Success Fee funding be designated for projectors Priority to provide funding next year for upgrading new classroom and lab spaces Mass Projector Replacement in 117 Rooms including all TELS Classroom screens will also need to be adjusted to16:10 format – image will be smaller until wide format screens are installed in future room upgrades Breakdown by college is listed on the Recommendation Form

Instructional Technology Working Group Replacement of Classroom Projectors Recommendation #2 – Schedule & Milestones February – Demonstration Projector installed in Building 5 March – Confirm Rooms & Order Projectors April/May – Receive Equipment Limited projector installations as time/access permits June thru August – Scheduled Projector Installations All projectors installed prior to the start of Fall Term

Instructional Technology Working Group Replacement of Classroom Projectors Recommendation #2 – Risks Risk Assessment: Low All projected images will need to be adjusted to fit widescreen 16:10 format Due to existing XGA screen dimensions, anticipated loss of 12 to 18 inches of vertical image Faculty or students may find new image is brighter, but less functional as the image resolution can make fonts smaller To provide the same vertical height will require larger wide format screens which is part of a longer term classroom upgrade strategy

Instructional Technology Working Group Replacement of Switchers and Cable Management Recommendation #3 - Findings Committee proposes that the full classroom rebuild projects be suspended in favor of a mass projector replacement The campus still has 43 TELS rooms in need of AV infrastructure improvements Prior recommendations provide for new projectors and lectern computers that will be placed in these rooms Connection equipment is either 10 years old or non-existent Approach will still not be up to the standards of today’s modern classrooms

Instructional Technology Working Group Replacement of Switchers and Cable Management Recommendation #3 – Funding Recommendation Committee recommends that up to $40,000 in Student Success Fee funding be designated to purchase video input switchers, associated computer cables, and cable management Without the installation of full lectern and AV improvements, there are steps to improve the quality of the environment enough to keep the spaces viable New video input switching equipment, connection cables, and cable management to be installed in the 43 TELS rooms Modest upgrade at approximately $1,000 per room

Instructional Technology Working Group Replacement of Switchers and Cable Management Recommendation #3 – Schedule & Milestones March – Purchase Extron Equipment June thru August – Deploy A/V control equipment in conjunction with new lectern computers All equipment will be installed prior to the start of Fall Term

Instructional Technology Working Group Replacement of Switchers and Cable Management Recommendation #3 – Risks Risk Assessment: Very Low Fully accessible locations for mounting A/V control equipment may not be available Equipment may not meet the functional expectations of faculty & staff